cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Muhammad Andi Septiadi
Contact Email
septiadi.andi90@gmail.com
Phone
+6282176562270
Journal Mail Official
septiadi.andi90@gmail.com
Editorial Address
A.H Nasution Street No.104
Location
Kota bandung,
Jawa barat
INDONESIA
Khazanah Sosial
Published by Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung
ISSN : -     EISSN : 27158071     DOI : https://doi.org/10.15575
Core Subject : Religion, Economy, Humanities, Social,
Religion Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences
is an open access and peer-reviewed journal. It publishes current and original research on various contemporary social and political issues, including: Gender politics and identity Digital society and disruption Civil society movement Community welfare & social development Citizenship & public management Public policy innovation International politics & security Media, information & literacy Economic & political issues Educational problems (not teaching procedures) Governance & democracy Radicalism & terrorism Sociology
Arjuna Subject : Umum - Umum
Articles 303 Documents
 27   28   29   30   31 
Social Capital Configurations in the Livelihood Resilience of Pineapple Farmers: Bonding, Bridging, and Linking in Prabumulih, Indonesia Rudy Kurniawan; Andries Lionardo; Deviana Mayasari; Yusnaini Yusnaini
Khazanah Sosial Vol. 8 No. 2 (2026): Khazanah Sosial
Publisher : UIN Sunan Gunung Djati

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15575/ks.v8i2.40134

Abstract

This study aims to interpret the lived experiences of pineapple farmers in mobilizing social capital to build livelihood resilience in Prabumulih, South Sumatra Province, Indonesia. The study employed a qualitative approach with an interpretative phenomenological design. The researchers purposively selected 25 informants, including farmers as the primary informants and supporting actors involved in pineapple processing, farmer groups and cooperatives, and agricultural institutions. The researchers collected data through semi-structured in-depth interviews, field observations, and documentation and analyzed the data using an interpretative phenomenological approach guided by abductive reasoning. The findings reveal three relational mechanisms. First, kinship reciprocity rooted in Seinggok Sepemunyian generates bonding social capital that strengthens buffer capacity through trust, solidarity, and mutual assistance. Second, value-added collectivity through the MIWA Cooperative, women farmers’ groups, agritourism, fiber processing, and knowledge networks generates bridging social capital that strengthens self-organization and the capacity for learning. Third, empowerment linkages with government institutions, state-owned enterprises, private companies, and knowledge institutions generate linking social capital that expands farmers’ access to technology, resources, markets, and institutional authority while strengthening their agency and transformative capacity. This study demonstrates that livelihood resilience does not merely constitute a household-level capacity; rather, farmers activate it relationally through configurations of bonding, bridging, and linking social capital that are rooted in local culture and enable them to move from coping toward adaptation and transformation.
Digital Populism and the Erosion of Public Trust in Democratic Institutions in Indonesia Lukman Munawar Fauzi; Hamzah Jamaludin
Khazanah Sosial Vol. 8 No. 2 (2026): Khazanah Sosial
Publisher : UIN Sunan Gunung Djati

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The degradation of contemporary democratic quality has increasingly manifested through the rise of digital populism and the declining level of public trust in state institutions. This study aims to examine how populist discourse constructed in social media shapes citizens’ perceptions of democratic legitimacy and contributes to the erosion of institutional trust. A qualitative descriptive–interpretive approach was applied, drawing on data from active social media users, civil society activists, academics, and journalists. Data were collected through in-depth interviews, digital document analysis, and non-participant observation of discursive interactions in online political spaces. Thematic analysis indicates that digital populism operates as a sphere for articulating public dissatisfaction with political elites and democratic procedures, expressed through moralistic narratives, issue simplification, and institutional delegitimation. The circulation of biased information and echo-chamber dynamics reinforces structural distrust and weakens procedural democratic legitimacy. These findings reveal that democratic backsliding occurs within the domains of discourse, political perception, and citizens’ trust relations toward public institutions.
State Protection and Personal Security in Indonesia’s Response to Online Scam Trafficking in Cambodia, 2020–2024 M. Irawan Pandu Negara; Muhammad Abdul Azis
Khazanah Sosial Vol. 8 No. 2 (2026): Khazanah Sosial
Publisher : UIN Sunan Gunung Djati

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15575/ks.v8i2.54360

Abstract

This study examines how the Indonesian government protected Indonesian citizens affected by Cambodia’s online scam industry between 2020 and 2024, with particular attention to individuals identified or documented as victims of trafficking in persons, and evaluates gaps between formal protection mandates and documented outcomes. It employs a descriptive qualitative case study and documentary analysis of 31 government, embassy, international organization, NGO, academic, and media documents. The documentary record shows that Indonesian authorities handled a substantially larger population of citizens associated with online scam cases than those formally identified as trafficking victims; these categories are therefore treated separately throughout the analysis. State protection is most clearly documented at the rescue, consular assistance, victim-identification, referral, and repatriation stages, while post-return rehabilitation, economic recovery, and long-term monitoring remain less systematically documented. The findings also show that transnational syndicates exploit digital recruitment, tourist-visa travel, indirect transit routes, debt, document confiscation, confinement, and physical, psychological, and financial coercion. Three recurring implementation gaps are identified: a temporal gap between the escalation of cases and institutional responses, a coverage gap affecting citizens who move through non-procedural migration channels, and a capacity-related gap between broad protection mandates and the publicly documented institutional resources available for implementation. The study contributes by adapting personal security analysis to the role of a migrant-origin state and by emphasizing protection continuity from prevention and identification to rescue, repatriation, and reintegration.

Page 31 of 31 | Total Record : 303

 27   28   29   30   31 

Filter by Year

2019 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 8 No. 2 (2026): Khazanah Sosial Vol. 8 No. 1 (2026): Khazanah Sosial Vol. 7 No. 4 (2025): Khazanah Sosial Vol. 7 No. 3 (2025): Khazanah Sosial Vol. 7 No. 2 (2025): Khazanah Sosial Vol. 7 No. 1 (2025): Khazanah Sosial Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024): Khazanah Sosial Vol. 6 No. 3 (2024): Khazanah Sosial Vol. 6 No. 2 (2024): Khazanah Sosial Vol. 6 No. 1 (2024): Khazanah Sosial Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023): Khazanah Sosial Vol. 5 No. 3 (2023): Khazanah Sosial Vol. 5 No. 2 (2023): Khazanah Sosial Vol. 5 No. 1 (2023): Khazanah Sosial Vol. 4 No. 4 (2022): Khazanah Sosial Vol 4, No 4 December 2022 Vol. 4 No. 3 (2022): Khazanah Sosial Vol 4, No 3 October 2022 Vol. 4 No. 2 (2022): Khazanah Sosial Vol 4, No 2 August 2022 Vol. 4 No. 1 (2022): Khazanah Sosial Vol 4, No 1 April 2022 Vol. 3 No. 3 (2021): Khazanah Sosial Vol 3, No 3 November 2021 Vol. 3 No. 2 (2021): Khazanah Sosial Vol 3, No 2 August 2021 Vol. 3 No. 1 (2021): Khazanah Sosial Vol 3, No 1 April 2021 Vol. 2 No. 3 (2020): Khazanah Sosial Vol 2, No 3 November (2020) Vol. 2 No. 2 (2020): Khazanah Sosial Vol 2, No 2 August 2020 Vol. 2 No. 1 (2020): Khazanah Sosial Vol 2, No 1 April 2020 Vol. 1 No. 1 (2019): Khazanah Sosial More Issue