cover
Contact Name
Meldi T.M. Sinolungan
Contact Email
cocos@unsrat.ac.id
Phone
+6281356422433
Journal Mail Official
cocos@unsrat.ac.id
Editorial Address
Fakultas Pertanian Universitas Sam Ratulangi Manado
Location
Kota manado,
Sulawesi utara
INDONESIA
COCOS
ISSN : -     EISSN : 27150070     DOI : 10.35791
Core Subject : Agriculture,
Jurnal ini memuat materi yang berkaitan dengan Pertanian. Menyangkut Tanah, Budidaya Pertanian, Proteksi Tanaman, Teknologi Pertanian dan Sosial Ekonomi Pertanian
Articles 831 Documents
ANALISIS PENDAPATAN USAHATANI PADI SAWAH PENERIMA BANTUAN DAN BUKAN PENERIMA BANTUAN PEMERINTAH DI DESA PASSO KECAMATAN KAKAS BARAT KABUPATEN MINAHASA Agustinus Kaliele; Ribka M. Kumaat; Olly E.H. Laoh; Eyverson Ruauw
COCOS Vol. 4 No. 3 (2014)
Publisher : Universitas Sam Ratulangi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35791/cocos.v4i3.4002

Abstract

ABSRACTAgustinus Kaliele. The Income Analysist of the Government Subsidary Rice Farmingand Non-Subsidary Rice Farming in Passo Village Kakas Barat Subdistrict MinahasaRegency. Under guidance of Ribka M. Kumaat as chairman, with Esry H. Laoh and E.Ruauw as members.The objective of this research is to calculate the des race farming income,bothsubsidy raice farming,and to calculate the difference of income, between them.Samplingmethod used in this research is simple by random sampling. This research used primary andsecondary date. Primary date were obtained from interviewet with raice farmer waithquestioner to collect data. Secondary data were obtained from villagegovernment/administration office. The data analysis was qualitative, presented in narrativedescriptive from.This research shows that in average subsidier farmer’s income is more than nonsubsidaryfarmer’s income. Subsidary farmer’s rate income is Rp. 11.510.594,4, otherwisenon-subsidier farmer’s rate income is Rp. 8.191.950,4. R/ C analysis done in this researchshowed that R/C ratio for subsidary farmer’s is 3,012, while R/C ratio for non-subsidaryfarmer’s is 2,543. This different income rate caused by subsidary farmer’s got insentive forsupply fertilizer and pesticide, so that the used of it can raised the productivity and income ofsubsidary farmers.
KAJIAN EKONOMI RUMAH TANGGA PETANI KELAPA DI KECAMATAN KAUDITAN KABUPATEN MINAHASA UTARA Destreeana Suratinojo; Caroline B.D. Pakasi; Charles R. Ngangi; Vicky R.B. Moniaga
COCOS Vol. 4 No. 3 (2014)
Publisher : Universitas Sam Ratulangi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35791/cocos.v4i3.4012

Abstract

ABSTRACTThe objective of this research is to assess the economic conditions in the coconut farming households in the Kauditan Sub District , North Minahasa Regency based on relation among time working, total expenditure, total revenue and contribution of farm income to total family income of coconut farming.The research was conducted from June to December 2013 in the Kauditan Sub District, at Treman and Kauditan I Village , North Minahasa Regency . Research was conducted by direct interview to 55 respondents of coconut farming households drawn from the population of the two villages, named is Treman and Kauditan I Village. The data used in this study is primary data and secondary data obtained from the office of the BP4K Kauditan Sub District, Treman and Kauditan I Village ofice. Data are analyzed descriptively and presented in tabular form , as well as using the formulation of econometric models and analyzed using the method of 2SLS ( two stage least squares ) to estimate the model in the form of simultaneous equations using SPSS v.20.The result from this research indicates that the most outpouring of work time for farmers family is coconut farming. Farmers family income from coconut is the lowest. It’s because the divison of work time in a field, in that field there’s coconut farm, and the other farm such as nutmeg and cloves also. The relation between work time in a farm and out of farm is positive with total expenditure, it means that if the total expenditure increase, work time will increase. the biggest spending at the consumption from farmers family have relation with dispossible income from family, it that means if dispossible increase the expenditure of consumption will increase.
Curahan Kerja Wanita Pada Usahatani Padi Sawah di Desa Beha Kecamatan Tabukan Utara Kabupaten Kepulauan Sangihe Debora Philip; Charles R. Ngangi; Olfie L.S. Benu; Welson M. Wangke
COCOS Vol. 4 No. 3 (2014)
Publisher : Universitas Sam Ratulangi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35791/cocos.v4i3.4021

