cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Kukuh Tejomurti
Contact Email
kukuhmurtifhuns@staff.uns.ac.id
Phone
+6281225027920
Journal Mail Official
yustisia@mail.uns.ac.id
Editorial Address
Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sebelas Maret Jalan Ir. Sutami No. 36A, Kentingan, Surakarta Kodepos: 57126
Location
Kota surakarta,
Jawa tengah
INDONESIA
Yustisia
Published by Universitas Sebelas Maret
ISSN : 08520941     EISSN : 25490907     DOI : https://doi.org/10.20961/yustisia.v9i3
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences
The scope of the articles published in Yustisia Jurnal Hukum deal with a broad range of topics in the fields of Civil Law, Criminal Law, International Law, Administrative Law, Islamic Law, Constitutional Law, Environmental Law, Procedural Law, Antropological Law, Health Law, Law and Economic, Sociology of Law and another section related contemporary issues in Law (Social science and Political science). Yustisia Jurnal Hukum is an open access journal which means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 389 Documents
 1   2   3   4   5 
STANDARD AND CONFORMITY: THE PERSPECTIVE STRATEGIES OF THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT’S ROLES IN THE INDUSTRY COMPETITIVENESS Dona Budi Kharisma; Najib Imanullah; Pranoto .
Yustisia Vol 6, No 2: August 2017
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/yustisia.v6i2.12484

Abstract

The Agreement on the Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT Agreement) WTO and The ASEAN Economic Community (AEC) The Blueprint envisions the transformation of the WTO and ASEAN region through the facilitation of the free flow of goods and services. With tariffs declining to near-zero levels, non-tariff barriers are increasingly focused on coordination by member-countries. However, the quality of goods / services becomes a central issue that determines the market entry. Therefore, TBT agreement and AEC Blueprint require fulfillment of Standards and Conformity Assessment to guarantee the quality of goods or services. On the one hand, the low level of compliance of business actors in applying SNI (Indonesian National Standards) represents of the low level of Indonesian industry competitiveness in international level. Thus, specific government’s policies are required, one of which is that dealing with the strategic roles of local government to support products manufactured by national industries to break through global markets. Some strategies for strengthening local policies in national standardization include: (a) constructing local regulations governing Standards and Conformity assessment; (b) implementing mandatory SNI to leading local products; (c) Strengthening mutual cooperation between local government and related stakeholders.
HUBUNGAN KEMANdIRIAN PERAdILAN dENGAN KEYAKINAN HAKIM MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI UNTUK PENEGAKAN KEAdILAN Mariyadi Mariyadi
Yustisia Vol 3, No 1: April 2014
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/yustisia.v3i1.10104

Abstract

AbstractJudicial independence is not absolute or unlimited freedom, but survival is based by juridical norms, professional codes of ethics, and moral norms. Proof of judicial independence is determined by the role of judges in addressing or resolving the matter of law, the other based on his belief, nor because of the influence of the strength that comes from any party. One of judicial institutions that are able to demonstrate survived constitutional court (MK). MK judges in addressing or resolving legal matters petitioned MK based on the belief, that belief is also not free from obyektifitas tools evaluated evidence the truth. AbstrakKemandirian peradilan bukanlah kebebasan absolut atau tanpa batas, tetapi kemandirian yang didasarkan oleh  norma yuridis, kode etik profesi, dan norma moral.  Bukti kemandirian peradilan ditentukan oleh peran hakim dalam menangani atau menyelesaikan perkara hukum, yang selain berdasar keyakinannya, juga tidak karena adanya pengaruh dari kekuatan yang berasal dari pihak manapun. Salah satu Institusi peradilan yang mampu menunjukkan kemandiriannya adalah Mahkamah Konstitusi (MK). Hakim-hakim MK dalam menangani atau menyelesaikan perkara hukum yang dimohonkan pada MK didasarkan oleh keyakinannya, yang keyakinannya ini juga tidak lepas dari obyektifitas alat-alat  bukti yang dinilai kebenarannya. 
LEGAL IMPACT OF STATE DEFENSE ON INDONESIAN CITIZEN IN INTERNATIONAL HUMANITARIAN LAW PRESPECTIVE Gerald Aldytia Bunga; Elisabeth Nirmalasari Bota Tukan
Yustisia Vol 8, No 2: August 2019
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/yustisia.v8i2.21604

