Journal of Health Literacy and Qualitative Research
Focus and Scope Welcome to the Journal of Health Literacy and Qualitative Research, a pioneering platform dedicated to advancing the understanding of health literacy through the prism of qualitative inquiry. Our journal serves as a confluence of insights from researchers, practitioners, policymakers, and educators aiming to enhance health literacy outcomes across diverse populations and settings. Through rigorous qualitative research, we endeavor to unravel the complexities of health literacy, fostering a holistic understanding that can inform effective interventions, policies, and educational strategies. Focus The Journal of Health Literacy and Qualitative Research focuses on the following key areas: Health Literacy Foundations: Exploring the theoretical underpinnings, models, and frameworks that shape our understanding of health literacy. Methodological Innovations: Highlighting qualitative research methodologies, tools, and techniques that offer novel insights into health literacy phenomena. Population-Specific Studies: Examining health literacy across different populations, including but not limited to age-specific groups, ethnic and cultural communities, and individuals with chronic conditions, to uncover unique challenges and solutions. Intervention Design and Evaluation: Investigating the development, implementation, and assessment of interventions aimed at improving health literacy. Policy and Practice: Analyzing the implications of health literacy research for health policy, public health initiatives, and clinical practice. Digital Health Literacy: Delving into the role of digital technologies in enhancing or impeding health literacy, including the evaluation of digital health interventions. Educational Strategies: Sharing innovative educational approaches and programs designed to enhance health literacy among healthcare professionals and the public. Scope Our journal welcomes submissions that: Employ qualitative research methodologies to explore health literacy-related questions. Present innovative theoretical or conceptual models that advance understanding of health literacy. Report on the design, implementation, and evaluation of interventions aimed at improving health literacy. Analyze policies and practices affecting health literacy levels in various contexts. Offer critical reviews of the literature on specific aspects of health literacy. Explore the intersection of health literacy with technology, communication, and information design. Submission Categories We invite submissions in the form of original research articles, systematic reviews, methodological papers, case studies, and commentary pieces that adhere to the highest standards of qualitative research. Audience The Journal of Health Literacy and Qualitative Research is intended for a wide audience, including: Health literacy researchers and academics Public health professionals and policymakers Healthcare providers and educators Students in health professions and related fields Commitment to Quality and Integrity We are committed to upholding the highest standards of research integrity and academic excellence. Submissions undergo a rigorous peer-review process to ensure that they contribute valuable insights to the field of health literacy.
Articles
51 Documents
Switching from Antipsychotic Polypharmacy to Monotherapy in Hebephrenic Schizophrenia: A Case Study
Silaban, Rusdiana;
Nur Azizah;
Hafid Algristian
Journal of Health Literacy and Qualitative Research Vol. 6 No. 1 (2026): March 2026
Publisher : Yayasan Sinergi Kawula Muda
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.61194/jhlqr.v6i1.905
Schizophrenia is a chronic psychiatric disorder that imposes a substantial burden on patients and caregivers. Antipsychotic polypharmacy remains a common clinical practice to manage persistent positive and negative symptoms, although growing evidence indicates it does not significantly improve treatment outcomes and may instead increase adverse effects, treatment costs, and non-adherence. This case study aimed to describe the clinical benefits and rational considerations of switching from antipsychotic polypharmacy to monotherapy in a patient with hebephrenic schizophrenia. A 37-year-old woman with a 20-year history of hebephrenic schizophrenia was observed. She had previously received a combination of chlorpromazine and trifluoperazine with trihexyphenidyl for extrapyramidal symptom prevention. Clinical evaluations were performed to assess therapeutic effects, side effects, and medication adherence before and after the switch to chlorpromazine monotherapy. During the polypharmacy phase, the patient experienced several side effects, including insomnia, restlessness, irritability, and mild extrapyramidal symptoms. After transitioning to monotherapy with an adjusted chlorpromazine dose, she showed notable improvement in psychotic symptoms, sleep quality, and social functioning without severe adverse reactions. Medication adherence increased as the patient reported greater comfort and tolerance with a single-drug regimen. This case suggests that switching from antipsychotic polypharmacy to monotherapy can reduce side effects, improve adherence, and maintain clinical stability. Rational and individualized use of antipsychotics should be prioritized to achieve better long-term outcomes and quality of life in schizophrenia management.