Recital Review
The aims of RECITAL REVIEW is to provide a venue for academicians, researchers and practitioners for publishing the original research articles or review articles. The scope of the articles published in this journal deal with a broad range of topics related with Notary area, including: Deed of Making Techniques; Agrarian law; Family Law; Inheritance Law; Contract Law; Auction Law; Code Ethic of Notary; Land Law; Company and Insolvency Law; Intellectual Property Rights; Tax Law; Politics of Notarial Law; Guarantee Law; Banking Law.
Articles
132 Documents
<![CDATA[Keabsahan Force Majeure Dalam Perjanjian Di Masa Era Pandemi Covid -19 ]]>
<![CDATA[Lina Habibah, Irma]]>
<![CDATA[ Recital Review Vol. 3 No. 1 (2021): Volume 3 Nomor 1 2021 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Magister Kenotariatan, Universitas Jambi ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.22437/rr.v3i1.11050
<![CDATA[Perjanjian merupakan suatu kegiatan penyangga segala kegiatan bisnis, hal ini tidak bisa dipungkiri bahwa segala kegiatan manusia selalu berhubungan dengan kerjasama dan interaksi dengan manusia lainnya, sehingga perjanjian menjadi sangat penting perkembangannya serta menjadi tolak ukur dalam melakukan kegiatan perekonomin. Pada umunya ketentuan atau pengaturan mengenai force majeure atau keadaan memaksa ada di dalam suatu perikatan atau perjanjian. Pengaturan mengenai force majeure terdapat di dalam Pasal 1244 KUHPerdata dan Pasal 1245 KUHPerdata, Pengaturan atas force majeure ini ada karena untuk melindungi debitur manakala dalam menjalankan kewajibannya kepada kreditur terjadi suatu kejadian yang berada di luar kuasa pihak yang bersangkutan. Keadaan memaksa atau force majeure dapat berupa gempa bumi, kebakaran, banjir, tanah longsor, perang, kudeta militer, embargo, epidemik, dan lain sebagainya. Di masa pandemi Covid-19 yang sedang melanda diseluruh dunia, tidak terkecuali di Indonesia berdampak bagi pelaku usaha atau kontrak bisnis. Penulisan ini membahas tentang keabsahan alasan force majeure di masa era Covid-19 yang menjadi berdebatan dikalangan pelaku usaha . Covid-19 dapat dijadikan alasan adanya force majeure untuk tidak terlaksananya suatu prestasi, namun apabila dalam perjanjian ditentukan lain bahwa pandemi tidak termasuk dalam keadaan kahar maka, pelaksanaan prestasi harus dilaksanakan meskipun sulit, dan juga harus tetap memperhatikan kebijakan yang berlaku.]]>
<![CDATA[PERAN DEWAN KEHORMATAN DAERAH DALAM PENYELESAIAN PELANGGARAN KODE ETIK NOTARIS DI KOTA PEKANBARU ]]>
<![CDATA[HASFAREVY, TIARA]]>
<![CDATA[ Recital Review Vol. 3 No. 1 (2021): Volume 3 Nomor 1 2021 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Magister Kenotariatan, Universitas Jambi ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.22437/rr.v3i1.11270
<![CDATA[Abstract Violation of a notary code of ethics that occurs in Pekanbaru City, lack of understanding of the duties and functions of a notary public, violations committed by a notary are included in the code of ethics sanction in the form of suspension and dismissal of a notary public. Sanctions received by notaries who violate the code of ethics are not only suspension and dismissal sanctions, but also get criminal and civil sanctions. The issues raised in this study, namely 1) how the scope of violations of the notary code of ethics in the city of Pekanbaru, 2) how the role of the regional Honorary Council in resolving violations of the notary code of ethics in the city of Pekanbaru and 3) what are the obstacles to the regional Honorary Board in resolving the code violations ethical notary in the city of Pekanbaru.The scope of violation of the notary code of ethics in Pekanbaru City is in the supervision of the Regional Honorary Council in providing sanctions other than based on examination at the trial also looking at the good faith of the Notary who is aware of his mistakes and wants to make improvements to the deed he made. Some violations of the notary code of ethics in Pekanbaru City are notaries who spend more time doing activities outside the office, installing name signs not in accordance with standards, installing flower boards by writing PPAT and Notary Public. The role of the Pekanbaru City Honorary Board in solving violations of the Notary Ethics Code in the city of Pekanbaru has not been fully effective, because so far the Honorary Board has never sanctioned a notary who violated the nameplate installation. The Pekanbaru City Honorary Council has imposed sanctions only in the form of verbal reprimands to the notary who committed the violation, no written warning or dismissal had ever been held in the association of notary organizations that committed violations. The obstacle to the Regional Honorary Council in solving violations of Notary Ethics Code in Pekanbaru city is that the Rules for conducting oversight are incomplete, the Notary Honorary Board who has the authority to supervise the performance of Notaries is often very slow and walks in following up on any violations committed by Notaries. Furthermore, the object of supervision is the peer notary himself. Efforts must be made related to obstacles faced by the Pekanbaru City Honorary Council by conducting regular guidance and guidance in member meetings which are held once a month. Â Keywords: Keywords: Notary, code of Ethics, Honorary Board.]]>
