cover
Contact Name
Auliya Ghazna Nizami
Contact Email
auliyanizami@uinsa.ac.id
Phone
+6281915490279
Journal Mail Official
jurnalkomparatif@uinsa.ac.id
Editorial Address
Jl. Ahmad Yani No.117, Jemur Wonosari, Kec. Wonocolo, Surabaya, Jawa Timur 60237
Location
Kota surabaya,
Jawa timur
INDONESIA
Komparatif: Jurnal Perbandingan Hukum dan Pemikiran Islam
ISSN : -     EISSN : 30261643     DOI : https://doi.org/10.15642/komparatif.v3i2
The Komparatif furnishes an international and regional scholarly forum for research on Comparative Mazahib, Law, and Islamic Thought. Taking an expansive view of the subject, the journal brings together all disciplinary perspectives. It publishes peer-reviewed articles on the historical, cultural, social, philosophical, political, anthropological, literary, artistic and other aspects of Comparative Mazahib, Law, and Islamic Thought in all times and places.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 45 Documents
Hukum Bermain Catur Menurut Mazhab Syafi’i dan Mazhab Maliki Muiz, Moch. Zulkarnain
Komparatif: Jurnal Perbandingan Hukum dan Pemikiran Islam Vol. 1 No. 2 (2021): Desember
Publisher : Department of Comparative Mazhab Comparative, Fakulty of Shariah and Law

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15642/komparatif.v1i2.1125

Abstract

Abstract: This article discusses the laws of playing chess according to the Syafi'i and Maliki schools. This research is library research and qualitative. Data were collected through the books of the mazhab Syafi'i and Maliki scholars, then the collected data were analyzed descriptively comparatively. The Syafi'i school argues that the law of playing chess is makruh as long as it is not accompanied by gambling, dirty speech, and obligatory worship. The Maliki school argues that playing chess is haram because it is similar to dice. Based on the comparative analysis, the Syafi'i school and the Maliki school agree that it is forbidden to play chess if it is accompanied by gambling and if it causes dirty speech and neglects obligatory worship. The two schools differ in their opinion regarding the law of playing chess that the Syafi'i mazhab requires playing chess based on the fiqh rule "everything is allowed" and there is no clear passage about the law of playing chess. Meanwhile, the Maliki school of law forbids playing chess by accepting it with dice games. Keywords: Chess, Syafi'i school, Maliki school, Islamic law, comparative. Abstrak: Artikel ini membahas tentang hukum bermain catur menurut mazhab Syafi’i dan mazhab Maliki. Penelitian ini adalah penelitian pustaka dan kualitatif. Pengambilan data dilakukan melalui kitab-kitab karya ulama mazhab Syafi’i dan ulama mazhab Maliki, kemudian data yang terkumpul dianalisis secara deskriptif komparatif. Penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa mazhab Syafi’i berpendapat bahwa hukum bermain catur adalah makruh jika tidak disertai dengan judi, perkataan kotor dan melupakan ibadah wajib. Mazhab Maliki berpendapat bahwa bermain catur hukumnya haram. Permainan catur sama dengan permainan dadu. Berdasarkan analisis komparatif, mazhab Syafi’i dan mazhab Maliki sepakat mengharamkan bermain catur jika disertai dengan judi, dan jika menyebabkan keluarnya ucapan kotor dan melalaikan ibadah wajib. Kedua mazhab tersebut berbeda pendapat dalam hal hukum bermain catur, bahwa mazhab Syafi’i memakruhkan bermain catur berdasarkan kaidah fikih “al-ashl fi al-ashya’ al-ibahah/segala sesuatu adalah boleh”, karena tidak ada nas yang secara jelas menjelaskan tentang hukum bermain catur. Sedangkan mazhab Maliki mengharamkan secara mutlak hukum bermain catur dengan mengqiyaskannya dengan permainan dadu. Kata Kunci: Catur, mazhab Syafi’i, mazhab Maliki, hukum Islam, komparasi.
Studi Komparatif Pemikiran Muhammad Syahrur dan David S. Powers Tentang Hukum Waris Islam Rifqi, Muhammad Jazil
Komparatif: Jurnal Perbandingan Hukum dan Pemikiran Islam Vol. 1 No. 1 (2021): Juni
Publisher : Department of Comparative Mazhab Comparative, Fakulty of Shariah and Law

