Judex Laguens
ISSN: 3025-7182 Penerbit: Ikatan Hakim Indonesia (IKAHI) 0009-0000-1749-8018 : ORCID Fokus dan Ruang Lingkup Judex Laguens bertujuan untuk menyediakan wadah bagi akademisi, peneliti, dan praktisi untuk mempublikasikan artikel penelitian asli atau artikel review. Ruang lingkup artikel yang dimuat dalam jurnal ini membahas berbagai topik di bidang hukum dan peradilan. Frekuensi: 3 terbitan per tahun (April, Agustus, dan Desember) Judex Laguens merupakan jurnal akses terbuka dan peer-review yang bertujuan untuk menyebarkan hasil penelitian atau pemikiran asli yang fokus pada isu-isu di bidang hukum dan peradilan. Penulis diundang untuk mengirimkan naskah yang termasuk dalam lingkup Judex Set Lex Laguens. Artikel-artikel yang diterbitkan di Judex Set Lex Laguens melalui proses peer-review double-blind. Oleh karena itu, diterima atau tidaknya karya ilmiah tersebut merupakan hak Dewan Redaksi berdasarkan rekomendasi peer reviewer. Silakan baca informasi tentang proses peer-review. Mohon membaca dan memahami pedoman penulis dalam penyusunan naskah. Penulis yang menyerahkan naskah ke editor harus mematuhi pedoman dan template penulis. Jika naskah yang dikirimkan tidak sesuai dengan pedoman atau menggunakan format yang berbeda, maka naskah tersebut akan ditolak oleh tim editorial sebelum ditinjau. Tim redaksi hanya akan menerima naskah yang memenuhi persyaratan format yang ditentukan.
Articles
108 Documents
<![CDATA[COEVOLVING: A WAY WHEN A JUDGE BECOMES MORE THAN A JUDGE ]]>
<![CDATA[Aprina Chintya]]>
<![CDATA[ Judex Laguens Vol 1 No 2 (2023) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Ikatan Hakim Indonesia (IKAHI) ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.25216/ikahi.1.2.8.2023.151-168
<![CDATA[Career development through professional organizations is the central concept in the importance of members joining professional organizations. As a professional organization, IKAHI need to accommodate and develop this professional organization into a strong organization that provides benefits to its members. Judges, however, not only carry out their main duties in examining and resolving cases, but are also bound by other additional duties. The question in this research is what are the strategies that can be carried out by IKAHI to make IKAHI an advanced professional organization? The following article presents a complementary and additional framework within developing and advancing the profession of judges, monitoring and expanding the field of movement of the profession, as well as gathering and providing opportunities for all members to work and play an active role in developing and advancing the profession. This framework is rooted in the theory of coevolving that integrates a responsive understanding of censure and relational responsibility, thus IKAHI become a professional organization that has advantages and collaborates with other organizations. The results of this study indicate that the strategy that IKAHI can take to make IKAHI an advanced professional organization is to carry out cross-organizational synergies through the concept of coevolving with counter-intuitive collaboration, developing competition, reducing concerns about efficiency, and respecting the personal interests of IKAHI members.]]>
<![CDATA[PROYEKSI OPTIMALISASI PERADILAN ELEKTRONIK SEBAGAI UPAYA PEMBANGUNAN SISTEM PAKAR (EXPERT SYSTEM ]]>
<![CDATA[Sugeng Sulistyo, Trisoko]]>
<![CDATA[ Judex Laguens Vol 1 No 2 (2023) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Ikatan Hakim Indonesia (IKAHI) ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.25216/ikahi.1.2.8.2023.169-204
<![CDATA[What is the projection for optimization of information technology systems, especially electronic justice based on the 2010-2035 judicial reform blueprint? and, Does an expert system have the potential to be built and integrated with electronic justice so that it can provide input for judge's judgments? the two aforementioned questions are fundamental questions which in discussion are able to provide an explanation for the public regarding the achievements of the Supreme Court in the development of electronic judicial today and provide input on how electronic justice will be developed in the future so as to be able to improve the quality of judgments. The discussion of this paper is based on the 2010-2035 blueprint and contemporary achievements in the development of electronic judicial. The results of the research indicated that i) MA is developing electronic justice according to the 2010-2035 blueprint and developing the potential E-RIS to become a knowledge database ii) Development of a knowledge database is a major potential in the development of an expert system that may assist to provide input to judge judgments. The input is in accordance with the rules of reasoning, faster and more consistent.]]>
<![CDATA[Judicial Wellness Initiative: A Conceptual Framework for Supporting the Sustainable System of Modern Judiciary ]]>
<![CDATA[Ramadhan , Solihin Niar]]>
<![CDATA[ Judex Laguens Vol 1 No 1 (2023) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Ikatan Hakim Indonesia (IKAHI) ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.25216/ikahi.1.1.4.2023.135-150
