cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
M. Natsir Asnawi
Contact Email
syafiuddin@judexlaguens.ikahi.or.id
Phone
+6221-3449335
Journal Mail Official
mail@judexlaguens.ikahi.or.id
Editorial Address
Jl. Medan Merdeka Utara No.9, RT.2/RW.3, Gambir, Kecamatan Gambir, Kota Jakarta Pusat, Daerah Khusus Ibukota Jakarta 10110
Location
Kota adm. jakarta pusat,
Dki jakarta
INDONESIA
Judex Laguens
Published by Ikatan Hakim Indonesia
ISSN : -     EISSN : 30257182     DOI : https://doi.org/10.2032023/ikahi
Core Subject : Science, Education, Social,
Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science
ISSN: 3025-7182 Penerbit: Ikatan Hakim Indonesia (IKAHI) 0009-0000-1749-8018 : ORCID Fokus dan Ruang Lingkup Judex Laguens bertujuan untuk menyediakan wadah bagi akademisi, peneliti, dan praktisi untuk mempublikasikan artikel penelitian asli atau artikel review. Ruang lingkup artikel yang dimuat dalam jurnal ini membahas berbagai topik di bidang hukum dan peradilan. Frekuensi: 3 terbitan per tahun (April, Agustus, dan Desember) Judex Laguens merupakan jurnal akses terbuka dan peer-review yang bertujuan untuk menyebarkan hasil penelitian atau pemikiran asli yang fokus pada isu-isu di bidang hukum dan peradilan. Penulis diundang untuk mengirimkan naskah yang termasuk dalam lingkup Judex Set Lex Laguens. Artikel-artikel yang diterbitkan di Judex Set Lex Laguens melalui proses peer-review double-blind. Oleh karena itu, diterima atau tidaknya karya ilmiah tersebut merupakan hak Dewan Redaksi berdasarkan rekomendasi peer reviewer. Silakan baca informasi tentang proses peer-review. Mohon membaca dan memahami pedoman penulis dalam penyusunan naskah. Penulis yang menyerahkan naskah ke editor harus mematuhi pedoman dan template penulis. Jika naskah yang dikirimkan tidak sesuai dengan pedoman atau menggunakan format yang berbeda, maka naskah tersebut akan ditolak oleh tim editorial sebelum ditinjau. Tim redaksi hanya akan menerima naskah yang memenuhi persyaratan format yang ditentukan.
Arjuna Subject : Umum - Umum
Articles 14 Documents
 1   2 
Search results for , issue "Vol 1 No 2 (2023)" : 14 Documents clear
COEVOLVING: A WAY WHEN A JUDGE BECOMES MORE THAN A JUDGE Aprina Chintya
Judex Laguens Vol 1 No 2 (2023)
Publisher : Ikatan Hakim Indonesia (IKAHI)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/ikahi.1.2.8.2023.151-168

Abstract

Career development through professional organizations is the central concept in the importance of members joining professional organizations. As a professional organization, IKAHI need to accommodate and develop this professional organization into a strong organization that provides benefits to its members. Judges, however, not only carry out their main duties in examining and resolving cases, but are also bound by other additional duties. The question in this research is what are the strategies that can be carried out by IKAHI to make IKAHI an advanced professional organization? The following article presents a complementary and additional framework within developing and advancing the profession of judges, monitoring and expanding the field of movement of the profession, as well as gathering and providing opportunities for all members to work and play an active role in developing and advancing the profession. This framework is rooted in the theory of coevolving that integrates a responsive understanding of censure and relational responsibility, thus IKAHI become a professional organization that has advantages and collaborates with other organizations. The results of this study indicate that the strategy that IKAHI can take to make IKAHI an advanced professional organization is to carry out cross-organizational synergies through the concept of coevolving with counter-intuitive collaboration, developing competition, reducing concerns about efficiency, and respecting the personal interests of IKAHI members.
PROYEKSI OPTIMALISASI PERADILAN ELEKTRONIK SEBAGAI UPAYA PEMBANGUNAN SISTEM PAKAR (EXPERT SYSTEM Sugeng Sulistyo, Trisoko
Judex Laguens Vol 1 No 2 (2023)
Publisher : Ikatan Hakim Indonesia (IKAHI)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/ikahi.1.2.8.2023.169-204

