cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Indra Ava Dianta
Contact Email
garuda@apji.org
Phone
+6285885852706
Journal Mail Official
firman@stekom.ac.id
Editorial Address
Kampus Universitas Sains & Teknologi Komputer Address: Jl. Majapahit No.605, Pedurungan Kidul, Kec. Pedurungan, Kota Semarang, Jawa Tengah 50192
Location
Kota semarang,
Jawa tengah
INDONESIA
Perkara: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Politik
Published by Universitas Sains Dan Teknologi Komputer
ISSN : 29887755     EISSN : 29885213     DOI : 10.51903
Core Subject : Humanities, Social,
Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences
Sub Rumpun ILMU POLITIK 1 Ilmu Politik 2 Kriminologi 3 Hubungan Internasional 4 Ilmu Administrasi (Niaga, Negara, Publik, Pembangunan, Dll) 5 Kriminologi 6 Ilmu Hukum 7 Ilmu Pemerintahan 8 Ilmu Sosial dan Politik 9 Studi Pembangunan (Perencanaan Pembangunan, Wilayah, Kota) 10 Ketahanan Nasional 11 Ilmu Kepolisian 12 Kebijakan Publik 13 Bidang Ilmu Politik Lain Yang Belum Tercantum Sub Rumpun ILMU SOSIAL 1 Ilmu Kesejahteraan Sosial 2 Sosiologi 3 Humaniora 3 4 Kajian Wilayah (Eropa, Asia, Jepang, Timur Tengah Dll) 5 Arkeologi 6 Ilmu Sosiatri 7 Kependudukan (Demografi, dan Ilmu Kependudukan Lain) 8 Sejarah (Ilmu Sejarah) 9 Kajian Budaya 10 Komunikasi Penyiaran Islam 11 Ilmu Komunikasi 12 Antropologi 13 Bidang Sosial Lain Yang Belum Tercantum
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Ilmu Politik dan Hubungan Internasional
Articles 281 Documents
 25   26   27   28   29 
The Politics of Legal Reform of the Judicial System in Ensuring Access to Justice for Society Martareda Eda; Sisilia Eda
Perkara : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Politik Vol. 3 No. 4 (2025): Desember 2025: Perkara Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Politik
Publisher : Universitas Sains dan Teknologi Komputer

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51903/ndzvhw36

Abstract

This study examines the politics of legal reform in the judicial system and the role of that reform in ensuring access to justice. Judicial reform has largely emphasized institutional efficiency and regulatory modernization, often overlooking the political-legal dynamics that shape access to justice. This research aims to analyze how legal reform policies are formulated through political legal choices and their implications for equitable access to justice. Using a normative legal research method with a qualitative analytical-descriptive approach, this study draws on statutory, conceptual, and policy analyses supported by primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. The findings indicate that judicial reform reflects underlying political and legal orientations that influence policy priorities and outcomes. Although reforms have strengthened institutional and regulatory frameworks, their impact on substantive access to justice remains uneven due to a predominant normative focus and limited responsiveness to social realities. This study highlights the importance of integrating access to justice into judicial reform agendas and emphasizes the need for stronger political and legal commitment to inclusive, justice-oriented legal development. 
Hubungan Antara Kepatuhan Hukum dan Kepercayaan Masyarakat terhadap Institusi Negara Nabilah Azmi
Perkara : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Politik Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026): Maret: Perkara Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Politik
Publisher : Universitas Sains dan Teknologi Komputer

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51903/1tvx7z93

Abstract

This study examines the relationship between legal compliance and public trust in state institutions, addressing the limitations of linear approaches that treat trust solely as a determinant of compliance. Using a quantitative explanatory design, data were collected via a structured survey of adult respondents who had experience interacting with state institutions. Statistical analyses, including descriptive statistics, reliability testing, correlation analysis, and linear regression, were employed to evaluate the empirical relationship between the two constructs. The findings reveal a positive, statistically significant association between legal compliance and institutional trust, indicating that higher levels of legal compliance are associated with stronger public trust in state institutions. Beyond confirming existing theoretical assumptions, the results suggest that legal compliance may function not only as an outcome of institutional trust but also as a social mechanism that actively contributes to the formation and reinforcement of trust. This reciprocal relationship highlights the role of consistent and perceived fair compliance practices in strengthening institutional legitimacy. The study offers a relational perspective on legal compliance, enriching socio-legal scholarship and providing practical insights for policymakers seeking to enhance public trust through sustainable and non-coercive governance strategies.
Hak Anak di Atas Kertas: Kegagalan Negara dalam Pemenuhan Pendidikan Dasar di Wilayah 3T: Analisis Sosiologi Hukum (Studi Kasus di Sumba) Bruno Bani; Novinda Grezen Nufninu
Perkara : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Politik Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026): Maret: Perkara Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Politik
Publisher : Universitas Sains dan Teknologi Komputer

