cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Auliya Ghazna Nizami
Contact Email
auliyanizami@uinsa.ac.id
Phone
+6281915490279
Journal Mail Official
jurnalkomparatif@uinsa.ac.id
Editorial Address
Jl. Ahmad Yani No.117, Jemur Wonosari, Kec. Wonocolo, Surabaya, Jawa Timur 60237
Location
Kota surabaya,
Jawa timur
INDONESIA
Komparatif: Jurnal Perbandingan Hukum dan Pemikiran Islam
Published by Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Ampel
ISSN : -     EISSN : 30261643     DOI : https://doi.org/10.15642/komparatif.v3i2
Core Subject : Religion, Humanities, Social,
Religion Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences
The Komparatif furnishes an international and regional scholarly forum for research on Comparative Mazahib, Law, and Islamic Thought. Taking an expansive view of the subject, the journal brings together all disciplinary perspectives. It publishes peer-reviewed articles on the historical, cultural, social, philosophical, political, anthropological, literary, artistic and other aspects of Comparative Mazahib, Law, and Islamic Thought in all times and places.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 49 Documents
 1   2   3   4   5 
A Review of Fiqh and Compilation of Islamic Law on the Marriage Status of Apostate Couples: A Case Study of Kayu Kebek Village, Tutur District, Pasuruan Regency Nahar Luthfillah, Sulthon
Komparatif: Jurnal Perbandingan Hukum dan Pemikiran Islam Vol. 5 No. 1 (2025): June
Publisher : Department of Comparative Mazhab Comparative, Fakulty of Shariah and Law

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15642/komparatif.v5i1.2585

Abstract

The marital status of a partner who is an apostate or changes religion in marriage in Law No. 1 of 1974 does not involve the breaking of a marriage bond. But in the Fiqh of a partner who apostates, the marriage bond is automatically annulled or the marriage bond is dissolved. According to Fiqh experts, if one of the partners, be it husband or wife, changes religion or apostates, then the marriage is said to be fasakh or the breaking of their marriage bond. In the Compilation of Islamic Law, article 115 states that divorce can only be carried out in front of a religious court, if they do not file for divorce in court then the marriage is still considered valid. As is the case in Kayu Kebek village, Tutur subdistrict, Pasuruan regency. In Kayu Kebek village there are several couples who change religions or apostatize during marriage. The main question in this research is what is the marital status of couples who have apostatized from the perspective of Islamic Law and the Compilation of Islamic Law? To answer this question, the author uses a normative juridical approach by using field research to obtain these data. The author uses two data sources, namely primary data sources obtained from interviews while secondary data obtained from laws. Marriage, KHI Hadith and rules of Fiqh.
Distribution of Social Assistance by Election Candidate Pairs according to Ulama' Nahdlatul Ulama and Muhammadiyah Nada, Nihalun; Sunan Umam, Zulfi; Musta'an Najikh, Ahmad
Komparatif: Jurnal Perbandingan Hukum dan Pemikiran Islam Vol. 5 No. 1 (2025): June
Publisher : Department of Comparative Mazhab Comparative, Fakulty of Shariah and Law

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15642/komparatif.v5i1.2597

Abstract

Abstract: Social assistance distributed by pairs of election candidates during the campaign has caused debate among politicians and clerics. With this case, the two largest community organizations in Indonesia, namely Nahdlatul Ulama and Muhammadiyah, gave a fatwa on the distribution of social assistance during the campaign period. This study explains and analyzes the problemof social assistance which is equated with money politics and compares the opinions between Ulama Nahdlatul Ulama and Ulama Muhammadiyah. The data in this study was collected using library research. The data analysis technique uses the techniqueof descriptive analysis and comparative approach to analyze the similarities and differences of the opinions of Nahdlatul Ulama and Muhammadiyah. The results of this study conclude that Nahdlatul Ulama and Muhammadiyah gave a fatwa that receiving social assistance from the pair of election candidates during the campaign period is haram. This is because social assistance is equated with money politics and risywah which is legally haram. However, both of them gave the fatwa only as a suggestion, not as a binding Islamic law. This is because both consider the economic situation of the Indonesian people.
Musdah Mulia's Thoughts on Women's Reproductive Rights in Islam Aziz, Muhammad Hilmi
Komparatif: Jurnal Perbandingan Hukum dan Pemikiran Islam Vol. 5 No. 1 (2025): June
Publisher : Department of Comparative Mazhab Comparative, Fakulty of Shariah and Law

