cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Evangelista Lus Windyana Palupi
Contact Email
evangelistapalupi@unesa.ac.id
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
mathedunesa@unesa.ac.id
Editorial Address
Gedung C8 lantai 1FMIPA UNESA Ketintang 60231 Surabaya Jawa Timur
Location
Kota surabaya,
Jawa timur
INDONESIA
MATHEdunesa
Published by Universitas Negeri Surabaya
ISSN : 23019085     EISSN : 26857855     DOI : https://doi.org/10.26740/mathedunesa.v12n1
Core Subject : Education,
Education Mathematics Other
MATHEdunesa is a scientific journal of mathematics education published by the Mathematics Department of Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences of Universitas Negeri Surabaya. MATHEdunesa accepts and publishes research articles and book review in the field of Education, which includes: ✅ Development of learning model ✅ Problem solving, creative thinking, and Mathematics Competencies ✅Realistic mathematics education and contextual learning, ✅Innovation of instructional design ✅Learning media development ✅ Assesment and evaluation in Mathematics education ✅ Desain research in Mathematics Education
Arjuna Subject : Matematika - Matematika (Lain-Lain)
Articles 332 Documents
 30   31   32   33   34 
Penalaran Induktif Peserta Didik SMP dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Matematika Ditinjau dari Perbedaan Jenis Kelamin Marwah, Aulia Putri; Wijayanti, Pradnyo
MATHEdunesa Vol. 15 No. 1 (2026): Jurnal Mathedunesa Volume 15 Nomor 1 Tahun 2026
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26740/mathedunesa.v15n1.p81-92

Abstract

Inductive reasoning is one of the skills required to solve mathematics problems. As a cognitive process, inductive reasoning is influenced by many factors, including gender differences. This study aims to describe students' inductive reasoning in solving mathematics problems based on gender differences. This research is a descriptive study with a qualitative approach. The subjects were two eighth-grade students from SMPN 6 Tulungagung during the 2024/2025 academic year: one male student and one female student, both with equivalent mathematical abilities. Data collection methods included tests and interviews. Inductive reasoning was analyzed based on the following indicators used by the researcher: (1) observation on particular cases, (2) organization of particular cases, (3) search and prediction patterns, (4) conjecture formulation, (5) conjecture validation, (6) conjecture generalization, and (7) general conjecture justification. The research results indicate that both students observed specific cases, managed specific cases, searched for and conjectured patterns, conjectured formulas, validated conjectures, generalized conjectures, and justified general conjectures. The differences lay in how they acquired initial knowledge and their conjecture validation strategies. The male student acquired initial knowledge based on previously known information and validated conjectures more than once, while the female student acquired initial knowledge based on direct measurement results with the help of a protractor and validated conjectures only once.
Menilai Kualitas Tugas Matematika Buatan Guru SMP dengan Stimulus Soal Berbasis Literasi dan Numerasi yang Menumbuhkan Berpikir Kritis Siswa Ismail, Ismail; Siswono, Tatag Yuli Eko; Masriyah, Masriyah; Abadi, Abadi
MATHEdunesa Vol. 15 No. 1 (2026): Jurnal Mathedunesa Volume 15 Nomor 1 Tahun 2026
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26740/mathedunesa.v15n1.p72-80