Abstract

ABSTRACTDebora Philip. The Flurry of Female Labor of Rice Farming in Beha Village, North Tabukan Sub District, Sangihe Regency under guidance of Charles R. Ngangi as a Chairman, BenuOlfie L. S. and Welson M. Wangke as Members.The objective of this research is to know flurry of female labor in rice farming from nursery work, land preparation, planting, weeding, pest and disease control until harvest. The data used in this study is primary data and secondary data. The primary data obtained through interviews based on questionnaire to the farmers directly and secondary data obtained from relevant department such as Agricultural Crops, Estate Plantation, and Forestry service of Sangihe Regency, office of north Tabukan Sub District. In this study the variables measured is the amount of labor in women who used the low land rice farming. The data analyzed descriptively.The results showed that the flurry of female labor in rice farming in general was in the work of planting, weeding and harvesting although the available data showed that the flurry of female labor also exists in the number of female workers in lowland rice farming village in the District brassiere North Tabukan Sangihe Regency was 22.64 person – days per ha or 28.03 % in one growing season of rice farming.
ANALISIS USAHATANI PALA DI KAMPUNG TALAWID KECAMATAN KENDAHE KABUPATEN KEPULAUAN SANGIHE Nolvi Sanggel; Olly E. H. Laoh; Grace A.J. Rumagit; Ellen G. Tangkere
COCOS Vol. 4 No. 3 (2014)
Publisher : Universitas Sam Ratulangi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35791/cocos.v4i3.4022

Abstract

ABSTRACTNolvi Sanggel. Analysis Nutmeg Farming in Talawid Village, Kendahe Sub District, Sangihe Islands Regency. Under the guidance O. Esry H. Laoh, as a Chairman, Grace A. J. Rumagit, and Ellen G. Tangkere as Members.The objective of this research is to analyze nutmeg farming in Talawid Village, Kendahe Sub District, Sangihe Islands Regency, Benefits of this research is to provide input and information materials for the development of nutmeg farming to related institution in order to increase their income.The method used in this study was "Purposive Sampling". Data used in this research is a primary data by using questionnaires that have been prepared are obtained from direct interviews with nutmeg farmers and secondary data from the Department of Agriculture, Livestock and Forestry and Village Office Talawid. Data obtained are presented in table form and then analyzed descriptively, followed by Return Cost Ratio analysis to determine the level of success of the farm.The results of this research showed that the average income Nutmeg farmers in the Village Talawid was Rp. 18,337,690, -. As costs incurred on average was Rp. 2,337,079, -. So that the average income received by farmers was Rp. 16,000,611, -. Analysis Results Return Cost Ratio (R/C) was 7.85, indicating that farming is done nutmeg experiencing gains.
Produktivitas Tenaga Kerja Pada Usahatani Ubi Jalar di Desa Lenganeng Kecamatan Tabukan Utara Kabupaten Kepulauan Sangihe Chrisye Limpong Amelia Limpong; Eyverson Ruauw; Charles R. Ngangi; Martha M. Sendow
COCOS Vol. 4 No. 3 (2014)
Publisher : Universitas Sam Ratulangi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35791/cocos.v4i3.4023

Abstract

ABSTRACTChrisye Amelia Limpong Labor Productifity of Sweet Potato Farming at Lenganeng Vilage Northern Tabukan Sub District Under the quidance of Eyverson Ruauw as a Chairman, Charles R. Ngangi and Martha M. Sendow as members.The objective of this research is to know the labour prductivity of sweet potatos farming at Lenganeng Villages North Sub District. Tabukan district. This study uses case study method of sweet potato farming at Lenganeng Villages North Tabukan sub district.Data collection is conducted through direct interview, with Farmer group and individual using simple random sampling method. Samples taken from farmer group andindividual 16 respondents The data collected will be analysed descriptively.The result of this research showed that labor productivity of sweet potatos farm in Lenganeng villages Northern Tabukan Sub District according the amount of labor used was 79,72 kg per labor, product`ivity according to the number of working hours (working day) was 57,66 kg and labor productivity according working day hour (HOK) was 35,89 kg per HOK.The condusson of this researched, if the sweet potato farmers in the village lenganeng village use more people working on the land, would be more effective than using less to work more days, because the value of the average productivity by the amount of labor more than the value of the average labor productivity by the number of working day.
MARGIN PEMASARAN TOMAT APEL DI KELURAHAN KOLONGAN BEHA BARU KECAMATAN TAHUNA BARAT Musperi Menggasa; Mex F.L. Sondakh; Grace A.J. Rumagit; Oktavianus Porajouw
COCOS Vol. 4 No. 3 (2014)
Publisher : Universitas Sam Ratulangi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35791/cocos.v4i3.4024