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15642/komparatif.v5i1.2656

Abstract

Abstrak: Reproductive rights are a crucial issue that must be advocated for. Musdah Mulia is one of the prominent figures deeply concerned with this matter. This article aims to examine Musdah Mulia's thoughts on reproductive rights and analyze their alignment with the principles of maqāṣid al-sharī‘ah. The study draws from her books, YouTube channel, podcasts, and seminar presentations, which are then analyzed in relation to the objectives of Islamic law. There are seven reproductive rights identified in her discourse: the right to express sexual desire equally with men; the right to refuse sexual intercourse; the right to decide if and when to become pregnant; the right to determine the number of children; the right to choose whether or not to marry; the right to access healthcare services; and the right to obtain accurate and adequate information regarding reproductive rights and health. The protection of these reproductive rights falls under al-maqāṣid al-ḍarūriyyāt, which are the essential objectives of maqāṣid al-sharī‘ah, as women's reproductive rights constitute a fundamental aspect of life that ensures the proper functioning of both religious and human affairs. Neglecting these aspects leads to disorder and injustice..
Fatwa on the Marriage of a Person Who Has a Deviation of Sexual Orientation in Islamweb.net from the Perspective of Maqāṣid al-Sharī'ah Aisyah, Nabilah Rohadatul; Tussa’banniya, Nabila; Abida, Rossana Farah; Musyafa’ah, Nur Lailatul
Komparatif: Jurnal Perbandingan Hukum dan Pemikiran Islam Vol. 5 No. 1 (2025): June
Publisher : Department of Comparative Mazhab Comparative, Fakulty of Shariah and Law

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15642/komparatif.v5i1.2657

Abstract

Nowadays, more and more people have a deviant sexual orientation. The laws of their marriage, both same-sex and of different sexes, have caused legal debate among clerics, including on websites. This study aims to examine the fatwa of islamweb.net scholars on marriage for someone who has a deviant sexual orientation. This research is a normative legal research with a conceptual approach. Primary data is collected through the fatwa of islamweb.net clerics, while secondary data comes from books and scientific articles. The collected data was analyzed descriptively with the theory of Maqāṣid al-sharī'ah. The results of the study show that islamweb.net clerics view homosexuality as a form of deviance that needs to be cured through spiritual and medical approaches, with heterosexual marriage as "sharia therapy". This marriage is recommended if there are no biological disorders that hinder the relationship between husband and wife. This fatwa reflects the purpose of the shari'a in preserving religion (ḥifẓ al-dīn), honor (ḥifẓ al-'ird), and heredity (ḥifẓ al-nasl), but on the other hand, it has social implications for the LGBT community, which is still positioned as a deviant group. A more inclusive and equitable approach to maqāṣid is needed to bridge the gap between religious norms and human rights principles.
صفة التجدد والحياة للفقه الإسلامي: نظام مقاصد الشريعة المعاصر Ghazna Nizami, Auliya; Prima Pratista, Farida
Komparatif: Jurnal Perbandingan Hukum dan Pemikiran Islam Vol. 5 No. 1 (2025): June
Publisher : Department of Comparative Mazhab Comparative, Fakulty of Shariah and Law

