cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
YUSUF ADIWIBOWO
Contact Email
lentera.hukum@unej.ac.id
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
lentera.hukum@unej.ac.id
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kab. jember,
Jawa timur
INDONESIA
Lentera Hukum
Published by Universitas Jember
ISSN : 23554673     EISSN : 26213710     DOI : -
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
E-Journal Lentera Hukum merupakan sarana ilmiah bagi mahasiswa untuk menyalurkan pemikiran-pemikiran ilmiah di bidang ilmu hukum. Artikel yang dikirim belum pernah dipublikasikan atau tidak dalam proses penerbitan dalam berkala ilmiah lain. E-Journal Lentera Hukum terbit tiga kali dalam setahun yaitu April, Juli, dan Desember. Diterbitkan secara elektronik atas kerjasama Fakultas Hukum dan UPT Penerbitan Universitas Jember
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 227 Documents
 6   7   8   9   10 
Ekologi Demokrasi: Temukan Cara-cara untuk Memiliki Kehidupan yang Kuat dalam Membentuk Masa Depan Emanuel Raja Damaitu
Lentera Hukum Vol 5 No 2 (2018): LENTERA HUKUM
Publisher : University of Jember

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19184/ejlh.v5i2.8156

Abstract

Buku ini merupakan salah satu buku yang membahas mengenai bagaimana konsep demokrasi yang seharusnya berjalan di masyarakat saat ini yang menekankan tidak hanya dengan memilih para wakilnya di parlemen melainkan turut serta dalam merumuskan solusi dalam menghadapi permasalahan yang ada di masyarakat. Berbeda dengan buku-buku mengenai demokrasi lainnya, buku ini mengajak pembaca untuk menggugat politik retorika para elit politik dan menjadi sebuah pemahaman yang baru kemudia ditarik mejadi politik kerja ‘warga’ dengan melibatkan kepedulian setiap orang. Demokrasi yang ditulis dalam buku ini adalah dalam bentuk sebuah partisipasi seluruh rakyat untuk memenuhi kebutuhan bersama (hlm.21). David Mathews mengajak para pembaca untuk melihat kembali konsep demokrasi Amerika yang masih mencari kembali konsep demokrasi yang sesungguhnya.
Sistem Pemerintahan Indonesia: Pendekatan Teori dan Praktik Ahmad Yani
Lentera Hukum Vol 5 No 2 (2018): LENTERA HUKUM
Publisher : University of Jember

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19184/ejlh.v5i2.7004

Abstract

Abstract Indonesia’s presidential system requires the separation of powers (executive, legislative and judiciary) as it is based on checks and balances. It is stated in the Indonesian Constitution, but it still needs further reform, particularly on the limitation of such tripartite powers. This article uses legal research to analyse and discuss theoretical and practical issues on the governmental system of Indonesia. Theoretically, the authority of state institutions in Indonesia encourages an executive-centered government system. In fact, in carrying out functions and authorities, state institutions do not reflect that the Indonesian system of government embraces the separation of powers. In addition, this study recommends the need for refinement and improvement efforts, to enforce ideal concept and practice. Keywords: Theory and Practice, Governmental System, Indonesia
Penetapan Tersangka pada Peradilan Koneksitas dalam Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi Yusnita Mawarni
Lentera Hukum Vol 5 No 2 (2018): LENTERA HUKUM
Publisher : University of Jember

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19184/ejlh.v5i2.7579

Abstract

Corruption is a criminal act, not only committed by civilians, but also by military members. Members of the military utilize procedural law called connectivity, in which cases are examined through the mechanism of connectivity. Neglecting the mechanism of connectivity results in uncertain legal implementation. The arrangement of the existing connectivity mechanism within the legislation includes the establishment of a permanent team: public court officials and military court officials whose implementation is considered complicated. While one official’s handling of cases would be considered corrupt, they instead commit the act of splitsing (the separated settlement of the case). The Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK), as an institution, has the authority to control and coordinate corruption criminal cases. In the case of a criminal act of connectivity, related to corruption cases handled by KPK investigators and military investigators, although it may not be examined through the mechanism of connectivity, it is still valid because the determination of the suspect on the offender is based on sufficient initial evidence. Yet, this connectivity mechanism is necessary so that the examination of the case will be a set of intact connectivity, stated in the legislation that regulates the handling of the crime of connectivity in order to sustain justice for all parties. Keywords: Corruption, Connectivity, Determination of Suspects
Kewenangan Pemerintah Daerah dalam Pemenuhan Bantuan Hukum bagi Masyarakat Miskin di Kabupaten Jember Siti Maimunawaroh; Antikowati Antikowati
Lentera Hukum Vol 5 No 2 (2018): LENTERA HUKUM
Publisher : University of Jember

