cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Rifqi Muhammad
Contact Email
-
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
jiu.fu@uinjkt.ac.id
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kota tangerang selatan,
Banten
INDONESIA
ILMU USHULUDDIN
Published by Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta
ISSN : 20878265     EISSN : 25027530     DOI : 10.15408/tjems
Core Subject : Religion, Education,
Religion Education
Ilmu Ushuluddin specializes in U??l al-D?n which concern to Qur’an and ?ad?th, Religious, Islamic Philosophy studies, and Islamic studies in general, and is intended to communicate original researches and current issues on the subject.
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 14 Documents
 1   2 
Search results for , issue "Vol. 9, No. 1, July 2022" : 14 Documents clear
THE SIGNIFICANCE OF LINGUISTIC APPROACH IN SHARḤ ḤADĪTH OF MIṢBĀḤ AL-ẒALĀM BY MUHAJIRIN AMSAR Fatihunnada Fatihunnada; Nailil Huda; Hannanah Thabrani
ILMU USHULUDDIN Vol. 9, No. 1, July 2022
Publisher : Himpunan Peminat Ilmu-Ilmu Ushuluddin (HIPIUS)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/iu.v9i1.17966

Abstract

This paper strengthens the research of Shittu and Adebolu (2016) confirming that Arabic language science: semantics, naḥw-ṣarf, and balāghah has an important role in understanding ḥadīth. In addition, this research also strengthens Asmaʿ al-Khatab and Ali Younis affirming that the Arabic style of ḥadīth in terms of balāghah can provide a more comprehensive understanding of the historical facts of ḥadīth and the substance of ḥadīth teachings. In particular, this research concludes that Muhajirin Amsar (d. 2003) as one of the Indonesian ḥadīth experts has a deep concern about understanding ḥadīth with a language approach. This is proven by the study of semantics, naḥw-ṣarf, and balāghah in the Miṣbāḥ al-Ẓalām as a work that explains the legal ḥadīth of Islamic law.
POLYGAMY SEMINARS: BUILDING MASCULINITY VIA LIBIDINAL ECONOMY Karunia Haganta; Firas Arrasy; Siamrotul Ayu Masruroh
ILMU USHULUDDIN Vol. 9, No. 1, July 2022
Publisher : Himpunan Peminat Ilmu-Ilmu Ushuluddin (HIPIUS)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/iu.v9i1.25811

Abstract

This paper discusses polygamy seminars with three critical perspectives: religious commodification, hegemonic masculinity, and libidinal economics. In terms of religious commodification, polygamy seminars as a religious activity held in many places in Indonesia with quite expensive costs are economically beneficial. Regarding Raewyn W. Connell’s masculinity theory, polygamy seminars can be read as activities closely related to masculinity and femininity. The libidinal economic perspective of Jean Francois Lyotard helps see the relationship between religious commodification, desire, and capital in polygamy seminars. This article is an analytical descriptive study with quite extensive empirical data.
UNDERSTANDING THEOLOGICAL INTERPRETATION IN TAFSIR DEPARTEMEN AGAMA REPUBLIK INDONESIA PRINTED 1996-1997 Masri Mansoer
ILMU USHULUDDIN Vol. 9, No. 1, July 2022
Publisher : Himpunan Peminat Ilmu-Ilmu Ushuluddin (HIPIUS)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/iu.v9i1.29251