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15642/komparatif.v5i1.2773

Abstract

Sometimes, it might be seen that the contents of Islamic jurisprudence is a set of laws or regulations, whether religious or social, that manage the matter of life and its source the Almighty, that does not accept change at all, if we try to change it, the attempt might be known as an attempt to make bid’ah in religon-which is forbidden in Islam-. Even atheists and extremists in religion have inferred it to justify all the radical behavior that has remained under the umbrella of religious jihad. Jasser also saw those conditions in a city-London- that has a high level of security and elements that guarantee security and make it its starting point to get rid of the symbol of atheism and extremism from religion, whatever the religion - especially the religion of Islam - because religion is in its nature spreading safety, not in the position of spreading fear to scare people then runaway from it. Jasser saw that the trait of “renewable” and “alive” is what was completely absent from religion - from the viewpoint of its adherents - and tried to find these traits of the religion itself, because he believed that religion is the solution and not a source of the problem. This research spoke about the foundations of Jasser’s academic and scientific endeavors to make religion go hand in hand, like the solution, with modernity and endless realities. And he invented that the religious system corresponding to modernity must possess the six factors, namely: the cognitive nature of systems, wholeness, openness, and the hierarchical structure of interrelated hierarchy and multi-dimensionality and the Purposefulness or Goal-oriented.
Comparative Study of Husband’s Iddah Policy in Indonesia: Imam al-Ghazali’s Maslahah and Jeremy Bentham’s Utilitarianism Perspective Marshalina Rahadatul 'Aisyi; Ulya, Zakiyatul; Hidayat, Muhammad Rifqi
Komparatif: Jurnal Perbandingan Hukum dan Pemikiran Islam Vol. 5 No. 2 (2025): December
Publisher : Department of Comparative Mazhab Comparative, Fakulty of Shariah and Law

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15642/komparatif.v5i2.2797

Abstract

The existence of the iddah policy for husbands has caused much debate because the validity of the iddah adopted by the majority of scholars is only for women. This study aims to analyze the iddah policy for husbands in the Circular of the Director General of Islamic Community Guidance, Number P-005/DJ.III/HK/007/10/2021 using Imam al-Ghazali's maslahah theory and Jeremy Bentham's utilitarianism theory. This study is library research with a qualitative approach, using documentation as a data collection technique and descriptive analysis as a data analysis technique. The study concluded that the policy of iddah for husbands in the Circular of the Director General of Islamic Community Guidance, Number P-005/DJ.III/HK/007/10/2021 is in accordance with Al-Ghazali's maslahah because it has fulfilled 5 (five) elements of maqashid al-shari’ah, namely: hifdz ad-din (maintenance of religion), hifdz an-nafs (maintenance of the soul), hifdz al-aql (maintenance of reason), and hifdz an-nasl (maintenance or offspring), hifdz al-mal (maintenance of property) and is in accordance with Jeremy Bentham's utilitarianism theory because it has fulfilled seven core elements of happiness, namely: intensity of pleasure, duration of pleasure, certainty of happiness, closeness to achieving pleasure, fecundity, purity, and extent. By fulfilling the five elements of maqashid al-shari’ah and seven core indicators of happiness, it can be concluded that this policy is appropriate to implement because it contains benefits and happiness. Keywords: Husband's Iddah Policy, Al-Ghazali's Maslahah, Jeremy Bentham's Utilitarianism, maqashid al-shari’ah.   Abstrak: Keberadaan kebijakan iddah untuk suami telah menimbulkan banyak perdebatan karena keabsahan iddah yang diadopsi oleh mayoritas ulama hanya untuk wanita. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis kebijakan iddah bagi suami dalam Surat Edaran Direktur Jenderal Panduan Masyarakat Islam Nomor: P-005/DJ. III/HK/007/10/2021 menggunakan teori maslahah Imam al-Ghazali dan teori utilitarianisme Jeremy Bentham. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian kepustakaan dengan pendekatan kualitatif yang menggunakan dokumentasi sebagai teknik pengumpulan data dan analisis deskriptif sebagai teknik analisis data. Hasil penelitian menyimpulkan bahwa kebijakan iddah untuk suami dalam Surat Edaran Dirjen Bimbingan Masyarakat Islam Nomor: P-005/DJ. III/HK/007/10/2021 sesuai dengan maslahah Al-Ghazali karena telah memenuhi lima unsur maqashid, yaitu: hifdz ad-din (pemeliharaan agama), hifdz an-nafs (pemeliharaan jiwa), hifdz al-aql (pemeliharaan akal), dan hifdz an-nasl (pemeliharaan atau keturunan), hifdz al-mal (pemeliharaan harta benda) dan sesuai dengan teori utilitarianisme Jeremy Bentham karena telah memenuhi tujuh unsur inti kebahagiaan,  yaitu: intensitas kesenangan, durasi kesenangan, kepastian kebahagiaan, kedekatan untuk mencapai kesenangan, kesuburan, kemurnian, dan luasnya jangkauan. Dengan memenuhi lima unsur maqashid al-shari’ah dan tujuh indikator inti kebahagiaan, dapat disimpulkan bahwa kebijakan ini tepat untuk diterapkan karena mengandung manfaat dan kebahagiaan. Kata kunci: Kebijakan Iddah Suami, Maslahah Al-Ghazali, Utilitarianisme Jeremy Bentham, maqashid al-shari’ah.
An Interpretation of the East Java MUI Fatwa on “Sound Horeg”: Bayānī, ‘Irfānī, and Burhānī Perspectives Ach Badri Amien; M. Sa’ad Alfanny; Achmad Sholakhuddin Al Af Ghoni; Aniq, Ahmad Fathan
Komparatif: Jurnal Perbandingan Hukum dan Pemikiran Islam Vol. 5 No. 2 (2025): December
Publisher : Department of Comparative Mazhab Comparative, Fakulty of Shariah and Law

