cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Akbar Narum
Contact Email
akbar.nasrum@gmail.com
Phone
+6282293685122
Journal Mail Official
pengelolajme@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Jalan Pemuda No. 339, Kab. Kolaka, Sulawesi Tenggara, Indonesia
Location
Kab. kolaka,
Sulawesi tenggara
INDONESIA
JME (Journal of Mathematics Education)
Published by Universitas Sembilanbelas November Kolaka
ISSN : 25282468     EISSN : 25282026     DOI : https://doi.org/10.31327/jomedu
Core Subject : Education,
Mathematics
The Journal of Mathematics Education (JME) aims to serve as a scientific platform for researchers, practitioners, and educators in the field of mathematics education to publish their original research. JME welcomes contributions that advance theory, practice, and policy in mathematics education across all educational levels. The scope of the journal includes, but is not limited to: Teaching and learning of mathematics Mathematics curriculum development Technology in mathematics education Mathematics teacher education Assessment and evaluation in mathematics education Systematic literature reviews Bibliometric analyses related to mathematics education The journal accepts quantitative, qualitative, and mixed-methods approaches relevant to these topics.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Pendidikan
Articles 6 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue "Vol. 3 No. 2 (2018): JME" : 6 Documents clear
The Effect of I-CARE Learning Model on the Students' Metacognition Mamik Suendarti; Hawa Liberna
JME (Journal of Mathematics Education) Vol. 3 No. 2 (2018): JME
Publisher : USN Kolaka

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31327/jme.v3i2.439

Abstract

The general objective of this study was to find and analyze empirically the effect of the I Care learning model on the students' metacognition. The method used in this research was the experimental method. The affordable population in this study was grade X students of SMK Assyafiah which is located at Jalan Bukit Duri No.29, South Jakarta 2016/2017 academic year. The sample of the study was 60 students obtained through random sampling method that the researcher mixed in the population so that all subjects were considered the same. Data collection was done by documentation techniques (learning model variables) and test techniques (student metacognition variables). The collected data was then analyzed using the t-test. Before the data was analyzed, first descriptive statistical analysis and data requirements test (normality test, homogeneity test) were carried out. The results of the study showed that there was an influence of the I Care learning model on the students' metacognition. In other words, students' metacognition who used the I Care learning model was higher than the students' metacognition who used constructivism learning model.
Effectiveness of STAD Cooperative Learning Model with LKS Help on Mathematical Learning Outcomes of Class VIII Students Istiqfar Istiqfar; Irma Magfirah
JME (Journal of Mathematics Education) Vol. 3 No. 2 (2018): JME
Publisher : USN Kolaka

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31327/jme.v3i2.808

Abstract

The learning outcomes of mathematics are one of the benchmarks of the high and low quality of a mathematics learning process. This study aims to find out how the effectiveness of STAD type cooperative learning model with the help of worksheets on mathematics learning outcomes of class VIII students at MTs. Muhammadiyah Palleko in Takalar in 2014/2015 academic year. This research is quasi-experimental or quasi?experimental research. The instrument used in this study is the essay type learning test with a sample of 35 people, and the sampling technique used is saturated samples. The data analysis technique used is descriptive statistical analysis and inferential statistical analysis. Based on the results of descriptive analysis obtained the average of the two groups, namely the experimental class before treatment (pre-test) of 59.16 and after the surgery of (posttest) 75.61, the average pre-test control class was 54.56, and the post test average is 58.25. Whereas based on the results of relative efficiency and inferential analysis it can be concluded that the STAD type of cooperative learning model with the help of LKS is effective in improving the mathematics learning outcomes of the eighth-grade students of MTs. Muhammadiyah Palleko District of Taylar.
Development of Mathematical Comic-Strip Application as a Mobile Learning Media-Based Learning Witri Lestari; Yhohan Ady Chandra
JME (Journal of Mathematics Education) Vol. 3 No. 2 (2018): JME
Publisher : USN Kolaka

