Deposisi: Jurnal Publikasi Ilmu Hukum
Jurnal ini memuat kajian-kajian di bidang ilmu hukum dan Sosial Politik baik secara teoritik maupun empirik. Fokus jurnal ini tentang kajian-kajian hukum perdata, hukum pidana, hukum tata negara, hukum internasional, hukum acara dan hukum adat, politik dan ilmu sosial.
Articles
220 Documents
<![CDATA[Penegakan Hukum Pelaku Tindak Pidana Penganiayaan Berat Karena Halusinasi di Kecamatan Satarmese Barat, Kabupaten Manggarai ]]>
<![CDATA[Marselinus Mardi Anto]]>;
<![CDATA[Aksi Sinurat]]>;
<![CDATA[Rudepel Petrus Leo]]>
<![CDATA[ Deposisi: Jurnal Publikasi Ilmu Hukum Vol. 2 No. 2 (2024): Juni : Jurnal Publikasi Ilmu Hukum ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Lembaga Pengembangan Kinerja Dosen ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.59581/deposisi.v2i2.2975
<![CDATA[The purpose of this study is to analyze the law enforcement of perpetrators of serious maltreatment due to hallucinations in Satarmese Barat Subdistrict, Manggarai Regency. This research is an empirical juridical research that examines a legal event that occurs through a statute cause approach. Data were collected in two ways, namely interviews and document studies. The data obtained is then presented descriptively qualitatively. The results showed that law enforcement of perpetrators of serious maltreatment due to hallucinations in West Satarmese District, Manggarai Regency in relation to liability that the perpetrators were released from criminal liability by investigators which was not in accordance with Article 44 of the Criminal Code and termination of investigation which was not in accordance with the provisions of Article 109 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The obstacles to law enforcement are influenced by several factors, namely: facilities and infrastructure factors (limited facilities and infrastructure available at Satarmese Police Station), law enforcement factors (inconsistency of investigators with existing regulations), community factors (lack of understanding of community law), and cultural factors (Manggarai community culture is thick with kedi kilo (kinship) in solving problems.]]>
<![CDATA[Tinjauan Yuridis Perlunya Pengaturan Hukum LGBT dari Perspektif Hukum Adat dan Hukum Islam di Indonesia ]]>
<![CDATA[Lydyana Trisnaeni Martin]]>;
<![CDATA[Nur Aulia Lathifah]]>;
<![CDATA[Eka Era Nurtanti]]>;
<![CDATA[Kheisa Rahma Adhadina]]>;
<![CDATA[Savira Eka Kusumawati]]>
<![CDATA[ Deposisi: Jurnal Publikasi Ilmu Hukum Vol. 2 No. 2 (2024): Juni : Jurnal Publikasi Ilmu Hukum ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Lembaga Pengembangan Kinerja Dosen ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.59581/deposisi.v2i2.2992
<![CDATA[Juridically in the context of Indonesian law, there are two perspectives that can be used to discuss the need for LGBT legal regulations, namely the customary law perspective and the Islamic law perspective. Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender (LGBT) groups in Indonesia have received significant attention. This research uses normative legal research techniques as its methodology. This research further examines the need for clear legal regulations regarding LGBT. Considering the fact that Indonesia is a legal country where people respect each other's customs and religious beliefs, it can be said that the legalization of LGBT people is not justified. Thus, it is hoped that this research can answer problems that are of concern to the Indonesian people. As well as, it can open insight that legal regulations regarding LGBT in Indonesia are very necessary to achieve benefits, certainty and legal justice.]]>
<![CDATA[Analisis Yuridis Kebijakan Hukuman Pidana Mengenai Tindakan Match Fixing Di Indonesia ]]>
<![CDATA[Siti Durotunnafisah]]>;
<![CDATA[Umi Nuris Sholikah]]>;
<![CDATA[Winda Ardila]]>
<![CDATA[ Deposisi: Jurnal Publikasi Ilmu Hukum Vol. 2 No. 2 (2024): Juni : Jurnal Publikasi Ilmu Hukum ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Lembaga Pengembangan Kinerja Dosen ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.59581/deposisi.v2i2.2999
<![CDATA[Football matches are one of the most popular sports matches in Indonesia. Victories between leagues are often awaited with great enthusiasm by some sports fans. However, in practice, there are incidents that are carried out by individuals to achieve certain goals in a match while fixing the future score. Match Fixing or match fixing is during a match to gain financial or sporting advantage. This action is indirectly an act of bribery which can be subject to the crime of bribery in accordance with Law Number 11 of 1980 concerning Bribery]]>
