cover
Contact Name
Muannif Ridwan
Contact Email
indragirilawreview@gmail.com
Phone
+6282250112790
Journal Mail Official
indragirilawreview@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Program Studi Pascasarjana Magister Hukum Universitas Islam Indragiri. Editorial Address: Jl. Soebrantas, Tembilahan Hilir, Kec. Tembilahan, Kabupaten Indragiri Hilir, Riau 29281.
Location
Kab. indragiri hilir,
Riau
INDONESIA
Indragiri Law Review
ISSN : -     EISSN : 30314186     DOI : https://doi.org/10.32520/ilr.v2i1
Core Subject : Social,
Focus and scope : Criminal Law, Civil Law, Constitutional Law, International Law, Administrative Law, Islamic Law, Business Law, Medical Law, Environmental Law, Customary Law, Agrarian Law, Legal Philosophy, international regime law, legal pluralism governance, and other sections related to contemporary issues in legal scholarship.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 79 Documents
Kepastian Hukum dalam Pelaksanaan Asas Kebebasan Berkontrak pada Perjanjian Kredit KPR di Bank BNI Tembilahan Nia Susanti; Fitri Wahyuni; Wandi
Indragiri Law Review Vol. 3 No. 2 (2025): Indragiri Law Review
Publisher : Program Studi Pascasarjana Magister Hukum Universitas Islam Indragiri

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32520/ilr.v3i2.203

Abstract

This research originates from the imbalance of positions between banks and customers in Mortgage (KPR) credit agreements. Although the freedom of contract principle is guaranteed under Article 1338 KUH Perdata, in practice, the agreements are unilaterally determined by the bank. This study aims to deeply understand how legal certainty is implemented in the application of the freedom of contract principle in mortgage credit agreements at Bank BNI Tembilahan Branch, as well as to identify the obstacles and efforts made to achieve it. This research employs empirical legal methods with a descriptive approach. Data were collected through in-depth interviews with bank officials, notaries, and customers, as well as document analysis of 30 mortgage credit agreements at Bank BNI Tembilahan Branch for the period 2021-2024. The findings reveal that normatively, the freedom of contract principle has been fulfilled through the existence of a written agreement between the bank and the debtor. However, in practice, this freedom is limited because the agreements use a standard contract format unilaterally prepared by the bank. The main obstacles include customers' lack of understanding of the contract clauses, the dominance of exoneration clauses benefiting the bank, and the potential for default due to unforeseen economic factors. As efforts to ensure legal certainty, Bank BNI Tembilahan Branch conducts socialization of the agreement contents, involves notaries/land deed officials in collateral binding, provides a credit restructuring mechanism for troubled customers, and establishes clear collateral execution procedures in accordance with applicable laws and regulations. This research underscores the need for balance between banking business efficiency and the protection of customer rights as consumers.
Analisis Kepastian Hukum Putusan Pra Peradilan Terhadap Tersangka Tindak Pidana Korupsi (Studi Putusan Pra Peradilan Nomor:02/Pid.Pra/2022/Pntbh) Zainuddin Kasim; Fitri Wahyuni; Ali Azhar
Indragiri Law Review Vol. 3 No. 2 (2025): Indragiri Law Review
Publisher : Program Studi Pascasarjana Magister Hukum Universitas Islam Indragiri

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32520/ilr.v3i2.204

Abstract

This study explores the challenges of legal certainty within pretrial institutions in Indonesia, particularly in the context of corruption. The study focuses on Pretrial Decision Number 02/Pid.Pra/2022/PN Tembilahan, which annulled Indra Muchlis Adnan's suspect status. Problems arise when investigators frequently ignore the effectiveness of the final and binding pretrial decision through re-determination of the suspect. Using a normative juridical research method with a case-based and statutory approach, the results show that legal certainty is not achieved absolutely due to ambiguity in the implementation of new evidence (novum) as stipulated in PERMA No. 4 of 2016. The study concludes that the judicial oversight function must be strengthened so that pretrial proceedings are not merely procedural formalities but rather substantive protectors of the suspect's human rights.
Eksistensi Putusan Dewan Kehormatan Penyelenggara Pemilu (Dkpp) Terhadap Pelanggaran Kode Etik Ditinjau Dari Perspektif Kepastian Hukum Erwin Syarif; Wandi; Ali Azhar
Indragiri Law Review Vol. 3 No. 2 (2025): Indragiri Law Review
Publisher : Program Studi Pascasarjana Magister Hukum Universitas Islam Indragiri

