cover
Contact Name
Maya Ruhtiani
Contact Email
mayaruhtiani@uhb.ac.id
Phone
+6285320608563
Journal Mail Official
inconcreto@uhb.ac.id
Editorial Address
Jl. Raden Patah No.100, Kedunglongsir, Ledug, Kec. Kembaran, Kabupaten Banyumas, Jawa Tengah 53182
Location
Kab. banyumas,
Jawa tengah
INDONESIA
Jurnal Hukum Inconcreto
ISSN : 29637724     EISSN : 29637724     DOI : 10.35960
Core Subject : Social,
Filsafat dan Teori Hukum Perbandingan Hukum Sosiologi Hukum Hukum Internasional Hukum Tata Negara Hukum Perdata Hukum Bisnis Hukum Ekonomi Hukum Lingkungan Hukum Pidana Hukum Administrasi Negara Hukum Teknologi, Informasi, dan Komunikasi Hukum Hak Asasi Manusia Hukum Islam dan Keluarga Hukum Agraria Hak Kekayaan Intelektual Hukum Syariah Perbandingan Hukum.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 74 Documents
Legal Protection of Digital Copyrighted Works Traded Through NFTs in the Perspective of Intellectual Property Rights Maria Theresia; Maya Ruhtiani; Apitta Fitria Rahmawati
Jurnal Hukum In Concreto Vol. 5 No. 2 (2026): Jurnal Hukum In Concreto Volume 5 Nomor 2 2026
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Harapan Bangsa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35960/inconcreto.v5i2.2593

Abstract

The emergence of NFTs as digital marketplace technology has created new opportunities for artists and creators to monetize their works efficiently. Although Copyright Law Number 28 of 2014 serves as the primary legal framework for intellectual property protection in Indonesia, no specific regulations currently govern NFTs or digital copyrighted works traded through NFT platforms. This study examines the legal framework and protection of digital copyrighted works traded through NFTs under Indonesian copyright law. It employs a normative juridical method using statutory and conceptual approaches. The legal materials consist of primary, secondary, and tertiary legal sources collected through library research. The primary legal materials include international treaties, Copyright Law Number 28/2014, ITE Law Number 19/2016, and Constitutional Court Decision Number 84/PUU-XXI/2023. The findings show that Copyright Law implicitly protects digital copyrighted works traded through NFTs through provisions concerning moral rights, economic rights, reproduction, distribution, and technology-based copyrighted works. However, the absence of specific NFT regulations creates legal uncertainty. Furthermore, NFT marketplaces, as Electronic System Providers, have legal responsibilities regarding content traded on their platforms. Therefore, specific NFT regulations and strengthened marketplace policies are required to ensure effective legal protection for digital copyrighted works traded through NFTs.
Law Enforcement Against Juvenile Sexual Offenders Under Indonesia’s Juvenile Justice System: A North Gorontalo District Police Study Dedi; Hijrah Lahaling; Apriyanto Nusa
Jurnal Hukum In Concreto Vol. 5 No. 2 (2026): Jurnal Hukum In Concreto Volume 5 Nomor 2 2026
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Harapan Bangsa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35960/inconcreto.v5i2.2519