<![CDATA[Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Kopi Dapat Dikatakan Doping Jika Melebihi Takaran Yang Telah Ditentukan ]]>
<![CDATA[Bayu Sakti]]>;
<![CDATA[Alif Lutfi Rohman]]>;
<![CDATA[Alex Sandro Lumban Gaol]]>
<![CDATA[ Deposisi: Jurnal Publikasi Ilmu Hukum Vol. 2 No. 2 (2024): Juni : Jurnal Publikasi Ilmu Hukum ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Lembaga Pengembangan Kinerja Dosen ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.59581/deposisi.v2i2.3002
<![CDATA[Coffee has become a beverage not only refreshing but also an energy drink that dominates the global beverage market with its unparalleled appeal. coffee opens up many positive opportunities in sports. Dope was first introduced in 1889. The ergogenic dose of caffeine is about 250-500 mg per day (three cups of coffee or six to eight soft drinks). Most athletes consume caffeine in pill form. Caffeine can be considered doping if it exceeds the set maximum limit. That is why a controlling body is needed to control this issue, thus WADA was born. WADA is an independent international agency that was established in 1999 to also control world anti-doping standards. This private sector was created after a historic event in the world. of sports when it was discovered that a cyclist had used doping at the 1998 Summer Olympics]]>
<![CDATA[Hambatan Penegakan Hukum terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Pencurian Benda Cagar Budaya di Kupang Nusa Tenggara Timur ]]>
<![CDATA[Hildegardis Ajeng Wantur]]>;
<![CDATA[Jimmy Pello]]>;
<![CDATA[Bhisa Vitus Wilhelmus]]>
<![CDATA[ Deposisi: Jurnal Publikasi Ilmu Hukum Vol. 2 No. 2 (2024): Juni : Jurnal Publikasi Ilmu Hukum ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Lembaga Pengembangan Kinerja Dosen ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.59581/deposisi.v2i2.3004
<![CDATA[The purpose of this study is the obstacles to law enforcement against perpetrators of criminal acts of theft of cultural heritage objects in Kupang, East Nusa Tenggara. This research is an empirical juridical research that examines a legal event that occurs through a statute cause approach. Data collection is carried out with two events, namely interviews and document studies. The data obtained is then presented descriptively qualitative. The results showed that the obstacles experienced by the community and law enforcement officials are: the absence of reports to the police and coordination with other stakeholders; the caretaker's mistake in understanding evidence; stakeholders who observe cultural heritage have not functioned optimally; and there is no PPNS cultural heritage in NTT. Prevention efforts taken in the form of prevention include: organizing cultural heritage promotion and counseling campaigns; providing training or technical guidance to all cultural heritage caretakers in NTT; the government supports the presence of the Cultural Preservation Agency (BPK); and collaborating with stakeholders. Law enforcement against criminal acts of theft of cultural heritage objects is still not optimal. Therefore, suggestions for the results of this study are the socialization of cultural heritage protection and cultural heritage laws comprehensively. All stakeholders must be more adaptive and responsive. BPK needs to cooperate with local governments and related institutions to draft a special regulation or law governing the establishment of a special agency for the supervision of cultural heritage sites. Make a government regulation regarding the establishment of a special cultural heritage police.]]>
<![CDATA[Wewenang Kepala Desa dalam Membina Ketentraman dan Ketertiban Masyarakat Desa di Desa Bodae dan Desa Keliha Kecamatan Sabu Timur Kabupaten Sabu Raijua ]]>
<![CDATA[Inda Juita Kaho]]>;
<![CDATA[Saryono Yohanes]]>;
<![CDATA[Hernimus Ratu Udju]]>
<![CDATA[ Deposisi: Jurnal Publikasi Ilmu Hukum Vol. 2 No. 2 (2024): Juni : Jurnal Publikasi Ilmu Hukum ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Lembaga Pengembangan Kinerja Dosen ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.59581/deposisi.v2i2.3005
