cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Dr. Shofil Fikri, S.S., M.Pd
Contact Email
h_anada@uin-malang.ac.id
Phone
+6282332924040
Journal Mail Official
h_anada@uin-malang.ac.id
Editorial Address
Gedung Megawati Fakultas Syariah Jl. Gajayana No 50 Kec. Lowokwaru, Kota Malang 65144
Location
Kota malang,
Jawa timur
INDONESIA
MLIJo
Published by Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang
ISSN : 31249124     EISSN : 31249124     DOI : https://doi.org/10.18860/mlijo
Core Subject :
MLIJo: Journal of Law and Islamic Thought is an open access, double-blind, and peer-reviewed journal that serves as a medium for communication and scientific publication in the field of Law and Islamic Thought. This journal publishes scientific works four times a year (March, June, September and December) and each issue contains 7 articles, covering various issues of Law and Islamic Thought, ranging from classical jurisprudence to modern legal reform, using various interdisciplinary approaches. This journal is managed by the Sharia Faculty of Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang, Indonesia. FOCUS AND SCOPE: MLIJo: Journal of Law and Islamic Thought focuses on legal studies rooted in Islamic values, principles, and intellectual traditions. It emphasizes the integration of Law and Islamic thought, both contemporary and comparative, by exploring both normative and practical aspects. The journal aims to develop scholarly discourse in areas such as Islamic jurisprudence (fiqh), legal theory (uṣūl al-fiqh), and maqāṣid al-sharī‘ah, while also addressing contemporary socio-legal issues from an Islamic perspective. The scope of this journal includes: 1. Classical and contemporary Islamic law (fiqh and uṣūl al-fiqh); 2. Islamic legal theory and thought; 3. Comparative studies between Islamic and positive law; 4. Islamic family law, criminal law, and Islamic economic law; 5. Maqāṣid al-sharī‘ah and its application in modern legislation; 6. Studies on the thoughts of Islamic scholars and legal schools (madhāhib); 7. Human rights in Islamic legal perspective; 8. Islamic constitutional and public law; 9. Legal conflict resolution through Islamic law approaches; 10. Contemporary developments in ijtihād and Islamic legal methodology.
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 14 Documents
 1   2 
Analisis Studi Kasus: Peran Mahkamah Syariah Aceh Sebagai Wujud Otonomi Khusus di Tengah Sistem Hukum Nasional Indonesia Nurul Raudah Afifah; Muhammad Saubani; Muhammad Akbar Erlangga; Muhammad Jaidi
MLIJo: Journal of Law and Islamic Thought Vol 1 No 2 (2026): MLIJo
Publisher : Sharia Faculty of Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18860/mlijo.v1i2.25331

Abstract

This study examines the position, authority, and historical background of the Sharia Court (Mahkamah Syar’iyah) in Aceh as a manifestation of special autonomy within Indonesia’s national legal system. This phenomenon is significant as it reflects the integration of national law with local Islamic values. The objective of this research is to provide a comprehensive understanding of how the Sharia Court operates as an autonomous judicial institution while remaining integrated within the national system. This study employs a qualitative approach with a descriptive-analytical design using observation, interviews, and document analysis. The findings indicate that the Sharia Court holds a strong legal position, possesses broader authority compared to other religious courts, and enjoys high historical and social legitimacy within Acehnese society. Furthermore, the implementation of its authority is evident in practice, although challenges remain in regulatory synchronization and technical execution. Therefore, the Mahkamah Syar’iyah Aceh represents a harmonious balance between state policy and local needs. This study highlights the importance of an adaptive and contextual legal approach in maintaining the balance between national unity and regional diversity.
Disharmoni Kebijakan Prioritas BUMN dalam UU Persaingan Usaha terhadap Prinsip Level Playing Field di Indonesia Muhammad Baihaqy Ash Shiddiqi; Akhmad Farroh Hasan
MLIJo: Journal of Law and Islamic Thought Vol 1 No 2 (2026): MLIJo
Publisher : Sharia Faculty of Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18860/mlijo.v1i2.30353

