cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Pahlefi
Contact Email
pahlefi@unja.ac.id
Phone
+6282181066381
Journal Mail Official
recital@unja.ac.id
Editorial Address
Fakultas Hukum Universitas Jambi
Location
Kota jambi,
Jambi
INDONESIA
Recital Review
Published by Universitas Jambi
ISSN : 26225891     EISSN : 26232928     DOI : https://doi.org/10.22437/rr
Core Subject :
The aims of RECITAL REVIEW is to provide a venue for academicians, researchers and practitioners for publishing the original research articles or review articles. The scope of the articles published in this journal deal with a broad range of topics related with Notary area, including: Deed of Making Techniques; Agrarian law; Family Law; Inheritance Law; Contract Law; Auction Law; Code Ethic of Notary; Land Law; Company and Insolvency Law; Intellectual Property Rights; Tax Law; Politics of Notarial Law; Guarantee Law; Banking Law.
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 132 Documents
 10   11   12   13   14 
Efektivitas Nasionalisasi dalam Menyeimbangkan Kepentingan Nasional dan Investasi Asing di Indonesia Rahely, Angela; Broto Hazelli Elfrida, Adi; Hamidah, Abna
Recital Review Vol. 7 No. 2 (2025): Volume 7 Nomor 2 Juli 2025
Publisher : Magister Kenotariatan, Universitas Jambi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22437/rr.v7i2.44477

Abstract

The nationalization of foreign-owned companies in Indonesia, from the early independence period to the present, has sparked debates between national interests and the protection of foreign investors. On the one hand, nationalization is considered an essential instrument to strengthen economic independence and state sovereignty. On the other hand, poorly regulated nationalization practices without clear procedures, adequate financing schemes, and proper investor protection mechanisms may lead to legal uncertainty and a decline in the investment climate. This study aims to analyze the effectiveness of nationalization in Indonesia by examining three main aspects: legal procedures, compensation financing schemes, and the protection of foreign investors. Using a normative juridical method based on literature review, the study finds that although the legal framework of nationalization is stipulated under the Investment Law, its implementation remains hampered by lengthy procedures and ambiguities regarding the definition of “national interest.” Moreover, the financial burden of compensation often disrupts the country’s fiscal stability. The findings highlight the urgency of regulatory reform to ensure that nationalization can be carried out effectively, fairly, and in balance—protecting national interests while maintaining legal certainty for foreign investors.
Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Pembeli dalam Jual Beli Tanah yang Belum Dibalik Nama Pandia, Dion; Yetniwati, Yetniwati; Yahya, Taufik
Recital Review Vol. 7 No. 2 (2025): Volume 7 Nomor 2 Juli 2025
Publisher : Magister Kenotariatan, Universitas Jambi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22437/rr.v7i2.45334

Abstract

Land sale and purchase transactions often end with the issuance of a Sale and Purchase Deed (AJB) without being followed by the transfer of the certificate name. This situation creates legal uncertainty for buyers, even though the payment has been completed and physical possession of the land has been transferred. Such conditions reveal a gap in public understanding as well as in land administration practices, which may potentially lead to disputes. This study aims to analyze the legal consequences of land transactions without a name transfer and the forms of legal protection available to disadvantaged buyers. The research employs a normative juridical method with a statutory approach and analysis of secondary data, including literature, regulations, and relevant court decisions. The findings show that legal certainty can only be guaranteed if the name transfer process is carried out in accordance with the Basic Agrarian Law (UUPA) and Government Regulation No. 24 of 1997 on Land Registration. Nevertheless, even without a certificate transfer, buyers may still obtain preventive legal protection through the AJB and physical control of the land, as well as repressive protection through litigation in court. Therefore, the transfer of certificate ownership constitutes a crucial instrument in ensuring legal protection and certainty of land rights for buyers.
Analisis Yuridis Terhadap Pembuatan Akta Hibah Sebagai Alat Bukti Dalam Sengketa Kepemilikan Tanah Cyntia Marshel, Dwi
Recital Review Vol. 7 No. 2 (2025): Volume 7 Nomor 2 Juli 2025
Publisher : Magister Kenotariatan, Universitas Jambi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22437/rr.v7i2.45430

