Studies in Social Sciences and Humanities
SS&H focuses on issues, theories, and methodologies within the fields of social sciences and humanities. Furthermore, the scope of SS&H encompasses a wide range of topics including (but not limited to): Sociology: Studies exploring social behavior, structures, institutions, and processes. Politics: Investigations into political systems, governance, ideologies, and public policies in various contexts. Economics: Analyses of economic theories, markets, development, and global economic issues. Law: Research on legal systems, jurisprudence, human rights, and legal reform. Psychology: Inquiries into human behavior, cognition, emotions, and mental processes. Linguistics: Studies on language structure, usage, instruction, and acquisition/learning. Literature: Critical examinations of literary texts, genres, movements, and literary theory. Philosophy: Philosophical inquiries into metaphysics, ethics, epistemology, and philosophical traditions. Religious Studies: Explorations of religious beliefs, practices, rituals, and comparative religious studies. History: Investigations into historical events, periods, movements, and historiography. Anthropology: Studies on human cultures, societies, and other ethnographic research. Geography: Research on spatial relationships, environmental studies, and human geography. Tourism: Research on tourism industry, destination management, cultural tourism, sustainable tourism practices, and tourism impacts. International Relations: Analyses of international politics, diplomacy, conflict resolution, and global governance. Arts: Critical studies of visual arts, performing arts, literature, and cultural expressions.
Articles
36 Documents
<![CDATA[Implementasi Pasal 3 Huruf C Peraturan Bupati Jember Nomor 29 Tahun 2024 Tentang Percepatan Penurunan Stunting Terintegrasi Pada Ibu Hamil Di Kecamatan Kaliwates ]]>
<![CDATA[Feri Aji]]>;
<![CDATA[Icha Cahyaning Fitri]]>
<![CDATA[ SS&H: Studies in Social Sciences and Humanities Vol 3 No 1 (2026): SS&H: Studies in Social Sciences and Humanities ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Empat Sembilan Publisher ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.63232/ssh.v3i1.83
<![CDATA[Despite national efforts to reduce stunting, Kaliwates District in Jember Regency presents a unique paradox where high stunting prevalence persists amidst adequate urban infrastructure. This study aims to analyze the implementation effectiveness of Article 3 Letter C of Jember Regent Regulation Number 29 of 2024, specifically regarding integrated interventions for pregnant women, and to identify the determinative factors behind its execution. Employing a juridical empirical method with a socio-legal approach, this research utilizes primary data obtained through in-depth interviews with pregnant women, health officials, and local government agencies, complemented by observations and legal documentation analysis. The findings reveal that the regulatory mandate for integrated services remains largely unfulfilled due to significant bureaucratic fragmentation and sectoral ego between agencies. A critical discovery is the phenomenon of administrative stunting, where rigid requirements for residency documents exclude vulnerable populations from accessing state sponsored nutrition programs. Furthermore, the implementation faces cultural resistance from elite urban communities who reject health interventions, viewing them as irrelevant to their social status. Consequently, the regulation has not been effective, creating a distinct gap between the written law and its practical application. The study concludes that structural rigidity and lack of officer legitimacy hinder the protection of constitutional health rights. These findings imply an urgent need for bureaucratic reform towards more adaptive governance, requiring policymakers to establish discretionary mechanisms that bypass administrative hurdles to ensure stunting eradication efforts are inclusive for all social strata.]]>
<![CDATA[Program Bank Sampah Binor Lestari Sebagai Lingkungan Berkelanjutan Di Desa Binor, Kecamatan Paiton, Kabupaten Probolinggo ]]>
<![CDATA[Edhi Siswanto]]>;
<![CDATA[Nadiya Amalia Putri]]>
<![CDATA[ SS&H: Studies in Social Sciences and Humanities Vol 3 No 1 (2026): SS&H: Studies in Social Sciences and Humanities ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Empat Sembilan Publisher ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.63232/ssh.v3i1.89