Abstract

Implementation of state defense in Indonesia can be implemented in military and non-military. Civilians can also be involved in state defense including in thoseconducted militarily, therefore this study is aimed at examining how national lawarrangements regulate the involvement of civilians in state defense which may beinvolved in military defense and how international humanitarian law regulates theinvolvement of civilians. This research uses normative legal research. The result ofthe research shows that involvement of civilians in military state defense can affectthem losing the protection they should enjoy in armed conflict.
RENEWAL OF LEGAL POLITICS OF INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS CONCERNING INDONESIA'S LOAN AGREEMENT TO ACHIEVE SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT Siti Sumartini
Yustisia Vol 7, No 1: April 2018
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/yustisia.v7i1.18472

Abstract

The government loan agreement is a tool or mechanism to generate capital, and as a source of national development financing as set forth in the RAPBN framework. However, it is practically reviewed that the status of the foreign loan agreement is inconsistent with existing laws and regulations, in particular Law No.24 of 2000 on the International Agreement (Treaty). In the provisions of the law foreign borrowing is one aspect that is subject to the criteria as an international agreement, whereas in the implementation of the G to G government loan agreement tends to use the international private legal system. In addition, loan agreement clauses often do not accommodate the debtor country's interest in realizing sustainable development. Therefore, a legal political renewal related to the loan agreement is required to fulfill the legal certainty element and can accommodate the national interest.
KONVERGENSI TELEMATIKA, ARAH KEBIJAKAN DAN PENGATURANNYA DALAM TATA HUKUM INDONESIA Djulaeka Djulaeka; Rhido Jusmadi
Yustisia Vol 2, No 3: December 2013
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/yustisia.v2i3.10156

Abstract

AbstractTelematics convergence, as a phenomenon, has caused a changing in the system of law in Indonesia. In the first assumption, there are several Acts, such as Telecommunication Act, Broadcasting Act, and Electronic Information and Transaction Act, which are considered to be able to respond to the need of regulation to regulate the phenomenon of telematics convergence. However, the issue of a certain regulation which specifically regulates the telematics convergence appears in the society. Therefore, the article is aimed (1) to explain how actually the conception of telematics convergence in Indonesia is in order to clarify the essential meaning of telematics convergence, and (2) to explain how the system of law in Indonesia responds to the process of telematics convergence. This study is legal research which applies the conceptual approach. The data is the products of law, primarily and secondarily, and non-law products. The data is analyzed by using analytical descriptive approach.Key Words: convergence, Telematics, regulation, Indonesian Legal System.AbstrakKonvergensi telematika sebagai sebuah fenomena telah mengakibatkan terjadinya perubahan dalam sistem pengaturan hukum di Indonesia. Disamping itu, fenomena konvergensi telematika mengakibatkan paradigma pengaturan hukum yang ada harus mengikuti fenomena perubahan akibat perkembangan teknologi. Pada asumsi awal terdapat beberapa peraturan perundang-undangan, yakni Undang-Undang Telekomunikasi, Undang-Undang Penyiaran, dan Undang-Undang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik, yang dianggap dapat merespon kebutuhan regulasi dari adanya fenomena konvergensi telematika, namun dalam perjalanannya isu akan kebutuhan peraturan perundang-undangan yang khusus mengatur tentang konvergensi telematika mencuat di masyarakat.   Melalui artikel ini hendak menjelaskan bagaimana sebenarnya konsepsi tentang konvergensi telematika yang saat ini terjadi di Indonesia, serta menjelaskan bagaimana sistem pengaturan hukum di Indonesia merespon adanya proses konvergensi telematika tersebut. Tujuannya adalah untuk menjelaskan apa sebenarnya makna dari adanya fenomena konvergensi telematika dan sejauh mana peraturan perundang-undangan di Indonesia yang saat ini eksis merespon adanya proses konvergensi telematika tersebut. Penelitian ini adalah penelitian hukum (legal research) dengan menggunakan pendekatan konseptual (conceptual approach) serta bahan penelitian berupa bahan hukum (primer maupun sekunder) dan bahan nonhukum, serta analisisnya menggunakan pendekatan deskriptif analitis.Kata Kunci: Konvergensi, Telematika, Pengaturan, Sistem Hukum Indonesia.
STUFEN THEORY AS A BASIC ANALYSIS OF THE LEGAL STANDING OF THE MINISTERIAL REGULATION AND ITS RELATION TO THE EXECUTION OF THE LOCAL REGULATION Bachrul Amiq; Yovan Iristian
Yustisia Jurnal Hukum Vol 8, No 3: December 2019
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/yustisia.v8i3.33590