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31327/jme.v3i2.813

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to develop comic strip media as a learning media for mathematics so that it can create mathematical learning media by utilizing technology or called mobile learning, knowing the steps for developing learning media and designing m-learning learning media designs that are easy for students to understand. as well as knowing the quality of the Mathematical Strip Comic learning media that was developed through three test stages, namely expert validation testing, testing on teacher and student respondents, and evaluation for product revisions. In addition, a research and development development research approach is used in compiling work steps so that conclusions can be drawn that mathematical strips are learning media byutilizing image illustrations in loading the content of teaching materials that can attract students' interest and motivation in learning activities that are easier and more enjoyable. Assessment carried out by media experts, material experts, linguists, teacher respondents, and student respondents found that Comic Strip learning media is in a good category to be used as a support for mathematics learning
Analysis of the Difficulty of Mathematical Education Students in Completing the Geometric Running Problem Based on Van Hiele Theory in Geometry Transformation Andi Mariani Ramlan; Fitriyani Hali
JME (Journal of Mathematics Education) Vol. 3 No. 2 (2018): JME
Publisher : USN Kolaka

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31327/jme.v3i2.834

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to: (1) finding out the difficulties experienced by mathematics education students in solving geometric reasoning problems based on van Hiele's theory; (2) identifying the factors causing difficulties experienced by students in solving geometric problems based on van Hiele’s theory; and (3) determining the steps that need to be taken to overcome the students' difficulties in solving geometric reasoning problems based on van Hiele's theory in the Transformation Geometry Course. The students' difficulties in solving geometric reasoning problems based on van Hiele's levels will give an idea of the indicators of geometrical reasoning abilities that are still low, so that the right alternative solutions are obtained. This type of research is descriptive research with a qualitative approach. The research subjects were 28 studentswho programed geometry transformation courses. The instrument in this study was a test instrument, namely geometric reasoning abilities of students as many as 5 questions consisting of 5 levels of ability, namely visualization, analysis, abstraction, formal deduction, and rigor. While the data analysis techniques in this study used descriptive analysis. Collecting data in this study used interview techniques and written tests. The results showed that from the five indicators of geometric reasoning ability, for the visualization level, there were 26 people who achieved the optimal score with a percentage of 92.9. Seen at the level of analysis still not reached optimally with a percentage of 21.4 or only 6 people who achieved the optimal score, while the level of abstraction, formal deduction, and rigor has not been achieved. Difficulties experienced by students at the level of analysis, abstraction, formal deduction, and rigor. The causal factors experienced by students based on the results of interviews obtainedinformation that students have difficulty answering questions due to several things including; students have forgotten about the material being taught, when they learn they understand but are less interested in developing, feel unsatisfied so they expect concrete media, need to be trained in many questions, and follow up to students. From this information, an appropriate alternative is needed, for example using van Hiele's theory to familiarize students with reasoning skills.
EFFECTIVENESS OF COOPERATIVE LEARNING MODEL FOR ENHANCING CAPABILITY OF INVESTIGATION TIPEGROUP RESOLUTION ON STUDENT MATHEMATICAL HIGHT SCHOOL Supratman Supratman; Akbar Nasrum
JME (Journal of Mathematics Education) Vol. 3 No. 2 (2018): JME
Publisher : USN Kolaka

