cover
Contact Name
Andri Nirwana
Contact Email
andri.nirwana@ums.ac.id
Phone
+6282219302020
Journal Mail Official
birjournal2023@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Bulletin of Islamic Research Address: Jl. Kompleks Lampadang, Desa Lamteh, Kec. Peukan Bada, Kabupaten Aceh Besar, Aceh, 23351
Location
Kab. aceh besar,
Aceh
INDONESIA
Bulletin of Islamic Research
ISSN : -     EISSN : 30314526     DOI : https://doi.org/10.69526/bir.v1i4.1
Aims The Bulletin of Islamic Research aims to advance Religious Studies through an interdisciplinary investigation of the role of religion particularly Islam in addressing contemporary global challenges, including globalization, social transformation, and sustainability. It examines the influence of religious beliefs, practices, and institutions on culture, education, psychology, social behavior, governance, economics, digital technology, and environmental ethics, with particular attention to human well-being, ethical development, social cohesion, and societal resilience across diverse cultural contexts. Scope The scope of this Bulletin, situated within Religious Studies and the Social Sciences, covers the dynamics of religiosity and Islamic thought in response to globalization and modernity; the interrelationships between history, religion, culture, governance, and economic systems; the role of digital media and communication technologies in shaping religious identity and social interaction among Muslim communities; educational, psychological, and behavioral dimensions of religion related to mental health and well-being; the contribution of Islamic values to moral education, character formation, and social ethics; Islamic perspectives on environmental sustainability and ecological responsibility; and consumer and social behavior analyzed through qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-method research designs in cross-cultural and comparative settings.
Articles 132 Documents
Effectiveness of Contemporary Da‘wah Strategies: An Empirical Review and Synthesis of Existing Literature Bello Ali; Aminu Sa’ad Abdullahi; Muhammad Muhammad; Murjanatu Ismail Agwaru
Bulletin of Islamic Research Vol. 4 No. 3 (2026)
Publisher : Educational Foundation for Qur'anic Exegesis and Hadith Studies (Yayasan Pendidikan Tafsir Hadis)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.69526/bir.v4i3.450

Abstract

Purpose– The rapid expansion of digital communication technologies has fundamentally transformed contemporary da‘wah, shifting Islamic outreach from conventional face-to-face preaching toward interactive digital platforms. This study examines the effectiveness of contemporary da‘wah strategies by synthesizing empirical evidence on the factors that influence successful digital Islamic communication and audience engagement across social media environments. Design/methodology/approach– This study employs a qualitative systematic literature review (SLR) methodology. Empirical studies published between 2017 and 2026 were systematically identified, screened, and analyzed using thematic content analysis. The review synthesizes evidence concerning digital da‘wah practices across major social media platforms, with particular attention to communication strategies, audience engagement, technological affordances, and the emerging role of social media handlers. Findings– The review demonstrates that digital platforms—including Facebook, WhatsApp, YouTube, Instagram, TikTok, Telegram, and X—have substantially expanded the reach of Islamic knowledge, strengthened audience participation, and facilitated the formation of virtual religious communities. The effectiveness of contemporary da‘wah is determined by the interaction of several key factors: content quality, preacher credibility, communication competence, digital literacy, audience-centred messaging, platform suitability, and the strategic functions of social media handlers in content production, moderation, audience engagement, and platform management. Nevertheless, challenges such as misinformation, concerns regarding content authenticity, unequal digital access, and limited technological competence continue to constrain online da‘wah effectiveness. Research implications/limitations– As a literature-based study, the findings rely on existing empirical evidence and do not assess the effectiveness of specific digital da‘wah programs. Future research should employ comparative and mixed-methods designs to evaluate digital da‘wah strategies across different cultural, institutional, and technological contexts. Originality/value– This study contributes to contemporary Islamic communication scholarship by providing an integrative synthesis of empirical research on digital da‘wah. It develops a comprehensive framework demonstrating that effective contemporary da‘wah depends on the integration of authentic Islamic principles, strategic communication, technological innovation, digital literacy, and professional social media management, thereby offering practical guidance for scholars, Islamic organizations, and digital content practitioners.
Causes of the Differences among Islamic Jurists Regarding the Principles of Usul al-Fiqh Idris Salih Ahmad
Bulletin of Islamic Research Vol. 4 No. 3 (2026)
Publisher : Educational Foundation for Qur'anic Exegesis and Hadith Studies (Yayasan Pendidikan Tafsir Hadis)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.69526/bir.v4i3.449

Abstract

Purpose – Juristic disagreement (ikhtilāf) has long been recognized as an inherent characteristic of Islamic jurisprudence (fiqh), reflecting the diversity of scholarly reasoning rather than doctrinal division. This study examines the principal causes of juristic disagreement among classical Muslim scholars and analyzes its epistemological significance for the development and adaptability of Islamic law. Design/methodology/approach – This study employs a qualitative library-based research design using descriptive and analytical methods. Primary and secondary sources in Islamic jurisprudence, uṣūl al-fiqh, and classical legal literature are critically examined to identify the methodological, linguistic, textual, and contextual factors underlying juristic disagreement. A thematic analysis is applied to synthesize recurring patterns across the scholarly tradition. Findings – The study demonstrates that juristic disagreement arises from multiple interconnected factors. These include differences in the authentication and interpretation of Qur’anic and Prophetic texts, linguistic variations within the Arabic language, divergent applications and prioritizations of uṣūl al-fiqh principles, and the influence of local customs (ʿurf) and changing social contexts. Variations in jurists’ intellectual backgrounds, reasoning methods, and access to legal evidence further contribute to differing legal conclusions. Rather than indicating inconsistency, these differences constitute a legitimate and productive feature of Islamic legal methodology that enables Sharīʿah to respond to diverse circumstances across time and place. Research implications/limitations – This study is conceptual and based exclusively on classical juristic literature. It does not investigate the contemporary application of ikhtilāf in modern legal systems. Future research may explore how classical theories of juristic disagreement inform contemporary ijtihād, legal reform, and comparative Islamic jurisprudence. Originality/value – This study contributes to Islamic legal scholarship by synthesizing the principal epistemological foundations of ikhtilāf into an integrated analytical framework. It highlights juristic disagreement as a source of methodological richness, legal flexibility, and intellectual dynamism, thereby reinforcing its enduring significance in the development of Islamic jurisprudence.