cover
Contact Name
Iqbal Faza Ahmad
Contact Email
qobelahmed@gmail.com
Phone
+6285848797379
Journal Mail Official
sahabatakademia@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Wisma Brilliant, Dabag, Condongcatur, Depok, Sleman, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Location
Kab. sleman,
Daerah istimewa yogyakarta
INDONESIA
Saneskara: Journal of Social Studies
Published by Sahabat Akademia Group
ISSN : -     EISSN : 30322510     DOI : https://doi.org/10.62491/sjss.v1i1.2024.6
"Saneskara: Journal of Social Studies" is a scholarly journal that explores various aspects within the field of social studies. The journal aims to provide a platform for researchers, academicians, and practitioners to share knowledge, ideas, and recent findings related to a wide range of social issues. The scope of the journal encompasses sociology, anthropology, political science, history, geography, education and cultural studies. The journal encourages innovative contributions and critical thinking to deepen the understanding of social dynamics in both global and local contexts. Published articles delve into contemporary challenges, trends, and social phenomena influencing societies today. Through an interdisciplinary approach, "Saneskara" seeks to enrich academic insights and support the development of progressive thinking in the field of social studies. The journal welcomes contributions from empirical research, theoretical analyses, and in-depth literature reviews. With a focus on quality, originality, and relevance, "Saneskara: Journal of Social Studies" serves as a platform for researchers and social thinkers to formulate solutions and recommendations that enhance our understanding of the complexities of contemporary society.
Articles 5 Documents
Search results for , issue "Vol. 2 No. 1 (2025)" : 5 Documents clear
Religious Coping Strategies Among Divorced Single Mothers in Garut: Managing Stigma and Patriarchal Challenges Annisa Qurrotul Ayuni; Purnairawan, Riski Eka
Saneskara: Journal of Social Studies Vol. 2 No. 1 (2025)
Publisher : Sahabat Akademia Group

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62491/sjss.v2i1.2025.28

Abstract

This study examines how divorced single mothers in Garut, West Java, navigate social, cultural, and economic pressures in a society deeply rooted in patriarchal norms. It explores how religious coping strategies assist them in managing emotions, combating social stigma, and addressing gender injustice. This research employs a descriptive qualitative approach with a multiperspective framework to explore the experiences of four informants selected using purposive and snowball sampling techniques. Data were collected through in-depth interviews and thematically analyzed to identify key patterns in religious coping strategies. The study is grounded in Kenneth Pargament’s religious coping theory and Mary Wollstonecraft’s feminist theory, which provide a robust theoretical foundation. The findings reveal that religious coping strategies help single mothers cope with social and economic pressures through three main approaches. First, self-directing strategies strengthen independence and problem-solving skills. Second, deferring strategies provide emotional peace by entrusting outcomes to God. Third, collaborative coping enhances spiritual connections through prayer and dhikr. Furthermore, the reinterpretation of religious teachings plays a crucial role in challenging patriarchal norms, promoting dignity, resilience, and self-identity. These strategies not only support psychological well-being but also function as tools for empowerment and gender justice. However, this study is limited by its small sample size and localized scope, which may affect the generalizability of the findings. 
Religious Narratives and Diversity on Social Media: Analyzing the Digital Role in Strengthening Pluralism Al Ayubbi, Syaefuddin Ahrom
Saneskara: Journal of Social Studies Vol. 2 No. 1 (2025)
Publisher : Sahabat Akademia Group

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62491/sjss.v2i1.2025.35

Abstract

The rapid development of social media has significantly altered the way society engages with religious narratives, influencing perceptions of pluralism and moderate Islam. This study aims to examine the role of social media in shaping diversity narratives, with a particular focus on the Twitter account @AlissaWahid. Employing a content analysis approach, this research evaluates the messages disseminated through this account’s posts and their impact on public discourse regarding religious tolerance. The findings indicate that social media serves as an influential platform for fostering inclusivity, spreading messages of religious moderation, and countering radical narratives. Through the strategic use of inclusive language, visual content, and interactive engagement, the dissemination of diversity narratives becomes more effective and accessible to digital audiences. Furthermore, this study highlights the necessity of active participation from religious leaders, scholars, and civil society organizations to reinforce moderate Islamic discourse in online spaces. Strengthening these collaborative efforts is crucial to ensuring that social media continues to function as a medium for promoting harmony, pluralism, and religious coexistence in Indonesia.
Integration of Juridic-Sociologic Approaches in Waste Management: The Role of Government and Community Participation in Patangpuluhan Subdistrict Yogyakarta Sari, Elly Popika; Riana, Ana
Saneskara: Journal of Social Studies Vol. 2 No. 1 (2025)
Publisher : Sahabat Akademia Group