<![CDATA[This study examines the role of the Binor Lestari Waste Bank as an innovative community-based model for sustainable environmental management in Binor Village, Paiton District, Probolinggo Regency, Indonesia. The research addresses increasing household waste generation, limited waste-sorting practices, and the need to transition from conventional collect-and-dispose systems toward reduction- and recycling-oriented management. Methods: A descriptive qualitative research design was employed. Data was collected through field observations, in-depth interviews with waste bank managers and community members, documentation review, and questionnaire distribution. Data was analyzed through systematic classification, interpretation, and triangulation to ensure validity and contextual accuracy. Results: The findings indicate that the Binor Lestari Waste Bank significantly contributes to improving environmental awareness, encouraging household-level waste segregation, and fostering active community participation. In 2024, approximately 313 kg of recyclable waste was managed, generating IDR 313,600 in economic value. From January to September 2025, 202 kg of waste was collected, producing IDR 426,750. Beyond measurable economic returns, the program strengthens social cohesion, supports local environmental education, and integrates with village-level sustainability initiatives. However, challenges remain in participation consistency, operational resources, and systematic waste collection scheduling. The Binor Lestari Waste Bank demonstrates that community-driven waste management can simultaneously achieve ecological, social, and economic benefits. As a village-based environmental governance model, it supports sustainable development through participatory mechanisms and local institutional collaboration. Strengthening administrative systems, expanding community engagement, and improving logistical support will enhance long-term sustainability and replicability in other rural contexts.]]>
<![CDATA[Legal Accountability of Government Administrative Officials for the Issuance of Dual Land Ownership Certificates (A Study on the Ownership Certificate of Mangli Community Health Center, Jember Regency) ]]>
<![CDATA[Nazylatul Muawanah]]>;
<![CDATA[Ahmad Suryono]]>
<![CDATA[ SS&H: Studies in Social Sciences and Humanities Vol 3 No 1 (2026): SS&H: Studies in Social Sciences and Humanities ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Empat Sembilan Publisher ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.63232/ssh.v3i1.92
<![CDATA[The issuance of two land title certificates over the same parcel of land constitutes a serious problem in land administration and may undermine legal certainty in land registration. This study aims to analyze the form of administrative legal responsibility of land officials for the issuance of overlapping land certificates, particularly in the case of the Puskesmas Mangli property in Jember Regency. The research employs a normative juridical method with a statutory and conceptual approach by examining relevant laws and regulations concerning administrative governance and land administration. The results show that the issuance of two certificates occurred due to inadequate verification of physical and juridical data during the land registration process, particularly in the examination of land history and cadastral records. In administrative law, a land certificate is considered a state administrative decision that must fulfill the requirements of authority, procedure, and substance. If these requirements are not met, the decision may be declared invalid and subject to administrative correction. The study concludes that the administrative legal responsibility arising from the issuance of overlapping certificates is primarily a responsibility of office, as the certificate was issued by officials exercising their official authority. Such responsibility may be realized through administrative actions including cancellation, revocation, or correction of the defective certificate by the National Land Agency. This mechanism reflects the application of the principle that administrative authorities have the power to revoke their own decisions when administrative defects are identified. The findings highlight the importance of strengthening verification procedures and administrative supervision in land registration to ensure legal certainty and prevent similar disputes in the future.]]>
<![CDATA[Implementation of Obstruction of Justice in News Reporting Cases (A Case Study of the Suspect Designation of Tian Bahtiar in Jak TV Coverage) ]]>
<![CDATA[Dewi Fiandika Sari]]>;
<![CDATA[Ahmad Suryono]]>
<![CDATA[ SS&H: Studies in Social Sciences and Humanities Vol 3 No 1 (2026): SS&H: Studies in Social Sciences and Humanities ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Empat Sembilan Publisher ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.63232/ssh.v3i1.93
