cover
Contact Name
Heri Firmansyah
Contact Email
herifirm06@gmail.com
Phone
+6285275401542
Journal Mail Official
albayanjournal@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Kabupaten Tapanuli Tengah, Sumatera Utara, Indonesia
Location
Kab. tapanuli tengah,
Sumatera utara
INDONESIA
Albayan : Journal of Islam and Muslim Societies
ISSN : -     EISSN : 30646219     DOI : -
Albayan Journal of Islam and Muslim Societies (AJIMS) is an international peer reviewed journal published by Yayasan Dar Arrisyah Indonesia. AJIMS has the primary academic mission to develop various Islamic studies based on contemporary Islamic perspective, particularly in Indonesia, and Commonly in Asia and Middle East.
Articles 7 Documents
Search results for , issue "Vol. 2 No. 02 (2025)" : 7 Documents clear
Implementasi Konsep Trias Politica dan Peradilan pada Masa Rasulullah SAW serta Khulafaur Rasyidin Munthe, Syaiful Akromi
Albayan Journal of Islam and Muslim Societies Vol. 2 No. 02 (2025)
Publisher : Albayan Journal of Islam and Muslim Societies

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This study aims to examine the implementation of the concept of trias politica and the judicial system during the time of the Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) and the era of the Rightly Guided Caliphs, with a focus on how the principle of separation of powers was manifested in early Islamic governance. The research employs a descriptive qualitative method through library research, comparing primary sources such as the Qur’an, Hadith, and the Charter of Medina, along with relevant secondary scholarly literature. The analysis is grounded in the theory of separation of powers and the Islamic theory of justice. The findings indicate that during the Prophet Muhammad’s leadership, the concept of trias politica had not yet been formally established. Nonetheless, legislative, executive, and judicial functions were integrated within a single authority, as reflected in the Charter of Medina, which affirms his role as lawmaker, administrator, and judge. In the era of the Khulafaur Rasyidin under Caliph Umar ibn al-Khattab the governmental structure began to show a clearer delineation of powers through the establishment of a more independent judiciary and the reinforcement of procedural justice principles. In conclusion, although a formal separation of powers was not implemented during either period, both the Prophet Muhammad and the Rightly Guided Caliphs upheld fundamental values such as justice, consultation (shura), and the rule of law. These values served as the essential foundations for the development of Islamic governance.
Dakwah Digital dan Tantangan Verifikasi Hadis: Studi Terhadap Pemahaman Audiens di Media Sosial Manik, Zulfirman; Nur Jannah; Moh Ikhsan Azmi; Fatonah Rahmah; Riza Fitri Lubis
Albayan Journal of Islam and Muslim Societies Vol. 2 No. 02 (2025)
Publisher : Albayan Journal of Islam and Muslim Societies

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The advancement of information technology has transformed the methods of Islamic preaching (da'wah), positioning social media as a primary platform for disseminating religious messages. Amid the rapid and massive flow of information, the spread of hadiths through digital media faces serious challenges in terms of verification and source authenticity. This study aims to understand how social media audiences perceive the importance of hadith verification in the context of digital da'wah and how such understanding influences their reception of religious content. This research employs a qualitative approach using a case study method, with data collected through in-depth interviews, participatory observation, and content analysis of social media platforms. The analysis is grounded in information reception theory and digital religious literacy. The findings reveal a diversity of audience understanding regarding hadith authenticity, influenced by educational background, trust in digital preachers, and exposure to religious content. The analysis shows that low levels of digital Islamic literacy contribute to the widespread dissemination of inauthentic hadiths. Compared to previous studies and relevant theories, this research emphasizes the need for a systematic enhancement of digital religious literacy. In conclusion, audience understanding of hadith verification remains uneven, highlighting the need for da'wah strategies that are not only informative but also educational within the social media landscape.
Urgensi Kajian Tarikh al-Tasyri’ dalam Formulasi Hukum Islam Kontemporer Salwa Husni Aprilia Pasaribu; Nur Azizah Shazrina; Rizky Ananda Marpaung; Ali Yanda Safaruddin Tanjung; Arman Alfiansyah Hasibuan
Albayan Journal of Islam and Muslim Societies Vol. 2 No. 02 (2025)
Publisher : Albayan Journal of Islam and Muslim Societies

