cover
Contact Name
Murdani Abdullah
Contact Email
ina.jghe@gmail.com
Phone
+6285891498517
Journal Mail Official
ina.jghe@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Divisi Gastroenterologi, Departemen Ilmu Penyakit Dalam, FKUI/RSUPN Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo, Jl. Diponegoro No. 71 Jakarta 10430 Indonesia
Location
Kota adm. jakarta pusat,
Dki jakarta
INDONESIA
The Indonesian Journal of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Digestive Endoscopy
ISSN : 14114801     EISSN : 23028181     DOI : -
Core Subject : Health,
The Indonesian Journal of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Digestive Endoscopy is an academic journal which has been published since 2000 and owned by 3 Societies: The Indonesian Society of Gastroenterology; Indonesian Association for the Study of the Liver; The Indonesian Society for Digestive Endoscopy. The aim of our journal is to advance knowledge in Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Digestive Endoscopy fields. We welcome authors for original articles, review articles, and case reports in the fields of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Digestive Endoscopy.
Articles 771 Documents
Endoscopic Dilatation versus Oesophageal Stent in Benign Oesophageal Stricture Hadyanto Caputra; Iqbal I Awang; Prionggodigdo Nugroho; Ari Fahrial Syam
The Indonesian Journal of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Digestive Endoscopy Vol 17, No 2 (2016): VOLUME 17, NUMBER 2, August 2016
Publisher : The Indonesian Society for Digestive Endoscopy

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (195.822 KB) | DOI: 10.24871/1722016141-146

Abstract

Aim: Oesophageal stricture is one of the causes of dysphagia. It is a condition in which the lumen of oesophagus is narrowed by fibrotic tissue in the oesophageal wall. It is usually caused by inflammation or any other cause that leads to necrotizing of tissue. It is mainly differentiated into benign or malignant. The aim of this article is to answer the clinical question on the effectiveness of oesophageal stenting compared to endoscopic dilatation in patient with benign oesophageal stricture due to ingestion of corrosive substances, who had undergone several endoscopic dilatations.Method: We conducted search of relevant articles using PubMed search engine to answer the clinical question. Keywords being used during the search process were: ("oesophageal stricture"[All Fields] OR "oesophageal stenosis"[All Fields] AND (("dilatation"[All Fields] AND ("stents"[MeSH Terms] OR "stents"[All Fields] OR "stent"[All Fields]). Results were further converged by adding specific filters, which were full text articles and clinical trial.Results: The chosen article was further appraised in order to identify its validity and eligibility to answer the clinical question. We chose to use CONSORT (statement to improve the quality of reporting of RCTs) to facilitate the critical appraisal and interpretation of RCTs.Conclusion: Stenting was associated with greater dysphagia, co-medication and adverse events. No randomized controlled trials which compared biodegradable stents with other stents or with balloon dilatation was identified. Lack of adequately robust evidence for effectiveness and cost-effectiveness formed the rationale of this trial.
Hepatitis A Virus Infection in Guillain-Barré Syndrome Neneng Ratnasari; Siti Nurdjanah
The Indonesian Journal of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Digestive Endoscopy VOLUME 3, NUMBER 2, August 2002
Publisher : The Indonesian Society for Digestive Endoscopy

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24871/32200258-62

Abstract

Prodromal factors of Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) are often associated with previous viral infection (60%). The ailment supported by the acquired immunomediated disorder concept. Viral hepatitis is very rarely found in GBS, preceded by cytomegalovirus (15-18%), Campylobacter jejuni (28%), and Epstein-Barr virus (5%). There is no specific etiology of GBS because those viruses usually appear sporadically (subclinically). All hepatitis virus infection can cause neurological complications, including GBS. We report two cases of hepatitis A virus infection (HAV) in GBS patients in Dr. Sardjito General Hospital during 5 years of observation (1996-2000) from 92 GBS patients. The diagnosis of HAV was based on more than 2 times increment of transaminase enzyme, positive IgM anti HAV, negative HbsAg, and negative IgM anti HCV. The diagnosis of GBS was based on clinical symptoms of acute generalized paralysis, cerebrospinal fluid examination, and electromyelography. In both cases, sub-clinical and sporadic symptoms appeared several days before paralysis, which makes it more likely that the prodromal period of GBS occurred at the same time of HAV incubation period.
Colorectal Polyp Evaluation Management and Its Role in Gastrointestinal Tract Malignancy Didi Kurniadhi; Ari Fahrial Syam; Chudahman Manan; Marcellus Simadibrata
The Indonesian Journal of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Digestive Endoscopy VOLUME 9, ISSUE 2, August 2008
Publisher : The Indonesian Society for Digestive Endoscopy

