cover
Contact Name
Heru Sugiyono
Contact Email
herusugiyono@upnvj.ac.id
Phone
+6281389067192
Journal Mail Official
jurnalstatuta@upnvj.ac.id
Editorial Address
Gedung Yos Sudarso UPN "Veteran" Jakarta Jalan RS. Fatmawati Raya, Pondok Labu, Cilandak, South Jakarta City, Jakarta 12450
Location
Kota depok,
Jawa barat
INDONESIA
Jurnal Hukum Statuta
ISSN : 30637163     EISSN : 30638666     DOI : https://doi.org/10.35586/
Core Subject : Social,
Jurnal Hukum Statuta adalah jurnal peer review yang diterbitkan Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pembangunan Veteran Jakarta. Naskah yang diterima Jurnal ini adalah naskah dalam Bahasa Indonesia, JHS diterbitkan tiga kali setahun pada bulan April, Agustus, dan Desember. Jurnal ini merupakan salah satu wadah bagi mahasiswa, akademisi, profesional dan peneliti di bidang hukum untuk menerbitkan hasil penelitiannya. Laman ini menyediakan akses terbuka langsung ke konten jurnal, prinsipnya bahwa penelitian harus tersedia secara mudah dan gratis untuk umum guna mendukung penyebarluasan ilmu pengetahuan khususnya di bidanag Ilmu Hukum. Ruang lingkup JHS mencakup semua topik yang berkaitan dengan ilmu hukum. Saat ini Jurnal Hukum Statuta terindeks di Google Schoolar
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 65 Documents
IMPLIKASI HUKUM PENERAPAN APPRAISAL RIGHTS (HAK MEMINTA SAHAM DIBELI) DALAM MERGER BANK DANAMON DAN BANK NUSANTARA PARAHYANGAN Cahya Utami Aldana
Jurnal Hukum Statuta Vol 5 No 2 (2026): Volume 5, Nomor 2, April 2026
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35586/jhs.v5i2.12488

Abstract

The 2019 merger between Bank Danamon and Bank Nusantara Parahyangan (BNP) raised a fundamental issue regarding the effectiveness of appraisal rights as a legal protection mechanism for minority shareholders. Although these rights are normatively regulated under Article 62 of the Indonesian Company Law (Law No. 40 of 2007) and the Financial Services Authority Regulation (POJK) No. 74/POJK.04/2016, their implementation in practice tends to be formalistic and has not fully ensured substantive justice. This study aims to analyze the application of appraisal rights in the Danamon–BNP merger and its legal implications for the protection of minority shareholders. The research employs a normative juridical method with statutory, conceptual, and comparative approaches. The findings reveal that although the merger procedure formally complies with existing regulations, its implementation does not fully reflect the fairness principle within good corporate governance. Limited transparency in fair value determination and weak supervisory oversight by the Financial Services Authority (OJK) have created potential inequities in protecting minority shareholders’ economic rights. Therefore, regulatory reform is required to enhance valuation transparency and strengthen OJK’s supervisory role, ensuring that appraisal rights function effectively as an instrument of corporate justice within Indonesia’s banking sector.
PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP KONSUMEN ATAS OVERCLAIM MANFAAT KESEHATAN PADA PRODUK NON-OBAT TANPA DUKUNGAN UJI KLINIK I Kadek Agus Aditya Firmantara; I Dewa Ayu Komang Candra Astiti
Jurnal Hukum Statuta Vol 5 No 2 (2026): Volume 5, Nomor 2, April 2026
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35586/jhs.v5i2.13969

Abstract

This study aims to examine the legal construction of consumer protection against health benefit overclaims in non-medicinal supplements lacking clinical trials, as well as the scope of business actors’ liability within the Indonesian legal system. The research employs a normative juridical method, applying both a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. The statutory approach analyzes the hierarchical structure of norms, encompassing Law Number 8 of 1999 on Consumer Protection, the Indonesian Civil Code, and sectoral regulations governing drug and food supervision administered by the Badan Pengawas Obat dan Makanan Republik Indonesia. The conceptual approach is utilized to critically assess the doctrines of overclaim, misrepresentation, duty of care, and the principle of actori incumbit probatio in the allocation of the burden of proof. Primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials are examined through qualitative analysis using systematic and grammatical interpretation. The study seeks to formulate a coherent legal argument concerning the permissible scope of health claims, the evidentiary standards required for therapeutic representations, and the layered framework of administrative, civil, and criminal liability in consumer protection law, emphasizing legal certainty and substantive justice.
ANALISIS KEPASTIAN HUKUM PEKERJA DALAM PERJANJIAN KERJA LISAN UNTUK MENJAMIN HAK DAN KESEJAHTERAAN DI INDONESIA Muhammad Tunjang Syaeh; Nayla Hishah Novianti; Najwa Syifa Aulia
Jurnal Hukum Statuta Vol 5 No 2 (2026): Volume 5, Nomor 2, April 2026
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35586/jhs.v5i2.14158