<![CDATA[Pelaksanaan Perjanjian Kredit Dengan Jaminan Fidusia Pada PT. Pegadaian (persero) Kantor Wilayah I Medan ]]>
<![CDATA[Johannes M Simanjuntak, Alexander]]>
<![CDATA[ Recital Review Vol. 3 No. 1 (2021): Volume 3 Nomor 1 2021 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Magister Kenotariatan, Universitas Jambi ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.22437/rr.v3i1.11452
<![CDATA[Abstract The high demand of public for installment plans with fiduciary security has changed PT. Pegadaian (Persero), a state-owned enterprise which business was initially about auction launches a financing product i.e. KREASI (Installment Plans with Fiduciary System). However, in practice, the implementation of this product is different form Law No. 42/1999 on Fiduciary Security. This is the background of this research. This research is conducted to discover how the agreement of Installment Plans with Fiduciary System is implemented and executed in PT. Pegadaian (Persero) Regional Office 1 Medan and why it is implemented differently from what is regulated in Law on Fiduciary Security.This is a normative juridical research which uses secondary data consisting of primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials. This research is descriptive analytical. The instrument used to collect the data consist of library research and field research at the PT. Pegadaian (Persero), Regional Office 1 Medan.The research result demonstrate that fiduciary security in its execution is not registered in consensus way in which defaulted debtors are given an opportunity to sell their collateral by themselves (motorcycles or cars) and if they are not willing to have consensus, they can take legal way through a court. The implementation of Regulations of Directors of PT. Pegadaian Number 67/DIR.I/2016 dated September, 2016 on Technical Guidance to online KREASI contradicts the provisions stipulated in Law No. 42/1999 on Fiduciary Security because it differently implements Article 5 paragraph (1) and Article 11 paragraph (1), in which some installment plans which is implemented by using underhanded letter and by not registering it do not provide any legal certainty in its execution in case of debtors’ default (Article 15 and 29) and may harm state finance. It is suggested that regulation of Directors of PT. Pegadaian on Installment Plans with Fiduciary System be revised and fully adjusted to the Law No. 42/1999 on Fiduciary System and that small installment plans be implemented by using auction security.  Keywords: Credit Agreement, Fiduciary Security]]>
<![CDATA[Akibat Hukum Kuasa Lisan Pembuatan Akta Notaris ]]>
<![CDATA[DINDA ARISA BR. PULUNGAN, MAYSARAH]]>
<![CDATA[ Recital Review Vol. 3 No. 1 (2021): Volume 3 Nomor 1 2021 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Magister Kenotariatan, Universitas Jambi ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.22437/rr.v3i1.11520
<![CDATA[Abstract Article 1793 of the Civil Code states that the authority can be given or received with a general deed, on underhanded deed, or even with a letter or orally. However, not all legal acts can be given to someone else orally. In the Supreme Court’s Ruling No. 08/Pdt G 2016 PN. Spt, Authenic Deed No 20 on October 28, 2008 on :…joining or discharging as a partner and the amendment of the Articles of Association of CV. Putra Jayaâ€made based on oral authorithy is suspected by the principal and revoked by the Sampu District Court The Objective of the research was to analyze the use of oral authority in the practice of making an authentic deed by Notary, his obligation to make an authentic deed which guarantee the rights of the persens appearing, and his Supreme Courts Ruling No 08 Pdt G 2016 PN.Spt. The research used juridical normative method and descriptive analytic approach which was aimed to get detailed and systematic description about the research problems .The data were gathered by conducting library research method, documentary study, and interviews and analyzed qualitatively.The result of the research showed that using oral authority in making an authentic deed was allowed as it is specified ini Article 1795 of the Civil Code. In Practice, Oral authentic in making an authentic deed was only based on the Notary’s consideration and for the benefit of the principal. Prudential principle should be the responsibility of a Notary’s as it is specified in Article 16, paragraph (1), letter a, for being careful. A Notary has to anticipate the legal risk of making an authentic deed orally by being based on prudential principle according to UUJN (the Notarial Act) He has to be responsible for has own negligence. For an authentic deed which is revoked or legally null and vold through the court’s verdict, a Notary can be imposed by a sanction by giving compensation materially and immaterally.  Keywords: Oral Authority, Notary, Authentic Deed  ]]>