Abstract

What is the projection for optimization of information technology systems, especially electronic justice based on the 2010-2035 judicial reform blueprint? and, Does an expert system have the potential to be built and integrated with electronic justice so that it can provide input for judge's judgments? the two aforementioned questions are fundamental questions which in discussion are able to provide an explanation for the public regarding the achievements of the Supreme Court in the development of electronic judicial today and provide input on how electronic justice will be developed in the future so as to be able to improve the quality of judgments. The discussion of this paper is based on the 2010-2035 blueprint and contemporary achievements in the development of electronic judicial. The results of the research indicated that i) MA is developing electronic justice according to the 2010-2035 blueprint and developing the potential E-RIS to become a knowledge database ii) Development of a knowledge database is a major potential in the development of an expert system that may assist to provide input to judge judgments. The input is in accordance with the rules of reasoning, faster and more consistent.
REKAYASA SOSIAL LEMBAGA PERADILAN UNTUK MEWUJUDKAN KEADABAN PUBLIK Hidayat, Wahyu
Judex Laguens Vol 1 No 2 (2023)
Publisher : Ikatan Hakim Indonesia (IKAHI)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/ikahi.1.2.8.2023.309-340

Abstract

Rekayasa sosial di dalam lembaga peradilan merupakan hal yang terpenting untuk terus membangun kepercayaan masyarakat Indonesia, dibutuhkan strategi dan rencana untuk mengentaskan permasalahan di internalnya, kemudian diperlukan juga rekayasa sosial terhadap masyarakat melalui putusan hakim yang berkeadilan, memberi manfaat dan kepastian hukum terhadap kasus-kasus yang menyita perhatian masyarakat demi mendapatkan kepercayaan publik sehingga membentuk masyarakat yang berkeadaban. Hasil penelitian ini pertama, rekayasa sosial menuju keadaban adalah dengan strategi dan rencana untuk memberantas korupsi di internal peradilan, dilakukan dengan cara menerapkan Zona Integritas dengan membangun wilayah bebas korupsi di internal peradilan, dari yang paling atas yaitu Mahkamah Agung sampai pengadilan tingkat 2 dan tingkat 1, karena terbukti dari tahun 2017 sampai 2019 jumlah WBK seluruh pengadilan di Indonesia naik secara signifikan. Kedua, Perkara-perkara yang mendapat perhatian publik sekiranya menjadi fokus menciptakan rekayasa sosial untuk mendapatkan lebih banyak lagi kepercayaan publik terhadap peradilan. Karena tingkat kepercayaan publik tersebut berfungsi sebagai a tool of social control agar masyarkat tetap mempertahankan kepercayaannya, bahwa hakim itu bebas dan putusan hakim tersebut berkeadilan dan tidak memandang siapapun dan putusan tersebut bukan hasil dari intervensi internal maupun eksternal.
REVITALISASI KEMANDIRIAN HAKIM MELALUI KONSEP PERADILAN RAMAH SEBAGAI WUJUD OPTIMALISASI AKUNTABILITAS LEMBAGA PERADILAN DI INDONESIA Ingrit, Ingrit
Judex Laguens Vol 1 No 2 (2023)
Publisher : Ikatan Hakim Indonesia (IKAHI)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/ikahi.1.2.8.2023.269-308

Abstract

One of the big challenges from the past until now for judicial independence in Indonesia, namely the large number of interventions that come from various parties, both internal and external. This phenomenon illustrates that the current judicial situation is unhealthy, because institutions that should stand by maintaining their independence, are actually weakening due to influences and conflicts that attack the integrity of the judicial institution. This situation certainly raises questions from the public about the demise of Indonesia's judicial independence, which ultimately makes the public lose confidence in the judiciary as a place to seek justice. The judge in this case as a functional body of the implementation of the judiciary, which basically the judicial power is formed and compiled on the basis of legislation. As a law enforcer, the integrity of judges can be seen through their decisions, therefore judges must have freedom and moral values as their authority to decide cases, because the independence of judges is a representation of the state of law. Although various policy measures have been pursued in order to reform the judiciary, without independence or independence in the judicial power body, it will certainly be easier to provide access to opportunities that can affect and adversely affect including paving the way for the emergence of abuse of power or deviation of power and also the neglect of human rights by state rulers.
PENGUATAN INTEGRITAS PERADILAN MELALUI PENERAPAN SISTEM KAMAR DI PERADILAN UMUM Putra, Ilhamdi
Judex Laguens Vol 1 No 2 (2023)
Publisher : Ikatan Hakim Indonesia (IKAHI)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/ikahi.1.2.8.2023.244-268