Abstract

ABSTRACTMusperi Menggasa. Marketing Margin of Tomato (Lycopercicumpryformer) in Kolongan BehaBaru andVillage, West Tahuna sub District. Under Guidance of MF. Sondakh as a Chairman, Grace A. J. Rumagit, O. Porajouw as members.The Objective of this research is to study the marketing margin of tomato (Lycopercicumpryformer) in Sangihe Regency. This study uses a purposive sampling method and then sampling from the farmers is traced to marketing agencies of tomato by using snow ball sampling method. This study is analyzed descriptively by calculating the magnitude of each channel marketing margin and profit margin.The result of this research showed that marketing agenciesin Kolongan Beha Baru Village consisted of Farmers, Retailers, collecting trader and Consumers. Marketing channels freely selectable means direct marketing agencies can choose which marketing channels are more profitable. While the marketing channel is Zero Level channel (Farmer-Consumer), Level One Channel (Farmer-Retailer-Consumer) and Level Two Channel (Farmer-Collecting Traders- Retailer-Consumer).Tomatoes marketing margins in Kolongan Beha Baru Village Channel Level I was Rp. 333.3,- with an average profit margin earned by each marketing agencies was 12.5 with a selling price at the retail level is the purchase price at the consumer level. The average value of marketing margin of tomato in Kolongan Beha Baru in Channel Level II was Rp. 4.833.3, - with an average profit margin earned by each agency marketing was Rp. 1.701.6 . The low value of the profit margin was affected by the value of marketing costs. Thus the best marketing channels was level one channel.
KONTRIBUSI USAHATANI KANGKUNG AIR TERHADAP PENDAPATAN KELUARAGA PETANI DI KELURAHAN MAHENA KECAMATAN TAHUNA Okteven Senggasi; Vicky R.B. Moniaga; Agnes E. Loho; Celsius Talumingan
COCOS Vol. 4 No. 3 (2014)
Publisher : Universitas Sam Ratulangi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35791/cocos.v4i3.4025

Abstract

ABSTRAKThe Objective of this research is to determine the contribution of water spinach to the household income of farmer in village Tahuna Sub District. Primary data obtained through interviews with farmers techniques based on a list of questions while the secondary data obtained from relevant agencies such as office of Tahuna Sub District. The determination of research location isData obtained in this study and the data were analyzed by descriptive proceed with spinach water farm income and farm family income.The results of this research indicated that the mounthy average revenue of water spinach farmer in was Rp.4.669.090 and the mounthly average cost during the production was Rp.239.000 obtained from the total fixed costs plus total variable costs. So that the mounthly average income was Rp.4.430.090The average income outside the water spinacth farmwasRp.335.454 and the average income of other family members was Rp.81.818The contribution of water spinach to the total of household income was 91,4 percent. There here water spinac has a great countribution to the is total income of household.
Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Produksi Pala Di Kecamatan Manganitu Kabupaten Kepulauan Sangihe Yustin Tarimakase; Paulus A. Pangemanan; Jenny Baroleh; Gene H.M. Kapantow
COCOS Vol. 4 No. 4 (2014)
Publisher : Universitas Sam Ratulangi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35791/cocos.v4i4.4026