Abstract

Law is a set of regulations that contain a kind of unity that we understand through a system, as one form of this realization through Article 22A of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. The legal force binds a regulation in accordance with the hierarchy as referred to in Article 7 of the Law Number 15 of 2019 on the Establishment of Laws and Regulations (hereinafter Law Number 15 of 2019), but in line with Law Number 15 of 2019, it does not recognize the legal standing of the Ministerial Regulation. This research focuses on analyzing and finding answers to questions about the legal standing and characteristics of Ministerial Regulations in the Hierarchy of Statutory Regulations in Indonesia. The research method with a normative juridical approach, prioritizes library research and its implementation in practice. Research specifications are descriptive. The research phase is carried out through library research, collecting secondary data in the form of primary, secondary, and field research materials to obtain primary data as a support. The theory put forward by Hans Kelsen through Stufen Theory and Adolf Merkl’s theory through (Das Doppelte Rechtsantlitz) as a basic analysis to study the legal standing and characteristics of the Ministerial Regulation. In line with the Law 9 of 2015 on the Local Government that Ministerial Regulations are above Provincial, Regency / City Regional Regulations, thus Ministerial Regulations may not conflict with Presidential Regulations and Government Regulations and provide guidelines for Provincial, District / City Regulations in determining the local regulations
PENEGAKKAN HUKUM TINDAK PIDANA ILLEGAL LOGING (ANTARA HARAPAN DAN KENYATAAN) Winarno Budyatmojo
Yustisia Vol 2, No 2: August 2013
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/yustisia.v2i2.10192

