cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Agus Budianto
Contact Email
agus.budianto@uph.edu
Phone
+622125535168
Journal Mail Official
lexprospiciteditor@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Kampus Pascasarjana Universitas Pelita Harapan Plaza Semanggi lt. 16, Jl. Jend. Sudirman No. 50, RT.1/RW.4, Karet Semanggi, Kecamatan Setiabudi, Kota Jakarta Selatan, Daerah Khusus Ibukota Jakarta 12930
Location
Kota tangerang,
Banten
INDONESIA
Lex Prospicit
Published by Universitas Pelita Harapan
ISSN : 29881781     EISSN : 29881773     DOI : -
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
Lex Prospicit is a scientific journal published by the Master of Law Study Program, Faculty of Law, Universitas Pelita Harapan in collaboration with Asosiasi Advokat Indonesia (AAI) and serves as a venue for scientific information in the field of law resulting from scientific research or research-based scientific law writing. The articles published in this journal cover a broad range of topics, including Business Law, Antitrust and Competition Law, Intellectual Property Rights Law, Criminal Law, International Law, Constitutional Law, Administrative Law, Agrarian Law, Health Law, Adat Law, Environmental Law, Banking Law, Cyber Law, Bankruptcy Law, WTO Law, Investment Law, Tax Law, Human Rights Law, ADR and Arbitration Law, and Labor Law.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 5 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue "Vol. 3 No. 2: July 2025" : 5 Documents clear
Perlindungan Hukum Pemegang Saham yang Tidak Setuju Terhadap Keputusan Buyback Saham Tanpa RUPS Hakim, Azizul; Patiaraja, Alfi Arian; Putriguena, Alana Christy
Lex Prospicit Vol. 3 No. 2: July 2025
Publisher : Universitas Pelita Harapan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19166/lp.v3i2.8028

Abstract

The existing problem of OJK Circular Letter Number 3/SEOJK.04/2020 which refers to POJK Number 2/POJK.04/2013 is regarding the determination of the appropriate share price for share buybacks if it is not determined in advance through the GMS. There is still uncertainty in determining the share price for share buybacks. In market conditions that fluctuate significantly, prices change very quickly. The purpose of the research is to analyze legal protection of shareholders who disagree with the decision to buyback shares without GMS. This research is normative legal research with statute approach. The results showed that SE OJK No. 3/SEOJK.04/2020 related to share buybacks when the market fluctuates significantly refers to POJK No. 2/POJK.04/2013 which specifically regulates these conditions. Furthermore, market conditions that fluctuate significantly are when the composite stock price index on the Stock Exchange drops 15% cumulatively in a row for 3 days or other conditions determined by OJK. The absence of information disclosure obligations to Shareholders by the Company in OJK Circular Letter No. 3/SEOJK.04/2020 which refers to POJK No. 2/POJK.04/2013 and buyback decisions that do not go through the GMS mechanism results in unfulfilled legal protection for shareholders if they do not approve the decision to buyback shares and various risks that will arise from the decision. Therefore, the Shareholders' right to obtain information disclosure in the form of full and fair disclosure from the Company is not fulfilled. Therefore, the determination of the share price for the share buyback must be further elaborated regarding the determination mechanism, which will not harm the Company and Shareholders. Bahasa Indonesia Abstrak: Permasalahan dalam Surat Edaran OJK Nomor 3/SEOJK.04/2020 yang merujuk pada POJK Nomor 2/POJK.04/2013 adalah perihal penetapan harga saham yang tepat untuk aksi buyback saham apabila tidak ditetapkan terlebih dahulu melalui RUPS. Masih terjadi ketidakpastian penetapan harga saham untuk aksi buyback saham. Dalam kondisi pasar yang berfluktuasi secara signifikan, harga berubah sangat cepat. Tujuan penelitian untuk membahas perlindungan hukum pemegang saham yang tidak setuju terhadap keputusan buyback saham tanpa RUPS. Analisis menggunakan metode penelitian hukum dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk menganalisis perlindungan hukum pemegang saham yang tidak setuju terhadap keputusan buyback saham tanpa RUPS. Penelitian ini adalah penelitian yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan SE OJK No 3/SEOJK.04/2020 terkait buyback saham saat pasar berfluktuasi secara signifikan merujuk pada POJK No 2/POJK.04/2013 yang secara khusus mengatur kondisi tersebut. Lebih lanjut, kondisi pasar yang berfluktuasi secara signifikan adalah ketika indeks harga saham gabungan di Bursa Efek turun 15% secara kumulatif berturut-turut selama 3 hari ataupun kondisi lain yang ditetapkan oleh OJK. Tidak adanya kewajiban keterbukaan informasi kepada Pemegang Saham oleh Perseroan pada SE OJK No 3/SEOJK.04/2020 yang merujuk pada POJK No 2/POJK.04/2013 dan keputusan buyback yang tidak melalui mekanisme RUPS menghasilkan tidak terpenuhinya perlindungan hukum bagi pemegang saham apabila tidak menyetujui keputusan untuk buyback saham dan berbagai risiko yang akan ditimbulkan dari keputusan tersebut. Oleh karena itu, hak Pemegang Saham untuk mendapatkan keterbukaan informasi berupa full and fair disclosure dari Perseroan menjadi tidak terpenuhi. Sehingga terkait penentuan harga saham untuk buyback saham harus dielaborasikan lebih lanjut perihal mekanisme penentuannya, yang sehingga tidak akan merugikan Perseroan dan Pemegang Saham.
Legal Framework of Property Ownership for Foreign Citizens in Indonesia Effendy, Edrick Edwardina; Winargo, William
Lex Prospicit Vol. 3 No. 2: July 2025
Publisher : Universitas Pelita Harapan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19166/lp.v3i2.8308