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15642/komparatif.v1i1.1162

Abstract

The thought of Islamic law always develops along with changing times, places, and social conditions, and this cannot be separated from the approach applied by every scientist in performing ijtihad. This article reveals a comparative study between Muhammad Syahrur and David S. Powers, who have different backgrounds in interpreting the law, especially inheritance. Syahrur has formal educational experience in the field of engineering. In turn, he studied Islam intensely, while Powers is indeed formally educated in the Islamic world, and although they both use different approaches, they almost have the same view. For Syahrur, there is no absolute specific percentage limit in wills, but the number of wills can be determined by the choices based on the best conditions, in his opinion. Likewise, with inheritance law, the 2: 1 rule for men and women is also not absolute. Under certain conditions, the distribution of property can be 1: 1. Meanwhile, Powers, this testamentary term, is increasingly related to Shahrur's inheritance. It is just that it is intended for heirs whom Ashabul Furudh blocks. Another term that Powers introduced was inheritance ab intestine which was no different from Shahrur's thought. However, it was valid for 2: 1 if the heir was in primary status and 1: 1 if the heir was in the second position.
Analisis Fatwa Jabatan Mufti Wilayah Persekutuan Malaysia Irsyad Al-Fatwa Ke 94 dengan Fatwa Majelis Ulama Indonesia Nomor 6 Tahun 2009 Tentang Otopsi Jenazah Hamdani, Mohd Asrul; Syafa’at, Abdul Kholiq
Komparatif: Jurnal Perbandingan Hukum dan Pemikiran Islam Vol. 1 No. 1 (2021): Juni
Publisher : Department of Comparative Mazhab Comparative, Fakulty of Shariah and Law

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15642/komparatif.v1i1.1186

Abstract

Autopsy is still unacceptable in the Islamic community. It is considered an act that hurts and destroys a corpse and also against Islamic law. The problem in this research is how the legal istinbāṭ method of autopsy for bodies according to the position of the 94th Mufti of the Malaysian Alliance Region Ersyad Al-Fatwa and the Fatwa of the Indonesian Ulama Council Number 6 of 2009 and how to compare the Position of the Mufti of the Malaysian Alliance Region, Irsyad Al-Fatwa 94 with the Fatwa of the Indonesian Ulema Council on legal istinbāṭ for autopsy bodies? This study is comparative study. The results, the Malaysian Association of Territory Mufti has determined that initially, it is legal to carry out an autopsy of a corpse to be permissible. Then it is legal to autopsy a body based on certain circumstances. The Indonesian Ulama Council also enforces the law on the autopsy of bodies as it must be based on certain circumstances. In a situation where a corpse autopsy is performed in order to save a still-living fetus in the womb of the corpse, it is mandatory.
Analisis Maqāṣid al-Sharī’ah Yusuf Qardhawi dan Abdullah Ibn Baz Tentang Hukum ‘Azl Trisnantaasari, Yullyta Eka
Komparatif: Jurnal Perbandingan Hukum dan Pemikiran Islam Vol. 1 No. 1 (2021): Juni
Publisher : Department of Comparative Mazhab Comparative, Fakulty of Shariah and Law

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15642/komparatif.v1i1.1213

Abstract

This study aims to describe Yusuf Qardawi and Abdul Aziz bin Abdullah bin Baz idea about the law of 'azl and find out the opinion of Yusuf Qardawi and Abdul Aziz bin Abdullah bin Baz about the law of 'azl in terms of Maqāṣ̱id shari'ah perspective. The purpose of marriage is that one of them wants to carry out a lineage, but some couples still want to focus on careers, work and managing economic problems, therefore they want to postpone pregnancy first, as for the way they are taken to prevent pregnancy, namely by doing 'azl. 'Azl is an effective way of not using other contraceptives. This study reviews about 'azl (interrupted intercourse) in the perspective of Maqāṣid shari'ah. The method that the author uses in this research is a qualitative method. In this study there are three data, namely primary, secondary, tertiary. The data collection method used by the author is a literature study in the form of data from various literary sources. The data analysis technique used by the author is descriptive data analysis. To explain analyzing the existing data, the author compares maqāṣid shari'ah against the views of Yusuf Qardawi with Abdul Aziz bin Abdullah bin Baz on the law of 'azl. The findings from this study are that Yusuf Qardhawi's opinion if 'azl is associated with Maqāṣid shari'ah then it is classified as a ḥājīyāt need. It because a married couple can manage pregnancy and the number of children they want, while the opinion of Abdul aziz bin Abdullah bin baz if 'azl is associated with Maqāṣid Shari'ah is classified as a dharūrīyat need because he wants Muslims to become many.
Hafalan dan Pengajaran Alquran sebagai Mahar Pernikahan Menurut Mazhab Hanafi dan Mazhab Syafi’i Al Ghifari, Hilman
Komparatif: Jurnal Perbandingan Hukum dan Pemikiran Islam Vol. 1 No. 1 (2021): Juni
Publisher : Department of Comparative Mazhab Comparative, Fakulty of Shariah and Law