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24871/92200848-54

Abstract

Colorectal polyp is one of important factors that have roles in developing malignancy of lower gastrointestinal tract. Adenomatous polyp is the most common colorectal polyps and it has been known as a lesion precursor for transformation process in developing gastrointestinal malignancy. Such transformation is known as adenocarcinoma sequence, a long-term process which usually does not elaborate any symptoms and remains asymptomatic. Since most colorectal polyps are asymptomatic, they are usually undiscovered at the time of diagnosis and results to the increasing case of malignancy especially the colorectal cancer. Considering that colorectal cancer still becomes one of the most common causes of death and morbidity worldwide, early detection and elimination of colorectal polyp may have a significant role in preventing lower gastrointestinal tract malignancy. Keywords: polyp, colorectal polyp, adenomatous polyp
The Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Simvastatin in the Management of Portal Hypertension in Cirrhotic Patients: A Systematic Review Raksheeth Agarwal; Matthew Billy; Oliver Emmanuel Yausep; Radhian Amandito; Vito Filbert Jayalie; Rino Alvani Gani
The Indonesian Journal of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Digestive Endoscopy Vol 21, No 1 (2020): VOLUME 21, NUMBER 1, April 2020
Publisher : The Indonesian Society for Digestive Endoscopy

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (210.862 KB) | DOI: 10.24871/211202026-32

Abstract

Background: Variceal bleeding is a serious complication of portal hypertension in liver cirrhosis. Current guidelines recommend non-selective beta blockers (NSBBs) and endoscopic variceal ligation for primary prophylaxis of variceal bleeding. However, NSBBs are associated with low response rates and systemic adverse effects. Simvastatin has been shown to reduce portal hypertension in previous studies. Our aim was to assess its clinical efficacy and safety in reducing portal hypertension in cirrhotic patients. Method: We searched PubMed, The Cochrane Library, ScienceDirect, ProQuest, CINAHL, Scopus, and Clinicaltrials.gov, and manually browsed abstracts of major hepatology conferences for selection of studies. We selected randomized controlled trials with a population of cirrhotic patients, simvastatin as an intervention, HVPG change as an outcome, and English as the primary language. The quality of selected studies was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. We extracted change in HVPG from baseline to post-treatment as the principal summary measure, with safety as the secondary outcome.Results: Two full articles were included for qualitative analysis. Both studies reported reductions in HVPG from baseline to post-treatment in the simvastatin group, with this reduction being significantly higher as compared to the control group. Adverse effects were homogenously distributed in both groups, and good safety was reported by both studies. Simvastatin’s HVPG lowering effects are possibly additive to those of NSBBs. Conclusion: Simvastatin effectively reduces HVPG in cirrhotic patients with portal hypertension, although more clinical trials are needed to validate these results. Simvastatin could potentially be combined with NSBBs to achieve greater results.
Diagnosis of Autoimmune Hepatitis using International Autoimmune Hepatitis Group Scoring Sigit Triyus Priyantoro; Harijono Ahmad
The Indonesian Journal of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Digestive Endoscopy VOLUME 14, NUMBER 3, December 2013
Publisher : The Indonesian Society for Digestive Endoscopy

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (514.042 KB) | DOI: 10.24871/1432013184-187

Abstract

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is described as T lymphocyte suppressor disturbance, thus there is formation of autoantibody which attacks surface antigen of liver cells or hepatocytes. Diagnosis of AIH is done after other liver abnormalities have been ruled out. The diagnosis of AIH needs to be done with thorough and careful examination as there is no pathognomonic clinical appearance.Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is described as T lymphocyte suppressor disturbance, thus there is formation of autoantibody which attacks surface antigen of liver cells or hepatocytes. Diagnosis of AIH is done after other liver abnormalities have been ruled out. The diagnosis of AIH needs to be done with thorough and careful examination as there is no pathognomonic clinical appearance.Keywords: autoimmune hepatitis, asymptomatic, increased transaminase
The Effect of Domperindone on Intestinal Motility and Bacterial Overgrowth in Patients with Liver Cirrhosis Yustar Mulyadi; Rino Alvani Gani; Murdani Abdullah; Hamzah Shatri
The Indonesian Journal of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Digestive Endoscopy VOLUME 13, NUMBER 3, Desember 2012
Publisher : The Indonesian Society for Digestive Endoscopy