Abstract

AbstrakTindak pidana illegal logging/penebangan liar menunjukan adanya suatu rangkaian kegiatan yang merupakan suatu mata rantai yang saling terkait, mulai dari sumber atau prosedur kayu illegal atau yang melakukan penebangan kayu secar illegal hingga ke konsumen atau pengguna bahan baku kayu. Kayu tersebut melalui proses penyaringan yang illegal, pengangkutan illegal dan proses eksport atau penjualan yang illegal. Proses penebangan liar ini, dalam perkembangannya semakin nyata terjadi dan sering kali kayu–kayu illegal hasil dari penebangan yang liar itu dicuci (dilegalkan) terlebih dahulu sebelum memasuki pasar yang legal, artinya bahwa kayu-kayu pada hakekatnya adalah illegal, dilegalkan oleh pihak-pihak tertentu yang bekerja sama dengan oknum aparat, sehingga kayu-kayu tersebut memasuki pasar, maka sulit lagi diidentifikasi mana yang merupakan kayu illegal dan mana yang merupakan kayu legal. Upaya pencegahan telah dilakukan pemerintah untuk mem-berantas illegal logging yaitu telah membuat banyak kesepakatan dengan negara lain dalam upaya penegakan hukum terhadap illegal logging dan perdagangan illegal, seperti Inggris, Uni Eropa, RRC, Jepang dan Korea Selatan. Juga tidak kalah banyaknya adalah upaya LSM Internasional dan lembaga donor membantu Indonesia dalam memberantas illegal logging. Berbagai pertemuan telah dilakukan, namun senyatanya rencana-rencana aksi yang dibuat seringkali tidak menyelesaikan akar masalah. Sedangkan di dalam negeri, menurut Departemen Kehutanan, setidaknya ada 11 (sebelas) lembaga dan instansi pemerintah di Pusat yang menentukan upaya pemberantasan pembalakan liar tersebut, akan tetapi kerjasama kuratif yang bersifat polisionil tersebut tidaklah mudah mewujudkannya dalam pemberantasan illegal logging. Oleh karena itu tulisan ini diharapkan dapat menjadi sumbangan pemikiran bagi pengambil kebijakan baik di tingkat pusat maupun daerah.Kata Kunci: Penegakkan, Hukum, Illegal Loging, Harapan, Kenyataan.AbstractIllegal logging activities showed the presence of a series of activities that constitute a chain of inter- related , ranging from illegal timber sources or procedure or the conduct of illegal logging in abundance up to the consumer or user of wood raw material . The timber screening process is illegal, and the illegal transportation of export or sale is illegal . The logging process , the more real development going on and often times the result of illegal timber from illegal logging was washed ( legalized ) before entering the legal market , means that the timber is essentially illegal , legalized by the parties certain cooperate with local police officers , so that the timber enters the market , it is difficult to be identified which is a timber which is illegal and legal timber . prevention efforts have been made   governments to eradicate illegal logging that has made many agreements with other countries in law enforcement efforts against illegal logging and illegal trade , such as the UK , the EU , the prc , Japan and South Korea . Is also not lose much effort NgOs and donor agencies to assist Indonesia in combating illegal logging . Various meetings have been held , but the actual action plans that are made are often not solve the root problem . While in the country , according to the department of Forestry , there are at least 11 ( eleven ) institutions and government agencies in central decisive efforts to combat illegal logging , but cooperation curative nature is not easy to make it happen in combating illegal logging . Therefore, this paper is expected to be a conceptual contribution to the policy makers at national and local levels .Keywords: Enforcement, Law, Illegal Loging, Expectation, reality
URGENSITAS HARMONISASI HUKUM PERLINDUNGAN DAN PENGELOLAAN HUTAN DALAM MITIGASI PERUBAHAN IKLIM GLOBAL MELALUI PROGRAM REDUCING EMMISION DEFORESTATION AND FOREST DEGRADATION AND ENHANCING STOK CARBON Dewi Gunawati
Yustisia Vol 4, No 1: April 2015
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/yustisia.v4i1.8630

Abstract

AbstrakThis study aims to identify the urgency or the reasons for the harmonization of legal protection and management of forests in mitigating global climate change through REDD + .Urgency harmonize the protection and management of forests in mitigating global climate change examined in three approaches. First, a philosophical approach that formed in the Welfare State Theory by Espring Enderson, active role of the state in the context of the protection and management of forests is that the state is obliged to undertake the protection and management of forests in mitigating global climate change. Studied from the theory of sustainable development Edith Brown Weiss, i) The phenomenon of global climate change is a result of lifestyle or human behavior in the form of patterns of production and patterns of excessive and unfriendly environment. Excessive fossil energy resulting ecological crisis impact on global warming so trigger global climate change. ii) Due to the interest of developing countries to emission concept promoted in the global climate change convention, which it does not restrict their movement from space to improve economic competitiveness by building centers of industrial activity which tends to be a major contributor to the increase in gas emissions greenhouse. In this condition the developing countries try to hum with the concept that those countries have the same right to do the construction. Studied from the theory of justice, John Rawls justice is understood as a balance between personal interests and common interests. In the structure of the society in which justice as the main problems then need to be formulated and given a list of reasons on the principles that must be met by a basic structure of a just society in which the principles of justice must distribute the prospect of meeting the basic needs.Secondly, the juridical approach imprinted on the legal system theory, Lawrence Friedman, and Third, Sociological Approach, engraved on Theory Brianz Tamanaha.
NON SECULARIZATION OF MARRIAGE LEGAL PROCEDURE BASED ON BELIEF IN ONE ALMIGHTY GOD IN INDONESIA Burhanudin Harapah; Solikhah Muslich Sugiyono; Luthfiyah Trini Hastuti
Yustisia Jurnal Hukum Vol 9, No 2: August 2020
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/yustisia.v9i2.27394