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15642/komparatif.v1i1.1234

Abstract

Abstract: The complex development of the application of Islam has entered into various lines of life, including marriage. One of the growing trends in this millennial era is to make memorizing or reading the Koran use a marriage dowry for young people. However, many apply this only to fulfil their prestige without knowing the legal basis. Does this study discuss the opinion of the Hanafi School and the Shafi'i School in responding to the use of memorizing the Qur'an as a marriage dowry? Then what is the main argument for the two major schools of thought in determining opinions regarding memorizing the Qur'an as a marriage dowry? This research is descriptive-analytical with a comparative approach. The results of this study, Imam Shafi'i and the Shafi'i school, argue that the use of memorization and teaching of the Qur'an as a marriage dowry is permissible as long as the bride and groom express their willingness. Meanwhile, Imam Abu Hanifah and the Hanafi school stated that memorising and teaching the Qur'an as a marriage dowry is legally damaged (fasad) and must be replaced with a mitsil dowry. Keywords: dowry, marriage, memorization, teaching.   Abstrak: Perkembangan kompleks tentang penerapan agama Islam telah masuk ke berbagai lini kehidupan termasuk dalam pernikahan. Salah satu tren yang berkembang di zaman milenial ini adalah menjadikan hafalan atau bacaan Alquran sebagai mahar pernikahan bagi muda-mudi. Namun banyak yang menerapkan hal tersebut hanya untuk memenuhi gengsi tanpa mengetahui bagaimana dasar hukumnya. Penelitian ini membahas tentang bagaimana pendapat Mazhab Hanafi dan Mazhab Syafi’i dalam menyikapi penggunaan hafalan Alquran sebagai mahar pernikahan? Lalu dalil apakah yang menjadi dasar argumen utama bagi kedua mazhab besar tersebut dalam menentukan pendapat terkait penggunaan hafalan Alquran sebagai mahar pernikahan? Penelitian ini bersifat deskriptif-analitis dengan pendekatan komparatif. Hasil dari penelitian ini, Imam Syafi’i dan mazhab Syafi’i berpendapat bahwa penggunaan hafalan dan pengajaran Alquran sebagai mahar pernikahan itu dibolehkan selama kedua mempelai menyatakan kerelaannya. Sedangkan Imam Abu Hanifah dan mazhab Hanafi menyatakan bahwa penggunaan hafalan dan pengajaran Alquran sebagai mahar pernikahan status hukumnya adalah rusak (fasad) dan harus diganti dengan mahar mitsil. Kata Kunci: mahar, pernikahan, hafalan, pengajaran. 
Konsep Mahram Bagi Haji Wanita Perspektif Fikih Syafi’i dan Regulasi Pemerintah Arab Saudi Jawahirul Maknun, Ahmad; Nizami, Auliya Ghazna
Komparatif: Jurnal Perbandingan Hukum dan Pemikiran Islam Vol. 2 No. 2 (2022): Desember
Publisher : Department of Comparative Mazhab Comparative, Fakulty of Shariah and Law