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (363.612 KB) | DOI: 10.24871/1332012130-135

Abstract

ABSTRACTBackground: Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) is a common serious complication of liver cirrhosis mainly caused by bacterial translocation (BT) into ascites fluid. The most essential issue that affects BT is small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO), which usually caused by gastrointestinal dysmotility. This study was aimed to evaluate the prokinetic effects of domperidone on gastrointestinal motility and small intestinal bacterial overgrowth and the correlation between restoration of motility and the incidence of SIBO in patients with liver cirrhosis.Method: A cross-over double blind clinical trial was conducted on patients who were treated at the ward and outpatient clinic from Division of Hepatology in Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital, Jakarta and Soedarso Hospital, Pontianak between September 2010 and March 2011. All patients suffered from liver cirrhosis with ascites, gastrointestinal dysmotility and SIBO were included in the study. Out of 34 eligible patients, 16 patients received placebo and 18 patients received prokinetics (domperidone). Wilcoxon test was performed to analyze the comparison of SIBO before and after treatment in the placebo group; while paired T-test was employed for the prokinetics (domperidone) group. To evaluate improved balance of SIBO in the placebo and domperidone group, a Chi-square test was performed.Results: In the placebo group, 61.8% patients experienced SIBO; while in the prokinetics group, SIBO occurred only in 2.9% patients. Restored gastrointestinal motility took place in the prokinetics group with reduced median value for orocaecal transit time from 120 minutes into 90 minutes (p = 0.0001). In contrast, it went worse in the placebo group, i.e. from 90 minutes into 110 minutes (p = 0.002). There was a significant correlation between restored gastrointestinal motility and SIBO (p = 0.0001). Similarly, so does the effect of administering prokinetic agent on restored gastrointestinal motility (p = 0.0001) and SIBO (p = 0.0001).Conclusion: The administration of prokinetics has been proven effective to restore gastrointestinal motility that may lead to reduced incidence of SIBO in patients with liver cirrhosis. Keywords: prokinetics, breath hydrogen test, dysmotilitas, bacterial overgrowth 
Hepatitis B Reactivation in Immunosupressed Patients, Prophylaxis and Management Ulfa Kholili; Tri Yanti
The Indonesian Journal of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Digestive Endoscopy Vol 18, No 2 (2017): VOLUME 18, NUMBER 2, AUGUST 2017
Publisher : The Indonesian Society for Digestive Endoscopy

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (666.41 KB) | DOI: 10.24871/182201798-103

Abstract

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation is a clinical problem associated with high morbidity and mortality rates. Currently, this incidence seems to be increasing around the world. The reactivation commonly developes in immunosuppressed individuals, although it may also occur spontaneously. Individuals who develop malignancy with chronic hepatitis B virus infection are at high-risk for hepatitis B virus reactivation, since they are closely related to immunosuppression, especially when undergoing chemotherapy. The loss of immune control in these patients may results in the reactivation of HBV replication within hepatocytes. This review article will focus on HBV reactivation related to immunosuppressed patients, immunosuppressive drug classes and corresponding risk estimates of hepatitis B virus reactivation, screening test recommended before getting this drugs, choice of antiviral drugs for prophylaxis, and duration of prophylaxis treatment based on EASL, AASLD and APASL guidelines.
The Effectiveness of Emergency Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography in Patients with Severe Acute Cholangitis Muhammad Begawan Bestari; Nenny Agustanti; Yelica Rachmat; Dolvy Girawan; Ali Djumhana; Juke Roslia Saketi; Siti Aminah Abdurachman
The Indonesian Journal of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Digestive Endoscopy VOLUME 11, NUMBER 3, December 2010
Publisher : The Indonesian Society for Digestive Endoscopy