Abstract

A deed of grant (akta hibah) is an authentic legal instrument used to prove the transfer of land and building ownership from a donor to a recipient without compensation. Although grants are regulated under the Indonesian Civil Code, the Basic Agrarian Law, and land registration regulations, in practice many grants are still executed through private deeds or remain unregistered, often leading to ownership disputes. This gap between legal provisions and implementation forms the basis of this study, which examines the juridical aspects of grant deeds and their evidentiary strength in land disputes. The findings reveal that a properly executed grant deed, fulfilling both formal and material requirements before a Land Deed Official (PPAT) and registered with the Land Office, holds perfect evidentiary value as an authentic deed. Conversely, improperly executed deeds may be annulled, as demonstrated in several court rulings on disputed grants. This study contributes to legal scholarship by emphasizing the importance of procedural compliance and the crucial role of PPAT in ensuring legal certainty, protecting parties’ rights, and preventing potential family conflicts in the future.
Perlindungan Hukum Pemegang Hak Cipta Atas Karya Video Youtube Yang Di Unggah Ulang Di Tiktok Oleh Pihak Lain Adam Putra Hidayat, Mohamad; Anggriani, Reni
Recital Review Vol. 7 No. 2 (2025): Volume 7 Nomor 2 Juli 2025
Publisher : Magister Kenotariatan, Universitas Jambi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22437/rr.v7i2.46768

Abstract

This research discusses legal protection for YouTube video works that are re-uploaded on TikTok without the permission of the copyright holder. The phenomenon of digital content re-uploading has become increasingly prevalent as social media platforms develop into sources of both entertainment and income. The research employs a normative legal method, examining statutory regulations, doctrines, and policies related to copyright law. The findings indicate that re-uploading YouTube content to TikTok may constitute copyright infringement if it exceeds the limits of fair use and causes harm to the copyright holder. Legal protection is provided through preventive measures—such as regulations, government supervision, platform policies, and public awareness—and repressive measures in the form of dispute resolution through both litigation and non-litigation mechanisms. Therefore, collaboration among the government, digital service providers, and the public is essential to ensure legal certainty while safeguarding the moral and economic rights of copyright holders.
Analisis Yuridis Atas Akta Notaris Yang Cacat Hukum Dan Implikasinya Terhadap Kepastian Hukum Teresa P. Sapni , Dripsy
Recital Review Vol. 7 No. 2 (2025): Volume 7 Nomor 2 Juli 2025
Publisher : Magister Kenotariatan, Universitas Jambi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22437/rr.v7i2.46980

Abstract

Notaries have an important role in ensuring legal certainty through the creation of authentic deeds. However, in practice, there are various cases where deeds made by notaries contain legal defects, resulting in cancellation or cancellation by law by the court. This study aims to analyze the factors causing legal defects in notarial deeds, the form of notary accountability, and its legal enforcement against the parties. This study uses a qualitative method with a normative legal approach, by reviewing regulations, scientific journals, and related court decisions. The results of the study indicate that notaries can be held accountable for both civil, administrative, and criminal, depending on the level of error made. In addition, deeds containing legal defects have the potential to cause legal uncertainty and losses for the parties involved. Therefore, stricter supervision of notarial practices and increased notary professionalism are needed, so that cases of legal defects in deeds can be minimized.
Pertanggungjawaban Direksi dalam Kepailitan Perseroan Terbatas Menurut Hukum Positif Indonesia Edwar Fransisko, Rendra
Recital Review Vol. 7 No. 2 (2025): Volume 7 Nomor 2 Juli 2025
Publisher : Magister Kenotariatan, Universitas Jambi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22437/rr.v7i2.47684

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the liability of the board of directors in the bankruptcy of a Limited Liability Company under Indonesian positive law, using the case of PT. Gunung Bara Utama as the focal point. The research employs a normative legal approach through statutory, conceptual, and case study analyses. The findings indicate that the directors’ liability in bankruptcy is explicitly regulated under Law Number 40 of 2007 concerning Limited Liability Companies and Law Number 37 of 2004 concerning Bankruptcy and Suspension of Debt Payment Obligations. Directors may be held personally liable if proven negligent or acting beyond their authority, causing losses to the company, creditors, or third parties. The PT. Gunung Bara Utama case demonstrates that weak internal oversight and violations of the fiduciary duty principle were significant factors contributing to the bankruptcy. This research recommends strengthening regulations by clarifying the duty of care standard and enhancing supervisory mechanisms over directors to prevent abuse of authority leading to bankruptcy.
Tanggung Jawab Hukum Perusahaan Asuransi dan Perlindungan Konsumen Pasca Pencabutan Izin Usaha Mayang Asmara Megaputri, Vincencia; Hariyani, Iswi; Prakoso, Bhim
Recital Review Vol. 7 No. 2 (2025): Volume 7 Nomor 2 Juli 2025
Publisher : Magister Kenotariatan, Universitas Jambi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22437/rr.v7i2.47747

