cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Yuliansyah
Contact Email
admin@penerbitgoodwood.com
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
admin@penerbitgoodwood.com
Editorial Address
Z.A. Pagar Alam Street No. 57, Rajabasa, Bandar Lampung City - Indonesia
Location
Kota bandar lampung,
Lampung
INDONESIA
Kajian Ilmiah Hukum dan Kenegaraan
Published by Goodwood Publishing
ISSN : -     EISSN : 30252539     DOI : https://doi.org/10.35912/kihan
Core Subject : Humanities, Social,
Humanities Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences
Kajian Ilmiah Hukum dan Kenegaraan (KIHAN) is a peer-reviewed journal that publishes quality papers in the fields of law and state. KIHAN aims to become a credible source related to law studies and mediates academicians, researchers, and practioners in dissemination their findings and ideas to solve various law and state issues.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 53 Documents
 2   3   4   5   6 
The Limits of Authority of Regional Heads as Protectors of the Indonesian Red Cross (PMI) under the Red Cross Law Janggur, Stefanus Kurniadi
Kajian Ilmiah Hukum dan Kenegaraan Vol 4 No 2 (2025): Desember
Publisher : Penerbit Goodwood

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35912/kihan.v4i2.5154

Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to analyze the limits of regional head authority in the PMI management election process so as not to cause conflict or chaos in the region. Methodology/approach: The research method used is a normative approach with a juridical-qualitative method, based on a literature study of laws and regulations, especially Law Number 1 of 2018 concerning the Red Cross and the PMI Statutes/Bylaws. Results/findings: The results of the study indicate that although PMI has a close relationship with the regional government, in the process of appointing and dismissing PMI administrators, regional heads do not have the authority to intervene outside the provisions of PMI's Articles of Association/Bylaws. Article 28 of Law Number 1 of 2018 concerning the Red Cross emphasizes that the organizational structure, management, technical implementing units, authorities, and responsibilities of PMI, as well as procedures for the use of PMI symbols are stipulated in the PMI's articles of association and bylaws in accordance with statutory regulations. Conclusions: Regional heads need to understand that their role is to support, facilitate, and protect the PMI as a humanitarian organization, not to regulate its internal affairs. Regional heads' efforts to maintain synergy with the PMI must be carried out without violating the PMI's independence as part of the International Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement. Limitations: Research on the legal status of the Indonesian Red Cross is still very limited, so journals that can be used as references are very difficult to find. Contribution: As a reference in the PMI management election process so as not to cause conflict or chaos in the region.
vonis pidana mati terhadap pelaku penembakan anggota polri oleh TNI Ayu Winda Amelia Des Tifa Mahesa Ayu; I Ketut Seregig; Zainab Ompu Jainah
Kajian Ilmiah Hukum dan Kenegaraan Vol 4 No 2 (2025): Desember
Publisher : Penerbit Goodwood

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35912/kihan.v4i2.6205

Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to analyze the application of military criminal law and judges’ legal considerations in imposing the death penalty on a member of the Tentara Nasional Indonesia (TNI) who shot and killed members of the Kepolisian Negara Republik Indonesia (POLRI) based on the Decision of Pengadilan Militer I-04 Palembang Number 50-K/PM.I-04/AD/V/2025.Research Methodology: This study applies a normative and empirical juridical approach using a case approach. The research examines relevant regulations, including the Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana, Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana Militer, Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 1997 tentang Peradilan Militer, and Undang-Undang Darurat Nomor 12 Tahun 1951, supported by interviews with a Polisi Militer investigator and a military court judge. Data were analyzed qualitatively.Results: The findings show that premeditated murder was not proven because the act occurred due to panic and anger. However, the intentional shooting using an illegal firearm that caused three deaths fulfilled the elements of intentional killing under Article 338 of the Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana.Conclusions: The military justice system effectively enforced criminal accountability, demonstrating that TNI status does not eliminate legal responsibility.Limitations: This study is limited to one military court decision and a specific criminal case context.Contributions: This research contributes to military criminal law studies by providing insights into sentencing policies for serious crimes committed by TNI members.
Kewenangan Jaksa Dalam Melakukan Penyadaoan Terhadap Setiap Orang Yang Berpotensi Melakukan Tindak Pidana Korupsi Di Bandar Lampung I Ketut Seregig; Nur Amalia Zahra; Zainab Ompu Jainah
Kajian Ilmiah Hukum dan Kenegaraan Vol 4 No 2 (2025): Desember
Publisher : Penerbit Goodwood

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35912/kihan.v4i2.6209

Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to analyze the legal basis and limitations of the prosecutor’s authority to conduct wiretapping against parties potentially involved in corruption offenses, and to examine its implementation in the practice of corruption law enforcement.Research Methodology: This study employs a juridical-empirical approach. The research was conducted at the Bandar Lampung District Prosecutor’s Office. Data were collected through in-depth interviews with prosecutors and related law enforcement officers, supported by a review of laws and regulations, legal documents, and scholarly literature on prosecutorial authority, wiretapping, and corruption offenses.Results: The findings indicate that prosecutors in Indonesia do not have general or independent authority to conduct wiretapping. The Prosecutor’s Law does not explicitly regulate wiretapping authority for prosecutors. In practice, prosecutors do not carry out wiretapping directly, but only make use of wiretapping results lawfully obtained by authorized institutions, such as the Corruption Eradication Commission, in accordance with applicable legal procedures.Conclusions: This study is limited to law enforcement practice at the Bandar Lampung District Prosecutor’s Office and relies on interview data from a limited number of informants, so its findings do not fully represent the practice of wiretapping by prosecutors in other regions of Indonesia.Contribution: This study contributes to the development of criminal law and criminal procedure law by clarifying the limits of prosecutorial authority in wiretapping practices, and provides insights for policymakers and law enforcement agencies to strengthen legal certainty and human rights protection in corruption law enforcement.

Page 6 of 6 | Total Record : 53

 2   3   4   5   6 

Filter by Year

2022 2025


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 4 No. 2 (2025): Desember Vol 4 No 2 (2025): Desember Vol. 4 No. 1 (2025): Juni Vol. 3 No. 2 (2024): Desember Vol. 3 No. 1 (2024): Juni Vol. 2 No. 2 (2023): Desember Vol. 2 No. 1 (2023): Juni Vol. 1 No. 2 (2022): Desember Vol. 1 No. 1 (2022): Juni