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24871/1132010128-131

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study was to assess the frequency, indications, yield and outcome of emergent endoscopy retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in severe acute cholangitis patients. Method: Records of all cholangitis patients undergoing ERCP were reviewed over a six months period. Indications, findings, therapeutic interventions and survival were analyzed. Indications for urgent drainage were temperature greater than 38ºC, increasing abdominal pain, jaundice and any organ involvement. Results: Of 80 ERCPs, 19 (23.75%) were severe acute cholangitis patients underwent emergency ERCP. The common bile duct was the duct of interest in all patients and was cannulated in 100%. The most common findings were choledocholithiasis (42.1%) and pancreatic head cancer (42.1%), followed by cholangiocarcinoma (10.5%) and papil vater carcinoma (5.3%). There were 12 (63.2%) septic shock patients with systolic blood pressure less than 90 mmHg and heart rate greater than 90 beats/minute who required inotropic drugs. Endoscopic biliary drainage was performed using 8.5 F biliary stent (73.7%) or common bile duct (CDB) stones removal (26.3%). The overall 30 days mortality was 0. Conclusion: Emergency ERCP in severe acute cholangitis is associated with improvement of clinical and some laboratory parameters without a complication of acute pancreatitis. In cases of chIoledocholithiasis, it can be performed with stone extraction as well as stent insertion   Keywords: severe acute cholangitis, emergent ERCP, endoscopic stenting in difficult hilar biliary stricture
Level of Gastrin Serum and Ulcer Size on Gastric Ulcer Correlated to Helicobacter pylori Infection Dasril Efendi; Rustam Effendi; Leonardo Basa Dairy; Juwita Sembiring; Betthin Marpaung; Mabel Sihombing; Sri Maryuni Soetadi; Lukman Hakim Zain
The Indonesian Journal of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Digestive Endoscopy VOLUME 10, NUMBER 3, December 2009
Publisher : The Indonesian Society for Digestive Endoscopy

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24871/1032009113-116

Abstract

Background: Previously has been defined that peptic ulcer has strongly correlated to Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection. But it hasn’t determined about correlation of gastrin serum level to the ulcer severity on H. pylori infection. The aims of this study were to find the percentage of H. pylori infection on peptic ulcer cases and its correlation to the gastrin serum level. Method: This is analytic cross sectional study in 50 patients with gastric ulcer who came to Adam Malik hospital from February to October 2007. The correlation between gastrin serum level and the size of ulcer with positive and negative Urea Breath Test (UBT) group was analyzed by unpaired student t- test. The correlation between gastrin serum level and ulcer size were investigated with Pearson correlation test and linier regression. Result: Fifty eligible patients, 33 (66%) had positive UBT and 17 (34%) were negative. There were statistically significant difference on gastrin serum level in positive UBT and negative respectively (p = 0.017). There were also significant difference between mean of ulcer size in positive UBT and negative respectively (p = 0.025). There were correlation between gastrin serum level and ulcer size (r = 0.315; p = 0.026). It can predict the increasing ulcer size in 0.012 mm every 1 pg/mL of gastrin serum elevated. Conclusion: Patients with positive UBT has greater ulcer size and higher gastrin level as compared to the negative group. There were positive correlation between gastrin serum level to the size of ulcer in peptic ulcer patients and increase of ulcer size followed with elevated of gastrin serum level. Keywords: Helicobacter pylori infection, gastrin serum level, ulcer size
Iron Deficiency Anemia as The Only Manifestation of Colon Cancer in Male Patient: A Case Report Wulyo Rajabto; Pandu Tridana Sakti; Andi Putra Kevinsyah
The Indonesian Journal of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Digestive Endoscopy Vol 21, No 3 (2020): VOLUME 21, NUMBER 3, December 2020
Publisher : The Indonesian Society for Digestive Endoscopy

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (525.382 KB) | DOI: 10.24871/2132020241-243

Abstract

Iron deficiency anemia can be the first manifestation of colon cancer. However, iron deficiency anemia is also common in other benign conditions, which may cause a longer delay for referral decisions to get a definitive diagnosis. This is a case of 40-year-old male patient who had only iron deficiency anemia as a manifestation of colon cancer. Colonoscopy revealed intraluminal mass in transverse colon. After resection of the tumor, histopathology showed well-differentiated mucinous adenocarcinoma, invasion of sub-serous, and one node positive (pT3pN1pM0). After resection, we administered XELOX as adjuvant chemotherapy every 3 weeks for 8 cycles.