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15642/komparatif.v5i2.2879

Abstract

Abstract: The phenomenon of “sound horeg” audio systems with bass pressure reaching 95–135 dB has caused social, health, and environmental problems in various regions of East Java. Responding to this condition, the Indonesian Ulema Council (MUI) of East Java issued Fatwa Number 1 of 2025, which stipulates that the use of “sound horeg” with excessive intensity and accompanied by practices that lead to harm is declared harām (forbidden), while reasonable use for positive activities is permitted. This study aims to explain the normative basis of the fatwa through the epistemological perspective of Muḥammad ‘Ābid al-Jābirī, covering three models of reasoning: bayānī, ‘irfānī, and burhānī. Data were collected through a literature study by examining official fatwa documents, fiqh literature, al-Jābirī’s works, and scientific articles related to the “sound horeg” phenomenon. The analysis was carried out using a qualitative-analytical approach, namely, reading the fatwa as a legal text as well as a social phenomenon to see how the three models of reasoning work. The study's findings demonstrate that the MUI combines the legitimacy of sharia texts (bayānī), ethical-spiritual considerations of society (ʿirfānī), and empirical evidence regarding the dangers of noise and social damage (burhānī). Thus, this fatwa is not merely normative but also constitutes a comprehensive epistemological response to changes in modern entertainment culture.   Keywords: Fatwa, Majelis Ulama Indonesia, Sound Horeg, Bayānī–‘Irfānī–Burhānī.   Abstrak: Fenomena “sound horeg” sistem audio dengan tekanan bass mencapai 95–135 dB menimbulkan persoalan sosial, kesehatan, serta gangguan lingkungan di berbagai daerah Jawa Timur. Merespons kondisi tersebut, Majelis Ulama Indonesia (MUI) Jawa Timur menerbitkan Fatwa Nomor 1 Tahun 2025 yang menetapkan bahwa penggunaan “sound horeg” dengan intensitas berlebihan dan disertai praktik yang mengarah pada kemudaratan dinyatakan haram, sedangkan penggunaan wajar untuk kegiatan positif diperbolehkan. Penelitian ini bertujuan menjelaskan dasar normatif fatwa tersebut melalui perspektif epistemologi Muḥammad ‘Ābid al-Jābirī, meliputi tiga model nalar: bayānī, ‘irfānī, dan burhānī. Data dikumpulkan melalui studi pustaka dengan menelaah dokumen resmi fatwa, literatur fikih, karya al-Jābirī, serta artikel ilmiah terkait fenomena “sound horeg”. Analisis dilakukan menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif-analitis, yaitu membaca fatwa sebagai teks hukum sekaligus fenomena sosial untuk melihat bagaimana ketiga model nalar tersebut bekerja. Hasil kajian menunjukkan bahwa MUI menggabungkan legitimasi teks syariat (bayānī), pertimbangan etika-spiritual masyarakat (ʿirfānī), serta bukti empiris mengenai bahaya kebisingan dan kerusakan sosial (burhānī). Dengan demikian, fatwa ini tidak hanya bersifat normatif, tetapi merupakan respon epistemologis yang komprehensif terhadap perubahan budaya hiburan modern. Kata Kunci: Fatwa, Majelis Ulama Indonesia, Sound Horeg, Bayānī–‘Irfānī–Burhānī.
Patriarchal Structures in Islamic Law and Indonesian Positive Law: A Comparative Legal Analysis from a Gender Justice Perspective Ramadhan, Rahmat Gilang; Hibatullah, Mohammad Rafii'; Farichudzaki, W.K.; Aji, Rajali H.
Komparatif: Jurnal Perbandingan Hukum dan Pemikiran Islam Vol. 5 No. 2 (2025): December
Publisher : Department of Comparative Mazhab Comparative, Fakulty of Shariah and Law

