cover
Contact Name
Afdhal
Contact Email
baileojurnal@gmail.com
Phone
+6281266036814
Journal Mail Official
baileojurnal@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Jl. Ir. M. Putuhena – Kampus Poka, Ambon 97233
Location
Kota ambon,
Maluku
INDONESIA
Baileo: Jurnal Sosial Humaniora
Published by Universitas Pattimura
Core Subject : Humanities, Social,
Focus Fokus Utama: - Sosiologi: Sosiologi merupakan studi ilmiah tentang masyarakat manusia, struktur sosial, interaksi sosial, dan perubahan sosial. Ini melibatkan analisis sistem nilai, norma, lembaga sosial, dan dinamika sosial yang mempengaruhi individu dan kelompok dalam masyarakat. - Ilmu Komunikasi: Ilmu Komunikasi adalah bidang studi yang mempelajari proses komunikasi manusia, termasuk cara pesan disampaikan, diterima, dan dipahami oleh individu, kelompok, atau masyarakat. Ini mencakup berbagai aspek, seperti komunikasi verbal dan nonverbal, komunikasi interpersonal, komunikasi massa, retorika, media, dan teori komunikasi. - Ilmu Administrasi Negara: lmu Administrasi Negara adalah bidang studi yang berkaitan dengan pengelolaan dan organisasi pemerintahan dalam konteks suatu negara. Bidang ini mencakup berbagai aspek seperti perencanaan, pelaksanaan, pengawasan, dan evaluasi kebijakan publik. - Ilmu Pemerintahan: Ilmu Pemerintahan adalah bidang studi yang berkaitan dengan analisis, studi, dan pemahaman tentang proses pemerintahan, sistem politik, serta fungsi dan struktur pemerintah dalam suatu negara. Fokus utama Ilmu Pemerintahan adalah memahami bagaimana kebijakan publik dibuat, diimplementasikan, dan dievaluasi dalam konteks sistem politik tertentu. Cakupan Topik: Jurnal ini mencakup berbagai topik dalam bidang sosial dan humaniora, termasuk namun tidak terbatas pada: - Kajian Sosiologi - Kajian Ilmu Komunikasi - Kajian Ilmu Administrasi Negara - Kajian Ilmu Pemerintahan
Articles 122 Documents
Do Public Rice Distribution Programs Stabilize Food Markets? Evidence from SPHP Rice and Food Assistance Policies in Urban Indonesia Carter Daniel Tarigan; Diana Chalil; Rulianda Purnomo Wibowo
Baileo: Jurnal Sosial Humaniora Vol 4 No 1: September 2026
Publisher : Universitas Pattimura

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30598/baileofisipvol4iss1pp274-295

Abstract

Rising rice prices have emerged as a critical challenge for food security, inflation management, and household welfare in urban Indonesia. In response, the government has implemented the Food Supply and Price Stabilization (SPHP) program and Rice Food Assistance as complementary policy instruments. However, empirical evidence regarding their effectiveness in stabilizing food markets remains limited. This study investigates the impact of these interventions on rice price volatility, overall Consumer Price Index (CPI) volatility, and food-related CPI volatility in Medan City, Indonesia. Using a quantitative before–after policy evaluation design, the study analyzes monthly time-series data from 2019–2023. Market stability is assessed through the Coefficient of Variation (CV), Corrected Coefficient of Variation (CCV), and Standard Deviation of Log Price Differences (SDD), complemented by paired-sample statistical tests. The results indicate that SPHP distribution alone had a limited effect on reducing rice price levels and market volatility. However, the integration of SPHP with Rice Food Assistance significantly reduced rice price volatility and overall CPI volatility compared with the pre-intervention period. In contrast, its effect on food-related CPI volatility remained modest, reflecting the influence of other highly volatile food commodities. This study proposes a Dual-Track Food Market Stabilization Framework that integrates supply-side market intervention and demand-side social protection, demonstrating that food assistance programs can simultaneously strengthen social protection, inflation control, and food market stability.
The Voices from Within: Exploring Collaboration, Competition and Coping Mechanisms among Female Employees in female-dominates workplace Lungisile Lorraine Simelane; Thobeka Nkomo
Baileo: Jurnal Sosial Humaniora Vol 4 No 1: September 2026
Publisher : Universitas Pattimura

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30598/baileofisipvol4iss1pp252-273

Abstract

Workplace bullying among women remains an underexplored sociological phenomenon, particularly within female-dominated professional environments where gender similarity does not necessarily produce solidarity, support, or protection. This study aims to explore how female employees experience, interpret, and respond to workplace bullying, with particular attention to the dynamics of competition, interpersonal conflict, and coping mechanisms among social workers in a female-dominated workplace in Gauteng, South Africa. A qualitative phenomenological design was employed to examine participants’ lived experiences. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews with 10 purposively selected female employees and analysed thematically to identify recurring patterns in their accounts. The findings indicate that workplace bullying is experienced as both overt and subtle behaviour, including verbal confrontation, gossip, patronising treatment, exclusion, undermining, and misuse of organisational power. Participants perceived women as particularly vulnerable to bullying because of persistent gender stereotypes, internalised sexism, interpersonal competition, jealousy, and expectations surrounding women’s workplace and social roles. Coping responses varied from direct confrontation, boundary-setting, avoidance, and informal negotiation to reporting through supervisors, human resource channels, and employee support services. However, limited awareness and inconsistent use of formal mechanisms encouraged reliance on individual coping strategies, which sometimes intensified conflict or prolonged exposure to harm. The study’s novelty lies in conceptualising female-to-female workplace bullying as a relational and structural phenomenon shaped simultaneously by gendered expectations, competition, power relations, and organisational practices. The study recommends strengthening organisational awareness, standardising reporting and intervention mechanisms, and fostering gender solidarity and supportive workplace cultures. For sociology, the findings contribute to understanding how gendered power relations are reproduced within ostensibly gender-congruent workplaces and how employees negotiate, resist, and cope with these relations.

Page 13 of 13 | Total Record : 122