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15642/komparatif.v2i2.1653

Abstract

Abstract: This study explains the concept of Mahram for Muslim women who wish to perform the pilgrimage. This research method uses a qualitative description approach. Collection of data from the sources of the books of the Shafi'i school of thought by reading, interpreting, observing, analyzing to be used as data for research purposes on the concept of mahram for women who perform the pilgrimage in Saudi Arabia in terms of the Shafi'i school. This type of thesis research is descriptive analysis and literature research. The process in this research found that, First, the government of Saudi Arabia allows women to go on pilgrimage without a mahram if a trusted travel agent shades the trip. Second, the application of the concept of mahram for women who perform the pilgrimage according to the Shafi'iyyah school is mandatory. Keywords: Mahram; Shafi’i School; Saudi Arabia; Pilgrimage Abstrak: Penelitian ini menejelaskan konsep Mahram bagi perempuan muslimah yang hendak menunaikan ibadah haji. Metode penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan deskripsi kualitatif. Pengumpulan data-data dari sumber kitab-kitab mazhab Syafi’i dengan membaca, mengartikan, mencermati, menelaah untuk dijadikan data keperluan penelitian penerapan  law bagi wanita yang menunaikan ibadah haji di Arab Saudi ditinjau dari mazhab Syafi’i. Jenis penelitian skripsi ini adalah deskriptif analisis dan penelitian pustaka. Proses dalam penelitian ini menemukan bahwa, Pertama, pemerintah Arab Saudi memperbolehkan haji perempuan tanpa mahram jika perjalanannya dinaungi oleh travel agent yang terpercaya. Kedua, penerapan konsep mahram  bagi wanita yang menunaikan ibadah haji menurut mazhab Shāfi’iyyah adalah wajib adanya. Kata Kunci: Mahram; Madhhab Syafi’i; Arab Saudi; Haji
Dinamika Lembaga Bahtsul Masail Nahdlatul Ulama: Studi Komparasi Fatwa Pencatatan Perkawinan sani, Kurnia
Komparatif: Jurnal Perbandingan Hukum dan Pemikiran Islam Vol. 1 No. 2 (2021): Desember
Publisher : Department of Comparative Mazhab Comparative, Fakulty of Shariah and Law

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15642/komparatif.v1i2.1673

Abstract

Abstract: This research seeks to find differences and similarities in fatwa products produced by several Bahtsul Masail Nahdlatul Ulama Institutions (LBM NU). This study focuses on fatwas related to the issue of registering marriages. There are still many unregistered marriages in Indonesia, which makes this research interesting. This research is library research. The data collection technique is through collecting documents and relevant data from primary data sources then supported by secondary data sources, then compared by comparing the fatwa of the Bahtsul Masail PWNU Yogyakarta institution and the fatwa of the Bahtsul Masail PBNU institution regarding marriage registration. The results of this study indicate that unregistered marriages raise pros and cons regarding the validity of the marriage. Keywords: Registration of Marriage; Bahtsul Masail NU; Fatwa   Abstrak: Penelitian ini berupaya untuk menemukan perbedaan dan persamaan produk fatwa yang dihasilkan oleh beberapa Lembaga Bahtsul Masail Nahdlatul Ulama (LBM NU). Penelitian ini berfokus pada fatwa yang berkaitan dengan isu pencatatan perkawinan. Fakta bahwa di Indonesia masih banyak terjadi perkawinan siri menjadikan penelitian ini menarik. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian pustaka. Teknik pengumpulan data yakni melalui mengumpulkan dokumen dan data-data yang relevan dari sumber data primer kemudian ditunjang dengan sumber data sekunder, kemudian dikomparasikan dengan membandingkan fatwa lembaga Bahtsul Masail PWNU Yogyakarta dan fatwa lembaga Bahtsul Masail PBNU mengenai pencatatan perkawinan. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa perkawinan yang tidak dicatatkan menimbulkan pro kontra mengenai keabsahan perkawinan. Kata Kunci: Pencatatan Perkawinan; Bahtsul Masail NU; Fatwa
Komparasi Pemikiran Wahbah Zuhaili dan Musdah Mulia tentang Penyelesaian Nusyuz Rahmayanti, Nurvita; Ulya, Zakiyatul
Komparatif: Jurnal Perbandingan Hukum dan Pemikiran Islam Vol. 2 No. 1 (2022): Juni
Publisher : Department of Comparative Mazhab Comparative, Fakulty of Shariah and Law