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32520/ilr.v3i2.207

Abstract

The decision of the Election Organizers Ethics Council (DKPP) regarding violations of the Code of Ethics, once made, has immediate legal force and direct legal consequences for the election organizers. The Bawaslu (Election Supervisory Board) is obligated to supervise the implementation of this decision, and legally, every decision made by DKPP must be executed by the concerned parties. The research questions in this study are as follows: 1. What is the philosophical and juridical foundation of the position of DKPP in enforcing violations of the election organizers' code of ethics? 2. How is the existence of the DKPP's decision in response to violations of the code of ethics viewed from the perspective of legal certainty?.The approach used in this research is a normative juridical method, which involves processing secondary data obtained from library studies such as official documents, books, and laws related to the research issues. The author uses theories and concepts of democratization, authority, and legal certainty. The results of the research and discussion indicate that the position of DKPP's decision, based on DKPP Regulation No. 1 of 2013 concerning the Code of Ethics Procedural Guidelines for Election Organizers, stipulates that the decision is "final and binding." Furthermore, a judicial review was conducted in the Constitutional Court Decision No. 31/PUU-XI/2013, leading to a change in which the decision is final and binding only for the President, KPU (General Elections Commission), and Bawaslu as election organizers. Regarding the decision of the DKPP, the State Administrative Court (PTUN) can test the substance of DKPP's decision. The existence of DKPP's decision in enforcing the code of ethics for election organizers has significant implications in ensuring the integrity of elections. Institutionally, DKPP is classified as an independent supporting state institution.
Sengketa Pers: Pencemaran Nama Baik Menurut UU ITE dan UU Pers Ramadana; Siti Rahma; Syariffuddin
Indragiri Law Review Vol. 3 No. 3 (2025): Indragiri Law Review
Publisher : Program Studi Pascasarjana Magister Hukum Universitas Islam Indragiri

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32520/ilr.v3i3.217

Abstract

This study examines legal issues regarding press disputes arising from alleged defamation in online media, which often lead to legal uncertainty and the risk of criminalization against journalists. The objectives are to analyze applicable legal provisions and formulate dispute resolution mechanisms consistent with the principles of press freedom and professional responsibility. This research uses a normative legal method with statutory, conceptual, and case approaches. The findings reveal overlapping regulations between the Electronic Information and Transactions Law as general law and the Press Law as specific law. Under the principle of lex specialis derogat legi generali, journalists working in accordance with journalistic standards shall have their disputes resolved through non-criminal procedures at the Press Council. In contrast, reporting that fails to meet professional standards may be subject to general legal provisions. It is concluded that press disputes should be prioritized for resolution through the Press Council mechanism, while criminal law may only be applied if malicious intent or false information is proven.
Penerapan Asas Kepastian Hukum, Keadilan dan Kemanfaatan Pada Putusan PK Nomor 171/Pk/Ag/2022 Tentang Hak Asuh Bersama Perspektif Undang-Undang dan Maqasid Al-Syari’ah Gushairi
Indragiri Law Review Vol. 3 No. 3 (2025): Indragiri Law Review
Publisher : Program Studi Pascasarjana Magister Hukum Universitas Islam Indragiri