Abstract

The dynamics of community development have resulted in an increase in legal conflicts arising as factual expressions between legal subjects, as well as influencing an increase in cases in court. Meanwhile, the General Court does not classify the Panel of Judges based on areas of expertise, between criminal and civil cases, which has the potential to disrupt the integrity of the judiciary. This phenomenon boils down to two issues, namely the urgency of classifying the fields of expertise of judges in the General Courts in terms of the public character of criminal cases and the private character of civil cases, as well as the workload of judges and the design of the chamber system within the General Courts. This study concludes that the absence of a judge's expertise in the General Courts greatly affects the integrity of the judiciary. This happened due to the mixing of judges with a variety of cases of a different nature, between public and private. This phenomenon necessitates the application of a chamber system in the General Courts through the Criminal Chamber and the Civil Chamber in the District Court and High Court. This design which focuses on the judges' areas of expertise is in line with the model for filling the positions of Candidates for Supreme Court Justices which go directly to the Chamber System through areas of expertise. Keyword: Integrity, Chamber System, General Judiciary
TRANSFORMASI DIGITAL WAJAH PERADILAN: PERAN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE DALAM PENGUATAN INTEGRITAS Hardhika, Romi
Judex Laguens Vol 1 No 2 (2023)
Publisher : Ikatan Hakim Indonesia (IKAHI)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/ikahi.1.2.8.2023.341-380

Abstract

In the era of the fourth industrial revolution, human roles have started to be replaced by artificial intelligence (AI) technology. Artificial intelligence is a computational program created to simulate human thinking and decision-making abilities. In the field of justice, several countries have applied AI technology to determine judges handling cases, create transcripts of court proceedings, and even provide legal considerations and sentencing recommendations. Despite having various benefits, the use of AI in the judicial system is not without risks such as security and privacy concerns. Additionally, there are also issues related to the principle of fair trial proceedings. Therefore, there are several conditions that the Supreme Court needs to consider when implementing AI in the Indonesian judicial system. Firstly, the use of AI must be adjusted to the national legal context in Law No. 19 of 2016 concerning Amendments to Law No. 11 of 2008 concerning Electronic Information and Transactions. Secondly, the Supreme Court needs to pay attention to the five principles outlined in the European Ethical Charter on the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Judicial Systems and their environment. Thirdly, decision-making by AI still requires human intervention (hybrid decision-making) to mitigate errors in the system. It is hoped that the integration of AI into the Indonesian judicial system will be able to realize the vision of "Realizing an Honorable Indonesian Judiciary."
LEGITIMASI PUTUSAN PENGADILAN INDONESIA SEBAGAI SUMBER HUKUM MAHKAMAH INTERNASIONAL DALAM PEMBENTUKAN HUKUM INTERNASIONAL Eka An Aqimuddin
Judex Laguens Vol 1 No 2 (2023)
Publisher : Ikatan Hakim Indonesia (IKAHI)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/ikahi.1.2.8.2023.205-242

Abstract

Most research has focused on how Indonesian courts apply international law. In fact, Indonesian courts can also help shape international law through the International Court of Justice (ICJ) as a source of law used by the ICJ. This article addresses two main questions about whether or not ICJ could use Indonesian court decisions as a source of international law. The first issue is that the ICJ participated in making international law. The ICJ's decision may come from the domestic court decision. Second, Indonesian court decisions could be used by ICJ as a source of law when making international law. The way to do this is through informal channels, such as legitimacy, which is gained when other countries recognize the decisions of Indonesian courts. Legitimacy can be achieved by improving the system and structure of judicial institutions, creating references to Indonesian court decisions in international languages, assuring judges know both customary law and international law, and encouraging Indonesian judges to become judges in ICJ.
COEVOLVING: A WAY WHEN A JUDGE BECOMES MORE THAN A JUDGE Aprina Chintya
Judex Laguens Vol 1 No 2 (2023)
Publisher : Ikatan Hakim Indonesia (IKAHI)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/ikahi.1.2.8.2023.151-168