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15642/komparatif.v5i2.3126

Abstract

Abstract: This study critically examines the persistence of patriarchal bias in Indonesia’s legal system by comparing Islamic law and positive law through a gender justice lens. This research specifically identifies how patriarchal structures are embedded in family law norms, judicial reasoning, and institutional legal practices, particularly in matters of marriage, lineage, and gendered legal authority. Using a qualitative normative method with a comparative socio-legal approach, the study analyzes statutory regulations, classical and contemporary Islamic legal doctrines, and scholarly interpretations relevant to the Indonesian legal context. The findings reveal a fundamental divergence between the two systems: while positive law formally endorses gender equality, patriarchal bias persists at the level of legal interpretation and implementation, especially within judicial institutions; conversely, Islamic law, when interpreted textually, may reproduce gender hierarchy, yet offers a strong emancipatory potential when re-read through maqāṣid al-sharī‘ah and egalitarian legal reasoning. The study argues that patriarchal bias is not merely normative but institutional, and that meaningful legal reform requires not only doctrinal revision but also transformation of judicial reasoning and legal culture. Keywords: patriarchy, Islamic law, Indonesian positive law, judicial reasoning, gender justice   Abstrak: Penelitian ini mengkaji tentang bias patriarki dalam sistem hukum Indonesia melalui analisis komparatif antara hukum Islam dan hukum positif dari perspektif keadilan gender. Studi ini secara spesifik mengidentifikasi bagaimana struktur patriarkal terinternalisasi dalam norma hukum keluarga, pola judicial reasoning, serta praktik kelembagaan peradilan, terutama dalam isu perkawinan, nasab, dan otoritas hukum berbasis gender. Dengan metode kualitatif normatif dan pendekatan komparatif sosio-legal, penelitian ini menelaah peraturan perundang-undangan, doktrin hukum Islam klasik dan kontemporer, serta pandangan akademik yang relevan dengan konteks Indonesia. Temuan penelitian menunjukkan perbedaan fundamental antara kedua sistem: hukum positif secara normatif menjamin kesetaraan gender, namun masih mereproduksi bias patriarki pada tingkat interpretasi dan implementasi hukum, khususnya dalam praktik peradilan; sementara itu, hukum Islam dalam pembacaan tekstual berpotensi melanggengkan hierarki gender, tetapi sekaligus menyediakan landasan emansipatoris yang kuat melalui pendekatan maqāṣid al-sharī‘ah dan penalaran hukum yang egaliter. Penelitian ini menegaskan bahwa bias patriarki bersifat institusional, bukan semata normatif, sehingga reformasi hukum yang berkeadilan gender mensyaratkan transformasi penafsiran hukum, penguatan nalar hakim, dan perubahan budaya hukum. Kata Kunci: patriarki, hukum Islam, hukum positif Indonesia, judicial reasoning, keadilan gender
Marriage Prohibition Between Sepande and Banjarpoh Residents: Perspectives of Nahdlatul Ulama and Muhammadiyah Almahdi, Tajuddin Nabil; Destiara, Sumi; Salsabila , Nisrina Ruliana; Nadhifah , Nurul Asiya; Yanda, Gatralina Sekar Harum Ael
Komparatif: Jurnal Perbandingan Hukum dan Pemikiran Islam Vol. 5 No. 2 (2025): December
Publisher : Department of Comparative Mazhab Comparative, Fakulty of Shariah and Law