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15642/komparatif.v2i1.1679

Abstract

bstract: Marriage is a legal bond between a man and a woman as husband and wife to form a prosperous and happy family. Not infrequently, domestic life is not always harmonious; differences of opinion cause fights and even blame each other. Each partner has rights and obligations that must be carried out according to applicable regulations. If they violate these provisions, it can be said to be nusyuz. Wahbah Zuhaili and Musdah Mulia have different opinions regarding the concept and completion of nusyuz. This study aims to discover the concept and completion of nusyuz according to Wahbah Zuhaili and Musdah Mulia. The research method used by the researcher is Library Research or literature study. The differences in opinion between Wahbah Zuhaili and Musdah Mulia focused on several aspects, one of which was the completion of nusyuz at the final stage and also the meaning of waḍribūhunna in verse An-Nisa' verse 34. In addition to differences, both of them also have similarities of opinion such as nusyuz can be done by the wife or husband. Keywords: Musdah Mulia, Nusyuz, Wahbah Zuhaili. Abstrak: Pernikahan adalah suatu ikatan yang sah antara laki-laki dan perempuan sebagai suami istri untuk membentuk sebuah keluarga yang sejahtera dan bahagia. Tak jarang dalam kehidupan rumah tangga tidak selalu harmonis dan terjadi pertengkaran yang disebabkan perbedaan pendapat bahkan menyalahkan satu sama lain. Setiap pasangan memiliki hak dan kewajiban yang harus dilaksanakan sesuai peraturan yang berlaku, jika melanggar ketentuan tersebut maka hal tersebut dapat dikatakan sebagai nusyuz. Wahbah Zuhaili dan Musdah Mulia memiliki perbedaan pendapat mengenai konsep serta penyelesaian nusyuz. Tujuan dari penelitian ini untuk mengetahui bagaimana konsep dan penyelesaian nusyuz menurut Wahbah Zuhaili dan Musdah Mulia. Metode penelitian yang digunakan oleh peneliti yaitu Library Research atau studi pustaka. Perbedaan pendapat Wahbah Zuhaili dan Musdah Mulia terfokus pada beberapa aspek salah satunya penyelesaian nusyuz pada tahap akhir dan juga makna tentang waḍribūhunna dalam ayat An-Nisa’ ayat 34. Selain perbedaan, keduanya juga memiliki persamaan pendapat seperti nusyuz dapat dilakukan pihak istri maupun suami. Kata Kunci: Musdah Mulia, Nusyuz, Wahbah Zuhaili.
Hukum Akad Bahaupan di Masa Pandemi Covid-19 pada Kota Banjarmasin Perspektif Mazhab Hanafi dengan Mazhab Syafi’i Fadillah, Rahmat Fadillah
Komparatif: Jurnal Perbandingan Hukum dan Pemikiran Islam Vol. 2 No. 2 (2022): Desember
Publisher : Department of Comparative Mazhab Comparative, Fakulty of Shariah and Law

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15642/komparatif.v2i2.1680

Abstract

Abstract: During the COVID-19 pandemic, many economic obstacles were inevitable in the Banjarmasin City area of South Kalimantan province. Various efforts are made to maintain the course of the economy in this region, and all strategies are implemented. However, one contract system can still survive, namely the Bahaupan contract system, owned by Banjar community in Banjarmasin. This is empirical research with a legal sociology approach through observation media and direct interviews with economic entrepreneurs during the COVID-19 pandemic. As for some of the results found, the Bahaupan contract can still be used during the pandemic; entrepreneurs use the latest ways to manage their businesses during the Pandemic and still always increase caution in carrying out economic activities. Keywords: Jurisprudence; Bahaupan Contract System; Covid-19 Abstrak: Di masa pandemi Covid-19 banyak sekali terjadi kendala dalam perekonomian, tidak terelakkan juga pada wilayah Kota Banjarmasin Provinsi Kalimantan Selatan. Berbagai upaya dilakukan untuk mempertahankan jalannya perekonomian di wilayah ini semua strategi dijalankan. Akan tetapi, tampaknya masih ada satu sistem akad yang masih dapat bertahan, yaitu sistem akad Bahaupan yang merupakan sistem akad yang dimiliki oleh masyarakat Banjar di Kota Banjarmasin. Penelitian ini bersifat penelitian empiris dengan pendekatan sosilogi hukum, melalui media observasi dan wawancara langsung di lapangan kepada para pengusaha ekonomi dimasa pandemi Covid-19. Adapun beberapa hasil yang ditemukan adalah akad Bahaupan masih bisa digunakan di masa Pandemi, para pengusaha menggunakan cara-cara terbaru dalam mengelola usahannya di masa Pandemi, dan tetap selalu meningkatkan kehati-hatian dalam melangsungkan kegiatan perekonomian. Kata Kunci: Hukum; Akad Bahaupan; Covid-19.
Analisis terhadap Hasil Pemikiran Yusuf Qardhawi Berkenaan Nikah Misyar menurut Ulama Nahdhatul Ulama dan Muhammadiyah Kota Malang Kholil, Ahmad; Kasuwi Saiban; R. Cecep Lukman Yasin
Komparatif: Jurnal Perbandingan Hukum dan Pemikiran Islam Vol. 2 No. 1 (2022): Juni
Publisher : Department of Comparative Mazhab Comparative, Fakulty of Shariah and Law