Abstract

Questions that encourage students to construct meaning and build mental connections tend to foster critical thinking skills. Previous research on junior high school mathematics teachers shows that, in reality, teachers often have not been successful in teaching students to think critically; instead, they focus more on teaching the subject matter content alone. The problem concerns how to improve the quality of mathematics tasks designed by junior high school mathematics teachers in Pasuruan Regency, and whether the tasks developed by teachers have already fostered students’ critical thinking skills. One effort that teachers can undertake is to use literacy- and numeracy-based problem stimuli in the tasks given to students. However, the development of literacy- and numeracy-based questions that can enhance critical thinking skills has not yet been well mastered by mathematics teachers. Therefore, they need to engage in direct, interactive activities with experts in mathematics education, particularly in the field of critical thinking. Through the workshop on critical thinking–oriented learning for junior high school mathematics teachers in Pasuruan Regency, it is expected that teachers will be able to design literacy- and numeracy-based problem stimuli to be used in critical thinking–oriented mathematics instruction at the junior high school level. The results of the teacher mentoring activities in designing mathematics tasks with literacy- and numeracy-based problem stimuli for critical thinking–oriented mathematics learning at the junior high school level are as follows: 16 out of 19 participants (84%) produced stimuli that were well designed based on literacy and numeracy, containing sufficient information to develop questions that trigger students’ critical thinking skills; 2 out of 19 participants (10.5%) produced stimuli that were fairly well designed based on literacy and numeracy, containing limited information to develop questions that stimulate students’ critical thinking skills; and 1 out of 19 participants (5%) produced stimuli that were poorly designed based on literacy and numeracy, containing no information that could develop questions to stimulate students’ critical thinking skills. Based on the questionnaire results, 53.8% of participants strongly agreed and 46.2% agreed that the workshop materials could be easily understood and applied; 76.9% strongly agreed and 23.1% agreed that the workshop materials were delivered in a well-structured and systematic manner; 84.8% strongly agreed and 15.4% agreed that the resource person mastered the material presented; 61.5% strongly agreed and 38.5% agreed that the resource person presented the material clearly and sequentially; 69.2% strongly agreed and 30.8% agreed that the answers provided by the resource person to participants’ questions were very clear; and 38.5% strongly agreed, 46.2% agreed, while only 15.4% disagreed that the duration of the training was appropriate.

Page 34 of 34 | Total Record : 332

 30   31   32   33   34 

Filter by Year

2020 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 15 No. 1 (2026): Jurnal Mathedunesa Volume 15 Nomor 1 Tahun 2026 Vol. 14 No. 3 (2025): Jurnal Mathedunesa Volume 14 Nomor 3 Tahun 2025 Vol. 14 No. 2 (2025): Jurnal Mathedunesa Volume 14 Nomor 2 Tahun 2025 Vol. 14 No. 1 (2025): Jurnal Mathedunesa Volume 14 Nomor 1 Tahun 2025 Vol. 13 No. 3 (2024): Jurnal Mathedunesa Volume 13 Nomor 3 Tahun 2024 Vol. 13 No. 2 (2024): Jurnal Mathedunesa Volume 13 Nomor 2 Tahun 2024 Vol. 13 No. 1 (2024): Jurnal Mathedunesa Volume 13 Nomor 1 Tahun 2024 Vol 12 No 3 (2023): Jurnal Mathedunesa Volume 12 Nomor 3 Tahun 2023 Vol. 12 No. 3 (2023): Jurnal Mathedunesa Volume 12 Nomor 3 Tahun 2023 Vol 12 No 2 (2023): Jurnal Mathedunesa Volume 12 Nomor 2 Tahun 2023 Vol 12 No 1 (2023): Jurnal Mathedunesa Volume 12 Nomor 1 Tahun 2023 Vol 11 No 3 (2022): Jurnal Mathedunesa Volume 11 Nomor 3 Tahun 2022 Vol 11 No 2 (2022): Jurnal Mathedunesa Volume 11 Nomor 2 Tahun 2022 Vol 11 No 1 (2022): Jurnal Mathedunesa Volume 11 Nomor 1 Tahun 2022 Vol 10 No 3 (2021): Jurnal Mathedunesa Volume 10 Nomor 3 Tahun 2021 Vol 10 No 2 (2021): Jurnal Mathedunesa Volume 10 Nomor 2 Tahun 2021 Vol 10 No 1 (2021): Jurnal Mathedunesa Volume 10 Nomor 1 Tahun 2021 Vol 9 No 3 (2020): Jurnal Mathedunesa Volume 9 Nomor 3 Tahun 2020 More Issue