<![CDATA[This study examines the application of obstruction of justice in the context of media reporting, focusing on the case of the suspect designation of Tian Bahtiar in Jak TV coverage. The issue arises from the intersection between law enforcement interests and press freedom, particularly when journalistic activities are alleged to interfere with legal processes. This research employs a normative juridical method using statutory and conceptual approaches to analyze whether the elements of obstruction of justice, as regulated under Article 21 of the Anti-Corruption Law, are fulfilled. The findings indicate that although the element of “every person” is met, other essential elements such as intentional conduct, acts of preventing, obstructing, or thwarting the legal process, and both direct or indirect interference are not sufficiently proven. The reporting activities carried out were found to fall within the scope of journalistic functions and did not demonstrate a clear causal relationship with the disruption of law enforcement processes. Therefore, the application of obstruction of justice in this case is considered legally inappropriate. This study highlights the importance of maintaining a balance between effective law enforcement and the protection of press freedom in a democratic legal system.]]>
<![CDATA[TANGGUNG JAWAB PEMERINTAH KABUPATEN SUMENEP TERHADAP PENGGUNAAN TANAH MASYARAKAT UNTUK PEMBANGUNAN SEKOLAH MENURUT UNDANG-UNDANG NO 2 TAHUN 2012 TENTANG PENGADAAN TANAH BAGI PEMBANGUNAN UNTUK KEPENTINGAN UMUM ]]>
<![CDATA[Anggita Yulia]]>;
<![CDATA[Ahmad Suryono]]>
<![CDATA[ SS&H: Studies in Social Sciences and Humanities Vol 3 No 1 (2026): SS&H: Studies in Social Sciences and Humanities ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Empat Sembilan Publisher ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.63232/ssh.v3i1.95
<![CDATA[Land acquisition for public purposes, particularly in the education sector, often raises legal issues related to the protection of community land rights. This study aims to analyze the legal responsibility of the Sumenep Regency Government in the use of community land for school development based on Law Number 2 of 2012 concerning Land Acquisition for Public Interest, as well as to examine the legal consequences arising from improper land use. This research employs a normative juridical method with a statute and conceptual approach, supported by the analysis of relevant laws, legal principles, and doctrines. The results indicate that, although land acquisition has been clearly regulated, its implementation in practice does not always comply with legal procedures, particularly in terms of providing fair and proper compensation. In certain cases, land owned by the community has been utilized without following formal acquisition mechanisms, leading to disputes and potential violations of legal norms. The study concludes that the government bears legal responsibility for ensuring the protection of land rights through lawful procedures and fair compensation. Failure to do so may result in legal consequences, including claims of unlawful acts by the government and disputes before the administrative or general courts. The implications of this research highlight the importance of strengthening accountability, transparency, and legal compliance in land acquisition processes to ensure the realization of justice, legal certainty, and public welfare.]]>
<![CDATA[Pengawasan Pemerintah Daerah Terhadap Tambak Udang Berdasarkan Pasal 71 UU PPLH di Kecamatan Gumukmas ]]>
<![CDATA[Lidang Mampetua Siahaan]]>;
<![CDATA[Fauziyah Fauziyah]]>
<![CDATA[ SS&H: Studies in Social Sciences and Humanities Vol 3 No 2 (2026): SS&H: Studies in Social Sciences and Humanities ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Empat Sembilan Publisher ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.63232/ssh.v3i2.104
<![CDATA[Shrimp farming activities in Gumukmas District, Jember Regency, provide economic benefits but raise issues of environmental pollution that harm coastal communities. This study aims to analyze the implementation of supervision by the Regional Government based on Article 71 of Law Number 32 of 2009 and to examine the relevance of applying the Good Environmental Governance (GEG) principles in the management of these shrimp farms. This study uses a mixed-methods legal research approach with a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. Empirical data were obtained through public documentation studies and digital tracking of the escalation of environmental conflicts in the field. Research results show that the implementation of supervision has not been effective because the relevant agencies tend to apply a passive supervision model (complaint-based supervision). This condition indicates administrative omission and maladministration regarding the existence of illegal ponds. In addition, the GEG principle has not been optimally applied, as seen from the closed access to licensing documents and minimal local community participation, thus violating citizens' constitutional rights to a good and healthy environment.]]>
