cover
Contact Name
Maulida Agustina
Contact Email
civilizapub@gmail.com
Phone
+6285235594596
Journal Mail Official
civilizapub@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Jln. Nori 14A Beduri, Ponorogo, Jawa Timur
Location
Unknown,
Unknown
INDONESIA
Rechtsvinding
Published by Civiliza Publishing
ISSN : -     EISSN : 29874424     DOI : https://doi.org/10.59525/rechtsvinding
This journal is published by Civiliza Publishing twice a year (June an December). The presence of the journal accommodates scientific writings from the academic community, researchers, students, and practices in Sharia Economic Law and law that have good values ​​and high rationality. The scope of the discussion about sharia economic law (muamalah) with sharia principle and values.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 173 Documents
Legal Relationship in The Subsidized Fertilizer Purchase and Sale Contract between CV Prima Tani and Toko Iffah Widya Cahya Nabila; Suarlan Datupalinge; Muhammad Ikbal
Rechtsvinding Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026)
Publisher : Civiliza Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59525/rechtsvinding.1822

Abstract

This study aims to examine the nature of the legal relationship between CV Prima Tani and Toko Iffah regarding the sales contract for subsidized fertilizer. A normative legal research method was employed. The findings indicate that the legal relationship between CV Prima Tani acting as the seller or distributor and Toko Iffah acting as the buyer or authorized retailer of subsidized fertilizer is grounded in a sales contract that establishes rights and obligations for both parties. CV Prima Tani is obligated to supply and deliver subsidized fertilizer in accordance with established stipulations regarding quantity, type, quality, and distribution mechanisms, while Toko Iffah is obligated to make payments and distribute the fertilizer to farmers in compliance with applicable regulations. However, implementation challenges persist, such as distribution delays, limited fertilizer availability, and varying levels of understanding among the parties regarding administrative requirements and regulations governing subsidized fertilizer. The study concludes that the sales contract between CV Prima Tani and Toko Iffah has established a binding legal relationship based on the principles of freedom of contract and good faith, as well as statutory provisions. Consequently, there is a need for improved adherence to distribution procedures and more effective oversight to ensure the contract is executed in an orderly manner and yields benefits for the farming community.
Dispute Resolution Through Local Institutional Mechanisms in the Baduy Indigenous People and Their Relevance to National Legal Pluralism Muhammad Tahsin Roy; Iwan Darmawan; Mahipal Mahipal
Rechtsvinding Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026)
Publisher : Civiliza Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59525/rechtsvinding.1828

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the dispute resolution mechanism through local institutions in the Baduy indigenous people and its relevance to national legal pluralism in Indonesia. On the one hand, the Baduy customary mechanism based on the philosophy of pikukuh and the concept of mutual forgiveness has proven to be effective in resolving conflicts quickly, participatoryly, and oriented towards restoring social-spiritual harmony at no cost. However, on the other hand, its implementation faces structural and normative challenges when interacting with the formal justice system, such as the lack of documentation of decisions, the lack of standardized due process, and the potential for overlapping jurisdictions. This study uses a normative-empirical legal approach with a qualitative case study method, through the analysis of regulatory documents, literature reviews, and in-depth interviews with key sources. The results of the study show that the local institutions of Baduy are in substantive harmony with the principles of restorative justice and preventive legal protection, but their constitutional recognition is still partial at the field level. This study recommends a complementary harmonization model that includes: (1) declarative registration of customary decisions as a peace deed in the District Court, (2) the preparation of institutional collaboration protocols (MoU/Joint Decree), (3) joint training on the principles of restorative justice and human rights, and (4) continuous legal assistance. Thus, the coexistence of customary law and national law can be realized in a healthy manner without sacrificing cultural autonomy and guarantees of human rights protection.
Legal Standing and Liability of Grabfood Drivers Vis-À-Vis Consumers within Grabfood Services Indra Aditama I. Dunggio; Syamsuddin Baco; Marini Citra Dewi
Rechtsvinding Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026)
Publisher : Civiliza Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59525/rechtsvinding.1829

Abstract

This study aims to determine the legal status of GrabFood drivers in the legal relationship between the application provider company, consumers, and business actors, as well as to analyze the legal responsibilities of GrabFood drivers towards consumers in the provision of GrabFood services. The research method used is normative legal research. The results of the study indicate that the legal status of GrabFood drivers in the provision of GrabFood services is as a working partner of the application provider company whose task is to carry out order delivery services from business actors to consumers. The legal relationship between drivers and the company is based on a partnership agreement, while the relationship between consumers and the application provider arises from an electronic agreement made through the GrabFood application. In carrying out the service, drivers have an obligation to carry out delivery tasks in accordance with operational standards set by the company and maintain the security and condition of orders until they are received by consumers. This study also shows that the legal responsibility of GrabFood drivers towards consumers can arise if the driver commits negligence or errors that result in losses for consumers, such as delivering the wrong order, losing the order, damaging food during the delivery process, or taking actions that are contrary to the terms of service.