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32520/ilr.v3i2.149

Abstract

Penetapan hak asuh anak di Indonesia mengalami pergeseran yakni adanya putusan hak asuh bersama yang diputuskan oleh Majelis Peninjauan Kembali sebagaimana dalam perkara Nomor 171/Pk/Ag/2022. Metode penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan yuridis normative dan penelitian kualitatif dan untuk mengumpulkan data-data yang akurat, penelitian ini mengambil data dari beberapa sumber, seperti Dokumentasi, dan wawancara. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa beberapa pola putusan hakim dalam menetapkan hak asuh anak, seperti hak asuh diberikan kepada ibu, diberikan kepada ayah, dan juga ada pola hak asuh bersama yang didasarkan kepada kepentingan terbaik bagi anak. Penetapan hak asuh bersama telah memenuhi asas kepastian hukum, keadilan, dan kemanfaatan hukum, serta jika dilihat dari sisi maqashid al-syari’ah telah menggunakan pertimbangan maslahah (efek positif) dan menghindari mafsadat (efek negatif). Namun demikian, menetapkan hak asuh anak di Indonesia, perlu adanya perubahan dalam Undang-Undang Perkawinan dan Kompilasi Hukum Islam terkait hak asuh anak dengan memasukkan konsep pengasuhan bersama, yakni legal custody dan physical custody, seperti pendidikan, paham keagamaan, kesehatan, dokumen-dokumen negara dan lain-lain. Selain itu, Majelis Hakim dalam memeriksa dan mengadili hak asuh anak agar dapat melihat dengan baik kepentingan terbaik bagi anak, dengan menyampaikan maslahat-maslahat dan mafsadat-mafsadat dalam menetapkan hak asuh bersama.
Transformasi Regulasi Dan Kebijakan Hukum Pidana Dalam Ekosistem Bisnis Digital Di Indonesia Asneliwarni; Aris Irawan; Fitri Wahyuni
Indragiri Law Review Vol. 3 No. 2 (2025): Indragiri Law Review
Publisher : Program Studi Pascasarjana Magister Hukum Universitas Islam Indragiri

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32520/ilr.v3i2.157

Abstract

The reconstruction of criminal provisions that correspond to the characteristics of electronic transactions and legal relationships in digital spaces has become increasingly urgent within Indonesia’s evolving digital economy. Regulatory dynamics demonstrate normative fragmentation, overlapping statutory frameworks, and unclear boundaries of criminal liability among legal subjects, particularly business actors, digital platform providers, and users. Such conditions generate legal uncertainty and create the risk of overcriminalization in digital business practices. This article aims to analyze the transformation of regulatory frameworks and criminal provisions within Indonesia’s digital business ecosystem and to identify the challenges of legal certainty in ensuring balanced protection for business actors and consumers. The research adopts a normative legal method, employing statutory and conceptual approaches. Primary legal materials include the Law on Electronic Information and Transactions, the Consumer Protection Law, the Trade Law, the Personal Data Protection Law, as well as criminal provisions under the Indonesian Criminal Code and related sectoral regulations. The findings indicate that regulatory transformation has not been adequately accompanied by proportionate and integrated criminal policy formulation, resulting in ambiguity regarding the legal status of digital platforms and uncertainty in the construction of criminal liability. Consequently, a harmonized regulatory model and the reconstruction of criminal provisions grounded in the principles of balanced legal protection, proportional liability, and the doctrine of ultimum remedium are necessary to establish adaptive, equitable, and responsive legal certainty within Indonesia’s digital economy
Upaya Banding Administratif Atas Keputusan Tata Usaha Negara Dalam Perspektif Kepastian Hukum (Studi Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2014 Tentang Administrasi Pemerintahan) M. Naufal; Jamri; Herdiansyah
Indragiri Law Review Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026): Indragiri Law Review
Publisher : Program Studi Pascasarjana Magister Hukum Universitas Islam Indragiri

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32520/ilr.v4i1.243

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the regulation of administrative appeals against State Administrative Decisions under Law Number 30 of 2014 on Government Administration, examine administrative appeals from the perspective of legal certainty, and identify the factors affecting their effectiveness. This research employs a normative legal research method using statutory, conceptual, and case approaches. The findings indicate that Law Number 30 of 2014 provides a legal basis for administrative appeals as a form of legal protection prior to litigation before the State Administrative Court. However, the existing regulation does not comprehensively govern the examination procedures, resulting in potential legal uncertainty. The effectiveness of administrative appeals is influenced by legal substance, institutional structure, legal culture, compliance with the General Principles of Good Governance, and the harmonization of legislation. Therefore, strengthening the regulatory framework and institutional capacity is essential to ensure legal certainty in the settlement of administrative disputes.
Perspektif Pembuktian Terhadap Tindak Pidana Cabul Berdasarkan Laporan Polisi (Studi Kasus Di Kepolisian Sektor Concong, Kabupaten Indragiri Hilir) Asdiansyah; Vivi Arfiani Siregar; KMS. Novyar Satriawan Fikri
Indragiri Law Review Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026): Indragiri Law Review
Publisher : Program Studi Pascasarjana Magister Hukum Universitas Islam Indragiri