<![CDATA[The purpose of this study was to determine the authority of the village head in fostering community peace and order in the village and to determine and examine the inhibiting factors of the village head's authority in fostering community peace and order in Bodae village and Keliha village. This research uses an empirical juridical approach method, namely the methods and procedures used to solve problems, this research first examines secondary data, then proceeds to conduct research on primary data in the field. The results of the research The authority of the Village Head in fostering the peace and order of the village community has not been carried out effectively, this is because there are several things behind it, namely the theft cases that occur because the environmental security system is not implemented effectively, unguarded livestock such as oxen that enter the residents' garden yards to cause losses to the farming community, chicken gambling can disturb the order of the village community. The inhibiting factors of the authority of the village head are the low level of human resources, the ineffective implementation of the environmental security system, the lack of understanding of the community in understanding order in the village environment.]]>
<![CDATA[Perlindungan Hukum bagi Konsumen Marketplace terhadap Tidak Tercantumnya Berat Bersih dalam Produk Makanan Kemasan Menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1999 tentang Perlindungan Konsumen ]]>
<![CDATA[Eugenia Giovani Anggasta Putri Banggung]]>;
<![CDATA[Siti Ramlah Usman]]>;
<![CDATA[Helsina Fransiska Pello]]>
<![CDATA[ Deposisi: Jurnal Publikasi Ilmu Hukum Vol. 2 No. 2 (2024): Juni : Jurnal Publikasi Ilmu Hukum ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Lembaga Pengembangan Kinerja Dosen ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.59581/deposisi.v2i2.3010
<![CDATA[Along with technological developments, buying and selling transactions are also influenced by technological developments. In the past, buying and selling transactions were carried out in markets, shops, stalls, but nowadays sellers and buyers carry out buying and selling transactions online (e-commerce), one of which is the marketplace. The increasingly consumerist life of society in the era of globalization has resulted in reduced public awareness of the packaged food products they consume. There are problems that often arise regarding the inclusion of net weight. For example, business actors do not include net weight information on packaged food products. This problem is certainly detrimental to the public because they do not know the actual net weight of the food product. The main problems in this research are (1) What is the legal protection for marketplace consumers against packaged food products that do not include net weight? (2) What factors cause packaged food product businesses in the marketplace to not include net weight? This research is empirical juridical research, meaning that analyzing problems is carried out by combining legal materials which are secondary data with primary data obtained in the field. The legal sources and materials used are primary and secondary legal materials. The results of this research indicate that legal protection for marketplace consumers for packaged food products that do not include net weight according to Law Number 8 of 1999 has not been implemented which has different (varied) answers from consumers because some consumers say that there are still business actors who have not know about the rules for including net weight and from the Kupang City Industry and Trade Service itself which has never handled cases regarding business actors selling packaged food products that do not include net weight, in other words there have been no complaints.]]>
<![CDATA[Penjatuhan Hukuman di Bawah Ancaman Pidana Minimum terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Korupsi Pemerasan oleh Pegawai Negeri Sipil (PNS) di Pelabuhan Kelas III Larantuka Nusa Tenggara Timur : (Studi Kasus: Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Kupang Nomor 17/Pid.Sus-TPK/2017/Pn.Kpg) ]]>
<![CDATA[Yunitra Marlinda Mau]]>;
<![CDATA[Orpa G Manuain]]>;
<![CDATA[Darius A Kian]]>
<![CDATA[ Deposisi: Jurnal Publikasi Ilmu Hukum Vol. 2 No. 2 (2024): Juni : Jurnal Publikasi Ilmu Hukum ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Lembaga Pengembangan Kinerja Dosen ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.59581/deposisi.v2i2.3011
