cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Nirwana Halide
Contact Email
nirwanahalide27@iainpalopo.ac.id
Phone
+6282133723363
Journal Mail Official
jurnal_dalrev@iainpalopo.ac.id
Editorial Address
Prodi Hukum Tata Negara (Siyasah), Fakultas Syariah, Institut Agama Islam Negeri Palopo Jln. Agatis, Kel. Balandai, Kec. Bara, Kota Palopo 91914
Location
Kota palopo,
Sulawesi selatan
INDONESIA
Datuk Sulaiman Law Review (DaLRev)
Published by Institut Agama Islam Negeri Palopo
ISSN : -     EISSN : 27466205     DOI : https://doi.org/10.24256/dalrev.v3i2.2989
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences
DALREV : Datuk Sulaiman Law Review is a double-blind peer-reviewed journal published by the Constitutional Law Study Program, Faculty of Sharia, IAIN Palopo, Indonesia. The journal publishes research, conceptual, and book reviews of Constitutional Law.
Arjuna Subject : Umum - Umum
Articles 82 Documents
 5   6   7   8   9 
KEWAJIBAN MORAL DAN KEWAJIBAN HUKUM: KAJIAN FILSAFAT HUKUM DENGAN RELEVANSI BAGI DISKURSUS HUKUM INDONESIA Wawan Haryanto
Datuk Sulaiman Law Review (DaLRev) Vol 6 No 2 (2025): Datuk Sulaiman Law Review (DaLReV)
Publisher : Program Studi Hukum Tata Negara (Siyasah) IAIN Palopo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24256/dalrev.v6i2.9759

Abstract

This article examines the conceptual relationship between moral obligation and legal obligation through a normative philosophy of law approach. By analyzing the theories of Hans Kelsen, H. L. A. Hart, Lon Fuller, and John Finnis, the study formulates a conceptual framework for understanding how moral norms and legal norms are interconnected, how they differ, and how they may reinforce one another. Special attention is given to the relevance of this discourse within the Indonesian legal context, particularly in understanding: (1) conflicts between conscience and the duty to obey the law; (2) the foundations of legal legitimacy beyond mere procedural formality; (3) the role of morality in the processes of lawmaking and legal interpretation; and (4) normative critiques of laws deemed unjust. The article concludes that although moral obligations and legal obligations can be conceptually distinguished, a stable and legitimate legal system requires a meaningful integration of moral dimensions as its normative foundation—especially in a pluralistic society such as Indonesia, which recognizes Pancasila as the foundational legal principle embodying moral values.
ELITE CAPTURE IN AGRARIAN REFORM: AN ANALYSIS OF NORMATIVE VULNERABILITY IN INDONESIA Nurul Adliyah; Rizka Amelia Armin; Mustaming Mustaming; Hamsah Hasan
Datuk Sulaiman Law Review (DaLRev) Vol 6 No 2 (2025): Datuk Sulaiman Law Review (DaLReV)
Publisher : Program Studi Hukum Tata Negara (Siyasah) IAIN Palopo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24256/dalrev.v6i2.9736

Abstract

Contestation over land rights involving communities, corporations, and the state indicates that the agrarian reform agenda in Indonesia has not been fully realized. Normatively, agrarian reform is positioned as a corrective measure to address land tenure inequality, while promoting social justice and enhancing the welfare of smallholder farmers. Through the existing schemes, state land and land released from forest areas are intended to be redistributed to priority beneficiaries, particularly small farmers, indigenous peoples, and other vulnerable groups. However, its implementation reveals a tendency toward elite capture, as evidenced by the inclusion of actors possessing superior political, economic, and social power as beneficiaries, which may potentially displace the intended priority groups. This study aims to analyze the normative vulnerabilities within Indonesia’s agrarian reform legal framework that enable such practices. It employs normative legal research using statutory and conceptual approaches. The findings demonstrate that agrarian reform implementation remains dominated by asset legalization oriented toward administrative outputs and has not fully promoted structural transformation in land tenure. The existing regulatory framework contains normative vulnerabilities, reflected in the open-textured formulation of beneficiary criteria, heavy reliance on administrative discretion during verification processes, and weak post-redistribution monitoring mechanisms. These vulnerabilities create a legal opportunity structure for the expansion of patronage and elite capture, which may reproduce land inequality. This article argues that elite capture should not be viewed merely as an implementation failure but as a consequence of a normative design insufficiently insulated from power asymmetries.

Page 9 of 9 | Total Record : 82

 5   6   7   8   9 

Filter by Year

2020 2025


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 6 No 2 (2025): Datuk Sulaiman Law Review (DaLReV) Vol 6 No 1 (2025): Datuk Sulaiman Law Review (DaLReV) Vol 5 No 2 (2024): Datuk Sulaiman Law Review (DaLReV) Vol 5 No 1 (2024): Datuk Sulaiman Law Review (DaLRev) Vol 4 No 2 (2023): Datuk Sulaiman Law Review (DaLRev) Vol 4 No 1 (2023): Datuk Sulaiman Law Review (DaLRev) Vol 3 No 2 (2022): Datuk Sulaiman Law Review (DaLRev) Vol 3 No 1 (2022): Datuk Sulaiman Law Review (DaLRev) Vol 1 No 1 (2020): Datuk Sulaiman Law Review (DaLRev)