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51903/dx40j373

Abstract

This research is motivated by the ongoing disparity in the distribution of education in underdeveloped, frontier, and outermost regions (3T), particularly in the Sumba region, despite national regulations and commitments to education funding being established. The main issue lies in the gap between legal norms that guarantee equal access to education and the reality of its implementation at the regional level. This research aims to analyze the effectiveness of educational equity policies from the perspective of legal sociology and to identify the structural factors that influence their implementation. The research method used is a qualitative approach with a case study design. Data were obtained through interviews with 30 informants consisting of education officials, school principals, teachers, and parents, as well as supported by document analysis and secondary data. The research results indicate that the education equity policy has not been fully effective, marked by an imbalance in the teacher-student ratio, limited infrastructure, and resource distribution constraints. These findings indicate a gap between regulatory design and implementation practices, influenced by institutional capacity, intergovernmental coordination, and the geographical conditions of the region. Theoretically, this research reinforces the perspective that the effectiveness of law is determined by the interaction between norms, structures, and social conditions. Practically, this research recommends need-based affirmative policies to achieve substantive educational equity in the 3T areas.
Analysis of the Effectiveness of Electronic Case Handling in Enhancing Legal Certainty and Accountability of Judicial Institutions in Indonesia Althea Serafim Kriswabdaru; Berliant Pratiwi
Perkara : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Politik Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026): Maret: Perkara Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Politik
Publisher : Universitas Sains dan Teknologi Komputer

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51903/yssf4e68

Abstract

This study examines the effectiveness of the implementation of electronic courts (e-Courts) in enhancing legal certainty and institutional accountability in Indonesia. Using a mixed methods sequential explanatory design, the research combines quantitative data from 100 respondents, including judges, lawyers, and court staff, with qualitative insights from in-depth interviews with 10 key informants. Quantitative analysis was conducted using Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) to assess the relationships among e-Court implementation, organizational readiness, legal certainty, and accountability, while thematic analysis was used to interpret qualitative findings. The results show that e-Court significantly improves legal certainty and strengthens institutional accountability. Organizational readiness is identified as a key mediating factor influencing system effectiveness. However, challenges such as technical constraints and varying levels of user adaptation remain evident. This study contributes to the literature by providing empirical evidence on the impact of digitalization in judicial systems and highlights the importance of integrating technological and organizational factors. The findings offer practical implications for policymakers and judicial institutions in optimizing e-Court implementation in Indonesia
Dominasi Platform Digital dan Tantangan Penegakan Hukum terhadap Praktik Anti Kompetisi dalam Ekonomi Berbasis Data Ardiansyah Putra Mahendra; Naufal Rizky Ramadhan
Perkara : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Politik Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026): Maret: Perkara Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Politik
Publisher : Universitas Sains dan Teknologi Komputer

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51903/7taqfb57

Abstract

The rapid growth of the data-driven economy has intensified the dominance of digital platforms, creating challenges for market competition and legal enforcement. Large technology companies increasingly control market access and user data, leading to structural imbalances and potential anti-competitive behavior. This study aims to develop a comprehensive measurement of platform dominance through the Platform Dominance Legal Index (PDLI), integrating market share and data control to better capture digital market power. The research adopts a normative juridical approach combined with quantitative analysis using secondary data from academic literature, industry reports, and regulatory documents. Market concentration is measured by the Herfindahl–Hirschman Index (HHI), while PDLI assesses dominance using economic and data-related indicators. The results show a highly concentrated market, with an HHI value of 2530, indicating strong oligopolistic conditions. Google recorded the highest PDLI score of 35.88, followed by Amazon at 18.48 and Meta at 15.30, indicating clear differences in dominance levels. The findings also indicate that platforms with strong data control maintain significant dominance even with a lower market share. Practices such as self-preferencing, predatory pricing, and lock-in effects are associated with higher levels of dominance. The study provides a structured framework for assessing digital platform dominance and supports regulators in developing more adaptive competition policies.
Krisis Legitimasi Regulasi dalam Perlindungan Hak Digital pada Era Ekonomi Data dan Pengawasan Teknologi Fajar Aditya Pranowo; Galih Putra Wiratama
Perkara : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Politik Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026): Maret: Perkara Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Politik
Publisher : Universitas Sains dan Teknologi Komputer