Abstract

This study aims to analyze law enforcement against children in conflict with the law in sexual abuse cases under Law Number 11 of 2012 concerning the Juvenile Criminal Justice System at the North Gorontalo District Police. Despite growing literature on restorative justice and juvenile justice in Indonesia, limited empirical attention has been given to how district-level police institutions balance criminal accountability, child protection, and victim interests in juvenile sexual abuse cases. This research employed an empirical legal method using statutory, conceptual, and socio-legal approaches. Data were obtained through observation, interviews with investigators from the Women and Children Protection Unit, and review of relevant legal documents and literature. The findings show that law enforcement is implemented through repressive and preventive approaches. Repressive measures include investigation, summons, examination, and evidence collection, while preventive measures involve legal education, community supervision, and institutional coordination. Implementation remains constrained by non-cooperative juvenile offenders, weak community participation, limited legal awareness, and insufficient coordination among police, families, schools, and child protection institutions. Cases recorded from 2023 to 2025, involving offenders aged 15 to 16 years, indicate a recurring problem requiring an integrated response. This study contributes empirical insight into the gap between juvenile justice norms and their practical implementation at the district police level. It concludes that effective law enforcement must integrate criminal accountability, restorative justice, victim protection, child rehabilitation, and community-based prevention.
Legal Certainty and Judicial Uniformity in Interfaith Marriage After Constitutional Court Decision Number 24/PUU-XX/2022 Vera Setiawati; Astika Nurul Hidayah; Susilo Wardani; Marsitiningsih
Jurnal Hukum In Concreto Vol. 5 No. 2 (2026): Jurnal Hukum In Concreto Volume 5 Nomor 2 2026
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Harapan Bangsa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35960/inconcreto.v5i2.2578

Abstract

Interfaith marriage in Indonesia continues to generate legal uncertainty because of the complex relationship between the Marriage Law, the Population Administration Law, constitutional interpretation, and judicial practice. This study examines the development of legal certainty and judicial uniformity following Constitutional Court Decision Number 24/PUU-XX/2022 and Supreme Court Circular Letter Number 2 of 2023. The research employs a normative legal method using statutory, case, conceptual, historical, and comparative approaches. Primary legal materials include the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia, the Marriage Law, the Population Administration Law, relevant Constitutional Court decisions, and Supreme Court Circular Letter Number 2 of 2023. The findings show that Constitutional Court Decision Number 24/PUU-XX/2022 reaffirmed the constitutional position of religious law in determining marital validity, while Supreme Court Circular Letter Number 2 of 2023 strengthened consistency in judicial practice by directing judges not to grant applications for the registration of interfaith marriages. These developments have increased predictability and judicial uniformity, but they have not completely eliminated normative tensions concerning marital validity, administrative registration, judicial authority, and constitutional protection. The study therefore finds that the current legal framework has strengthened formal legal certainty, while substantive legal certainty still depends on greater coherence among statutory provisions, judicial interpretation, and administrative implementation. The study contributes to the legal discourse by distinguishing substantive legal certainty from judicial uniformity in the regulation of interfaith marriage in Indonesia.
Reconstruction of The Governance of Advocate Organizations After The Decision of The Constitutional Court Number 126/PUU-XXIV/2026 Rahmat Bagja; Rahmad Lubis
Jurnal Hukum In Concreto Vol. 5 No. 2 (2026): Jurnal Hukum In Concreto Volume 5 Nomor 2 2026
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Harapan Bangsa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35960/inconcreto.v5i2.2697

Abstract

Constitutional Court Decision Number 126/PUU-XXIV/2026 represents an important development in the governance of advocate organizations in Indonesia by shifting the legal debate from the dichotomy between single-bar and multi-bar systems toward the institutional design of professional regulation. However, studies examining the constitutional implications of this Decision for the relationship among advocate organizations, professional regulators, and the state remain limited. This study analyzes the ratio decidendi and constitutional implications of Constitutional Court Decision Number 126/PUU-XXIV/2026 and formulates an institutional model for reconstructing advocate governance in Indonesia. The research employs normative legal research using statutory, case, conceptual, and comparative approaches. Legal materials are analyzed through systematic, historical, teleological, and comparative interpretation. The findings demonstrate that the Decision establishes constitutional parameters for reforming advocate governance by emphasizing the separation between representative and regulatory functions, strengthening professional independence, ensuring legal certainty, and improving institutional accountability. Based on these findings, this study proposes the Plural Representation–Unified Professional Regulation Model, which maintains organizational plurality in representative and professional-development functions while placing standardization, registration, supervision, discipline, and ethical enforcement within an independent and accountable regulatory framework. This model contributes to constitutional-law scholarship by reframing advocate organizations as part of professional governance with public and constitutional dimensions. The study also provides a normative framework for reforming Law Number 18 of 2003 concerning Advocates toward more independent, accountable, and constitutionally coherent professional governance.