Abstract

The revocation of PT Asuransi Jiwa Adisarana Wanaartha's business licence by OJK on 5 December 2022 was due to violations of solvency, investment adequacy ratio, and minimum equity requirements. The revocation of this business licence requires the company to undergo liquidation and has an impact on policyholders who face the risk of defaulting on claims. This research uses normative juridical method with statutory and conceptual approaches. The result of the discussion of the issues examined by the author is that the revocation of PT Asuransi Jiwa Adisarana Wanaartha's business licence by the OJK meant that the company lost its legal status to operate, resulting in a liquidation process aimed at settling the company's obligations and protecting the interests of policyholders. The consequences of the revocation of the business licence for policyholders include changes in the claims mechanism, which now proceeds through an administrative and uncertain liquidation process, as well as facing the risk of losses due to the company's limited assets. After its business licence was revoked, PT Asuransi Jiwa Adisarana Wanaartha is obligated to prioritise policyholders in settling its obligations, meaning the company must refund all premiums to policyholders due to the cancellation of the insurance agreement. Legal protection for policyholders is provided through the insurance policy as internal legal protection and external legal protection from the OJK and the Deposit Insurance Agency under the P2SK Law. In the event of a dispute, policyholders may resolve it through litigation by filing a breach of contract lawsuit if the company fails to fulfil the insurance agreement.
Disparitas Putusan Pengadilan Terhadap Izin Poligami Dalam Perspektif Kepastian Hukum (Studi Putusan Nomor 692/Pdt.G/2019/Pa.Plh Dan Nomor 0007/Pdt.G/2019/Pa.Lpk) Zahra, Rahima; Amin Qodri, Muhammad; Syelvita, Rema
Recital Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2024): Volume 6 Nomor 2 Juli 2024
Publisher : Magister Kenotariatan, Universitas Jambi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22437/rr.v6i2.48020

Abstract

Abstract This study analyzes the disparity in judicial decisions on polygamy permits by comparing two Religious Court rulings with identical legal conditions but different outcomes. Decision No. 692/Pdt.G/2019/PA.Plh granted the permit despite the applicant not meeting the alternative requirements of Article 4(2) of the Marriage Law, citing fulfillment of Article 5(1). Conversely, Decision No. 0007/Pdt.G/2019/PA.Lpk involved the same shortfall under Article 4(2), yet the judge rejected the request, deeming those requirements absolute and not subject to Article 5. Employing a normative-juridical method, this research dissects judges’ reasoning in final decisions. Findings reveal that divergent interpretations of Articles 4 and 5 are the root of the disparity. Such inconsistency highlights normative ambiguity and risks legal uncertainty. Accordingly, revisions to Articles 4 and 5 of the Marriage Law—and technical guidelines from the Supreme Court via SEMA or PERMA are necessary to prevent decision disparities and ensure legal certainty in polygamy cases. Keywords: Decision Disparity; Polygamy Permit; Judges' Consideration, Polygamy Requirement Abstrak Penelitian ini menganalisis terkait disparitas putusan hakim dalam perkara izin poligami dengan membandingkan dua putusan Pengadilan Agama yang memiliki kondisi hukum serupa namun menghasilkan putusan berbeda. Putusan No. 692/Pdt.G/2019/PA.Plh mengabulkan permohonan poligami meskipun pemohon tidak memenuhi salah satu syarat alternatif dalam Pasal 4 ayat (2) Undang-Undang Perkawinan, dengan alasan syarat-syarat dalam Pasal 5 ayat (1) telah dipenuhi. Sebaliknya, Putusan No. 0007/Pdt.G/2019/PA.Lpk juga menghadapi kondisi di mana pemohon tidak memenuhi Pasal 4 ayat (2), namun hakim di dalam pertimbangannya menolak permohonan karena menilai bahwa syarat dalam Pasal 4 ayat (2) bersifat mutlak dan tidak dapat dikesampingkan meskipun Pasal 5 telah dipenuhi. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridis Disparitas Putusan Pengadilan Terhadap Izin Poligami Dalam Perspektif Kepastian Hukum (Studi Putusan Nomor 692/Pdt.G/2019/Pa.Plh Dan Nomor 0007/Pdt.G/2019/Pa.Lpk) normatif dengan melihat dan menganalisis pertimbangan hakim dalam putusan yang telah memiliki kekuatan hukum tetap. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa perbedaan interpretasi hakim terhadap hubungan antara Pasal 4 dan Pasal 5 menjadi penyebab utama disparitas. Ketidakkonsistenan ini mencerminkan adanya kekaburan norma dan berpotensi menimbulkan ketidakpastian hukum. Oleh karena itu, diperlukan revisi terhadap Pasal 4 dan Pasal 5 Undang-Undang Perkawinan, serta pedoman teknis dari Mahkamah Agung melalui SEMA atau PERMA untuk mencegah disparitas putusan dan menjamin kepastian hukum dalam perkara izin poligami. Kata kunci: Disparitas Putusan; Izin Poligami; Pertimbangan Hakim; Syarat Poligami.
Sengketa Merek Dagang ‘Ayam Geprek Bensu’ Versus ‘I Am Geprek Bensu’ Puspita Sari, Amelia; Fuad Wasitaatmadja, Fokky
Recital Review Vol. 8 No. 1 (2026): Volume 8 Nomor 1 Januari 2026
Publisher : Magister Kenotariatan, Universitas Jambi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22437/rr.v8i1.48516