Filter by Year

2000 2025


Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 26, No 2 (2025): VOLUME 26, NUMBER 2, AGUSTUS, 2025 Vol 26, No 1 (2025): VOLUME 26, NUMBER 1, April, 2025 Vol 25, No 3 (2024): VOLUME 25, NUMBER 3, December, 2024 Vol 25, No 2 (2024): VOLUME 25, NUMBER 2, August, 2024 Vol 25, No 1 (2024): VOLUME 25, NUMBER 1, April, 2024 Vol 24, No 3 (2023): VOLUME 24, NUMBER 3, December, 2023 Vol 24, No 2 (2023): VOLUME 24, NUMBER 2, August, 2023 Vol 24, No 1 (2023): VOLUME 24, NUMBER 1, April, 2023 Vol 23, No 3 (2022): VOLUME 23, NUMBER 3, December 2022 Vol 23, No 2 (2022): VOLUME 23, NUMBER 2, August 2022 Vol 23, No 1 (2022): VOLUME 23, NUMBER 1, April 2022 Vol 22, No 3 (2021): VOLUME 22, NUMBER 3, December 2021 Vol 22, No 2 (2021): VOLUME 22, NUMBER 2, August 2021 Vol 22, No 1 (2021): VOLUME 22, NUMBER 1, April 2021 Vol 21, No 3 (2020): VOLUME 21, NUMBER 3, December 2020 Vol 21, No 2 (2020): VOLUME 21, NUMBER 2, August 2020 Vol 21, No 1 (2020): VOLUME 21, NUMBER 1, April 2020 Vol 20, No 3 (2019): VOLUME 20, NUMBER 3, December 2019 Vol 20, No 2 (2019): VOLUME 20, NUMBER 2, August 2019 Vol 20, No 1 (2019): VOLUME 20, NUMBER 1, April 2019 Vol 19, No 3 (2018): VOLUME 19, NUMBER 3, December 2018 Vol 19, No 2 (2018): VOLUME 19, NUMBER 2, August 2018 Vol 19, No 1 (2018): VOLUME 19, NUMBER 1, April 2018 Vol 18, No 3 (2017): VOLUME 18, NUMBER 3, DECEMBER 2017 Vol 18, No 2 (2017): VOLUME 18, NUMBER 2, AUGUST 2017 Vol 18, No 1 (2017): VOLUME 18, NUMBER 1, April 2017 Vol 17, No 3 (2016): VOLUME 17, NUMBER 3, December 2016 Vol 17, No 2 (2016): VOLUME 17, NUMBER 2, August 2016 Vol 17, No 1 (2016): VOLUME 17, NUMBER 1, April 2016 Vol 16, No 3 (2015): VOLUME 16, NUMBER 3, December 2015 Vol 16, No 2 (2015): VOLUME 16, NUMBER 2, August 2015 Vol 16, No 1 (2015): VOLUME 16, NUMBER 1, April 2015 Vol 15, No 3 (2014): VOLUME 15, NUMBER 3, December 2014 Vol 15, No 2 (2014): VOLUME 15, NUMBER 2, August 2014 Vol 15, No 1 (2014): VOLUME 15, NUMBER 1, April 2014 VOLUME 14, NUMBER 3, December 2013 VOLUME 14, NUMBER 2, August 2013 VOLUME 14, NUMBER 1, April 2013 VOLUME 13, NUMBER 3, Desember 2012 VOLUME 13, NUMBER 2, August 2012 VOLUME 13, NUMBER 1, April 2012 VOLUME 12, NUMBER 3, December 2011 VOLUME 12, NUMBER 2, August 2011 VOLUME 12, NUMBER 1, April 2011 VOLUME 11, NUMBER 3, December 2010 VOLUME 11, NUMBER 2, August 2010 VOLUME 11, NUMBER 1, April 2010 VOLUME 10, NUMBER 3, December 2009 VOLUME 10, ISSUE 2, August 2009 VOLUME 10, ISSUE 1, April 2009 VOLUME 9, ISSUE 3, December 2008 VOLUME 9, ISSUE 2, August 2008 VOLUME 9, ISSUE 1, April 2008 VOLUME 8, ISSUE 3, December 2007 VOLUME 8 ISSUE 2 August 2007 VOLUME 8, ISSUE 1, April 2007 VOLUME 7, ISSUE 3, December 2006 VOLUME 7, ISSUE 2, August 2006 VOLUME 7, ISSUE 1, April 2006 VOLUME 6, ISSUE 3, December 2005 VOLUME 6, ISSUE 2, August 2005 VOLUME 6, ISSUE 1, April 2005 VOLUME 5, ISSUE 3, December 2004 VOLUME 5, ISSUE 2, August 2004 VOLUME 5, ISSUE 1, April 2004 VOLUME 4, ISSUE 3, December 2003 VOLUME 4, ISSUE 2, August 2003 VOLUME 4, NUMBER 1, April 2003 VOLUME 3, NUMBER 3, December 2002 VOLUME 3, NUMBER 2, August 2002 VOLUME 3, NUMBER 1, April 2002 VOLUME 2, NUMBER 3, December 2001 VOLUME 2, NUMBER 2, August 2001 VOLUME 2, NUMBER 1, April 2001 VOLUME 1, NUMBER 1, December 2000 More Issue