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The study of Tarikh al-Tasyri‘ is a discipline that traces the formation of Islamic law from the prophetic era to the modern age, providing an essential historical framework for formulating contemporary Islamic legal rulings that remain adaptive while rooted in the tradition of the Shari‘ah. This research employs a qualitative, library-based approach to explore the development of Islamic legislation through key phases, beginning with the revelation of the Qur’an, the practices of the Companions, the formation of legal schools, and the transformation of law in the modern nation-state era. The findings indicate that Islamic law possesses dynamic, historical, and contextual characteristics, making an understanding of its historical trajectory crucial for interpreting the law accurately within the context of rapid social change. The integration of Tarikh al-Tasyri‘, maqasid al-shari‘ah, and contemporary ijtihad methodologies forms the epistemological foundation for constructing modern Islamic law that is not only normative but also relevant and responsive to present-day challenges. The novelty of this study lies in utilizing the history of legislation not merely as a descriptive record but as an active epistemological source for formulating contemporary approaches to Islamic legal thought.
KHULU' DALAM PERSPEKTIF FIKIH KLASIK DAN IMPLEMENTASINYA DALAM HUKUM POSITIF INDONESIA Siti khodijah; Firmansyah , Heri
Albayan Journal of Islam and Muslim Societies Vol. 2 No. 02 (2025)
Publisher : Albayan Journal of Islam and Muslim Societies

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Khulūʿ, as a divorce mechanism initiated by the wife through the payment of iwāḍ (compensation) to the husband, is a legal institution deeply rooted in classical Islamic jurisprudence, yet it has undergone significant transformation when adopted into modern legal systems, including that of Indonesia. This study reassesses the concept of khulūʿ across the four Sunni schools of law and compares these doctrinal formulations with its judicial implementation within the Indonesian legal system, particularly through the Kompilasi Hukum Islam (KHI) and the practices of the Religious Courts. Employing a qualitative, library-based research approach combined with doctrinal and comparative legal analysis, this research finds that although the fundamental elements of khulūʿ—such as the requirement of iwāḍ, the absence of the husband’s right to revoke the divorce, the prescribed ʿiddah, and the centrality of mutual consent—are maintained, the Indonesian legal system has formally institutionalized khulūʿ by mandating judicial proceedings, requiring specific grounds for divorce, authorizing judicial intervention in determining iwāḍ when no agreement is reached, and introducing administrative procedures absent from classical fiqh discourse. The study concludes that the Indonesian model of khulūʿ reflects a process of Islamic legal adaptation shaped by the demands of modernity, the administrative needs of the state, and the imperative of protecting women, thereby producing a dialectical relationship between fiqh orthodoxy and contemporary family law regulation.
Perempuan dan Pendidikan: Studi Historis-Kritis Dari Zaman Klasik Hingga Modern Dalam Konteks Pendidikan Islam Listi Hani Siregar; Siti Juraida Hasibuan; Abdusima Nasution
Albayan Journal of Islam and Muslim Societies Vol. 2 No. 02 (2025)
Publisher : Albayan Journal of Islam and Muslim Societies