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62491/sjss.v2i1.2025.42

Abstract

This study explores the roles of government institutions and community participation in waste management practices in Patangpuluhan Subdistrict, Yogyakarta. It responds to the gap between formal waste management regulations and their implementation in densely populated urban areas where infrastructure and public awareness are still limited. The research argues that sustainable waste governance cannot rely solely on legal instruments; it requires active community involvement and institutional collaboration at the grassroots level. Employing a qualitative socio-legal approach, data were collected through semi-structured interviews with local government officials, community leaders, and waste bank managers, as well as through document analysis and field observations. The study investigates how national and local waste policies are interpreted, implemented, and adapted by local actors. The findings reveal multidimensional challenges, including land constraints, low compliance with regulations, and unequal access to waste facilities. Although Law No. 18 of 2008 provides a strong legal basis, its implementation in the field is constrained by the gap between “law in books” and “law in action” and the limited institutional capacity at the local level. Waste bank initiatives in several Neighborhood Units (RWs) show high participation but remain fragmented. The study’s novelty lies in its juridical-sociological lens, highlighting the interplay between normative frameworks and lived realities, and offering critical insights into the social drivers behind legal compliance in environmental governance. 
Illegal Sand and Stone Mining in Rejosari, Gunung Kidul: The Erosion of Community Cohesion and Cultural Values Amid Livelihood Shifts Novitri, Chery Maria; Riana, Ana
Saneskara: Journal of Social Studies Vol. 2 No. 1 (2025)
Publisher : Sahabat Akademia Group

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62491/sjss.v2i1.2025.50

Abstract

This study aims to address a gap in literature by providing an in-depth analysis of the social and cultural dynamics of communities affected by illegal sand and stone mining in Gunung Kidul Regency. It focuses on shifts in livelihood patterns, cultural values, and adaptive mechanisms that emerge amid illegal mining activities. The central argument is that such practices foster social polarization, fragile economic dependence, and the erosion of community cohesion. Employing a qualitative ethnographic approach, the research explores the everyday lives of affected residents. Data were gathered through participant observation and in-depth interviews with key informants, including community leaders, village heads, and residents either involved in or impacted by mining. Additional supporting data were obtained from document studies. The data analysis followed an interactive process consisting of data reduction, display, and conclusion drawing. The study reveals that illegal mining has transformed the community’s economic structure from traditional agriculture to mining dependency, generating quick but unstable income. This shift has triggered social conflicts and polarization between pro- and anti-mining groups; undermining long-standing social cohesion rooted in cooperation. Furthermore, cultural values that emphasize respect for nature are increasingly eroded. Practically, the findings highlight that law enforcement alone is insufficient to address the issue. A comprehensive response should integrate local economic diversification, community empowerment, and the restoration of social cohesion. 
Sociological Implications of Sentencing Disparities in Corruption Verdicts: A Case Study in Yogyakarta Kurniawan, Dika
Saneskara: Journal of Social Studies Vol. 2 No. 1 (2025)
Publisher : Sahabat Akademia Group

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62491/sjss.v2i1.2025.51

Abstract

This study investigates the sociological implications of corruption court decisions on local communities in Yogyakarta. While most previous research on corruption verdicts has focused on normative-legal aspects, this article addresses the gap by exploring how disparities in sentencing affect perceptions of justice, social trust, and anti-corruption norms. A qualitative case study approach was employed, analyzing two corruption verdicts (Decision No. 9/Pid.Sus-TPK/2024/PN Yyk and Decision No. 1/Pid.Sus-TPK/2022/PN Yyk). Data was collected through in-depth interviews with community leaders, legal sociologists, and journalists, as well as document analysis and participant observation. Thematic analysis was applied to identify recurring patterns in community responses and perceptions. The study reveals that sentencing disparities undermine public trust in judicial institutions, fostering perceptions of “selective justice.” Communities interpret verdicts not only as legal outcomes but also as symbolic messages about social norms. Light sentences are perceived as legitimizing corruption and eroding collective morality, while consistent and firm verdicts strengthen anti-corruption awareness. The findings highlight that court decisions play a dual role as both legal enforcement and social communication, directly shaping community engagement in combating corruption. The research is context-specific, focusing on Yogyakarta, and thus the findings may not fully generalize to other regions. However, it underscores the need for policymakers and judges to consider the broader sociological impact of verdicts to rebuild public trust and strengthen social resilience against corruption. 

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 5