cover
Contact Name
Junaidi
Contact Email
jurnalconsensus@gmail.com
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
jurnalconsensus@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Jln. Kol. H. Animan Achad (d/h Jln. Sukabangun II) KM. 6.5 Lr. Suka Pandai No. 1610. Palembang, Indonesia.
Location
Kota palembang,
Sumatera selatan
INDONESIA
Consensus : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
ISSN : -     EISSN : 29622395     DOI : https://doi.org/10.46839/consensus
Diterbitkan oleh Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Sumpah Pemuda (STIHPADA) Palembang berisikan tulisan ilmiah, hasil pembahasan penelitian, pembahasan buku dan pendapat yang mendukung. Artikel Hukum yang dipublikasikan pada jurnal ini merupakan hasil karya ilmiah mahasiswa dan dosen yang telah memenuhi Pedoman Penulisan bagi Penulis (Author Guidelines) yang telah ditentukan oleh Consensus : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum. Semua artikel yang dikirimkan oleh penulis dan dipublikasikan dalam jurnal ini ditelaah melalui peer revie process. Jadwal penerbitan setahun 4 (empat) kali pada bulan Februari, Mei, Agustus, dan November. Tulisan yang dikirim harus berpedoman pada metode penulisan ilmiah dan petunjuk penulisan sebagai terlampir. Isi konten tulisan tanggung jawab sepenuhnya penulis. Redaksi tidak bertanggung jawab terhadap isi konten tulisan.
Articles 12 Documents
Search results for , issue "Vol. 4 No. 1 (2025)" : 12 Documents clear
Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Kebutuhan Pembaharuan Regulasi Hak Cipta Di Indonesia Dalam Menghadapi Perkembangan Karya Cipta Berbasis Artificial Intelligence (AI) Anggarini, Ni Kadek Listya; Rama, Bagus Gede Ari; Antari, Putu Eva Ditayani; Putra, Komang Satria Wibawa
Consensus : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 4 No. 1 (2025)
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Sumpah Pemuda

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The development of artificial intelligence (AI) technology has created new challenges in Indonesia's copyright law system. Artificial intelligence is now capable of producing works of art, writing, music, and other forms of expression that previously could only be produced by humans. However, Law No. 28 of 2014 on Copyright is still oriented towards the concept of human authorship, whereby only humans are recognized as creators and copyright holders. This situation creates a legal vacuum in determining the legal status of creative works produced in part or in whole by AI. Issues arise regarding the determination of the creator, ownership of economic and moral rights, and legal liability for copyright infringement involving AI systems.  This article uses a normative legal research method with a conceptual and legislative approach to analyze the extent to which Indonesia's copyright law system is able to accommodate developments in AI technology. The results of the study show that the current legal system is not yet able to provide adequate protection for AI-based works due to the lack of clear criteria regarding the level of human involvement required to obtain copyright protection. Therefore, regulatory updates are needed in the form of amendments to Law Number 28 of 2014 or the issuance of implementing regulations that regulate the limits of human roles, transparency in the use of AI training data, and legal protection mechanisms for works involving algorithms. These updates are important to ensure legal certainty, protect the rights of human creators, and encourage technological innovation and the national creative economy in the digital era
Analisis Yuridis Fenomena Blind Box Sebagai Bentuk Perjudian Digital Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2024 Tentang Informasi Dan Transaksi Elektronik Astrawan, I Kadek Angga Budi; Darma, I Made Wirya
Consensus : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 4 No. 1 (2025)
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Sumpah Pemuda

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Article 27 paragraph (2) of Law Number 1 of 2024 concerning Electronic Information and Transactions (ITE Law) contains a prohibition against any person who intentionally and without rights distributes or makes accessible electronic information that has “gambling content.” However, this phrase lacks a clear interpretation or definition, resulting in legal uncertainty in its application. This study aims to analyze the legal implications of the absence of a clear interpretation and its impact on law enforcement practices in the cyber realm. Using a normative juridical approach and conceptual analysis, this study finds that the absence of an explicit definition leads to differences in interpretation among law enforcement officials, potentially resulting in the over- criminalization of digital businesses and hindering consumer protection from covert gambling practices in the virtual world. In addition, the ambiguity of this phrase has resulted in weak law enforcement, as authorities find it difficult to prove the element of gambling in digital activities such as loot boxes, blind boxes, or luck-based lottery systems that are often used in online applications and games. As a result, the principles of legal certainty and justice as stipulated in Article 28D paragraph (1) of the 1945 Constitution have been neglected. This study emphasizes the need to establish implementing regulations or official guidelines that explain the objective indicators of “gambling content” in the digital space, including elements of economic value, dependence on luck, and potential financial gains. With the clarity of these norms, it is hoped that there will be uniformity in law enforcement, increased consumer protection, and the creation of fair legal certainty in the digital age.

Page 2 of 2 | Total Record : 12