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32520/ilr.v4i1.249

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the perspective of evidence in the crime of indecent acts (cabul) based on a police report at the Concong Sector Police, and to identify the obstacles encountered in the evidentiary process. This research employs an empirical (sociological) legal research method with a descriptive-analytical approach, using primary data obtained through interviews with investigators, the suspect, the victim, and witnesses, supported by secondary data from statutes, legal literature, and prior research. The findings indicate that evidence in cases of indecent acts against minors is built primarily upon witness testimony, including the unsworn statement of the child victim under Article 171 of the Criminal Procedure Code, which is strengthened when consistent with other witness statements, expert testimony in the form of a medical examination report (visum et repertum), and the statement of the suspect, in accordance with the minimum evidentiary standard of Article 183 and Article 184 of the Criminal Procedure Code. However, the evidentiary process faces several obstacles, namely the private and non-witnessed nature of the offence, the psychological vulnerability of the child victim in providing testimony, the time gap between the incident and medical examination, and the reluctance of the community to report such cases. Therefore, strengthening victim-sensitive investigative techniques and multidisciplinary cooperation between investigators, medical personnel, and psychologists is essential to achieve legal certainty and justice for the victim.
Pelaksanaan Restoratif Justice Terhadap Penyelesaian Perkara Tindak Pidana Kecelakaan Lalu Lintas Kepolisian Resor Indragiri Hilir Alwi Radi Pria Sabra; Vivi Arfiani Siregar; Bambang Sasmita Adi Putra
Indragiri Law Review Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026): Indragiri Law Review
Publisher : Program Studi Pascasarjana Magister Hukum Universitas Islam Indragiri

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32520/ilr.v4i1.250

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the implementation of restorative justice in resolving traffic accident criminal cases at the Indragiri Hilir Resort Police and to identify the obstacles encountered in its application. This research employs a sociological or empirical legal research method with a qualitative field approach. Data were collected through interviews, observations, and documentation studies, which were then analyzed descriptively and qualitatively. The results indicate that restorative justice is implemented through several stages, including report submission, investigation, criminal inquiry, mediation between the offender and the victim, achievement of a peace agreement, and case settlement in accordance with applicable regulations. The implementation reflects the principles of victim recovery, offender accountability, and active participation of the parties involved. The obstacles identified include internal factors such as administrative requirements and investigators' prudence, as well as external factors including differing interests of the parties, the offender's economic limitations, the victim's psychological condition, and the limited public understanding of restorative justice.
Pengungkapan Perkara Tindak Pidana Narkotika Di Wilayah Hukum Kepolisian Sektor Concong (Studi Kasus Perkara Nomor: LP/A/01/IX/2025/POLSEK.CONCONG) Musfidhal Arief; Vivi Arfiani Siregar; Kms Novyar Satriawan F
Indragiri Law Review Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026): Indragiri Law Review
Publisher : Program Studi Pascasarjana Magister Hukum Universitas Islam Indragiri

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32520/ilr.v4i1.251

Abstract

This study examines the process of uncovering a narcotics crime case within the jurisdiction of the Concong Sector Police, with reference to Case File Number: LP/A/01/IX/2025/Polsek.Concong. The research is designed as empirical (sociological) legal research using a statute approach and a case approach, combined with field data obtained from investigators, a suspect, and witnesses at the Concong Sector Police. The findings show that the process of uncovering the narcotics case followed the stages of investigation and inquiry regulated under Law Number 35 of 2009 on Narcotics and the Indonesian Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP), beginning with the receipt of information, undercover buy and controlled delivery techniques, arrest, search, seizure of evidence, examination of witnesses and the suspect, and coordination with the Public Prosecutor's Office and the Criminal Laboratory. The study also finds that the uncovering of the case faced several obstacles, namely limited investigative personnel and facilities, the closed and clandestine character of narcotics networks, the low willingness of the community to provide information, and the challenge of fulfilling minimum evidentiary standards under Article 183 and Article 184 of the KUHAP. The study recommends strengthening investigative capacity, community-based prevention, and closer inter-agency coordination in order to make the uncovering of narcotics cases in the jurisdiction of the Concong Sector Police more effectivef