Abstract

This paper aims to discuss the understanding of Islamic theology in Tafsir Departemen Agama Republik Indonesia. This paper mainly discussed the pattern of interpretation of the verses found in the Tafsir Departemen Agama Republik Indonesia, especially in interpreting the verses of kalam used as arguments by the Mutakalimīn. The primary sources were Tafsir Departemen Agama Republik Indonesia. In contrast, the secondary sources were works from rational and traditional mainstreams. This study find that several verses of the Quran were used as Naqlī arguments by rational and traditional mainstreams, which the Ministry of Religious Affairs then interpreted. This paper shows that the interpretation of the verses in the Tafsir tends to be somewhat closer to the rational-Mātūrīdīyah Samarkand style of thought, not the Muʿtazilaʾs rationale. On the other hand, it has very little in common with traditional mainstream, such as Ashʿarīyah and Mātūrīdīyah Bukhārā.
RELIGIOUS DIFFERENCE AND THE COMMON GOOD: REFLECTION ON TOLERATION AND PARTICIPATION IN CONTEMPORARY AMERICA AND INDONESIA Muhamad Ali
ILMU USHULUDDIN Vol. 9, No. 1, July 2022
Publisher : Himpunan Peminat Ilmu-Ilmu Ushuluddin (HIPIUS)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/iu.v9i1.29327

Abstract

This paper seeks to discuss the extent to which religious differences can contribute to the promotion of the common good. It asks if the religious difference is sufficient for the states and the societies to attain the common good across religious and ethical persuasions in multi-faith countries such as America and Indonesia. It is primarily an ethical-philosophical question but is also related to historical, sociological, anthropological, and political contexts.  For many religious people, religious particularity and distinction – including its truth and superiority claims – is a significant element of identity and sense of morality, but religious difference alone is insufficient for attaining the common good. Religions provide motivations to act good or evil. Religions offer rich resources, be doctrinal, narrative, experiential and emotional, ethical, legal, social, material, or political, but because there are many, often conflicting religious and ethical values from within the same and across religious traditions, it is not enough for everyone to share their beliefs and accept each other’s exclusive claims. For religions to help improve the public good, religious agents have to negotiate their particular and distinct identities and universal moralities and reinterpret their beliefs and norms contextually in light of the plural societies in which they live.  The governments should also allow multiple voices, including the religious, by ensuring toleration, freedom of conscience and worship, and right of assembly.
AL-FARABI ON HUMANS Tien Rohmatin
ILMU USHULUDDIN Vol. 9, No. 1, July 2022
Publisher : Himpunan Peminat Ilmu-Ilmu Ushuluddin (HIPIUS)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/iu.v9i1.29314

Abstract

The Discourse about humans to this day continues to be actual and contextual and has always been an important issue. The question of who, what, and where humans are is still a matter of debate among scientists, philosophers, and theologians. In general, among philosophers, scientists, and theologians, humans are understood in three ways: First, the group that holds that humans are only material that occupies space, can be seen, touched, measured, counted, and so on. The second group is having a view that human nature is only the spirit. While the third group has a view that humans are made up of matter and spirit perfectly and simultaneously or consist of body and spirit (soul). This paper describes the thoughts of a Muslim philosopher, al-Farabī about humans. Al-Farabī is a Muslim philosopher who is known as al-Muʿallim al-Thānī (Second Teacher) after Aristotle who was nicknamed al-Muʿallim al-Awwal (First Teacher). An honorary title was given to him for his ability to review the thoughts of Greek philosophers, especially Aristotle. Humans according to Al-Farabī are two-dimensional beings. The physical dimension is in the form of a material body and the spiritual dimension consists of the soul (al-nafs) and spirit (al-rūḥ).
BAḤR AL-MADHĪ AND THE ESTABLISHMENT MOMENTUM OF ḤADĪTH STUDIES IN NUSANTARA IN THE 20TH CENTURY Hilmy Firdausy; Rifqi Muhammad Fatkhi; Fuad Thohari
ILMU USHULUDDIN Vol. 9, No. 1, July 2022
Publisher : Himpunan Peminat Ilmu-Ilmu Ushuluddin (HIPIUS)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/iu.v9i1.20953