Abstract

Indonesia is rich with abundant natural resources. This wealth invites many foreign investors to come and develop their business in Indonesia. The presence of foreign nationals certainly requires a place to live in order to develop their business sustainably and requires a relatively long period of time. The purpose of this study is to analyze the regulations on property ownership in Indonesia for foreigners and to the best ways of property ownership for the foreigners in relation to increasing the investment in Indonesia. This study employs a normative juridical method to describe and analyze legal issues, facts, and other symptoms related to property ownership for foreigners in Indonesia, including the Job Creation Law and its implementing regulations to obtain a comprehensive understanding. The result of the research is that a notable issue arises from Agrarian Minister Regulation 18/2021, which allows for residential areas exceeding 2,000 m² for foreigners under "certain extraordinary circumstances." This provision is problematic due to its lack of a defined maximum limit, creating a legal vacuum ("empty norm"). This absence of clear restriction is seen as a violation of the principles of nationality and Article 33 of the 1945 Constitution, which prioritizes land for the welfare of Indonesian people. The study also identifies that foreigners often resort to "legal smuggling" practices, specifically nominee arrangements, to circumvent ownership restrictions and acquire Hak Milik (Freehold Title). In such arrangements, an Indonesian citizen registers the property title on behalf of a foreigner. However, Article 26 paragraph (2) of Law 5/1960 explicitly states that any direct or indirect transfer of property rights to foreigners is null and void by law. Consequently, if a nominee arrangement is discovered, the land title is cancelled and the land reverts to the State.
Mechanism of Share Transfer Through Court Decision for Shareholders in a State of Absence (Afwezigheid) Effendy, Edrick Edwardina; Octaviara, Talia
Lex Prospicit Vol. 3 No. 2: July 2025
Publisher : Universitas Pelita Harapan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19166/lp.v3i2.8399