<![CDATA[The Covid-19 pandemic has given us a valuable lesson that the most important asset of the judiciary besides its infrastructure, is the soundness of judges. Several factors such as ongoing family problems, high demand for judicial and non-judicial tasks, strict surveillance activities, and high public expectations of the court’s performance increasingly affect judges’ health extent. The amount of physical and psychological pressure experienced by judges in carrying out their duties directly impacts the court’s performance and the quality of delivered judicial services. To support the implementation of the modern judicial system, the judge's physical and psychological soundness must be considered carefully. Unfortunately, the wellness protection of judges in Indonesia is still hitherto not a distinctive concern. Through a Business Ecosystem approach, the Judicial Wellness Initiative is formulated as an alternative solution that can be implemented as a synergy between IKAHI and other related parties for supporting the fulfilment of the judges’ well-being. The Judicial Wellness Initiative scheme is hopefully expected to assist judges who are experiencing physical and mental health matters. Addressing the judges’ health problems directly affects the quality of the court’s performance and therefore, a sustainable modern judicial system can be realized.]]>
<![CDATA[Strategi Memperkuat Integritas Lembaga Peradilan Indonesia ]]>
<![CDATA[Sikti, Ahmad Syahrus]]>
<![CDATA[ Judex Laguens Vol 1 No 1 (2023) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Ikatan Hakim Indonesia (IKAHI) ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.25216/ikahi.1.1.4.2023.1-34
<![CDATA[Issues of the integrity of judges and judicial apparatus affect the quality of service, the reputation of the institution and the level of public trust. This means that the more integrity of judges and judicial apparatus in the law enforcement process, the fairer the verdicts handed down, the more quality services and the level of public trust increases. Integrity problems can be solved with a system approach, namely strengthening the internal supervision system which is both repressive and preventive.]]>
<![CDATA[Menggagas Descente Secara Elektronik ]]>
<![CDATA[Anam , Ahmad Zainul]]>
<![CDATA[ Judex Laguens Vol 1 No 1 (2023) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Ikatan Hakim Indonesia (IKAHI) ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.25216/ikahi.1.1.4.2023.35-56
<![CDATA[The Supreme Court has significantly changed the administration of information technology-based justice. The Supreme Court's efforts to modernize Indonesian judicial procedures gave them a new look. Electronic site visits (descente) are one strategic innovation that the Supreme Court should consider to sustain the current trend of technological advancement. Yet, the concept and how to implement it must be thoroughly investigated. In light of this, this paper examines the concept and application of electronic descente. This qualitative literary study applies a literature technique, which comprises reading and comprehending documents or other works of literature related to the performance of descente or local inspection. The study's findings support some conclusions, including the following: First, while theoretically extremely feasible, electronic descente must wait for a legal foundation to become lawful before it can be implemented. Second, a few prerequisites must be completed before employing electronic descente. Third, not all civil cases are available for electronic inspection via descente. Fourth, there are advantages and disadvantages of using electronic descente.]]>
<![CDATA[Mendesain Putusan Hakim Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Tentang Opened Legal Policy: Suatu Upaya Mewujudkan Integritas Peradilan ]]>
<![CDATA[Alan, Muhammad Fikri]]>;
<![CDATA[Saputri, Fenolia Intan]]>
<![CDATA[ Judex Laguens Vol 1 No 1 (2023) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Ikatan Hakim Indonesia (IKAHI) ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.25216/ikahi.1.1.4.2023.57-80
<![CDATA[The Administrative Court Judge's decision according to paragraph 97 section (7) Law Number 5 of 1986 consists of 4 types of decisions, namely: (a) Rejected Decision, (b) Accepted Decision, (c) Not Accepted Decision, (d) Aborted Decision. A State Administrative Decree (KTUN) can be defended, if the KTUN does not actually conflict with the Legislation and AUPB. This raises a new question, can a KTUN be defended on the grounds that the KTUN is an Opened Legal Policy from a State Administrative Agency or Official? In this paper the author tries to formulate an ideal design regarding PTUN decisions under the pretext of opened legal policy. The aim is that in the future there will be no debates regarding all decisions issued by the PTUN which are none other than as a momentum to realize an integrity of the judiciary in the life of the nation and state. The author in his writings uses the normative juridical method with statutory approaches, conceptual approaches, and case approaches.]]>
<![CDATA[Perkembangan Kompetensi Absolut PTUN Beserta Problematikanya: Analisis Menurut UU PTUN dan UU No. 30 Tahun 2014 tentang Administrasi Pemerintahan ]]>
<![CDATA[Nasution, Agus Nardi]]>
<![CDATA[ Judex Laguens Vol 1 No 1 (2023) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Ikatan Hakim Indonesia (IKAHI) ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.25216/ikahi.1.1.4.2023.81-106