<![CDATA[The purpose of this study is to analyze the imposition of penalties under the minimum criminal threat against perpetrators of corruption extortion by civil servants (PNS) at the Class III port of Larantuka, East Nusa Tenggara (Case study: Kupang District Court Decision Number 17/Pid.Sus-Tpk/2017/Pn.Kpg). This research is a normative juridical research which means that the author does not use samples and data collection is carried out by the library method, with the object of study. After the data is obtained, the author will analyze juridically normative data obtained on the object of study. The corruption case of I Wayan Adisucipto SN was proven to have violated Article 12 letter e Jo Article 12 A of Law No. 31 of 1999 jo Law No. 20 of 2001 concerning Eradication of Corruption, which states a maximum of 20 years in prison or life imprisonment and a minimum of 4 years, but in reality the judge imposed a prison sentence of only 5 months, the decision imposed by the judge that is not considered according to / based on the law will be null and void. The imposition of a 5-month sentence for the defendant by the judge in Number: 17/Pid.Sus-Tpk/2017/Pn.Kpg is not in accordance with the punishment system. From this research, the author can conclude that the Judge's consideration is not based on the provisions of the legislation, namely Article 12 letter e jo Article 12 A Paragraph (2) of Law No. 31 of 1999 Jo Law No. 20 of 2001 concerning Eradication of Corruption which is a minimum imprisonment of at least 4 (four) years and a maximum of 20 (twenty) years so that it is contrary to the applicable law.]]>
<![CDATA[Perlidungan Hukum Justice Collaborator Dalam Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan Berencana: Studi Putusan Nomor 798/Pid.B/2022/PN.Jkt.Sel. ]]>
<![CDATA[Syabilal Ali]]>;
<![CDATA[Irwan Triadi]]>
<![CDATA[ Deposisi: Jurnal Publikasi Ilmu Hukum Vol. 2 No. 2 (2024): Juni : Jurnal Publikasi Ilmu Hukum ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Lembaga Pengembangan Kinerja Dosen ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.59581/deposisi.v2i2.3027
<![CDATA[The world history of Justice Collaborators began in 1963 when the United States federal government awarded facilities or awards to a winner named Joe Cago. Cago was a member of a criminal organization whose members were Italian immigrants or descendants of Italians living in the country. The reason is, every member of this criminal organization who is arrested will still uphold omerta, or the culture of silence in the mafia network, and they never leak information about their organization to the authorities, making it difficult for the authorities. The research method used is normative juridical. The use of this type of normative juridical research is because the object of study is related to legal principles and principles as well as theories and opinions of legal experts. Criminal Law that include Justice Collaborators in criminal activities are inadequate, so that law enforcement officials cannot legally rely on this system. It turns out that there are many things that need to be set aside to achieve justice collaborator status, in terms of relevance. Many legal experts have expressed the same thing, the use of justice collaborator status is only to show appreciation for criminals who actively participate in cases that are difficult to prove.]]>
<![CDATA[Peran Notaris Dalam Pengesahan Perjanjian Pranikah ]]>
<![CDATA[An’nisa Al Aufia]]>
<![CDATA[ Deposisi: Jurnal Publikasi Ilmu Hukum Vol. 2 No. 2 (2024): Juni : Jurnal Publikasi Ilmu Hukum ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Lembaga Pengembangan Kinerja Dosen ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.59581/deposisi.v2i2.3032
<![CDATA[The role of a notary as a party who has the authority to legalize a marriage agreement in the form of a written agreement, with the intention of converting the marriage agreement into a notarial deed if the parties wish. Recording a prenuptial agreement on a marriage certificate is considered very important because a married couple during the marriage period must have carried out a legal action, if no recording is made, the marriage agreement is only binding for the parties who make it. The method used is a normative legal approach or statutory approach. This paper concludes that: 1) Notaries have an important role in making a marriage agreement deed by writing down the wishes of the husband and wife by applying Article 1338 of the Civil Code concerning freedom of contract and Article 1320 of the Civil Code concerning the valid requirements of the agreement. 2) When viewed from the community's point of view, there are many factors that cause notaries to notarize marriage agreements, such as unclear legal rules such as what and how the law is. It is also difficult for the community to make an agreement between the notary or the dukcapil office and the lack of public interest in making a prenuptial agreement.]]>