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15642/komparatif.v2i1.1682

Abstract

Abstract: The purpose of this research is to find out the views of NU and Muhammadiyah scholars in Malang regarding Yusur Qardhawi's thoughts regarding misyar marriage. This research falls under the umbrella of qualitative descriptive research or empirical studies. Sort the information collected from interviews and documents into primary, secondary, and tertiary data, then edit, categorize, verify, and analyze. Based on these findings, the following can be put forward the views of NU and Muhammadiyah Malang clerics regarding Yusuf Qardhawi's fatwa regarding misyar marriage: first, NU and Muhammadiyah Malang ulema are of the view that misyar marriage is permissible as long as the conditions and pillars are met. On the second point, NU and Muhammadiyah clerics in the city of Malang said that maqashidun marriages in misyar marriages are possible but underutilized. Third, NU and Muhammadiyah clerics in the city of Malang are of the view that only a small part of the rights and obligations of husband and wife are fulfilled in misyar marriages. There is a strong tendency among NU scholars, especially those leaning towards the Shafi'i school, to consult the canonical works of the four schools in forming their own opinions. Muhammadiyah scholars, meanwhile, cite the Al-Qur'an and as-Sunnah as their main sources; they can also cite additional opinions from one of the four schools of thought, but only if both are authoritative and do not conflict with the Qur'an and As-Sunnah. Keywords: Nahdlatul Ulama, Muhammadiyah, Misyar Marriage   Abstrak: Tujuan penelitian berikut adalah untuk mengetahui pandangan ulama NU serta Muhammadiyah kota Malang menyikapi pemikiran Yusur Qardhawi berkenaan nikah misyar. Riset berikut berada di bawah payung penelitian deskriptif kualitatif atau studi empiris. Urutan informasi yang dikumpulkan dari wawancara dan dokumen menjadi data primer, sekunder, dan tersier, lalu edit, kategorikan, verifikasi, dan analisis. Berdasarkan temuan-temuan tersebut, berikut dapat dikemukakan pandangan ulama NU dan Muhammadiyah Malang terhadap fatwa Yusuf Qardhawi berkenaan nikah misyar: Pertama, ulama NU dan Muhammadiyah Malang berpandangan bahwasanya nikah misyar diperbolehkan selama syarat dan pilar terpenuhi. Pada poin kedua, ulama NU serta Muhammadiyah kota Malang mengatakan bahwasanya pernikahan maqashidun dalam pernikahan misyar dimungkinkan tetapi kurang dimanfaatkan. Ketiga, ulama NU serta Muhammadiyah kota Malang berpandangan bahwasanya hanya sebagian kecil dari hak serta kewajiban suami istri yang terpenuhi pada pernikahan misyar. Ada kecenderungan kuat di kalangan ulama NU, terutama yang condong ke mazhab Syafi'i, untuk mengkonsultasikan karya kanonik keempat mazhab tersebut dalam membentuk pendapatnya sendiri. Para ulama Muhammadiyah, sementara itu, mengutip Al-Qur'an dan as-Sunnah dijadikan sumber utama mereka; mereka juga dapat mengutip pendapat tambahan dari salah satu dari empat mazhab, tetapi hanya jika keduanya otoritatif serta tidak bersebrangan dengan Al-Qur'an serta As-Sunnah. Kata Kunci: Nahdlatul Ulama, Muhammadiyah, Nikah Misyar