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31327/jme.v3i2.845

Abstract

The purpose of this study are: (1) To determine the ability of mathematical problemsolving class X SMA Negeri 1 Wundulako taught using cooperative learning model Group Investigation. (2)To determine the ability of mathematical problem solving class X SMA Negeri 1 Wundulakoyang taught using conventional learning model in teaching trigonometry. (3) To determine whether the mathematical problem solving ability of students taught bycooperative learning model of Group Investigationbetter than mathematics problem solving ability of students taught by conventional learning models in Class 1 Wundulako State XSMA in teaching trigonometry. This type of research used experimental method. The population in this study were all students of class X are scattered in seven classes in parallel with the number of 155 people. Sampling was conducted using random cluster sampling technique. In this study as a sample taken two classes of the population that there is a class X2 as an experimental class and class X4 as the control class. From the results of data analysis showed that: (1) average math problem solving ability X2 grade students taught using cooperative learning model type investigative groups (Group Investigation), which consists of 19 students showed minimum value maximum value 96.00 72.00 , the average (mean)87.0526, median88.00 and mode86.00, With a variance40.608And standard deviation 6.37246, (2 average math problem solving ability X4 grade students taught using conventional learning model which consists of 22 students showed 68.00 minimum value, maximum value 96, 00 average (mean)82.3636, median82,00, and mode82.00, With a variance58.147And standard deviation7.62543, (3) the results of t-test analysis using independent samples t-test obtained t =2.116 on the significant 0,005 <? = 0.05then H0 is rejected and H1 accepted. With the rejection of H0, it can be concluded that the increase in mathematical problem solving ability of students taught using cooperative learning model typeinvestigative groups (Group Investigation) is better than math problem solving ability ofstudents taught using conventional learning models.
Analysis of Pedagogic Competency of Mathematical Education Students in Microteaching Course at the Universitas Sembilanbelas November Kolaka Fitriyani Hali; Herlina Herlina
JME (Journal of Mathematics Education) Vol. 3 No. 2 (2018): JME
Publisher : USN Kolaka

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31327/jme.v3i2.842

Abstract

One of the competencies that must be possessed by teachers or prospective teachers to become professional teachers is pedagogical competence. Pedagogic competence is the ability of a teacher to manage the learning process that relates to students. Therefore, pedagogical competence is very important for mathematics education students as prospective teachers. This study aims to determine the pedagogic competencies possessed by students, to know the strengths and weaknesses of students' pedagogical competencies, to identify the causes of weaknesses in students' pedagogical competencies, and determine alternative solutions to the weaknesses of students' pedagogical competencies. This research is a descriptive study with a qualitative approach. The subjects in this research are Mathematics Education Study Program students who took Microteaching courses. Data collection in this study was carried out through giving tests and interviews. Data was analyzed in quantitative and qualitative ways. The conclusion of the results of this study are 1) students' pedagogical competencies are in the low category; 2) The advantages of pedagogical competencies possessed by students are a) understanding the students' characteristics; b) mastering the concepts, principles, and procedures for developing curriculum or expertise programs; c) creating learning situations that are active, interactive, communicative, effective, and fun, as well as effective students guidance. While the weaknesses of pedagogic competence possessed by students are: a) mastering learning theory and learning principles; b) mastering theories, principles, and learning strategies; c) mastering the use of media, communication technology, and information, as well as reflective actions to improve the quality of learning; d) mastering concepts, principles, and learning assessment strategies; e) understanding the process and results and the impact of learning for students. 3) Factors that lead to the students' weak pedagogical competence are lack of students' motivation in improving and developing their pedagogical abilities and lack of tasks or exercises carried out by students in developing their pedagogical abilities, and lack of students' creativity in completing tasks. 4) Efforts that can be used as alternative solutions namely applying the Lesson Study approach and providing material reinforcement of pedagogic abilities.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 6

 1 

Filter by Year

2018 2018


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 9 No. 2 (2024): JME Vol. 9 No. 1 (2024): JME Vol. 8 No. 2 (2023): JME Vol. 8 No. 1 (2023): JME Vol. 7 No. 2 (2022): JME Vol. 7 No. 1 (2022): JME Vol. 6 No. 2 (2021): JME Vol. 6 No. 1 (2021): JME Vol. 5 No. 2 (2020): JME Vol. 5 No. 1 (2020): JME Vol. 4 No. 2 (2019): JME Vol. 4 No. 1 (2019): JME Vol. 3 No. 2 (2018): JME Vol. 3 No. 1 (2018): JME Vol. 2 No. 2 (2017): JME Vol. 2 No. 1 (2017): JME Vol. 1 No. 2 (2016): JME More Issue