cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Zidnal Falah
Contact Email
jurnalcomserva@gmail.com
Phone
+6285322218207
Journal Mail Official
muhammadzidnal31@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Jl. Ki Ageng Tapa (Perumahan Pondok Mutiara Gegunungan Blok F9) RT 3, RW Gegunungan, Sumber, Kab. Cirebon, Jawa Barat.
Location
Kab. cirebon,
Jawa barat
INDONESIA
Journal Research of Social Science, Economics, and Management
Published by CV. Publikasi Indonesia
ISSN : 28076494     EISSN : 28076311     DOI : 10.36418
Core Subject : Social,
Environmental Science
The Journal Research of Social Science, Economics, and Management is a double-blind peer-reviewed academic journal and has open access to social and scientific fields. The journal is published monthly once by CV. Publikasi Indonesia. The Journal Research of Social Science, Economics, and Management provides a means for sustained discussion of relevant issues that fall within the focus and scopes of the journal which can be examined empirically. The journal publishes research articles covering all aspects of including social science, economics, management, law, and education.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Ilmu Sosial (Lain-Lain)
Articles 1,333 Documents
 130   131   132   133   134 
Analysis of Efficiency and Simplification of Procedures in Sipesut Innovation (Samarinda Customs Service Information System): Building A Lean Public Service Qisthi, Luthfilhadi; Wardiyanto, Bintoro; Setijaningrum, Erna
Journal Research of Social Science, Economics, and Management Vol. 5 No. 4 (2025): Journal Research of Social Science, Economics, and Management
Publisher : Publikasi Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59141/jrssem.v5i4.1216

Abstract

The Samarinda Customs Service Information System (SIPESUT) is a digital innovation developed by Samarinda Customs and Excise Office (KPPBC TMP B Samarinda) designed to simplify bureaucratic procedures and enhance service efficiency in customs administration. This study analyzes SIPESUT through the integration of various public service paradigms, including Old Public Administration (OPA), New Public Management (NPM), and Digital Era Governance (DEG), reflecting a lean, efficient, and responsive public service model. The paper begins by discussing the digital transformation in public administration and the challenges of conventional bureaucracy. It then introduces SIPESUT as an innovative response and explores its conceptual foundation within the framework of multiple public service paradigms. Using qualitative analysis and field observation data, this study highlights SIPESUT’s impact on streamlining procedures, improving efficiency, and optimizing resources, while also identifying technical, infrastructural, and human resource challenges. The findings emphasize the necessity for system integration, human resource capacity building, and infrastructure enhancement as strategic steps to support SIPESUT’s sustainability. This research contributes to the discourse on public service innovation and inspires the development of inclusive and sustainable digital public service initiatives.
Comparative Analysis of the Impact of Declarative and Imperative Programming Approaches on Android Application Performance Through Benchmarking Method Nurhadi, Nurhadi; Muslim, Aries
Journal Research of Social Science, Economics, and Management Vol. 5 No. 5 (2025): Journal Research of Social Science, Economics, and Management
Publisher : Publikasi Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59141/jrssem.v5i5.1231

Abstract

Mobile phones have become essential devices in the digital era, and with Android representing more than 87% of the market share, application performance is a critical factor influencing user retention and business success. Suboptimal performance increases the likelihood of users switching to competing platforms. Accordingly, an in-depth analysis and comparison of available development methods is required to identify the most efficient approach for achieving optimal Android application performance. This study aims to examine the impact of the declarative programming paradigm implemented through Jetpack Compose in comparison with the imperative paradigm using Kotlin-XML on Android application performance. A quantitative method with a benchmarking approach is employed by developing two prototype versions of the IDNFinancials news-portal application to compare and measure the performance of each version. These approaches exhibit distinct characteristics, which should be selected based on development priorities, whether in terms of resource efficiency or the consistency of user experience. The findings of this study are expected to serve as a reference for developers in determining more optimal strategies for implementing Android application interfaces, as well as to contribute to further research on the optimisation of mobile application performance.
The Institutional Synthesis of Local Wisdom and CPR Principles: The Sustainability of Kemiri-Coffee Agroforestry in Kawae Community Forest, Bima Sulaiman, Sulaiman
Journal Research of Social Science, Economics, and Management Vol. 5 No. 5 (2025): Journal Research of Social Science, Economics, and Management
Publisher : Publikasi Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59141/jrssem.v5i5.1232

Abstract

Bima Regency, West Nusa Tenggara, faces significant environmental degradation due to the widespread conversion of protected forest areas into seasonal corn fields, which increases flood vulnerability. This study analyzes the sustainability of the community-based natural resource management model in the Kawae Block Community Forest (HKm), managed by the Forest Farmers Group (KTH) Oi Rida, by integrating Elinor Ostrom’s Common-Pool Resources (CPR) theory with the local wisdom of Ngaha Aina Ngoho. Using a qualitative descriptive approach with a case study design, data were collected through in-depth interviews, participant observation, and document analysis. The findings indicate that the sustainability of HKm Kawae is driven by two synergistic factors: (1) Economic-Ecological Rationality, where the candlenut-coffee agroforestry model provides stable household income (30–50%) while performing essential ecological functions such as carbon sequestration and water conservation, fulfilling Ostrom’s principle of rule congruence (P2); and (2) Social-Institutional Legitimacy, where the local philosophy of Ngaha Aina Ngoho has been institutionalized into informal rules, strengthening collective compliance, supporting graduated sanctions (P6), and embedding conservation ethics into daily practice. The study concludes that the long-term sustainability of community-based forest management depends not only on technical-economic viability but also on the deliberate integration of local cultural values into governance institutions. This model offers a replicable framework for other regions in NTB and similar contexts facing land-use conflicts and environmental pressure.