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51903/4k5svz08

Abstract

The rapid expansion of the digital economy and surveillance technologies has raised critical concerns regarding the legitimacy of regulatory frameworks in protecting digital rights. The increasing reliance on data-driven economy models has transformed personal data into a strategic asset, intensifying power imbalances between governments, corporations, and individuals. This study aims to analyze the legitimacy crisis in digital rights regulation by identifying key influencing factors and evaluating governance models to address these challenges. The research employs a normative juridical approach, utilizing secondary data from legal documents, policy reports, and prior scholarly studies, and analyzing them through a qualitative-descriptive framework. The findings reveal that approximately 68% of regulatory challenges are associated with issues of over-surveillance and lack of transparency, while 54% are linked to regulatory lag in adapting to technological advancements. Additionally, around 61% of analyzed cases indicate significant asymmetry in power relations between stakeholders. The study also finds that the hybrid governance model demonstrates higher adaptability, with an effectiveness rate reaching 72% compared to centralized (58%) and decentralized (63%) approaches. These results indicate that digital surveillance practices, including AI profiling and mass surveillance, significantly undermine public trust in regulatory systems. This study contributes by proposing an integrated framework of regulatory legitimacy that emphasizes legality, accountability, transparency, and effectiveness, while highlighting the importance of adaptive and participatory regulatory approaches to ensure balanced protection of digital rights in the evolving digital ecosystem
Urgensi Ratifikasi Statuta Roma dan Implikasinya terhadap Efektivitas International Criminal Court dalam Penegakan Hukum HAM Internasional Sagara Alam
Perkara : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Politik Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026): Maret: Perkara Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Politik
Publisher : Universitas Sains dan Teknologi Komputer

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51903/17z0qd84

Abstract

The increasing occurrence of genocide, war crimes, crimes against humanity, and other serious human rights violations demonstrates the continuing need for an effective international legal mechanism capable of ensuring accountability beyond national jurisdictions. The International Criminal Court, established under the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, represents a permanent institution designed to prosecute individuals responsible for the most serious international crimes. However, the effectiveness of the Court remains highly dependent on state participation through ratification of the Rome Statute. This study aims to analyze the urgency of Rome Statute ratification and its implications for the ICC's effectiveness in enforcing international human rights law. The research employed a normative legal method using statute, conceptual, and comparative approaches. Data were collected through a literature review of international treaties, national regulations, scholarly publications, and institutional reports relevant to the subject. The findings indicate that wider ratification significantly strengthens the legitimacy, jurisdictional reach, and operational capacity of the ICC, particularly in areas such as investigation, arrest cooperation, evidence gathering, and enforcement of judicial decisions. For Indonesia, ratification may encourage harmonization of domestic law with international standards, improve accountability mechanisms for gross human rights violations, and enhance the country’s credibility in global legal diplomacy. This study contributes to the discourse on the relationship between state sovereignty and international accountability by demonstrating that ratification should be understood not as a loss of sovereignty, but as a commitment to responsible governance and justice. In conclusion, ratification of the Rome Statute constitutes a strategic legal step toward strengthening global human rights enforcement and promoting sustainable legal reform.
Krisis Akuntabilitas Hukum dalam Tata Kelola Algoritma dan Dampaknya terhadap Keadilan Regulasi di Era Ekonomi Digital Rangga Prasetyo Nugroho; Daffa Alif Ramadhan
Perkara : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Politik Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026): Maret: Perkara Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Politik
Publisher : Universitas Sains dan Teknologi Komputer

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51903/np0vfc89

Abstract

The rapid expansion of the digital economy has intensified the use of algorithmic systems in decision-making across sectors such as finance, e-commerce, and social media, raising concerns about legal accountability, transparency, and regulatory fairness. This study aims to examine the crisis of legal accountability in algorithmic governance and its implications for regulatory justice by integrating normative legal analysis, empirical observations, and quantitative simulation. A mixed-method approach is applied through literature review, legal analysis, and probabilistic simulation to assess transparency, audit mechanisms, and bias distribution. The findings indicate that transparency levels remain relatively low, with e-commerce at 48%, ride-hailing at 44%, and social media at 38%, while fintech performs moderately at 62%. Bias analysis reveals disparities in algorithmic accuracy, where majority groups reach 91% compared to 79% in minority rural groups, along with higher false positive (15%) and false negative (12%) rates. In addition, the gap between technological development and regulatory response has increased from 10 points in 2015 to 27 points in 2023, reflecting reactive regulatory frameworks. These results illustrate the presence of systemic bias and declining accountability in algorithmic systems. This study contributes by offering an integrative framework that connects technical algorithmic processes with legal accountability and regulatory justice, highlighting that transparency without strong audit mechanisms and adaptive regulation remains insufficient to ensure fairness and accountability in digital governance.
Legal Fragmentation in Regional Environmental Governance: Evaluating Decentralized Mining Policies in Indonesia Maulana Fahmi Idris
Perkara : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Politik Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026): Maret: Perkara Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Politik
Publisher : Universitas Sains dan Teknologi Komputer