Abstract

The dominance of informal sector workers in Indonesia has led to many employment relationships being based on oral agreements, which raises issues of legal certainty also protection of workers’ rights, particularly in evidentiary process of industrial relations disputes. Normatively, oral agreements are recognized under Article 50 and Article 51 paragraph (1) of Law Number 6 of 2023 concerning Job Creation, as long as they fulfill elements of work, wages, also orders; however, in practice, they have not provided optimal protection. Employs normative juridical method with statutory also conceptual approaches. Indicate absence of written evidence weakens workers’ positions and increases the risk of violations of normative rights, such as wages, working hours, social security, and protection against unilateral termination. Although regulated under Article 57 paragraph (1) and Article 88 paragraph (1) of the Job Creation Law, as well as supported by Government Regulation Number 35 of 2021 and Number 36 of 2021, their implementation remains suboptimal. Strengthening role of the state is necessary throughout preventive mechanisms, such as employment relationship registration and enhanced supervision, to ensure legal certainty as well as protection and welfare of workers. Keywords: Oral Agreement, Legal Protection, Legal Certainty.
ANALISIS DASAR PERTIMBANGAN MAJELIS HAKIM DAN IMPLIKASI ATAS PENGABULAN GUGATAN CERAI OLEH PENGADILAN AGAMA JAKARTA TIMUR (STUDI PUTUSAN NOMOR 5374/Pdt.G/2025/PA.JT) Suci Trianjani; Stefie Yuliandra; Yasinta Diva Negara
Jurnal Hukum Statuta Vol 5 No 2 (2026): Volume 5, Nomor 2, April 2026
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Divorce is a form of resolving marital disputes that may only be granted when the legal grounds stipulated by law have been fulfilled. This study aims to analyze the legal considerations of the panel of judges in granting a divorce petition and its legal implications in Decision Number 5374/Pdt.G/2025/PA.JT. This research employs a normative juridical method using statutory and case approaches. The findings indicate that the panel of judges granted the divorce petition due to continuous disputes and conflicts, the husband's failure to fulfill his financial support obligations, the defendant's involvement in online loans, and the parties' separation for more than two years. These considerations were based on Article 39 paragraph (2) of the Marriage Law in conjunction with Article 19 letter (f) of Government Regulation Number 9 of 1975 and Article 116 letter (f) of the Compilation of Islamic Law. The decision resulted in the dissolution of the marriage through a talak satu ba'in sughra. Although formally consistent with applicable legal provisions, the decision still raises concerns regarding the quality of evidence, the default judgment procedure (verstek), and the insufficient protection of women's rights and the best interests of children after divorce. Keywords: Divorce Lawsuit, Judicial Considerations, Broken Marriage, Talak Ba'in Sughra, Religious Court.
PERBANDINGAN KONSEP SURAT UTANG NEGARA DAN SURAT BERHARGA SYARIAH NEGARA DALAM MENJAMIN KEPASTIAN PEMBAYARAN Indah Kusuma Wardani; Nadia Marsya Ramdhani; Muhammad Abdul Aziz Hasibuan
Jurnal Hukum Statuta Vol 5 No 2 (2026): Volume 5, Nomor 2, April 2026
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The study examines a comparison of the concepts of Government Bonds and Sharia Government Securities in ensuring payment certainty and evaluates the regulatory framework for guarantees of government debt repayment in preventing default disputes. This study employs a normative legal research method using the statute approach, the case approach, the comparative approach, and the conceptual approach. The results of the study indicate that SUN are debt instruments whose principal and interest payments are guaranteed by the state through the State Budget (APBN), whereas SBSN are securities based on Sharia principles supported by underlying assets, Sharia contracts, and a trustee mechanism. From the perspective of legal certainty, SBSN have a stronger protective structure because they rely not only on state guarantees but also on the underlying assets that are the subject of the transaction. Meanwhile, in the case of legacy bonds, differing interpretations regarding maturity and repayment obligations indicate that inconsistent regulations can lead to legal disputes. Thus, SBSN are considered to provide greater legal certainty and minimize the risk of default compared to SUN.