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19184/ejlh.v5i2.6620

Abstract

Article 19 of the Law on Legal Aid provides the authority to local governments to deliver legal assistance to the poor by allocating budgets in the Regional Revenue and Expenditure Budgets, all of which are subsequently regulated by Regional Regulations. However, some areas have not yet implemented the mandate of Article 19 of this Legal Aid Law, because there is still doubt that the fulfillment of legal aid for the poor is part of the absolute government affairs relating to the justice sector. This includes establishing a Judicial Institution, appointing Judges and Prosecutors, establishing human rights and immigration policies, granting pardons, amnesty, abolition, legislation, Substitutionary Rules of Law, Government Regulations, and other national regulations. Unlike Jember Regency, which has legalized the Regional Regulation of Jember Number 6 Year 2016 regarding Legal Aid for the Poor, this Regulation of Jember Regency cannot be implemented since there is no Regent Regulation that regulates the implementation of the Regional Regulation. This article discusses how to regulate the authority of local government in fulfilling legal aid for the poor, and how to fulfill legal aid for the poor in Jember. This article concludes with a suggestion for the Local Government of Jember to immediately approve the Regent's Regulation as the implementing regulation of Jember District Regulation No. 6 of 2016 on Legal Aid for the Poor, and to provide opportunities for community participation in supervising the fulfillment of legal aid in Jember. Keywords: Local Government Authority, Legal Aid, Legal Protection, Poor People
Relokasi Permukiman Warga Bantaran Sungai Ciliwung di Provinsi Jakarta Nur Aini Fitrianti; Nurul Laili Fadhilah
Lentera Hukum Vol 5 No 2 (2018): LENTERA HUKUM
Publisher : University of Jember

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19184/ejlh.v5i2.6788

Abstract

As the population grows rapidly, more and more illegal settlements are built on state land that prohibits shelter, specifically in the Ciliwung River area. The Jakarta Provincial Government has a policy to relocate the residents of Ciliwung River, to ensure that the river and Ciliwung river functions return to normal. The government provides for relocation and the construction of flats, so residents may have increased wellbeing. We explore whether the relocation of Ciliwung River residents is in accordance with Law No. 2 of 2012, on Land Procurement for the Public Interest and Regional Regulation of the Special Capital Province of Jakarta No. 1 of 2012 on Spatial Plans. Normative juridical research concludes that the relocation of the settlement is in accordance with Law No. 2 of 2012 on Land Procurement for the Public Interest and Regional Regulation of the Province of Jakarta Capital Special Region No. 1 of 2012 on Spatial Planning. Keywords: Local Government, Relocation, River Basin Settlements
Pengawasan Warga Negara Asing Penerima Bebas Visa Kunjungan dalam Perspektif Hukum Kewarganegaraan Prayulianda, Helga Anton; Antikowati, Antikowati
Lentera Hukum Vol 6 No 1 (2019): LENTERA HUKUM
Publisher : University of Jember

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19184/ejlh.v6i1.8428

Abstract

The President issued a Presidential Regulation concerning visa-free visits to 179 countries aimed at advancing the economy. Referring to Presidential Regulation 21 of 2016 concerning Free Visit visa, in which Article 3 paragraph (1) that the recipient is free of a Visit visa is exempt from the obligation to have a Visit visa to enter Indonesian territory. As well as Article 4 paragraph (1) and paragraph (2) states that foreign tourists will be given permission to stay for a visit for 30 days but cannot extend the period of the visa exemption or convert it into another residence permit. Although the regulation will attract many foreign tourists to visit Indonesia, over time many of them have misused the right. This article found that the increasingly high demand and supply of labor made use of the visa-free policy gap that visited, leading to the emergence of increasingly massive illegal foreign workers. This is clearly a bad impact on Indonesia. So this article seeks to formulate how to improve the oversight mechanism for misuse of visa-free visits that could potentially harm the state. Keywords: Supervision, Foreign Nationals, Visa-free Visit
Hukum dan Bahasa: Refleksi dan Transformasi Pemenuhan Hak Ekonomi, Sosial dan Budaya James Reinaldo Rumpia; H. S. Tisnanta
Lentera Hukum Vol 5 No 2 (2018): LENTERA HUKUM
Publisher : University of Jember

