Perkara: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Politik
Sub Rumpun ILMU POLITIK 1 Ilmu Politik 2 Kriminologi 3 Hubungan Internasional 4 Ilmu Administrasi (Niaga, Negara, Publik, Pembangunan, Dll) 5 Kriminologi 6 Ilmu Hukum 7 Ilmu Pemerintahan 8 Ilmu Sosial dan Politik 9 Studi Pembangunan (Perencanaan Pembangunan, Wilayah, Kota) 10 Ketahanan Nasional 11 Ilmu Kepolisian 12 Kebijakan Publik 13 Bidang Ilmu Politik Lain Yang Belum Tercantum Sub Rumpun ILMU SOSIAL 1 Ilmu Kesejahteraan Sosial 2 Sosiologi 3 Humaniora 3 4 Kajian Wilayah (Eropa, Asia, Jepang, Timur Tengah Dll) 5 Arkeologi 6 Ilmu Sosiatri 7 Kependudukan (Demografi, dan Ilmu Kependudukan Lain) 8 Sejarah (Ilmu Sejarah) 9 Kajian Budaya 10 Komunikasi Penyiaran Islam 11 Ilmu Komunikasi 12 Antropologi 13 Bidang Sosial Lain Yang Belum Tercantum
Articles
271 Documents
<![CDATA[Migrasi dan Perlindungan Hak Asasi Imigran dalam Implementasi Prinsip Hukum Internasional Modern ]]>
<![CDATA[Amalia, Putri]]>;
<![CDATA[Nugraha, Farhan]]>
<![CDATA[ Perkara : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Politik Vol. 3 No. 3 (2025): September 2025: Perkara Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Politik ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Sains dan Teknologi Komputer ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.51903/kcbkzx75
<![CDATA[The complexity of international migration governance continues to challenge the effectiveness of legal protection for immigrants in non-signatory states of the 1951 Refugee Convention, including Indonesia. Although Indonesia has shown administrative commitment through Presidential Regulation No. 125 of 2016, the legal framework remains limited and fragmented. This study aims to analyze the extent to which international legal principles are implemented within Indonesia’s domestic system and how institutional coordination affects immigrant protection. Using a normative-empirical legal method, the research examines 112 policy documents, court decisions, and field data covering the period from 2011 to 2023, supported by case comparisons with Malaysia and the Philippines. The findings reveal that 68 percent of immigrant cases in Indonesia rely on administrative mechanisms rather than formal legal protection, and regional implementation capacity varies significantly between provinces such as Aceh and Jakarta. The results also indicate that the lack of coordination among agencies contributes to a 42 percent delay in refugee registration and documentation processes. Comparative analysis shows that countries with direct legal ratification of the Convention provide more consistent protection and access to fundamental rights. The study contributes to the understanding of the relationship between moral commitment and legal enforcement in international law. The novelty of this research lies in its empirical demonstration of Indonesia’s partial adaptation of international refugee norms without formal ratification, offering a new framework for analyzing human rights protection in transitional legal systems.]]>
<![CDATA[Peran Organisasi Internasional dalam Penegakan Hukum Lingkungan Global melalui Analisis Kebijakan Kualitatif ]]>
<![CDATA[Santoso, Mia]]>
<![CDATA[ Perkara : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Politik Vol. 3 No. 3 (2025): September 2025: Perkara Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Politik ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Sains dan Teknologi Komputer ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.51903/kndmyn76
<![CDATA[The increasing fragmentation of global environmental governance has undermined the effectiveness of international environmental law enforcement. Despite the proliferation of multilateral environmental agreements, compliance among member states has declined, raising concerns about institutional coordination and accountability. This study aims to analyze the effectiveness of international environmental law by assessing institutional synergy among major global organizations, including UNEP, GEF, and the WTO. Using a mixed normative-empirical legal method, the research evaluates 96 policy documents and institutional reports and conducts interviews with 14 international law experts from 2015 to 2023. The findings reveal a significant correlation of 0.82 between state participation and compliance, demonstrating that collective engagement improves enforcement consistency. However, the overall compliance rate has dropped to 63 percent in the last five years, indicating persistent institutional fragmentation. The correlation between financial assistance and compliance (r = 0.57) suggests that funding alone is insufficient without transparent governance structures. Comparative results also show that organizations with higher levels of policy harmonization exhibit 25 percent greater implementation effectiveness than those operating under fragmented systems. The study concludes that legal coherence, institutional capacity, and collaborative governance are critical determinants of the effectiveness of environmental law. The novelty of this research lies in introducing the concept of institutional synergy as a measurable indicator for assessing the integration and efficiency of international environmental regimes, offering new insights into the intersection of law, policy, and global sustainability governance]]>
