cover
Contact Name
Ritria Novidiyanti
Contact Email
ritria@untag-smd.ac.id
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
ritria@untag-smd.ac.id
Editorial Address
Jl. Ir. H. Juanda, Kotak Pos No. 1052 SAMARINDA 75124, Samarinda, Provinsi Kalimantan Timur, 75123
Location
Kota samarinda,
Kalimantan timur
INDONESIA
LEGALITAS : Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Hukum
ISSN : 2597968x     EISSN : 25488244     DOI : http://dx.doi.org/10.31293/lg
Core Subject : Social,
Legalitas: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Hukum is an open access and peer-reviewed journal that aims to offer an international academic platform for cross-border legal research in goverment regulation, particularly in developing and emerging countries. These may include but are not limited to various fields such as: the practice of international law, human rights law, civil law, criminal law, constitutional and administrative law, legal pluralism governance, and another section related to contemporary issues in legal scholarship. The journal sets up specific topic to be covered in each issue which can be analyzed from many perspective of laws as mentioned. However, in each issue we also accommodate latest issue of legal development in general
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 161 Documents
PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM DIREKSI DAN PEMEGANG SAHAM DALAM PEMBUBARAN PERSEROAN TERBATAS TIDAK AKTIF DITINJAU DARI PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG NO 1618 K/PDT/2016 Aprilia, Jessica; Syukri, Wildan; Ekklesia, Anggraini; Maria, Chindy; Hidayah, Nur; Adawiyah, Rabiatul; Alhasni, Almaidah; Damaiyanti, Tri
LEGALITAS : Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Hukum Vol 10, No 2 (2025)
Publisher : Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Samarinda

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31293/lg.v10i2.9247

Abstract

This article discusses the legal analysis of the dissolution of an inactive Limited Liability Company (PT) by highlighting Supreme Court Decision Number 1618 K/PDT/2016 as the main focus. The main focus of the study is how the decision strengthens legal certainty and protection of the rights of the parties in the process of dissolving a PT that no longer carries out business activities. In practice, there are many PTs that no longer carry out business activities, but are still legally registered, causing uncertainty for both internal and external parties. The Supreme Court's decision is an important reference in determining whether an inactive PT can be dissolved through a legal mechanism without the decision of the General Meeting of Shareholders (GMS). This research uses normative juridical method with legislative approach and decision study. The results of the analysis show that the decision provides a positive precedent in ensuring legal certainty for the parties involved in the dissolution of an inactive PT, and emphasizes that dissolution can be carried out through the court if the legal requirements are met. In addition, legal protection for directors and shareholders is maintained as long as the dissolution process is carried out in accordance with applicable legal procedures. Thus, this decision strengthens the role of the court in maintaining orderly corporate administration and protecting the legal interests of the parties.