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This article critically examines the position and role of women in education through a historical and Islamic perspective. The discussion traces the development of women’s education from ancient civilizations, the pre-Islamic era, the classical Islamic period, to the modern and contemporary context. Using a qualitative library research method with a historical-critical approach, this study analyzes normative Islamic texts, historical records, and contemporary scholarly works to explore the gap between Islamic ideals and social practices regarding women’s education. The findings demonstrate that women’s education has strong theological legitimacy in Islam and has played a significant role in the transmission of knowledge and the development of civilization. Furthermore, the emergence of women-only educational institutions reflects adaptive strategies to expand access while responding to socio-cultural contexts. This study argues that strengthening women’s education is not merely a matter of gender equality, but a strategic foundation for building an ethical, knowledgeable, and sustainable society.
Penalaran Hukum (Istinbāṭ) Walimatul ‘Ursy dalam Fikih Syafi’iyah dan Relevansinya terhadap Kompilasi Hukum Islam di Indonesia Marpaung, Mukhlis Tri Mulya; Heri Firmansyah
Albayan Journal of Islam and Muslim Societies Vol. 2 No. 02 (2025)
Publisher : Albayan Journal of Islam and Muslim Societies

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Walīmat al-ʿurs constitutes an important socio-religious practice in Islamic marriage, particularly within Muslim societies that adhere to the Shāfiʿī school of law. This article examines the legal reasoning (istinbāṭ) employed by Shāfiʿī jurists in determining the legal status of walīmat al-ʿurs and analyzes its relevance to Indonesia’s Compilation of Islamic Law (Kompilasi Hukum Islam/KHI). Employing a normative legal research method with conceptual and comparative approaches, this study analyzes classical Shāfiʿī legal texts alongside statutory Islamic family law in Indonesia. The findings demonstrate that Shāfiʿī jurists derive the ruling of walīmat al-ʿurs through an integrative mode of legal reasoning that combines textual commands of the Prophet, contextual indicators (qarāʾin), and functional considerations of marriage publicity (iʿlān al-nikāḥ), resulting in its classification as sunnah muʾakkadah. Meanwhile, the absence of explicit regulation on walīmat al-ʿurs in the KHI reflects a legislative choice to prioritize administrative and juridical aspects of marriage over ritual-social practices. This study argues that walīmat al-ʿurs remains epistemologically, normatively, and functionally relevant to the KHI as a form of living Islamic law that complements codified legal norms. The article contributes to Islamic legal scholarship by highlighting the continued relevance of classical Shāfiʿī legal reasoning in understanding and evaluating contemporary Islamic family law in Indonesia.
Penyelesaian Sengketa Hasil Pemilihan Kepala Daerah dan Prinsip Keadilan Konstitusional: Analisis Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 152/PHPU.BUP-XXIII/2025 dalam Perspektif Demokrasi dan Nilai Islam Koko Nugroho; Halimatul Maryani
Albayan Journal of Islam and Muslim Societies Vol. 2 No. 02 (2025)
Publisher : Albayan Journal of Islam and Muslim Societies

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This article examines the settlement of regional head election disputes in Indonesia through an analysis of Constitutional Court Decision No. 152/PHPU.BUP-XXIII/2025 concerning the 2024 Regent Election of Deli Serdang. The study aims to assess how the Constitutional Court resolves electoral disputes within the framework of constitutional justice and to evaluate the decision from the perspective of electoral justice and Islamic values relevant to Muslim societies. Employing a qualitative normative–empirical legal research approach, this article analyzes constitutional provisions, statutory regulations, and the Court’s legal reasoning (ratio decidendi), supported by limited empirical data related to the electoral context.  The findings indicate that the Constitutional Court consistently prioritizes procedural justice by strictly applying the vote-difference threshold as stipulated in Law No. 10 of 2016, thereby emphasizing legal certainty and political stability. However, this procedural orientation potentially constrains substantive justice, particularly when claims relate to the quality of the electoral process and voter participation affected by external conditions. From the perspective of Islamic legal and ethical principles—such as ʿadl (justice), amānah (trust), and maslaḥah (public interest)—the decision reflects institutional responsibility and formal legality, yet leaves room for a more socially responsive approach to electoral justice. This article contributes to existing scholarship by integrating constitutional law analysis with Islamic normative values, offering an interdisciplinary perspective on electoral dispute resolution in Muslim societies. It argues that incorporating ethical and social considerations alongside procedural requirements may strengthen public trust and enhance the substantive quality of democratic governance at the local level.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 7