Page 134 of 134 | Total Record : 1333

 130   131   132   133   134 

Filter by Year

2021 2025


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 4 No. 12 (2025): Journal Research of Social Science, Economics, and Management Vol. 4 No. 11 (2025): Journal Research of Social Science, Economics, and Management Vol. 4 No. 10 (2025): Journal Research of Social Science, Economics, and Management Vol. 5 No. 5 (2025): Journal Research of Social Science, Economics, and Management Vol. 5 No. 4 (2025): Journal Research of Social Science, Economics, and Management Vol. 5 No. 3 (2025): Journal Research of Social Science, Economics, and Management Vol. 5 No. 2 (2025): Journal Research of Social Science, Economics, and Management Vol. 5 No. 1 (2025): Journal Research of Social Science, Economics, and Management Vol. 4 No. 9 (2025): Journal Research of Social Science, Economics, and Management Vol. 4 No. 8 (2025): Journal Research of Social Science, Economics, and Management Vol. 4 No. 7 (2025): Journal Research of Social Science, Economics, and Management Vol. 4 No. 6 (2025): Journal Research of Social Science, Economics, and Management Vol. 3 No. 12 (2024): Journal Research of Social Science, Economics, and Management Vol. 3 No. 11 (2024): Journal Research of Social Science, Economics, and Management Vol. 3 No. 10 (2024): Journal Research of Social Science, Economics, and Management Vol. 4 No. 5 (2024): Journal Research of Social Science, Economics, and Management Vol. 4 No. 4 (2024): Journal Research of Social Science, Economics, and Management Vol. 4 No. 3 (2024): Journal Research of Social Science, Economics, and Management Vol. 4 No. 2 (2024): Journal Research of Social Science, Economics, and Management Vol. 4 No. 1 (2024): Journal Research of Social Science, Economics, and Management Vol. 3 No. 9 (2024): Journal Research of Social Science, Economics, and Management Vol. 3 No. 8 (2024): Journal Research of Social Science, Economics, and Management Vol. 3 No. 7 (2024): Journal Research of Social Science, Economics, and Management Vol. 3 No. 6 (2024): Journal Research of Social Science, Economics, and Management Vol. 3 No. 04 (2023): Journal Research of Social Science, Economics, and Management Vol. 2 No. 12 (2023): Journal Research of Social Science, Economics, and Management Vol. 2 No. 11 (2023): Journal Research of Social Science, Economics, and Management Vol. 2 No. 10 (2023): Journal Research of Social Science, Economics, and Management Vol. 3 No. 5 (2023): Journal Research of Social Science, Economics, and Management Vol. 3 No. 3 (2023): Journal Research of Social Science, Economics, and Management Vol. 3 No. 2 (2023): Journal Research of Social Science, Economics, and Management Vol. 3 No. 1 (2023): Journal Research of Social Science, Economics, and Management Vol. 2 No. 9 (2023): Journal Research of Social Science, Economics, and Management Vol. 2 No. 8 (2023): Journal Research of Social Science, Economics, and Management Vol. 2 No. 7 (2023): Journal Research of Social Science, Economics, and Management Vol. 2 No. 6 (2023): Journal Research of Social Science, Economics, and Management Vol. 1 No. 12 (2022): Journal Research of Social Science, Economics, and Management Vol. 1 No. 11 (2022): Journal Research of Social Science, Economics, and Management Vol. 1 No. 10 (2022): Journal Research of Social Science, Economics, and Management Vol. 2 No. 5 (2022): Journal Research of Social Science, Economics, and Management Vol. 2 No. 4 (2022): Journal Research of Social Science, Economics, and Management Vol. 2 No. 3 (2022): Journal Research of Social Science, Economics, and Management Vol. 2 No. 2 (2022): Journal Research of Social Science, Economics, and Management Vol. 2 No. 1 (2022): Journal Research of Social Science, Economics, and Management Vol. 1 No. 9 (2022): Journal Research of Social Science, Economics, and Management Vol. 1 No. 8 (2022): Journal Research of Social Science, Economics, and Management Vol. 1 No. 7 (2022): Journal Research of Social Science, Economics, and Management Vol. 1 No. 6 (2022): Journal Research of Social Science, Economics, and Management Vol. 1 No. 5 (2021): Journal Research of Social Science, Economics and Management Vol. 1 No. 4 (2021): Journal Research of Social Science, Economics and Management Vol. 1 No. 3 (2021): Journal Research of Social Science, Economics and Management Vol. 1 No. 2 (2021): Journal Research of Social Science, Economics and Management Vol. 1 No. 1 (2021): Journal Research of Social Science, Economics and Management More Issue