Abstract

Career development through professional organizations is the central concept in the importance of members joining professional organizations. As a professional organization, IKAHI need to accommodate and develop this professional organization into a strong organization that provides benefits to its members. Judges, however, not only carry out their main duties in examining and resolving cases, but are also bound by other additional duties. The question in this research is what are the strategies that can be carried out by IKAHI to make IKAHI an advanced professional organization? The following article presents a complementary and additional framework within developing and advancing the profession of judges, monitoring and expanding the field of movement of the profession, as well as gathering and providing opportunities for all members to work and play an active role in developing and advancing the profession. This framework is rooted in the theory of coevolving that integrates a responsive understanding of censure and relational responsibility, thus IKAHI become a professional organization that has advantages and collaborates with other organizations. The results of this study indicate that the strategy that IKAHI can take to make IKAHI an advanced professional organization is to carry out cross-organizational synergies through the concept of coevolving with counter-intuitive collaboration, developing competition, reducing concerns about efficiency, and respecting the personal interests of IKAHI members.
PROYEKSI OPTIMALISASI PERADILAN ELEKTRONIK SEBAGAI UPAYA PEMBANGUNAN SISTEM PAKAR (EXPERT SYSTEM Sugeng Sulistyo, Trisoko
Judex Laguens Vol 1 No 2 (2023)
Publisher : Ikatan Hakim Indonesia (IKAHI)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/ikahi.1.2.8.2023.169-204

Abstract

What is the projection for optimization of information technology systems, especially electronic justice based on the 2010-2035 judicial reform blueprint? and, Does an expert system have the potential to be built and integrated with electronic justice so that it can provide input for judge's judgments? the two aforementioned questions are fundamental questions which in discussion are able to provide an explanation for the public regarding the achievements of the Supreme Court in the development of electronic judicial today and provide input on how electronic justice will be developed in the future so as to be able to improve the quality of judgments. The discussion of this paper is based on the 2010-2035 blueprint and contemporary achievements in the development of electronic judicial. The results of the research indicated that i) MA is developing electronic justice according to the 2010-2035 blueprint and developing the potential E-RIS to become a knowledge database ii) Development of a knowledge database is a major potential in the development of an expert system that may assist to provide input to judge judgments. The input is in accordance with the rules of reasoning, faster and more consistent.
REKAYASA SOSIAL LEMBAGA PERADILAN UNTUK MEWUJUDKAN KEADABAN PUBLIK Hidayat, Wahyu
Judex Laguens Vol 1 No 2 (2023)
Publisher : Ikatan Hakim Indonesia (IKAHI)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/ikahi.1.2.8.2023.309-340

Abstract

Rekayasa sosial di dalam lembaga peradilan merupakan hal yang terpenting untuk terus membangun kepercayaan masyarakat Indonesia, dibutuhkan strategi dan rencana untuk mengentaskan permasalahan di internalnya, kemudian diperlukan juga rekayasa sosial terhadap masyarakat melalui putusan hakim yang berkeadilan, memberi manfaat dan kepastian hukum terhadap kasus-kasus yang menyita perhatian masyarakat demi mendapatkan kepercayaan publik sehingga membentuk masyarakat yang berkeadaban. Hasil penelitian ini pertama, rekayasa sosial menuju keadaban adalah dengan strategi dan rencana untuk memberantas korupsi di internal peradilan, dilakukan dengan cara menerapkan Zona Integritas dengan membangun wilayah bebas korupsi di internal peradilan, dari yang paling atas yaitu Mahkamah Agung sampai pengadilan tingkat 2 dan tingkat 1, karena terbukti dari tahun 2017 sampai 2019 jumlah WBK seluruh pengadilan di Indonesia naik secara signifikan. Kedua, Perkara-perkara yang mendapat perhatian publik sekiranya menjadi fokus menciptakan rekayasa sosial untuk mendapatkan lebih banyak lagi kepercayaan publik terhadap peradilan. Karena tingkat kepercayaan publik tersebut berfungsi sebagai a tool of social control agar masyarkat tetap mempertahankan kepercayaannya, bahwa hakim itu bebas dan putusan hakim tersebut berkeadilan dan tidak memandang siapapun dan putusan tersebut bukan hasil dari intervensi internal maupun eksternal.

Page 1 of 2 | Total Record : 14

 1   2 

Filter by Year

2023 2023


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 3 No 2 (2025) Vol 3 No 1 (2025) Vol 2 No 3 (2024) Vol 2 No 2 (2024) Vol 2 No 1 (2024) Vol 1 No 3 (2023) Vol 1 No 2 (2023) Vol 1 No 1 (2023)