Abstract

There are many problems found in the civil aspect these days, which are diverse and complex, so comprehensive arrangements are needed to fulfil all civil rights in humans as one of the subjects of civil law. This research will specifically discuss the state of Afwezigheid as a shareholder of a limited liability company where the assets owned are in the form of shares. To carry out the civil rights of an absent person (Afwezig), a determination of Afwezigheid is required by the local District Court, which then appoints Balai Harta Peninggalan (BHP) as a Special Manager (Bewindvoerder) to carry out management of the absent person's assets. This research is a normative legal study using secondary data, applying statute approach, conceptual approach, and historical approach. The data were collected through literature review of books, laws, and regulations relating to the state of Afwezigheid and its position under the Civil Code and Law Number 40 of 2007 on Limited Liability Company. The findings indicate that the absence (Afwezigheid) of a shareholder must be established by a court ruling, with BHP managing the shareholder’s rights and assets. However, the lack of clear technical procedures for share transfer creates legal uncertainty in practice.
Aspek Hukum Pemanfaatan Barang Milik Negara Perwakilan Republik Indonesia di Luar Negeri Pratidina, Khania Nirmala
Lex Prospicit Vol. 3 No. 2: July 2025
Publisher : Universitas Pelita Harapan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19166/lp.v3i2.9079

Abstract

The utilization of State Property owned by ministries/institutions is not a new thing in the national asset management system, but in its development, a problem was found that there are State Properties owned by Representatives of the Republic of Indonesia abroad that have not been utilized optimally in matters outside their duties and functions to support diplomatic activities abroad. This research is a normative juridical research that focuses on literature study regarding the regulation of the use of state property by Representatives of Foreign Countries in international law provisions and how Indonesian national law provisions regulate the utilization of State Properties owned by Representatives of the Republic of Indonesia abroad for commercial activities. Based on the research, it can be concluded that the utilization of State Properties owned by Representatives of Foreign Countries for commercial activities is contrary to international law, especially the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations 1961 and the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations 1963. However, there are exceptions that provide space for Representatives of Foreign Countries, namely if of course with the consequence that the State Properties releases its privileges such as immunity and tax exemption. In national legal provisions, the management of State Properties abroad is regulated in Minister of Finance Regulation Number 271/PMK.06/2015 and Minister of Foreign Affairs Regulation Number 5 of 2016, but both regulations have not accommodated the use of State Properties for Representatives of the Republic of Indonesia abroad. Bahasa Indonesia Abstrak: Pemanfaatan Barang Milik Negara (BMN) yang dimiliki oleh kementerian/lembaga bukan merupakan hal baru dalam sistem tata kelola aset nasional, namun pada perkembangannya ditemukan permasalahan bahwa terdapat BMN yang dimiliki oleh Perwakilan Republik Indonesia di luar negeri yang belum dimanfaatkan secara maksimal dalam hal di luar tugas dan fungsinya mendukung kegiatan diplomasi di luar negeri. Penelitian ini adalah penelitian yuridis normatif yang berpusat pada studi kepustakaan mengenai pengaturan penggunaan BMN oleh Perwakilan Negara Asing dalam ketentuan hukum internasional serta bagaimana ketentuan hukum nasional Indonesia mengatur mengenai pemanfaatan BMN yang dimiliki oleh Perwakilan Republik Indonesia di luar negeri untuk kegiatan yang bersifat komersial. Berdasarkan penelitian dapat disimpulkan bahwa pemanfaatan BMN milik Perwakilan Negara Asing untuk kegiatan komersial merupakan hal yang bertentangan dengan hukum internasional khususnya Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relation 1961 dan Vienna Convention on Consular Relation 1963. Namun terdapat pengecualian yang memberikan ruang kepada Perwakilan Negara Asing, yaitu apabila tentunya dengan konsekuensi bahwa BMN tersebut melepaskan privileges yang dimiliki seperti imunitas dan pembebasan pajak. Dalam ketentuan hukum nasional, pengelolaan BMN di luar negeri diatur dalam Peraturan Menteri Keuangan Nomor 271/PMK.06/2015 dan Peraturan Menteri Luar Negeri Nomor 5 Tahun 2016, namun kedua peraturan tersebut belum mengakomodir pemanfaatan BMN bagi Perwakilan Republik Indonesia di luar negeri.
Pemenuhan Pemenang Lelang Hak Tanggungan Aset Cessie Setelah Proses Lelang di Kantor Pelayanan Kekayaan Negara Lelang Bogor Rambing, Donny Sulistio; Nugraha, Dwi Putra
Lex Prospicit Vol. 3 No. 2: July 2025
Publisher : Universitas Pelita Harapan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19166/lp.v3i2.9111