Abstract

This paper intends to strengthen the view that Islam vernacularizing happened in the sharḥ of ḥadīth that provided new distinctions in the meaning of the Prophet’s Ḥadīths. Baḥr al-Madhī Syarah Bagi Mukhtaṣar Saḥīḥ al-Tirmidhī written by Muhammad Idris al-Marbawi (1896-1989) provided quite copious data on this matter. Instead of obscuring the Prophet’s ḥadīths, the subjectivity, and locality of al-Marbawi as a Nusantara Muslim scholar enriches the contextualization of the meaning of ḥadīth so that the non-Arab communities can understand the ḥadīths well. The abundant textual data in Baḥr al-Madhī also confirmed that the study of Nusantara ḥadīths had been established in the 19th and 20th centuries AD. This paper strengthened Oman Fathurrahman’s thesis which showed that the roots of the Nusantara ḥadīths writing tradition have existed since the 17th century. On the other hand, this paper refuted several academics’ opinions such as Brown (1966) and Azra (1997) who said that the study of ḥadīths was stagnant.
RELIGION AND THE POLITICS OF NATIONALIST THOUGHT: COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF HINDU NATIONALISM IN INDIA AND MUSLIM NATIONALISM IN INDONESIA Ali Munhanif; Yuli Yasin
ILMU USHULUDDIN Vol. 9, No. 1, July 2022
Publisher : Himpunan Peminat Ilmu-Ilmu Ushuluddin (HIPIUS)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/iu.v9i1.32065

Abstract

The rise of religious nationalism in recent decades in developing countries has sparked attention among scholars. This article seeks to explore the political and cultural dynamics of the contemporary resurgence of religious nationalism, many of them reflected in Hindu nationalist in India and Muslim nationalist in Indonesia. We address the following question: What are the likely factors for religious-nationalist movements coming to the center stage of nation-state politics? Using the historical-institutional approach to religious politics, we argue that the forces that have driven the resurgence of religious nationalist were the interaction between the institutional design of the nation-state and the considerable opportunities for change – in a certain period of political crisis. Embedded in the issues of the institutional challenge is another series of questions that this article will address. There are variations in how and when religious-nationalist politics emerged. Why, for example, did the rise of religious politics occur in such varying ways, for instance, through a political party in India and civil society movements in Indonesia? Why did regimes or governments that promoted secular ideologies in India and Indonesia lose their hegemonic position? The answers to these questions are also largely historical-institutional. By focusing on how political institutions shape political dynamics, we suggest that institutions shape social and political outcomes, they necessarily affect people’s behavior as reflected in the politics of religious nationalism.
RELIGION AND THE POLITICS OF NATIONALIST THOUGHT: COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF HINDU NATIONALISM IN INDIA AND MUSLIM NATIONALISM IN INDONESIA Ali Munhanif; Yuli Yasin
ILMU USHULUDDIN Vol. 9, No. 1, July 2022
Publisher : Peminat Ilmu Ushuluddin

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/iu.v9i1.32065

Abstract

The rise of religious nationalism in recent decades in developing countries has sparked attention among scholars. This article seeks to explore the political and cultural dynamics of the contemporary resurgence of religious nationalism, many of them reflected in Hindu nationalist in India and Muslim nationalist in Indonesia. We address the following question: What are the likely factors for religious-nationalist movements coming to the center stage of nation-state politics? Using the historical-institutional approach to religious politics, we argue that the forces that have driven the resurgence of religious nationalist were the interaction between the institutional design of the nation-state and the considerable opportunities for change – in a certain period of political crisis. Embedded in the issues of the institutional challenge is another series of questions that this article will address. There are variations in how and when religious-nationalist politics emerged. Why, for example, did the rise of religious politics occur in such varying ways, for instance, through a political party in India and civil society movements in Indonesia? Why did regimes or governments that promoted secular ideologies in India and Indonesia lose their hegemonic position? The answers to these questions are also largely historical-institutional. By focusing on how political institutions shape political dynamics, we suggest that institutions shape social and political outcomes, they necessarily affect people’s behavior as reflected in the politics of religious nationalism.
UNDERSTANDING THEOLOGICAL INTERPRETATION IN TAFSIR DEPARTEMEN AGAMA REPUBLIK INDONESIA PRINTED 1996-1997 Masri Mansoer
ILMU USHULUDDIN Vol. 9, No. 1, July 2022
Publisher : Peminat Ilmu Ushuluddin