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19184/ejlh.v5i2.7534

Abstract

The regulation of economic, social and cultural rights is always intertwined with language. Language is significant in the written dimension of legal protection and the legal fulfillment of rights. The text of the law is a commitment to fulfilling rights. Understanding the structure of the text is necessary to predict and reach the needs, as well as to fulfill the rights. States must be able to recognize legal texts that are aligned and responsive. These legal texts must favor the fulfillment of the civil rights through language that reflects and transforms elements of the economic, social, and cultural rights (ie. freedom, availability, accessibility, and conformity). Yet, it is often that the language in the legal text formulated is inconsistent and uncertain. Language as a tool of transformation can also become a tool that shackles. This issue requires an understanding of intertextuality, with respect to the text of the law. One strategy is to highlight the elements in legal texts: principles, standards, and concepts to enforce values and legal goals. This effort is intended to understand the various factors and relationships that affect the accuracy of meaning, and subsequently reflect on the purpose of formulating that legal text. The discovered weakness of the text can thus be reconstructed in responsive, progressive and communicative spaces and structures. Keywords: Language, Law Text, Reflection, Transformation, Socio-Economic and Cultural Rights
Warrant of Termination of Investigation (SP3) Issued Based on Peace Agreement Between Suspects and Reporters in Ordinary Offences Hakiki, Azizul
Lentera Hukum Vol 6 No 2 (2019): LENTERA HUKUM
Publisher : University of Jember

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19184/ejlh.v6i2.10501

Abstract

Warrant of Termination of Investigation (SP3 – Surat Perintah Penghentian Penyidikan) is applied as the power granted to the investigator of a criminal act. Article 109 paragraph (2) of Law No. 8 of 1981 on the Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP – Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana) states that there are three requirements to stop a criminal investigation: (a) insufficient evidence; (b) the act committed by the suspect is not a criminal offence; and (c) the investigation is stopped by law. These three conditions are alternative conditions. At the implementation level, there are many cases that are terminated because they fulfill these three requirements. However, it is not uncommon for cases that have progressed to the stage of investigation be stopped as well because the suspected and the reporter reached a peace agreement through mediation facilitated by police investigators. The mediation condition will impact the ongoing investigation since the investigation should be stopped and police should revoke the report of the investigation concerned. Whereas, in this context, the status of this case is an ordinary offence status which means that the revocation of the report has no consequences with the ongoing investigation. Peace agreements impact ongoing investigations. Whereas the investigation should be stopped and police should revoke the offense report, under extant legislation, investigations maintain ordinary offence status, meaning revocation of the offense report has no effect on the ongoing investigation. The investigation cannot be stopped with any other reasons excepts those that stated in Article 109 paragraph (2). The fact that the revocation of the report of investigation leads to the termination of the ongoing investigation as evidenced by the issuance of SP3. While the issuance of SP3 enables termination of an ongoing investigation by revoking the report of investigation, investigation termination requirements explicitly state that an agreement reached through a mediation mechanism cannot provide legal grounds to issue SP3. This paper provides a normative legal analysis of the validity of investigation termination as the result of an agreement reached through a mediation mechanism. Investigations that terminated based on an agreement achieved by mediation mechanism will create space for third parties to utilize a pre-trial mechanism whose purpose is to test the validity or termination of the investigation. Keywords: Termination of Investigation, Criminal Law, Criminal Procedure.
Third Parties’ Legal Protection over Agreed Authorized Capital Amount by Founders in Limited Liability Companies Nugraha, Xavier; Murti, Krisna; Putri, Saraswati
Lentera Hukum Vol 6 No 2 (2019): LENTERA HUKUM
Publisher : University of Jember