Abstract

The economic development in Indonesia has emphasized the importance of guarantee institutions that provide legal certainty, including the implementation of security rights auctions through the State Asset Management and Auction Office (KPKNL). Security rights auctions serve as a mechanism to resolve debtor defaults against creditors, conducted through public auctions in accordance with Law Number 4 of 1996. However, this process often encounters challenges such as unsold assets, legal disputes, or administrative obstacles. This study aims to analyze the implementation of security rights auctions at KPKNL Bogor and post-auction legal efforts for auction winners at KPKNL. This study employs a qualitative method with a descriptive-analytical approach. Data were collected through interviews with KPKNL officials, auction houses, and reviews of relevant legal documents. The findings indicate that the auction process adheres to applicable regulations but is frequently hindered by administrative issues, lack of transparency, and post-auction disputes. These challenges impede legal certainty for auction winners and often require time-consuming legal resolutions. The study concludes by recommending the strengthening of more specific auction regulations, increasing transparency in auction processes, and educating the public to understand auction procedures. Synergy between KPKNL, auction houses, and related authorities is also necessary to ensure the smooth execution of auctions and the protection of auction winners' rights. These efforts can make security rights auctions a more efficient mechanism for resolving debt disputes. Bahasa Indonesia Abstrak: Perkembangan ekonomi di Indonesia telah mendorong pentingnya lembaga jaminan hak yang memberikan kepastian hukum, termasuk dalam pelaksanaan lelang hak tanggungan melalui Kantor Pelayanan Kekayaan Negara dan Lelang (KPKNL). Lelang hak tanggungan merupakan mekanisme penyelesaian wanprestasi debitur terhadap kreditur, yang dilakukan melalui pelelangan umum sesuai dengan Undang-Undang Nomor 4 Tahun 1996. Namun, proses ini tidak jarang menghadapi tantangan, seperti aset yang tidak laku, sengketa hukum, atau kendala administrasi. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pelaksanaan lelang hak tanggungan di KPKNL Bogor dan upaya hukum pasca lelang Hak Tanggungan asset Cessie bagi pemenang lelang di KPKNL. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode kualitatif dengan pendekatan deskriptif-analitis. Data diperoleh melalui wawancara dengan pihak KPKNL, balai lelang, dan tinjauan dokumen hukum terkait. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pelaksanaan lelang telah sesuai dengan peraturan yang berlaku, tetapi sering terkendala oleh faktor administrasi, kurangnya transparansi, dan sengketa pasca-lelang. Kendala ini menghambat kepastian hukum bagi pemenang lelang dan memerlukan penyelesaian melalui jalur hukum yang sering memakan waktu. Kesimpulan penelitian menyarankan penguatan regulasi lelang yang lebih spesifik, peningkatan transparansi dalam proses lelang, dan edukasi kepada masyarakat untuk memahami prosedur lelang. Sinergi antara KPKNL, balai lelang, dan otoritas terkait juga diperlukan untuk memastikan kelancaran pelaksanaan lelang dan perlindungan hak pemenang lelang. Dengan upaya ini, lelang hak tanggungan dapat menjadi mekanisme yang lebih efisien dalam menyelesaikan sengketa utang-piutang.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 5

 1 

Filter by Year

2025 2025


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 3 No. 2: July 2025 Vol. 3 No. 1: February 2025 Vol. 2 No. 2: July 2024 Vol 2, No 1: February 2024 Vol. 2 No. 1: February 2024 Vol 1, No 2: July 2023 Vol. 1 No. 2: July 2023 Vol. 1 No. 1: February 2023 Vol 1, No 1: February 2023