Abstract

When disputing in court, non-Muslim citizens use positive laws established by the state that do not involve their religious beliefs. Philosophically, this is on the contrary to the constitution, which states that the country is based on belief in one Almighty God. Moreover, in every decision, judges are formally required to begin with "For the sake of the one Almighty God." This phenomenon may be the result of cultural and/or structural factors that require a research study. This research is normative legal research to devise models of religious legal formulation in the legal system in Indonesia. The results of the study illustrate that changing secular marriage law to religious marriage law is possible through formal procedural rules and substantial material rules. In the initial stages, efforts should be made to change the formal procedural arrangement stage using a procedure to examine, adjudicate, and decide a case. Before deciding on a divorce case, the religion of the disputing parties needs to be involved by (1) appointing a judge who is of the same religion as the disputing parties to examine, adjudicate, and decide the case; (2) requiring judges to present expert witnesses from religious leaders of the disputing parties. This is very important because religion is a truth system based on belief and not all religious beliefs can be rationalized.
PENERAPAN SISTEM PEMBUKTIAN TERBALIK TERHADAP TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI (SEBUAH UPAYA PROGRESIF DALAM PEMBERANTASAN TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI) Muwahid Muwahid
Yustisia Vol 1, No 2: August 2012
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/yustisia.v1i2.10618

Abstract

AbstractThe main object of this research is the regulation reversal burden of proof system of corruption in Act Number 20 of 2001. This research is a normative legal research, data obtained from primary legal materials that legislation, and secondary legal materials namely, books, journals and law relating to the burden of proof. The technique of data analysis uses content analysis.The results of research showed, First the reversal burden of proof system in criminal law of corruption stipulated in Article 12B paragraph (1), Article 37, Article 38A and Article 38B of Act Number 20 of 2001 on the eradication of corruption. Second, the application of reversal burden of proof principle in a criminal act of corruption is a specific provision in the law of criminal procedure, as a way to take war or eradicate of the corruption which is an extra ordinary crime, this provision is evidence of irregularities in the conventional system as was stipulated by the Criminal Code, in this case applies the principle of lex specialis derogat lex generalis. 

Page 2 of 39 | Total Record : 389

 1   2   3   4   5 

Filter by Year

2012 2024


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 13, No 2: August 2024 Vol 13, No 1: April 2024 Vol 12, No 3: December 2023 Vol 12, No 2: August 2023 Vol 12, No 1: April 2023 Vol 11, No 3: December 2022 Vol 11, No 2: August 2022 Vol 11, No 1: April 2022 Vol 10, No 3: December 2021 Vol 10, No 2: August 2021 Vol 10, No 1: April 2021 Vol 9, No 3: September - December 2020 Vol 9, No 3: December 2020 Vol 9, No 2: May - August 2020 Vol 9, No 2: August 2020 Vol 9, No 1: April 2020 Vol 9, No 1: January - April 2020 Vol 8, No 3: December 2019 Vol 8, No 2: August 2019 Vol 8, No 1: April 2019 Vol 7, No 3: December 2018 Vol 7, No 2: August 2018 Vol 7, No 1: April 2018 Vol 6, No 3: December 2017 Vol 6, No 2: August 2017 Vol 6, No 1: April 2017 Vol 5, No 3: December 2016 Vol 5, No 2: August 2016 Vol 5, No 1: April 2016 Vol 4, No 3: December 2015 Vol 4, No 2: August 2015 Vol 4, No 1: April 2015 Vol 3, No 3: December 2014 Vol 3, No 2: August 2014 Vol 3, No 1: April 2014 Vol 2, No 3: December 2013 Vol 2, No 2: August 2013 Vol 2, No 1: April 2013 Vol 1, No 3: December 2012 Vol 1, No 2 (2012): MEI-AGUSTUS Vol 1, No 2: August 2012 Vol 1, No 1: April 2012 Vol 3, No 3: SEPTEMBER-DECEMBER Vol 3, No 2: MEI-AGUSTUS Vol 3, No 1: JANUARI-APRIL Vol 2, No 3: SEPTEMBER-DESEMBER Vol 2, No 2: MEI-AGUSTUS Vol 2, No 1: JANUARI-APRIL Vol 1, No 1: JANUARI-APRIL More Issue