<![CDATA[Dampak Algoritma Moderasi Media Sosial terhadap Kebebasan Berekspresi melalui Analisis Sosiologi Hukum Kualitatif ]]>
<![CDATA[Nurhayati, Siti]]>;
<![CDATA[Hartono, Budi]]>
<![CDATA[ Perkara : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Politik Vol. 3 No. 4 (2025): Desember 2025: Perkara Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Politik ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Sains dan Teknologi Komputer ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.51903/3g5e4162
<![CDATA[The growing reliance on algorithmic systems in digital platforms has transformed the nature of legal governance and content moderation worldwide. While automation has improved efficiency, it has also created structural problems with transparency, fairness, and accountability. This study aims to examine how algorithmic governance influences procedural justice and public trust within digital environments. Using a qualitative-empirical legal method, the research analyzes 86 regulatory documents, 120 policy reports, and 300 moderated content cases from 2018 to 2024, and is complemented by interviews with 10 digital law experts. The findings reveal that algorithmic moderation increased by 45 percent during the observed period, yet 28 percent of deleted content was identified as non-violative, indicating a significant over-moderation bias. The correlation between transparency and user trust reached 0.85, showing that procedural clarity and appeal mechanisms strongly influence public perception of fairness. Furthermore, the study demonstrates that platforms with higher algorithmic accountability indices display 30 percent better compliance with ethical moderation standards. These results highlight that regulatory fragmentation and the absence of binding oversight mechanisms contribute to inconsistent digital justice outcomes. The study contributes to the theoretical discourse by identifying algorithmic systems as de facto legal actors in the digital domain. The novelty of this research lies in establishing algorithmic accountability as a measurable dimension of digital justice, integrating legal, technical, and sociological perspectives to propose a holistic framework for global algorithmic governance.]]>
<![CDATA[Analisis Jaringan (Social Network Analysis) terhadap Struktur Operasi Kejahatan Siber Terorganisir di ASEAN ]]>
<![CDATA[Laila, Astrid]]>
<![CDATA[ Perkara : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Politik Vol. 3 No. 4 (2025): Desember 2025: Perkara Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Politik ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Sains dan Teknologi Komputer ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.51903/ms8gsm95
<![CDATA[This study investigates the structural dynamics of organized Cybercrime networks operating across ASEAN by employing Social Network Analysis (SNA) to uncover relational patterns, key actors, and functional subgroups within digital criminal ecosystems. Drawing on validated secondary data and network modeling, the analysis demonstrates that Cybercriminal operations in the region exhibit scale-free characteristics, with a small number of highly influential nodes serving as central coordinators and connectors across multiple communities. These structural properties reveal that Cybercrime in ASEAN is sustained not only by technical capabilities but also by interconnected social relationships that enable resource sharing, role specialization, and cross-border collaboration. The findings provide empirical insight into the architecture of Cybercriminal networks, offering theoretical contributions to digital criminology and practical implications for regional law enforcement, particularly for designing targeted interventions to disrupt high-impact nodes. The study also highlights several limitations related to data availability and recommends deeper integration between SNA, digital forensics, and intergovernmental data-sharing mechanisms in future research.]]>
<![CDATA[Budaya Hukum Dan Dinamika Kepatuhan Masyarakat Melalui Pendekatan Sosio-Legal Mikro Dan Makro ]]>
<![CDATA[Astrid, Nuraini]]>
<![CDATA[ Perkara : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Politik Vol. 3 No. 4 (2025): Desember 2025: Perkara Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Politik ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Sains dan Teknologi Komputer ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.51903/qvapxs75