Abstract

The trademark dispute between Ayam Geprek Bensu and I Am Geprek Bensu highlights the complexity of trademark protection in Indonesia, particularly when involving public figures and large-scale business interests. At the core of this dispute is the application of the first to file principle under Law No. 20 of 2016 on Trademarks and Geographical Indications, which affirms that legal ownership is determined by formal registration rather than prior use in commerce. This issue is not only relevant due to its controversy but also because it reflects the vulnerability of Usaha Mikro, Kecil, dan Menengah (UMKM). Many UMKM, despite operating for years, have been compelled to discontinue their brands after third parties registered them earlier. Such cases expose weaknesses in legal protection and demonstrate the limited awareness of UMKM regarding the necessity of formal trademark registration. This research employs a normative juridical method, utilizing both case study and statutory approaches to analyze the legal foundations, judicial reasoning, and consequences of applying the first to file system. Furthermore, it evaluates the extent to which Indonesia’s trademark regime influences the legal standing of UMKM and examines their capacity to safeguard business identity when competing against parties with greater resources and faster access to formal registration.  
Implikasi Hukum Perjanjian Jual Beli Tiket Konser Tidak Resmi Terhadap Konsumen Almira Fadilla, Rizkia; Fitriyanti, Fadia
Recital Review Vol. 8 No. 1 (2026): Volume 8 Nomor 1 Januari 2026
Publisher : Magister Kenotariatan, Universitas Jambi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22437/rr.v8i1.48892

Abstract

This study discusses the legal implications of unofficial concert ticket sales agreements from a civil law perspective. The practice of selling tickets through unauthorized parties creates legal uncertainty and financial losses for consumers, as tickets purchased may not be recognized by the concert promoter. This research employs a normative juridical method using statutory and case approaches. The results show that such agreements fall under innominaat contracts (unnamed contracts), which may be deemed null and void if they do not fulfill the lawful cause requirement under Article 1320 of the Indonesian Civil Code. Legal protection for consumers is regulated in Law No. 8 of 1999 on Consumer Protection and Law No. 11 of 2008 on Electronic Information and Transactions. Strengthened supervision and synergy among the government, consumer protection institutions, and digital platforms are essential to ensure effective consumer legal protection in digital transactions.

Page 12 of 14 | Total Record : 132

 10   11   12   13   14 

Filter by Year

2019 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 8 No. 2 (2026): Volume 8 Nomor 2 Juli 2026 Vol. 8 No. 1 (2026): Volume 8 Nomor 1 Januari 2026 Vol. 7 No. 2 (2025): Volume 7 Nomor 2 Juli 2025 Vol. 7 No. 1 (2025): Volume 7 Nomor 1 Januari 2025 Vol. 6 No. 2 (2024): Volume 6 Nomor 2 Juli 2024 Vol. 6 No. 1 (2024): Volume 6 Nomor 1 Januari 2024 Vol. 5 No. 2 (2023): Volume 5 Nomor 2 Juli 2023 Vol. 5 No. 1 (2023): Vol. 5 No. 1 Januari 2023 Vol. 4 No. 2 (2022): Volume 4 Nomor 2 Juli 2022 Vol. 4 No. 1 (2022): Volume 4 Nomor 1 Januari 2022 Vol. 3 No. 2 (2021): Volume 3 Nomor 2 2021 Vol. 3 No. 1 (2021): Volume 3 Nomor 1 2021 Vol. 2 No. 2 (2020): Volume 2 Nomor 2 Juli 2020 Vol. 2 No. 1 (2020): Volume 2, Nomor 1, Januari 2020 Vol. 1 No. 2 (2019): Volume 1 Nomor 2 Juli 2019 Vol. 1 No. 1 (2019): Volume 1, Issue 1, Januari 2019 More Issue