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51903/3jmwhf91

Abstract

Legal fragmentation has become a significant challenge in decentralized environmental governance, particularly within extractive sectors in developing countries. This study examines how decentralized mining policies in Indonesia generate regulatory fragmentation and influence environmental governance performance across multiple administrative levels. A qualitative comparative case study approach is employed to analyze mining governance dynamics in selected regions with varying institutional capacities. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews with key stakeholders, including government officials, environmental regulators, civil society organizations, and local communities, complemented by systematic analysis of policy documents and regulatory frameworks. The data were analyzed using thematic comparative analysis to identify patterns of regulatory overlap, authority conflict, and policy inconsistency. The findings indicate that decentralization in the mining sector produces structural fragmentation characterized by overlapping regulations, weak intergovernmental coordination, and inconsistent policy implementation. These conditions are reinforced by divergent institutional priorities, where regional governments prioritize economic development while central authorities emphasize regulatory control and environmental protection. Such misalignment contributes to governance inefficiency and increases environmental risk. This study contributes to Multi-Level Governance and Institutional Fragmentation Theory by demonstrating that legal fragmentation is not merely an administrative issue but a structural governance condition shaped by institutional design and political-economic incentives. A regulatory fragmentation framework is proposed to explain how multi-level governance misalignment affects environmental outcomes in extractive industries. The study concludes that improving environmental governance in decentralized mining systems requires integrated regulatory coordination and strengthened multi-level governance mechanisms rather than relying solely on centralization reforms.
Constitutional Resilience in the Era of Digital Governance: Legal Challenges of Algorithmic Decision-Making in Public Administration Dian Kharisma
Perkara : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Politik Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026): Maret: Perkara Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Politik
Publisher : Universitas Sains dan Teknologi Komputer

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51903/rsfpte29

Abstract

The expansion of  algorithmic governance  in public administration has transformed the exercise of administrative power in the digital era. The increasing use of artificial intelligence (AI) in administrative decision-making improves bureaucratic efficiency while generating constitutional challenges related to transparency, accountability, due process, judicial oversight, and fundamental rights protection. This study examines the constitutional implications of algorithmic decision-making and the capacity of constitutional frameworks to preserve the rule of law in digital governance. This research employs a normative juridical method combined with comparative constitutional analysis of AI governance approaches in the European Union, the United States, and several Asian jurisdictions. The findings reveal that algorithmic decision-making has transformed AI into a mechanism of public authority capable of reshaping state–citizen relations. The opacity of  black-box systems , algorithmic bias, and the diffusion of administrative responsibility potentially weaken legality, democratic accountability, and judicial control in public administration. Comparative analysis demonstrates that different jurisdictions adopt distinct constitutional approaches to AI governance despite facing similar challenges in maintaining constitutional legitimacy within automated governance systems. This study proposes  constitutional resilience  as a normative framework for controlling algorithmic administrative power through transparency, human oversight, independent auditing, the right to explanation, and strengthened judicial review. The study contributes to the development of  digital constitutionalism  by reconstructing the relationship between technology, administrative authority, and constitutional principles in AI-driven governance.

Page 28 of 29 | Total Record : 281

 25   26   27   28   29 

Filter by Year

2023 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026): Maret: Perkara Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Politik Vol. 3 No. 4 (2025): Desember 2025: Perkara Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Politik Vol. 3 No. 3 (2025): September 2025: Perkara Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Politik Vol. 3 No. 2 (2025): Juni 2025 : Perkara Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Politik Vol. 3 No. 1 (2025): Maret 2025 : Perkara Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Politik Vol. 2 No. 4 (2024): Desember | Perkara: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Politik Vol 2 No 2 (2024): Juni : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Politik Vol. 2 No. 2 (2024): Juni : Perkara: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Politik Vol. 2 No. 1 (2024): Maret : Perkara Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Politik Vol 2 No 1 (2024): Maret : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Politik Vol 1 No 4 (2023): Desember : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Politik Vol. 1 No. 4 (2023): Desember : Perkara: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Politik Vol 1 No 3 (2023): September : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Politik Vol. 1 No. 3 (2023): September : Perkara: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Politik Vol 1 No 2 (2023): Juni : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Politik Vol. 1 No. 2 (2023): Juni : Perkara: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Politik More Issue