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19184/ejlh.v6i1.9676

Abstract

On July 14, 2016, the Government enacted the Government Regulation Number 29 of 2016 regarding Amendments in Authorized Capital of a Limited Liability Company (LLC). Article 1 paragraph (3) of the regulation showed that the amount of authorized capital was submitted to the agreement of the LLC founders. This regulation was issued in order to increase Indonesia’s ‘ease of doing business’ rank, especially in ‘starting a business.’ This article aims to examine the legal protection for the third party over the amount of authorized capital based on the agreement of the LLC founders using the study of dogmatic law. Regulations referenced are Law Number 40 of 2007 regarding Limited Liability Companies and Government Regulation Number 29 of 2016 regarding Amendments in Authorized Capital of LLC. Based on the results of this study, it was found that the determination of authorized capital based on the agreement of LLC founders has neglected the protection of the third parties. This manifested particularly in protecting minority investors and resolving insolvency. Through the enactment of authorized capital based on the agreement of the founders, the mechanism of preventive and repressive legal protection to the third parties are assumed to be eliminated. Keywords: The Authorized Capital, Limited Liability Company, Agreement, Legal Protection.
The Perspective of Islamic Law on a Mismatched Object in Online Sales and Purchases Transactions Mustikawati, Intan Mukarromah; Handono, Mardi; Zulaika, Emi
Lentera Hukum Vol 6 No 2 (2019): LENTERA HUKUM
Publisher : University of Jember

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19184/ejlh.v6i2.10839

Abstract

Online transaction is a cross-personal action done by two or more parties to reach an agreement. The law of sales and purchases in Islam requires the double coincidence of wants as a measure of transaction validity. However, humans will always find the double coincidence of wants as a remote probability. Therefore, the previous Ulamas set an ijab-qabul as a symbolization of the double coincidence of wants. A qabul is an expression of the handed over of one's ownership rights to a particular party, and vice versa, as well as a sign that both of the parties have agreed on the contract (akad). Keywords: Online Transactions, Buying and Selling in Islamic Law, Object Mismatches.

Page 8 of 23 | Total Record : 227

 6   7   8   9   10 

Filter by Year

2014 2025


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 12 No. 2 (2025): LENTERA HUKUM Vol. 12 No. 1 (2025): LENTERA HUKUM Vol. 11 No. 3 (2024): LENTERA HUKUM Vol 11 No 2 (2024): LENTERA HUKUM Vol 11 No 1 (2024): LENTERA HUKUM Vol 10 No 3 (2023) Vol 10 No 2 (2023): Human Rights and Economy in the Global South Vol 10 No 1 (2023): Human Rights in Indonesia and Beyond Vol 9 No 3 (2022): LENTERA HUKUM Vol 9 No 2 (2022): LENTERA HUKUM Vol 9 No 1 (2022): LENTERA HUKUM Vol 8 No 3 (2021): LENTERA HUKUM Vol 8 No 2 (2021): LENTERA HUKUM Vol 8 No 1 (2021): LENTERA HUKUM Vol 7 No 3 (2020): LENTERA HUKUM Vol 7 No 2 (2020): LENTERA HUKUM Vol 7 No 1 (2020): LENTERA HUKUM Vol 6 No 3 (2019): LENTERA HUKUM Vol 6 No 2 (2019): LENTERA HUKUM Vol 6 No 1 (2019): LENTERA HUKUM Vol 5 No 3 (2018): LENTERA HUKUM Vol 5 No 2 (2018): LENTERA HUKUM Vol 5 No 1 (2018): LENTERA HUKUM Vol 4 No 3 (2017): LENTERA HUKUM Vol 4 No 2 (2017): LENTERA HUKUM Vol 4 No 1 (2017): LENTERA HUKUM Vol 3 No 3 (2016): December 2016 Vol 3 No 1 (2016): April 2016 Vol 3 No 3 (2016): LENTERA HUKUM Vol 3 No 2 (2016): LENTERA HUKUM Vol 3 No 1 (2016): LENTERA HUKUM Vol 2 No 3 (2015): LENTERA HUKUM Vol 2 No 2 (2015): LENTERA HUKUM Vol 2 No 1 (2015): LENTERA HUKUM Vol 1 No 2 (2014): LENTERA HUKUM Vol 1 No 1 (2014): LENTERA HUKUM Vol 1, No 1 (2014) More Issue