Abstract

ABSTRACTYustin Tarimakase. The factors that influence the production of nutmeg in Manganitu Sub District (Under guidance of Paulus A. Pangemanan as a cahirman Jenny Baroleh and Gene H. M. Kapantow as members).The objective of this research is to determine tha factor that influence the production of nutmeg in Manganitu Sub District, Sangihe Islands. This research uses survey methods and Primary data obtained from questioner and interview with nutmeg farmers and secondary data from related department such as agriculture, animal, husbandry, estate plantation, and forestry service of Sangihe Island Regency, Manganitu sub District office and Sangihe Islands Statistic Central Service.This study analyzed using multiple regression by calculating the factors that influence behavior of farmers in production such as land, labor, capital and farmers behavior (dummy).The result of this research showed that was by R value or determination coefficient was 73,89 the remaining 26,2 %. The result of regression analysis from the formula Y = 4,0 + 34,9 X1 – 6,87 X2 + 0,0004 X3 + 5,32 X4.Effect of land to nutmeg production (X1) was 34,9 of means that the increase of one unit of land will be followed by the increase of 34,9 unit of production. The effect of labor to nutmeg production (X2) was – 6,87 means that the increase of one unit of labor will be followed by the decrease of 6,87 unit of nutmeg production.The effect of capital to nutmeg production (X3) was 0,00004 means that the increase of one unit of capital will be followed by the increase of 0,0004 unit of production.The effect of farmer behavior to nutmeg production (X4) was 5,34 means that the increase of one unit of farmer behavior will be followed by the increase of 5,34 unit production
Kinerja Penyuluh Pertanian Di Wilayah Kerja Badan Pelaksana Penyuluhan Pertanian Perikanan dan Kehutanan (BP4K) Kabupaten Kepulauan Sangihe Rudy L. Janis; Lyndon R.J. Pangemanan; Olly E.H. Laoh; Ribka M. Kumaat
COCOS Vol. 4 No. 4 (2014)
Publisher : Universitas Sam Ratulangi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35791/cocos.v4i4.4027

Abstract

ABSTRACKRudy Lantang Janis Performance of Agricultural Extension in the Working Area of the Implementing Agency of Agricultural Fisheries and Forestry (BP4K) Sangihe Islands Regency Under the guidance of Lindon R. J. Pangemanan as Chairman, O. Esry laoh and Ribka M. Kumaat as membersThe objective of the research to analyse performance, education, skill, discipline work ethos, number of extension wokers, agricultural extension and personnel motivation in Sangihe Regency Benefits of this research is to increase the knowledge in the field of human resource development for agricultural extension woker to increase the working productivity of extension woker and their institution.Data taken are primary data using questionnaire based interview techniques and using a Likert Scala and secondary data obtained from the Implementing Agency of Agricultural Fisheries andForesty Extesion (BP4K). Samples takenare so respondens spread in 5 (five)Implementing Agency (bp3k) Tahuna SubDistrict, East Tahuna Sub District, WestTahuna Sub district, Kendahe sub districtand North Tabukan sub disttict.Data are using regression analysis. Thisstudy is conducted over three monthsstarting from the Month of June 2013 toagustus 2013.The results of this research showed thateducation skills, discipline work ethosnumber of extension and motivation wassignificantly affected the performance ofagricultural extension officers in theSangihe Islands Regency
Analisis Pendapatan Usaha Tani Kelapa di Kampung Kendahe I Kecamatan Kendahe Kabupaten Sangihe Paulus Sasiang; Celsius Talumingan; Caroline B.D, Pakasi; Lorraine W. Th. Sondakh
COCOS Vol. 4 No. 4 (2014)
Publisher : Universitas Sam Ratulangi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35791/cocos.v4i4.4028

Abstract

ABSTRACTPaulus Sasiang. Coconut Farm Income Analysis at Kendahe I Village, Kendahe Sub District (Under the guidance of C. Talumingan as chairman, C. B. D. Pakasi and L. W. Th. Sondakh as members).The objective of this research is to determine the income of coconut farmers at Kendahe I Village Kendahe Sub District. This research uses the survey method. Data used is primary data and secondary data. Primary data obtained through direct interview by a list of questionnaire to the farmer, the secondary data obtained from the related institution.The data presented in tabular form and analyzed descriptively, to determine income uses FI = TR – TC formula, furthermore to determine if coconut farming giving benefits or not using R/C ratio formula.The result of this research showed that the average revenue coconut farming in Kendahe Village was Rp. 8.517.900, with an average cost Rp. 1.020.411, so that the average income received by farms Rp. 7.491.489, for 3 times harvest process. By considering based on the average area of farms owned land 1 ha, the average was Rp. 2.499.163. Based on R/C ratio calculation, The R/C was 8,35. Thus coconut farm in Kendahe village was benefits for farmers.