<![CDATA[This study examines legal culture and the dynamics of public compliance through an integrated socio-legal approach that bridges micro-level individual experiences and macro-level institutional structures. Departing from fragmented analyses that treat compliance either as an individual attitude or an institutional outcome, this research employs a qualitative, multilevel design combining in-depth interviews, limited observation, and document analysis to capture the relational processes through which legal compliance is produced and negotiated. The findings demonstrate that compliance is not primarily driven by coercive enforcement or formal regulation, but by perceptions of procedural justice, institutional consistency, and the quality of everyday interactions between citizens and legal authorities. Legal culture emerges as a dynamic, relational process in which individual experiences shape institutional legitimacy, while institutional practices simultaneously condition public trust and behavioral responses to the law. By conceptualizing legal culture as a multilevel socio-legal process, this study contributes to the literature by advancing an integrative analytical framework that moves beyond the micro–macro divide and offers theoretical and practical insights for designing legitimacy-oriented legal governance and sustainable compliance strategies.]]>
<![CDATA[Internalisasi Norma Hukum Sebagai Model Institusional Perilaku Sosial Masyarakat ]]>
<![CDATA[Arthur, Niki]]>
<![CDATA[ Perkara : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Politik Vol. 3 No. 4 (2025): Desember 2025: Perkara Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Politik ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Sains dan Teknologi Komputer ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.51903/r6syqm79
<![CDATA[This study investigates the institutional mechanisms through which legal norms are internalized and transformed into social behavior in Indonesian society. Using a qualitative exploratory–descriptive approach, data were collected through in-depth interviews, observation, and document analysis across three sociocultural settings. The findings reveal that internalization is not merely the result of formal enforcement or legal sanctions, but emerges through a layered social process involving translation of legal values by institutional actors such as community leaders, educators, and local organizations. Legal norms become effective when they are repeatedly enacted in everyday practices and perceived as socially relevant, ultimately forming behavioral orientations that operate without coercion. The study contributes a conceptual institutional model that integrates normative, institutional, and sociological dimensions and offers practical implications for policymakers to design ecosystem-based internalization strategies. Limitations include a limited number of research sites and the absence of standardized quantitative measures, suggesting the need for future mixed-methods studies to broaden applicability.]]>
<![CDATA[Hambatan Sosial dalam Pemanfaatan Mekanisme Hukum Formal oleh Masyarakat ]]>
<![CDATA[Sutami, Putri]]>;
<![CDATA[Austin, Dian]]>
<![CDATA[ Perkara : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Politik Vol. 3 No. 4 (2025): Desember 2025: Perkara Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Politik ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Sains dan Teknologi Komputer ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.51903/xfkdap30
<![CDATA[This study examines social barriers to the use of formal legal mechanisms in Indonesia using a sequential explanatory mixed-methods design that integrates a large-scale survey with in-depth interviews. The quantitative phase involved 400 respondents who had experienced legal problems within the last five years and was analyzed using logistic regression to identify key social determinants of formal legal use. The results indicate that trust in law enforcement institutions and perceptions of procedural justice significantly increase the likelihood of using formal legal channels, while prior negative experiences and fear of social stigma significantly reduce it. These findings were further elaborated through qualitative interviews, which revealed how institutional distrust, traumatic encounters with legal authorities, community pressure, and concerns over social reputation shape individuals’ legal choices. The study demonstrates that limited engagement with formal legal mechanisms cannot be fully explained by structural constraints alone, but must be understood as a socially constructed phenomenon rooted in everyday experiences and collective perceptions of law. By highlighting the central role of social and psychological factors, this research contributes to socio-legal scholarship on access to justice and suggests that judicial reform should prioritize not only procedural efficiency but also the restoration of public trust and the improvement of state–society relations in legal settings.]]>
<![CDATA[Assessing Legal Consistency in Decentralized Policy Implementation Across Newly Established Regions ]]>
<![CDATA[Yulianingsih, Sri]]>
<![CDATA[ Perkara : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Politik Vol. 3 No. 4 (2025): Desember 2025: Perkara Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Politik ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Sains dan Teknologi Komputer ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.51903/p66nv369