<![CDATA[Perspektif Hukum Persaingan Usaha terhadap Diskriminasi Harga Penjualan Barang pada Pasar Kaget dan Pasar Tradisional ]]>
<![CDATA[Yetti, Yetti]]>;
<![CDATA[Natassa Winstar, Yelia]]>;
<![CDATA[Haq, Miftahul]]>
<![CDATA[ Recital Review Vol. 3 No. 2 (2021): Volume 3 Nomor 2 2021 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Magister Kenotariatan, Universitas Jambi ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.22437/rr.v3i2.12388
<![CDATA[The problem in this research, how is the regulation, the selling price of goods in shock market in traditional markets, and the perspective of business competition law. and the legal consequences caused by these prices. The purpose of research on how the flight system, the sale price of goods in shock markets and traditional markets and the legal prices caused by these nationalities. The method to achieve the goal is to conduct sociological law research, which is to see the implementation of laws in society. The results of the national research that took place in Pasar Kaget with traditional markets on basic food items. Small entrepreneurs who are in traditional markets feel disadvantaged by market traders who are shocked because market traders are surprised to give cheaper prices to consumers for the same goods. Thus the traditional market has more consumers. This happens because the law of business competition gives privileges to small traders to exercise a monopoly, which in this case is an airline. The legal consequence of the existence of a shock market is that because its establishment is not in accordance with criteria such as traditional markets, it is difficult to carry out supervision by the relevant officials, even though between traders and the principles of symbiotic mutualism. It is recommended that the government amend this law because with the freedom of small entrepreneurs that are detrimental to other small rulers.]]>
<![CDATA[Peralihan Hak Atas Tanah Yang Menjadi Objek Sengketa Dalam Perspektif Penegakan Hukum ]]>
<![CDATA[Andari Pernia Deka, Adeka]]>
<![CDATA[ Recital Review Vol. 3 No. 2 (2021): Volume 3 Nomor 2 2021 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Magister Kenotariatan, Universitas Jambi ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.22437/rr.v3i2.12833
<![CDATA[Dispute land cases in Indonesia in 2019 reached 30,817 cases, which was dominated by the typology of registration of conveyance of land rights. This shows that the reconstruction of the transfer of rights is not being perfectly understood by society, authority and others. The essence of this particular problem is in physical and juridical data on land rights which frequently shifts due to unqualified of deep land subject obligations in maintaining physical and juridical data its self. The purpose of this research is to figure out the legal consequences of rights conveyance to dispute lands and what are the prospects of law enforcement on future transfer of land rights disputes. The type of this research is juridical normative research which uses the statutory and conceptual approach method by using the theory of authority and law enforcement. The results show that the legal consequences of the transfer of rights over land that becomes the object of dispute, namely freehold and deed of transfer of land rights could be cancelled and declared null and void. This is because it is not fulfilled the subjective and objective requirements of the validity of an agreement and obligations land subject to safeguard physical data and juridical data which are an important part of a proof of ownership of land rights. Law enforcement perspective on the transfer of land rights disputes based on Government Regulation 24 of 1997 relies on the subject of land rights and deeds of stipulation of transfer of rights and other parties which are the basis for this transfer of rights to the land.]]>
<![CDATA[Keabsahan Jual Beli Atas Rumah Dengan Perjanjian Di Bawah Tangan yang Hendak Di Buatkan Akta Jual Beli Tanpa Adanya Pihak Penjual ]]>
<![CDATA[Lidiyana, Monica]]>;
<![CDATA[Ismelina Farma Rahayu, Mella]]>
<![CDATA[ Recital Review Vol. 3 No. 2 (2021): Volume 3 Nomor 2 2021 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Magister Kenotariatan, Universitas Jambi ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.22437/rr.v3i2.12873