Filter by Year

2012 2024


Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 16 No. 3 (2024): EDISI JULI-SEPTEMBER 2024 Vol. 16 No. 2 (2024): EDISI APRIL-JUNI 2024 Vol. 16 No. 1 (2024): EDISI JANUARI-MARET 2024 Vol. 15 No. 1 (2023): EDISI JANUARI-MARET 20223 Vol. 15 No. 4 (2023): EDISI OKTOBER-DESEMBER 2023 Vol. 15 No. 2 (2023): EDISI APRIL-JUNI 2023 Vol. 14 No. 4 (2022): EDISI OKTOBER-DESEMBER 2022 Vol. 14 No. 3 (2022): EDISI JULI-SEPTEMBER 2022 Vol. 14 No. 2 (2022): EDISI APRIL-JUNI 2022 Vol. 14 No. 1 (2022): EDISI JANUARI-MARET 2022 Vol. 13 No. 4 (2021): EDISI OKTOBER-DESEMBER 2021 Vol. 13 No. 3 (2021): EDISI JULI-SEPTEMBER 2021 Vol. 13 No. 2 (2021): EDISI APRIL-JUNI 2021 Vol. 13 No. 1 (2021): EDISI JANUARI-MARET 2021 Vol. 12 No. 4 (2020): EDISI OKTOBER-DESEMBER 2020 Vol. 12 No. 3 (2020): EDISI JULI-SEPTEMBER 2020 Vol. 12 No. 2 (2020): EDISI APRIL-JUNI 2020 Vol. 12 No. 1 (2020): EDISI JANUARI-MARET 2020 Vol. 11 No. 4 (2019): EDISI OKTOBER-DESEMBER 2019 Vol. 11 No. 3 (2019): EDISI JULI-SEPTEMBER 2019 Vol. 11 No. 1 (2019): EDISI JANUARI-MARET 2019 Vol. 11 No. 2 (2019): EDISI APRIL-JUNI Vol. 10 No. 8 (2018) Vol. 10 No. 7 (2018) Vol. 10 No. 6 (2018) Vol. 10 No. 5 (2018) Vol. 10 No. 4 (2018) Vol. 10 No. 3 (2018) Vol. 10 No. 2 (2018) Vol. 10 No. 1 (2018) Vol. 9 No. 6 (2017) Vol. 9 No. 5 (2017) Vol. 9 No. 4 (2017) Vol. 9 No. 3 (2017) Vol. 9 No. 2 (2017) Vol. 9 No. 1 (2017) Vol. 8 No. 6 (2017) Vol. 8 No. 5 (2017) Vol. 8 No. 4 (2017) Vol. 8 No. 3 (2017) Vol. 8 No. 2 (2017) Vol. 8 No. 1 (2016) Vol. 7 No. 7 (2016) Vol. 7 No. 6 (2016) Vol. 7 No. 5 (2016) Vol. 7 No. 4 (2016) Vol. 7 No. 3 (2016) Vol. 7 No. 2 (2016) Vol. 6 No. 17 (2015) Vol. 6 No. 16 (2015) Vol. 6 No. 15 (2015) Vol. 6 No. 14 (2015) Vol. 6 No. 13 (2015) Vol. 6 No. 12 (2015) Vol. 6 No. 11 (2015) Vol. 6 No. 10 (2015) Vol. 6 No. 9 (2015) Vol. 6 No. 8 (2015) Vol. 6 No. 7 (2015) Vol. 6 No. 6 (2015) Vol. 6 No. 5 (2015) Vol. 6 No. 4 (2015) Vol. 6 No. 3 (2015) Vol. 6 No. 2 (2015) Vol. 6 No. 1 (2015) Vol. 5 No. 4 (2014) Vol. 5 No. 3 (2014) Vol. 5 No. 2 (2014) Vol. 5 No. 1 (2014) Vol. 4 No. 6 (2014) Vol. 4 No. 5 (2014) Vol. 4 No. 4 (2014) Vol. 4 No. 3 (2014) Vol. 4 No. 2 (2014) Vol. 4 No. 1 (2014) Vol. 3 No. 6 (2013) Vol. 3 No. 5 (2013) Vol. 2 No. 4 (2013) Vol. 2 No. 3 (2013) Vol. 2 No. 2 (2013) Vol. 2 No. 1 (2013) Vol. 1 No. 2 (2012) Vol. 1 No. 1 (2012) More Issue