<![CDATA[The concept of decentralization has gained popularity as a means to enhance regional self-governance, but the most recent regions established must cope with the challenge of legal consistency in policy application. The objective of the current research is to evaluate the legal consistency of decentralized policy implementations in newly created regions by examining the relationship between the national government's legal norms and local policy practices in these areas. The research employs a qualitative socio-legal method, using a comparative case study approach involving some newly autonomous regions. The data for the research were gathered through analysis of legal documents, policy records, and in-depth interviews with key regional policy actors; the researchers also used thematic and comparative analyses to work through the data. The results of the research show that legal consistency remains irregular, with inconsistencies occurring mainly during implementation rather than in the drafting stage. Differences in institutional capacity and varying understandings of legal responsibilities are the main factors driving these inconsistencies. The study makes a significant contribution to the understanding of decentralization by placing the spotlight on legal consistency as a crucial bridge between the normative frameworks and policy practice. It recommends that the effective functioning of decentralization depends not only on coherent legal arrangements but also on strong institutional mechanisms to ensure consistent implementation at the regional level. ]]>
<![CDATA[Legal Barriers Affecting Decentralized Public Service Delivery in Rapidly Transforming Political Environments ]]>
<![CDATA[Karisma, Dian]]>
<![CDATA[ Perkara : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Politik Vol. 3 No. 4 (2025): Desember 2025: Perkara Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Politik ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Sains dan Teknologi Komputer ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.51903/jqpxqv07
<![CDATA[Public service delivery through decentralization is meant to improve administrative effectiveness, but its implementation still faces legal ambiguity amid a constantly evolving political landscape. This research study proposes to examine the impact of legal impediments on the efficiency of implementing the legal framework for public service delivery through decentralization. The research will make use of the normative-empirical legal methodological framework. This uses the doctrinal research method, drawing on data collected from 30 local officials who provide the service under the legal framework of decentralization. The findings indicate that legal barriers take three forms: normative barriers arising from unclear implementing rules, structural barriers stemming from overlapping central and local authority, and implementation barriers arising from risk-averse bureaucracy. These challenges are exacerbated by political dynamics, which increase the likelihood of legal uncertainty and, in turn, of ineffective service delivery. The project will therefore make a theoretical contribution to the literature on the role of legal barriers to decentralization, the political dynamics that mediate them, and the outcomes of decentralized governance. More specifically, it will underscore the importance of harmonizing regulations and strengthening legal frameworks to enhance legal certainty in decentralized public administration. Finally, it is concluded that legal barriers are crucial to ensuring the effectiveness and accountability of decentralization in public service delivery.]]>
<![CDATA[Politik Hukum KUHP dan KUHAP Baru di Indonesia: Analisis Supremasi Hukum, Kebebasan Sipil, dan Ketegangan Kekuasaan dalam Demokrasi Kontemporer ]]>
<![CDATA[Melody, Chens]]>
<![CDATA[ Perkara : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Politik Vol. 3 No. 4 (2025): Desember 2025: Perkara Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Politik ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Sains dan Teknologi Komputer ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.51903/k5cm3637
<![CDATA[This study analyzes legal politics in the reform of the Indonesian Penal Code (KUHP) and Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP), focusing on its implications for the rule of law, civil liberties, and power relations in contemporary democracy. The study is grounded in public and academic debates concerning tensions between strengthening state authority and protecting citizens’ rights within a democratic rule-of-law framework. Using a qualitative empirical legal approach, data were collected through in-depth interviews and focus group discussions (FGDs) with 20 informants, including legal academics, practitioners, law enforcement officers, and civil society representatives. The data were analyzed thematically to identify dominant perceptions and issues surrounding the reforms. The findings reveal that civil liberties emerged as the most dominant concern, followed by the rule of law and power relations in the criminal justice system. Although the reforms are perceived as efforts to strengthen and unify the national legal system, several provisions are considered potentially problematic due to legal uncertainty and imbalances in authority. This study contributes to the discourse on criminal law politics and offers recommendations for ensuring that future legal reforms remain consistent with democratic principles, human rights protection, and effective checks and balances.]]>