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/iu.v9i1.29251

Abstract

This paper aims to discuss the understanding of Islamic theology in Tafsir Departemen Agama Republik Indonesia. This paper mainly discussed the pattern of interpretation of the verses found in the Tafsir Departemen Agama Republik Indonesia, especially in interpreting the verses of kalam used as arguments by the Mutakalimīn. The primary sources were Tafsir Departemen Agama Republik Indonesia. In contrast, the secondary sources were works from rational and traditional mainstreams. This study find that several verses of the Quran were used as Naqlī arguments by rational and traditional mainstreams, which the Ministry of Religious Affairs then interpreted. This paper shows that the interpretation of the verses in the Tafsir tends to be somewhat closer to the rational-Mātūrīdīyah Samarkand style of thought, not the Muʿtazilaʾs rationale. On the other hand, it has very little in common with traditional mainstream, such as Ashʿarīyah and Mātūrīdīyah Bukhārā.
RELIGIOUS DIFFERENCE AND THE COMMON GOOD: REFLECTION ON TOLERATION AND PARTICIPATION IN CONTEMPORARY AMERICA AND INDONESIA Muhamad Ali
ILMU USHULUDDIN Vol. 9, No. 1, July 2022
Publisher : Peminat Ilmu Ushuluddin

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/iu.v9i1.29327

Abstract

This paper seeks to discuss the extent to which religious differences can contribute to the promotion of the common good. It asks if the religious difference is sufficient for the states and the societies to attain the common good across religious and ethical persuasions in multi-faith countries such as America and Indonesia. It is primarily an ethical-philosophical question but is also related to historical, sociological, anthropological, and political contexts.  For many religious people, religious particularity and distinction – including its truth and superiority claims – is a significant element of identity and sense of morality, but religious difference alone is insufficient for attaining the common good. Religions provide motivations to act good or evil. Religions offer rich resources, be doctrinal, narrative, experiential and emotional, ethical, legal, social, material, or political, but because there are many, often conflicting religious and ethical values from within the same and across religious traditions, it is not enough for everyone to share their beliefs and accept each other’s exclusive claims. For religions to help improve the public good, religious agents have to negotiate their particular and distinct identities and universal moralities and reinterpret their beliefs and norms contextually in light of the plural societies in which they live.  The governments should also allow multiple voices, including the religious, by ensuring toleration, freedom of conscience and worship, and right of assembly.

Page 1 of 2 | Total Record : 14

 1   2 

Filter by Year

2022 2022


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 12, No. 1, July 2025 Vol. 11, No. 2, Desember 2024 Vol. 11, No. 1, July 2024 Vol. 10, No. 2, December 2023 Vol. 10, No. 1, July 2023 Vol 10, No 1, July 2023 Vol. 9, No. 2, December 2022 Vol. 9, No. 1, July 2022 Vol. 8, No. 2, December 2021 Vol. 8, No. 1, July 2021 Volume 7, Nomor 2, Juli 2020 Volume 7, Nomor 1, Januari 2020 Volume 6, Nomor 2, Juli 2019 Volume 6, Nomor 1, Januari 2019 Volume 5, Nomor 2, Juli 2018 Volume 5, Nomor 1, Januari 2018 Volume 4, Nomor 2, Juli 2017 Volume 4, Nomor 1, Januari 2017 Volume 3, Nomor 2, Juli 2016 VOLUME 3, NOMOR 1, JANUARI 2016 VOLUME 2, NOMOR 4, JULI 2015 Volume 2, Nomor 3, Januari 2015 Volume 2, Nomor 2, Juli 2014 Volume 2, Nomor 1, Januari 2014 Volume 1, Nomor 6, Juli 2013 Volume 1, Nomor 5, Januari 2013 Volume 1, Nomor 4, Juli 2012 Volume 1, Nomor 3, Januari 2012 More Issue