<![CDATA[The sale and purchase of house rights is based on the provisions of Article 37 Paragraph 1 of Government Regulation Number 24 of 1997, which in essence, the transfer of land rights must be proven by a deed made by Land Titles Registrar, but some people who are still lay people often think that the sale and purchase of land It is enough to do it by using receipts in full, so that when you want to reverse the name register, of course the effort is hampered, because there is no the sale and purchase of land deed made by Land Titles Registrar, the obstacles also increase, when one of the parties, especially the seller, is unknown, so that the sale and purchase of land deed cannot be made, because making the sale and purchase of land deed must involve the seller and the buyer. This research was conducted using the Normative Juridical Law Research method, this research was conducted using secondary data, which is divided into primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials. What will be examined in this research is related to the validity of the sale and purchase of land which is only proven by the receipt, the validity of the sale and purchase deed of land made by Land Titles Registrar without the seller, and the implementation of the sale and purchase deed by the Land Deed Making Official on land without a seller in Decision Number 256 / PDT. G / 2019 / PN Ckr.]]>
<![CDATA[Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Para Pihak Dalam Perjanjian Kredit Sindikasi ]]>
<![CDATA[Priady, Nicko]]>;
<![CDATA[Muskibah, Muskibah]]>
<![CDATA[ Recital Review Vol. 3 No. 2 (2021): Volume 3 Nomor 2 2021 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Magister Kenotariatan, Universitas Jambi ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.22437/rr.v3i2.12933
<![CDATA[This study aims to identify and criticize the arrangements, procedures and positions of all parties involved in syndicated financing. The formulation of the problem that will be discussed in this article is about the legal relationship between the parties in a syndicated loan to resolve bad loans when they default, and the legal protection of the parties in a syndicated loan agreement. The type of research is normative law, which is a research method that emphasizes legislation, conceptual law, and case law, and describes theories related to research problems. The results show that the implementation of Syndicated Loans is related to the rights and obligations of the parties. As long as the parties fulfill this and carry out the agreed agreements and carry out supervision simultaneously, the risk of default will be smaller. The regulation regarding the authority and rights and obligations between the Debtor and the Bank in the Syndicated Credit Agreement must be clearly stated in the Syndicated Credit Agreement so that there is no gap in the norm of ambiguity that can cause problems in the future.]]>
<![CDATA[Kepastian Hukum Pengambilalihan Saham (Akuisisi) Perseroan Terbatas Tertutup Dengan Akta Jual Beli Saham ]]>
<![CDATA[Feby Wulandari, Lifia]]>
<![CDATA[ Recital Review Vol. 3 No. 2 (2021): Volume 3 Nomor 2 2021 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Magister Kenotariatan, Universitas Jambi ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.22437/rr.v3i2.12939
<![CDATA[The practice in the world of notary that uses the Deed of Sale and Purchase of Shares in the event of a stock acquisition is a legal issue that underlies the occurrence of this research. The sale and purchase of shares and the acquisition of shares in notarial practice which are often equated cause problems in practice, in line with the duties of the notary office in making deeds, this will lead to multiple interpretations in making the Notary deed. There is no specific regulation that underlies this, so there needs to be a discussion about what the position of the legal issue is. The research method uses a normative juridical research type, with a statutory approach, a case approach, a historical approach, and a conceptual approach. The results of this research are: regarding the use of the Deed of Sale and Purchase of Shares, it can be done as long as there is no change in control, but if in practice the sale and purchase of shares results in a transfer of control, it should be carried out through procedures, terms and procedures for takeover of shares (acquisition). The legal position is closely related to the role of the notary in making deeds, which must always minimize the existence of the deed from any problems in the future. Legal certainty of share takeover (acquisition) of a Limited Liability Company with a Share Sale and Purchase Deed, where the sale and purchase of shares does not result in a change in controlling of shares, the use of the sale and purchase deed provides certainty for the parties therein, but if the sale and purchase of shares results in the occurrence of changes in share controllers, then the sale and purchase deed does not provide legal certainty for the parties in it, it should be done in accordance with the procedures and mechanisms governing share acquisition.]]>
