cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Ahmad
Contact Email
estudiante02lawjournal@gmail.com
Phone
+6281213569044
Journal Mail Official
ahmad_wijaya@ung.ac.id
Editorial Address
Jl. Jend. Sudirman No. 6 Kota Gorontalo
Location
Kota gorontalo,
Gorontalo
INDONESIA
Estudiante Law Journal
Published by Universitas Negeri Gorontalo
ISSN : -     EISSN : 2987114X     DOI : 10.33756
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
Estudiante Law Journal is a peer reviewed journal published by the Faculty of Law, Universitas Negeri Gorontalo. This journal is published three times every February, July and November of the same year. EsLaw aims to be a scientific and research journal for all legal observers and activists with a journal focus relating to all issues related to legal studies. EsLaw Journal publishes contemporary articles on law, book reviews, and case analysis, as well as journals published in Indonesian and/or English.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 382 Documents
 35   36   37   38   39 
An Adjudicative Filter for SMS Manual Gaps in Pilot Education: The Maritime Court Design Precedent Niko Arief Setyawan; Daniel Dewantoro Rumani; Yudha Bagus Tunggala Putra; Dimas Hari Cahyo; Chairustakmal Chairustakmal
Estudiante Law Journal VOL. 8 No. 2 JUNE 2026
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Gorontalo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33756/eslaj.v8i2.41442

Abstract

Formal safety-reporting norms exist internationally, nationally and institutionally, yet protection for reporters in Indonesian pilot training remains inoperative. This study asks why, and what design closes the gap. It compares the Safety Management System Manual of the Indonesian Civil Pilot Academy of Banyuwangi (Issued 02, Revision 02) with ICAO Annex 19, Third Edition, using normative legal research with a documentary case study. Soekanto’s legal-effectiveness theory supplies the diagnosis; responsive regulation, developed by Ayres and Braithwaite and refined by Baldwin and Black, supplies the prescription. Three connected gaps emerge. First, reporter protection travels through six referring levels, from the Manual’s “to the extent permissible by law” clause down to the 2017 Director General Regulations, which provide administrative de-identification only and whose delegating basis Ministerial Regulation 2/2026 revoked without a transitional provision. Second, the Manual grants cadets disciplinary immunity but withholds identity confidentiality. Third, no enforcement rung exists between internal correction and criminal proceedings. Annex 19 permits a non-judicial competent authority; Articles 364–369 of Law 1/2009 already provide for one. Because Government Regulation 62/2013 implemented only the investigation half of Article 369, the article proposes operationalising the Aviation Profession Council as a technical-professional adjudicative filter, on the Maritime Court design precedent
Implementation of Electronic Court (E-Court) in Case Resolution at the Gorontalo Administrative Court Adnan Nento; Fence M. Wantu; Mohamad Rivaldi Moha
Estudiante Law Journal VOL. 8 No. 2 JUNE 2026
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Gorontalo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33756/eslaj.v8i2.41357

Abstract

Judicial digitalisation makes the principle of simple, speedy, and low-cost justice the measure of its own success, yet that principle has rarely been tested in administrative courts located in regions with limited digital infrastructure. This article analyses the implementation of the Electronic Court (e-Court) system at the Gorontalo Administrative Court and the obstacles accompanying it. The study employs empirical legal research using statutory and case approaches; data were drawn from interviews, observation, the court's written responses, and the case register for 2020-2025, and analysed descriptively. Every case has been processed through e-Filing, e-Payment, e-Summons, and e-Litigation, with a consistent disposition rate. Digitalisation has deliberately been withheld from preliminary examination and evidentiary proceedings, a limitation proportionate only while certified electronic signature infrastructure remains unintegrated. The obstacles identified are unstable connectivity, centralised server disruption, and low digital literacy. This article identifies a normative gap in Supreme Court Regulation Number 7 of 2022, which treats failure to upload documents as a waiver of procedural rights without regulating technical force majeure, and proposes an institutionalised mechanism for restoring procedural deadlines.

Page 39 of 39 | Total Record : 382

 35   36   37   38   39 

Filter by Year

2019 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue VOL. 8 No. 2 JUNE 2026 VOL. 8 NO. 1 FEBRUARY 2026 VOL. 7 NO. 3 OCTOBER 2025 VOL. 7 No. 2 JUNE 2025 VOL. 7 NO. 1 FEBRUARY 2025 VOL. 6 NO. 3 OCTOBER 2024 VOL. 6 NO. 2 JUNI 2024 VOL. 6 NO. 1 FEBRUARY 2024 VOL. 5 NO. 3 OCTOBER 2023 VOL. 5 NO. 2 JUNI 2023 VOL. 5 NO. 1 FEBRUARY 2023 VOL. 4 NO. 3 OKTOBER 2022 VOL. 4 NO. 2 JUNI 2022 VOL. 4 NO. 1 FEBRUARI 2022 VOL. 3 NO. 3. OKTOBER 2021 VOL. 3 NO. 2 JUNI 2021 VOL. 3 NO. 1 FEBRUARI 2021 VOL. 2 NO. 3 OKTOBER 2020 VOL. 2 NO. 2 JUNI 2020 VOL. 2 NO. 1 FEBRUARI 2020 VOL. 1 NO. 3 OKTOBER 2019 VOL. 1 No. 2 JUNI 2019 VOL. 1 NO. 1 FEBRUARI 2019 More Issue