Abstract

The existence of Badan Usaha Milik Negara (BUMN) in the Indonesian economic system bears a constitutional mandate under Pasal 33 Undang-Undang Dasar 1945 to control production sectors vital to the state and crucial for the public livelihood. However, following the enforcement of Peraturan Menteri BUMN Nomor PER-2/MBU/3/2023 tentang Pedoman Tata Kelola dan Kegiatan Terpadu BUMN which intensifies the "Sinergi BUMN" policy a severe normative tension has emerged against Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1999 tentang Larangan Praktek Monopoli dan Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat. Priority policies and direct appointments inter-BUMN trigger a regulatory asymmetry that damages the level playing field principle and violates the global doctrine of competitive neutrality. Utilizing a normative legal research method with statutory, conceptual, and comparative approaches, this article dissects the constitutional boundaries of BUMN immunity, analyzes contemporary regulatory conflicts, and offers a concrete solution through the institutionalization of an Ex-Ante Competition Assessment (comprising Regulatory Impact Assessment and a Competition Checklist), drawing insights from the legal frameworks of Australia, Singapore, and China.
Tahliil al'Ahaadiith al-Zaaifah fi Khitaab al-Wataniyyah wa' Akhlaaqiyyaat al-'Amal bi al-Fadha' al-Raqamy Abdullah Ubaid; Nasrulloh Nasrulloh; Muh. Faruq; Al Lastu Nurul Fatim; Azzah Saniyyah
MLIJo: Journal of Law and Islamic Thought Vol 1 No 2 (2026): MLIJo
Publisher : Sharia Faculty of Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18860/mlijo.v1i2.32349

Abstract

This study examines the role of Arabic as a form of symbolic authority in the construction of pseudo-religious authority through the dissemination of pseudo-hadith within narratives of nationalism and work ethics in digital spaces. The study employed a qualitative approach using Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) combined with takhrij al-hadith methods. The data consisted of digital religious content containing Arabic quotations collected from Instagram, Facebook, TikTok, and YouTube. Data were analyzed through text identification, hadith verification, and discourse interpretation. The findings reveal that Arabic possesses strong symbolic capital due to its association with the Qur’an, hadith, and the Islamic scholarly tradition, enabling it to generate religious legitimacy for messages circulated in digital media. Pseudo-hadith are utilized as instruments of symbolic legitimation to reinforce narratives of religious nationalism and Islamic work ethics, despite lacking authentic hadith status. Furthermore, social media contributes to the reproduction of religious authority through digital popularity, algorithmic visibility, and symbolic representation. This study concludes that the acceptance of pseudo-hadith in digital spaces is shaped not only by textual validity but also by the symbolic power of Arabic and the logic of digital information distribution that constructs contemporary religious legitimacy.
Model Perjanjian Perkawinan Pasca Putusan MK No. 69/PUU-XII/2015 Perspektif Maqaṣhid al-Shari’ah Imam al-Shatibi Muhamad Sifak; Rayno Dwi Adityo
MLIJo: Journal of Law and Islamic Thought Vol 1 No 2 (2026): MLIJo
Publisher : Sharia Faculty of Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18860/mlijo.v1i2.32656

Abstract

This study examines the validity of the expansion of marital agreements following Constitutional Court Decision No. 69/PUU-XIII/2015, which allows such agreements to be made during the course of a marriage, unlike the previous provision under Article 29 of Law No. 1 of 1974 on marriage, which only permitted them to be made before or at the time of marriage. This type research used a normative legal method with a conceptual approach, utilizing secondary data consisting of primary legal materials, secondary, and tertiary legal materials obtained through library research and analyzed using a prescriptive approach and interpretative method. The result indicate that the expansion is legally valid as long as it fulfills the requirements of a valid agreement and does not conflict with applicable laws. From the perspective of Imam Al-Shatibi’s Maqaṣid Al-Shari’ah, this policy is consistent with the objectives of protecting property (hifz al-mal) and preservation of progeny (hifz al-nasl). Regarding the object of the agreement, its permissibility falls into the hajiyat (complementary) category, moving towards the dharuriyat (essential) in preserving those two objectives. Therefore, marital agreements can serve as a legal instrument for promoting justice, welfare, and harmony within the family.

Page 2 of 2 | Total Record : 14

 1   2 

Filter by Year

2026 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 1 No 2 (2026): MLIJo Vol 1 No 1 (2026): MLIJo