<![CDATA[Prinsip Kehati-Hatian PPAT Dalam Proses Pengikatan Jual Beli Tanah Sebagai Perwujudan Kepastian Hukum ]]>
<![CDATA[Aulia, Arsiendy]]>
<![CDATA[ Recital Review Vol. 4 No. 1 (2022): Volume 4 Nomor 1 Januari 2022 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Magister Kenotariatan, Universitas Jambi ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.22437/rr.v4i1.13364
<![CDATA[The purpose of this study was to identify and analyze the precautionary principle of PPAT in the land sale and purchase binding process as a manifestation of legal certainty and the legal consequences of PPAT if it does not use the PPAT caution principle in the land sale and purchase binding process in realizing legal certainty. As for the formulation of the problem. What is the form of the PPAT precautionary principle in the land sale and purchase binding process in realizing legal certainty? What are the legal consequences for PPAT if they do not use the precautionary principle in the process of binding the sale and purchase of land as a manifestation of legal certainty? This type of research uses a normative juridical approach using a statutory approach and a conceptual approach using the precautionary theory, responsibility theory, legal certainty theory and authority theory. The method used in data processing and data analysis used in this study is a qualitative method which refers to a particular problem or is based on the prevailing laws and regulations. The results of the study are a form of sanction against PPAT if they do not use the precautionary principle, namely administrative sanctions in the form of verbal warning, temporary dismissal, dismissal with respect and disrespectful dismissal, both legal consequences of the PPAT deed if they do not use the precautionary principle contained in the article. 22 government regulations number 37 of 1998, namely the PPAT deed can be canceled and null and void by law. Suggestions should be that there are detailed and clear rules regarding PPAT prudence in making deeds so that PPAT is protected and PPAT is expected to be able to understand and then apply the form of prudential principle in carrying out its duties, especially in land transfer using the land sale and purchase agreement process. so that it is able to provide legal certainty for the parties who use its services and is able to provide legal protection for the parties and the PPAT themselves Abstrak Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui dan menganalisis prinsip kehati-hatian PPAT dalam proses pengikatan jual beli tanah sebagai perwujudan kepastian hukum dan akibat hukum terhadap PPAT jika tidak menggunakan prinsip ke hati hati an PPAT dalam proses pengikatan jual beli tanah dalam mewujudkan kepastian hukum. Adapun rumusan masalah Bagaimana bentuk prinsip ketahi-hatian PPAT dalam proses pengikatan jual beli tanah dalam mewujudkan kepastian hukum? Bagaimana akibat hukum terhadap PPAT jika tidak menggunakan prinsip kehati-hatian dalam proses pengikatan jual beli tanah sebagai perwujudkan kepastian hukum? Tipe penelitian ini menggunakan metode pendekatan yuridis normatif dengan menggunakan metode pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan konsep dengan menggunakan teori kehati-hatian, teori tanggungjawab, teori kepastian hukum dan teori kewenangan. Metode yang digunakan dalam pengolahan data maupun analisis data yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah metode kualitatif yang mengacu pada suatu masalah tertentu maupun berdasarkan peraturan perundang-undangan yang berlaku. Hasil penelitian adalah bentuk sanksi terhadap PPAT jika tidak menggunakan prinsip kehati-hatian yaitu sanksi secara administrasi berupa teguran lisan, pemberhentian sementara, pemberhentian secara hormat dan pemberhentian secara tidak hormat kedua akibat hukum terhadap akta PPAT jika tidak menggunakan prinsip kehati-hatian yang terdapat didalam pasal 22 peraturan pemerintah nomor 37 tahun 1998 yaitu akta ppat dapat dibatalkan dan batal demi hukum. Saran hendaknya ada aturan yang secara rinci dan jelas tentang kehati-hatian PPAT didalam membuat akta agar PPAT mendapat perlindungan dan PPAT diharapkan mampu memahami dan kemudian menerapkan bentuk prinsip kehati-hatian dalam pelaksanaan tugas jabatannya khususnya dalam peralihan tanah yang menggunakan proses perjanjian pengikatan jual beli tanah sehingga mampu memberikan kepastian hukum bagi para pihak yang menggunakan jasanya dan mampu memberikan perlindungan hukum bagi para pihak dan PPAT sendiri]]>
