cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Heru Sugiyono
Contact Email
herusugiyono@upnvj.ac.id
Phone
+6281389067192
Journal Mail Official
jurnalstatuta@upnvj.ac.id
Editorial Address
Gedung Yos Sudarso UPN "Veteran" Jakarta Jalan RS. Fatmawati Raya, Pondok Labu, Cilandak, South Jakarta City, Jakarta 12450
Location
Kota depok,
Jawa barat
INDONESIA
Jurnal Hukum Statuta
Published by Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jakarta
ISSN : 30637163     EISSN : 30638666     DOI : https://doi.org/10.35586/
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
Jurnal Hukum Statuta adalah jurnal peer review yang diterbitkan Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pembangunan Veteran Jakarta. Naskah yang diterima Jurnal ini adalah naskah dalam Bahasa Indonesia, JHS diterbitkan tiga kali setahun pada bulan April, Agustus, dan Desember. Jurnal ini merupakan salah satu wadah bagi mahasiswa, akademisi, profesional dan peneliti di bidang hukum untuk menerbitkan hasil penelitiannya. Laman ini menyediakan akses terbuka langsung ke konten jurnal, prinsipnya bahwa penelitian harus tersedia secara mudah dan gratis untuk umum guna mendukung penyebarluasan ilmu pengetahuan khususnya di bidanag Ilmu Hukum. Ruang lingkup JHS mencakup semua topik yang berkaitan dengan ilmu hukum. Saat ini Jurnal Hukum Statuta terindeks di Google Schoolar
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 63 Documents
 3   4   5   6   7 
IMPLIKASI HUKUM PENERAPAN APPRAISAL RIGHTS (HAK MEMINTA SAHAM DIBELI) DALAM MERGER BANK DANAMON DAN BANK NUSANTARA PARAHYANGAN Cahya Utami Aldana
Jurnal Hukum Statuta Vol 5 No 2 (2026): Volume 5, Nomor 2, April 2026
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35586/jhs.v5i2.12488

Abstract

The 2019 merger between Bank Danamon and Bank Nusantara Parahyangan (BNP) raised a fundamental issue regarding the effectiveness of appraisal rights as a legal protection mechanism for minority shareholders. Although these rights are normatively regulated under Article 62 of the Indonesian Company Law (Law No. 40 of 2007) and the Financial Services Authority Regulation (POJK) No. 74/POJK.04/2016, their implementation in practice tends to be formalistic and has not fully ensured substantive justice. This study aims to analyze the application of appraisal rights in the Danamon–BNP merger and its legal implications for the protection of minority shareholders. The research employs a normative juridical method with statutory, conceptual, and comparative approaches. The findings reveal that although the merger procedure formally complies with existing regulations, its implementation does not fully reflect the fairness principle within good corporate governance. Limited transparency in fair value determination and weak supervisory oversight by the Financial Services Authority (OJK) have created potential inequities in protecting minority shareholders’ economic rights. Therefore, regulatory reform is required to enhance valuation transparency and strengthen OJK’s supervisory role, ensuring that appraisal rights function effectively as an instrument of corporate justice within Indonesia’s banking sector.
PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP KONSUMEN ATAS OVERCLAIM MANFAAT KESEHATAN PADA PRODUK NON-OBAT TANPA DUKUNGAN UJI KLINIK I Kadek Agus Aditya Firmantara; I Dewa Ayu Komang Candra Astiti
Jurnal Hukum Statuta Vol 5 No 2 (2026): Volume 5, Nomor 2, April 2026
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35586/jhs.v5i2.13969

Abstract

This study aims to examine the legal construction of consumer protection against health benefit overclaims in non-medicinal supplements lacking clinical trials, as well as the scope of business actors’ liability within the Indonesian legal system. The research employs a normative juridical method, applying both a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. The statutory approach analyzes the hierarchical structure of norms, encompassing Law Number 8 of 1999 on Consumer Protection, the Indonesian Civil Code, and sectoral regulations governing drug and food supervision administered by the Badan Pengawas Obat dan Makanan Republik Indonesia. The conceptual approach is utilized to critically assess the doctrines of overclaim, misrepresentation, duty of care, and the principle of actori incumbit probatio in the allocation of the burden of proof. Primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials are examined through qualitative analysis using systematic and grammatical interpretation. The study seeks to formulate a coherent legal argument concerning the permissible scope of health claims, the evidentiary standards required for therapeutic representations, and the layered framework of administrative, civil, and criminal liability in consumer protection law, emphasizing legal certainty and substantive justice.
ANALISIS KEPASTIAN HUKUM PEKERJA DALAM PERJANJIAN KERJA LISAN UNTUK MENJAMIN HAK DAN KESEJAHTERAAN DI INDONESIA Muhammad Tunjang Syaeh; Nayla Hishah Novianti; Najwa Syifa Aulia
Jurnal Hukum Statuta Vol 5 No 2 (2026): Volume 5, Nomor 2, April 2026
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35586/jhs.v5i2.14158

Abstract

The dominance of informal sector workers in Indonesia has led to many employment relationships being based on oral agreements, which raises issues of legal certainty also protection of workers’ rights, particularly in evidentiary process of industrial relations disputes. Normatively, oral agreements are recognized under Article 50 and Article 51 paragraph (1) of Law Number 6 of 2023 concerning Job Creation, as long as they fulfill elements of work, wages, also orders; however, in practice, they have not provided optimal protection. Employs normative juridical method with statutory also conceptual approaches. Indicate absence of written evidence weakens workers’ positions and increases the risk of violations of normative rights, such as wages, working hours, social security, and protection against unilateral termination. Although regulated under Article 57 paragraph (1) and Article 88 paragraph (1) of the Job Creation Law, as well as supported by Government Regulation Number 35 of 2021 and Number 36 of 2021, their implementation remains suboptimal. Strengthening role of the state is necessary throughout preventive mechanisms, such as employment relationship registration and enhanced supervision, to ensure legal certainty as well as protection and welfare of workers. Keywords: Oral Agreement, Legal Protection, Legal Certainty.

Page 7 of 7 | Total Record : 63

 3   4   5   6   7 

Filter by Year

2021 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 5 No 2 (2026): Volume 5, Nomor 2, April 2026 Vol 4 No 3 (2025): Volume 4, Nomor 3, Agustus 2025 Vol 4 No 2 (2025): Volume 4, Nomor 2, April 2025 Vol 4 No 1 (2024): Volume 4, Nomor 1, Desember 2024 Vol 3 No 3 (2024): Volume 3, Nomor 3, Agustus 2024 Vol 3 No 2 (2024): Volume 3, Nomor 2, April 2024 Vol 3 No 1 (2023): Volume 3, Nomor 1, Desember 2023 Vol 2 No 3 (2023): Volume 2, Nomor 3, Agustus 2023 Vol 2 No 2 (2023): Volume 2, Nomor 2, April 2023 Vol 2 No 1 (2022): Volume 2, Nomor 1, Desember 2022 Vol 1 No 3 (2022): Volume 1, Nomor 3, Agustus 2022 Vol 1 No 2 (2022): Volume 1, Nomor 2, April 2022 Vol 1 No 1 (2021): Volume 1, Nomor 1, Desember 2021 More Issue