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15642/komparatif.v5i2.3131

Abstract

Abstract: The myth about the taboo of marriage between the residents of Sepande Village and Banjarpoh Hamlet in Sidoarjo is part of a local tradition that is believed to bring bad luck, disaster, and even death. Although the majority in the area are Muslims, this myth is still believed by some people to this day. This article examines the views of Nahdlatul Ulama and Muhammadiyah village scholars on the myth of the prohibition of marriage between the residents of Sepande Village and Banjarpoh Hamlet. This type of research is empirical research using a sociological approach. The research data was obtained through interviews, observations and documentation. The data was analyzed comparatively to compare the opinions of the two scholars. The results of this study show that Nahdlatul Ulama and Muhammadiyah scholars agree against the myth of the prohibition of marriage between the people of Sepande and Banjarpoh, because they do not have a strong legal basis in Islam. According to the scholars of Nahdlatul Ulama, the myth is included in the category of 'urf fasid, which means it cannot be used as an argument (hujjah), but under certain conditions it can still be used socially as a form of prevention against non-kufu’ marriage for the sake of benefit. Meanwhile, Muhammadiyah scholars strongly reject all forms of myths that lack a basis in the Qur'an and Hadith. Keywords: Myths, prohibition of marriage, village scholar, Nahdlatul Ulama, Muhammadiyah. Abstrak: Mitos mengenai pantangan menikah antara warga Desa Sepande dan Dusun Banjarpoh di Sidoarjo merupakan bagian dari tradisi lokal yang diyakini dapat membawa kesialan, musibah, bahkan kematian. Meskipun mayoritas di daerah tersebut beragama Islam, tetapi mitos itu masih dipercaya sebagian masyarakat hingga saat ini. Artikel ini mengkaji tentang pandangan ulama desa  Nahdlatul Ulama dan Muhammadiyah terhadap mitos larangan menikah antara warga Desa Sepande dan Dusun Banjarpoh. Jenis penelitian ini adalah penelitian empiris dengan menggunakan pendekatan sosiologis. Data penelitian diperoleh melalui wawancara, observasi dan dokumentasi. Data tersebut dianalisis secara komparatif untuk membandingkan dua pendapat ulama tersebut. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukan bahwa ulama Nahdlatul Ulama dan Muhammadiyah sepakat menentang mitos larangan pernikahan antara warga Sepande dan Banjarpoh, karena tidak memiliki landasan hukum yang kuat di dalam Islam. Menurut ulama Nahdlatul Ulama mitos tersebut termasuk dalam kategori ‘urf fasid yang berarti tidak dapat digunakan sebagai hujjah, tetapi di dalam kondisi tertentu masih dapat digunakan secara sosial sebagai bentuk pencegahan terhadap pernikahan tidak sekufu’ demi kemaslahatan. Sementara itu, ulama Muhammadiyah menolak keras segala bentuk mitos yang tidak memiliki landasan dari Al-Qur'an dan Hadis. Kata Kunci: Mitos, larangan pernikahan, ulama desa, Nahdlatul Ulama, Muhammadiyah.  

Page 5 of 5 | Total Record : 49

 1   2   3   4   5 

Filter by Year

2021 2025


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 5 No. 2 (2025): December Vol. 5 No. 1 (2025): June Vol. 4 No. 2 (2024): Desember Vol. 4 No. 1 (2024): Juni Vol. 3 No. 2 (2023): Desember Vol. 3 No. 1 (2023): Juni Vol. 2 No. 2 (2022): Desember Vol. 2 No. 1 (2022): Juni Vol. 1 No. 2 (2021): Desember Vol. 1 No. 1 (2021): Juni