<![CDATA[Absolute competence is the authority of the State Administrative Court to adjudicate a case according to the object, material or subject matter of the dispute. The development of this Law is seen by differences in legal concepts and the existence of PTUN dispute objects regulated in the UUAP where procedural law has not been accommodated in the Law. -State Administrative Court Law (UUPTUN). The research method used is normative law in which legal norms, legal concepts, legal principles and legal ideology are the research objects. This study uses 2 (two) types of approaches, namely the statutory approach relating to the State Administrative Court and the historical approach regarding the existence of the State Administrative Court. In Indonesia, with the enactment of the UUAP, it has contained fundamental changes in the previous regulations, which are contained in the contents of the UUPTU. The problem of absolute competence of PTUN after the implementation of UUAP in handling PTUN disputes no longer recognizes individual elements in administrative decisions by judges. Whereas the provisions contained in Article 87 of Law Number 30 of 2014 concerning Government Administration have contained hidden changes in the provisions of Article 1 number 9 of Law Number 51 of 2009 concerning the Second Amendment to Law Number 5 of 1986 concerning Administrative Justice Country.]]>
<![CDATA[Implikasi Vacum Of Norm Nafkah Lampau Anak Di Indonesia ]]>
<![CDATA[Azmi, Miftahudin]]>;
<![CDATA[Habibah, Idha Nur]]>;
<![CDATA[Syafiuddin, M. Nur]]>;
<![CDATA[’El-Syafi, Lucky Eka Khalis Aulia]]>
<![CDATA[ Judex Laguens Vol 1 No 1 (2023) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Ikatan Hakim Indonesia (IKAHI) ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.25216/ikahi.1.1.4.2023.107-122
<![CDATA[There is no legal arrangement regarding the fulfillment of the child's right to a living which his biological father neglects to lead to the pattern of child protection in Indonesia. This paper aims to describe and analyze the sociological implications of the absence of regulation of the fulfillment of the last living right to the pattern of child protection in Indonesia. This research includes normative juridical research with a philosophical approach and legislation and analysis with analytical prescriptive methods, hermenautics (interpretation) of law and ijtihadi. The results of the study show that there are two implications of no legal regulation of the fulfillment of children's rights to the last living on the pattern of child protection in Indonesia, namely: the occurrence of disharmony in the relationship between children and their biological fathers and the degradation of the fulfillment of children's rights from their biological fathers.]]>
<![CDATA[Modernizing Court Through Communication Of Ikahi And Information Technology Generalization ]]>
<![CDATA[Pakpahan, Novritsar Hasintongan]]>
<![CDATA[ Judex Laguens Vol 1 No 1 (2023) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Ikatan Hakim Indonesia (IKAHI) ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.25216/ikahi.1.1.4.2023.123-134
<![CDATA[The establishment of modern judiciary begs the question whether modernity would serve just law properly or simply become another legal challenge for judges within the judiciary. The questions of the research formulated into how does IKAHI keeps the synergy between its member to communicate judges’ difficulties and how does IKAHI supports the idea of generalizing the perception of IT usage for judges in case trials. The role of the study would be beneficial in improving knowledge and application principle in IKAHI action. The result of the data shown positive aspect and proves the main theory and idea. The article is discussed in a deductive method. The main findings of the article is that modernization of court can only be achieved if the use of IT in court has been generalized so that there wouldn’t be contradiction or conflict through the use of electronic judgment templates and use of Google Meet for criminal court trials.]]>
<![CDATA[REKAYASA SOSIAL LEMBAGA PERADILAN UNTUK MEWUJUDKAN KEADABAN PUBLIK ]]>
<![CDATA[Hidayat, Wahyu]]>
<![CDATA[ Judex Laguens Vol 1 No 2 (2023) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Ikatan Hakim Indonesia (IKAHI) ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.25216/ikahi.1.2.8.2023.309-340
<![CDATA[Rekayasa sosial di dalam lembaga peradilan merupakan hal yang terpenting untuk terus membangun kepercayaan masyarakat Indonesia, dibutuhkan strategi dan rencana untuk mengentaskan permasalahan di internalnya, kemudian diperlukan juga rekayasa sosial terhadap masyarakat melalui putusan hakim yang berkeadilan, memberi manfaat dan kepastian hukum terhadap kasus-kasus yang menyita perhatian masyarakat demi mendapatkan kepercayaan publik sehingga membentuk masyarakat yang berkeadaban. Hasil penelitian ini pertama, rekayasa sosial menuju keadaban adalah dengan strategi dan rencana untuk memberantas korupsi di internal peradilan, dilakukan dengan cara menerapkan Zona Integritas dengan membangun wilayah bebas korupsi di internal peradilan, dari yang paling atas yaitu Mahkamah Agung sampai pengadilan tingkat 2 dan tingkat 1, karena terbukti dari tahun 2017 sampai 2019 jumlah WBK seluruh pengadilan di Indonesia naik secara signifikan. Kedua, Perkara-perkara yang mendapat perhatian publik sekiranya menjadi fokus menciptakan rekayasa sosial untuk mendapatkan lebih banyak lagi kepercayaan publik terhadap peradilan. Karena tingkat kepercayaan publik tersebut berfungsi sebagai a tool of social control agar masyarkat tetap mempertahankan kepercayaannya, bahwa hakim itu bebas dan putusan hakim tersebut berkeadilan dan tidak memandang siapapun dan putusan tersebut bukan hasil dari intervensi internal maupun eksternal.]]>
