Articles
76 Documents
Search results for
, issue
"Vol 1, No 1 (2018)"
:
76 Documents
clear
<![CDATA[SUATU TINJAUAN PERTANGGUNG JAWABAN PIDANA TERHADAP PELAKU TINDAK PIDANA MEMBUANG ANAK (TOVENDELING KEEGEN) BERDASARKAN PASAL 305, 306, 307 dan 308 KUHP ]]>
<![CDATA[Robiansyah, Muhamad]]>
<![CDATA[ Journal of Law ( Jurnal Ilmu Hukum ) Vol 1, No 1 (2018) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Samarinda ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
<![CDATA[ABSTRACT National development which is a process of modernization has both positive and negative impacts, many events that have attracted public attention these days. The increasing number of criminal acts, delicacy (delinquency) of children and the emergence of crime problems against children even throw away their own children. The research aims to find out the criminal responsibility of the perpetrator of the crime of throwing away the child. Based on the legal material of the Biblical Criminal Law (KUHP), Law Number 23 of 2002 concerning Child Protection, Law Number 39 of 1999 concerning Human Rights. Criminal sanctions are one of the ways to cope with criminal acts, the debate over criminal planning in the face of crime, has been going on for hundreds of years, the handling of crime by imposing criminal sanctions is the oldest way. Ability to be criminally responsible in relation to one's mental / mental state. When the perpetrator takes action in a state of physical and spiritual health, so that he is not categorized as a party covered by articles 44, 48, 49, 50 and 51 of the Criminal Code (there are forgiveness and justification reasons). To cope with criminal acts of throwing children out of society, such as can be done by legal and religious counseling, especially in the community and school environment. Keywords: Crime of throwing children based on articles 305, 306, 307 and 308 of the Criminal Code]]>
<![CDATA[IMPLEMENTASI PENETAPAN ALAT BUKTI YANG CUKUP DALAM UNSUR MERUGIKAN KEUANGAN NEGARA BERDASARKANUNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 20 TAHUN 2001 TENTANG PERUBAHAN ATAS UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 31 TAHUN 1999 TENTANG PEMBERANTASAN TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI ]]>
<![CDATA[Ragilio, Fadhil Mu’amar]]>
<![CDATA[ Journal of Law ( Jurnal Ilmu Hukum ) Vol 1, No 1 (2018) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Samarinda ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
<![CDATA[ABSTRACT The calculation and determination of state financial losses is one of the most frequent and controversial issues in the settlement of corruption cases. Each law enforcement officer often provides different interpretations, particularly those related to which agency has the authority to calculate and determine the amount of the state's financial loss in a court decision.In the Anti-Corruption Eradication Act which is the principal to determine a person as a suspect is the element of state losses. Meanwhile, in determining the element of state losses, it is necessary to calculate the losses incurred. The calculation of such losses if we refer to Article 184 Criminal Procedure Code can be categorized as letter proof. So in the determination of criminal acts of corruption based on at least 2 (two) evidences need to be considered documentary evidence in the form of calculation of state losses from the institution authorized to assign a person as a suspect.It is necessary to stipulate the party that can determine the state losses other than the CPC and BPKP as stated in the Constitutional Court Decision Number 31 / PUU-X / 2012 dated October 23, 2012 stipulated that in order to prove a criminal act of corruption, the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) can only coordinate with BPKP and BPK, but can also coordinate with other agencies, can even prove themselves outside the findings of BPKP and BPK, for example by inviting experts or by requesting material from the inspectorate general or body that has the same function with it. Keywords: Finance, Corruption, Suspect, Evidence]]>
<![CDATA[TINJAUAN HUKUM PENGANUT KEPERCAYAAN di INDONESIA BERDASARKAN PUTUSAN MK NOMOR 97/PPU/XIV/2016 ]]>
<![CDATA[Warih, Jantan]]>
<![CDATA[ Journal of Law ( Jurnal Ilmu Hukum ) Vol 1, No 1 (2018) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Samarinda ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
<![CDATA[ABSTRAK Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui pengakuan status hukum perkawinan terhadap pemeluk kepercayaan di Indonesia sebelum dan sesudah adanya putusan MK Nomor 97/PPU/XIV/2016 dan pengakuan status hukum terhadap pemeluk kepercayaan di Indonesia dalam hal pencantuman identitas kepercayaan pada KTP (kartu tanda penduduk) sebelum dan sesudah adanya putusan MK Nomor 97/PPU/XIV/2016. Adanya jaminan hak konstitusi dalam Undang-Undang Dasar Republik Indonesia 1945 (UUD 1945) termaksud, diikuti dengan ketentuan-ketentuan perlindungan, pemajuan, penegakkan, serta pemenuhan menjadi tanggung jawab negara, terutama pemerintah. Menurut Janedri M Gaffar, hal yang harus dilaksanakan baik dalam bentuk peraturan Perundang-Undangan dan kebijakan maupun tindakan penyelenggaraan negara. Dalam rangka melindungi, memajukan, menegakkan serta memenuhi hak konstitusi warga negara. Oleh karenanya diberikan suatu hak uji yang dimiliki oleh subjek hukum yaitu individu, masyarakat adat, badan hukum privat, badan hukum publik, dan lembaga negara. Setiap peraturan Perundang-Undangan yang dianggap tidak sesuai atau bertentangan dengan Undang-Undang Dasar Republik Indonesia 1945 mempunyai kesempatan yang sama diuji konstitusionalitasnya. Pengujian kadar konstitusionalitas ini merupakan suatu bentuk dari hak konstitusional warga negara. Keynote: Kebebasan Beragama, Penganut Kepercayaan, Jaminan Hak Konstitusi. ]]>
<![CDATA[PEMBEBASAN BERSYARAT SEBAGAI HASIL UPAYA PEMBINAAN NARAPIDANA TITIPAN DI RUTAN KELAS II A SAMARINDA ]]>
<![CDATA[Husain, M. slamet]]>
<![CDATA[ Journal of Law ( Jurnal Ilmu Hukum ) Vol 1, No 1 (2018) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Samarinda ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
<![CDATA[ABSTRACTProvision of parole to inmates is the last link in the effort of fostering prisoners in the prison system. By means of parole, inmates can improve communication with the wider community, rediscover their self-esteem as human beings and their existence as members of the community. In this conditional implementation must be considered or based on correctional principles, one of which states that during the loss of freedom of movement, prisoners must be introduced to the community and should not be alienated from it. Factors that are obstacles or barriers to the implementation of parole are as follows: The prisoner in question still has other cases that have not been decided by the court; The prisoner in question has not received remission or legal deduction; Recidivist inmates; The convict in question while being fostered in the Detention Center violates; Prisoners who undergo their sentence are less than one year; The detention officer indeed wants the parole to be increased, but the prisoner often commits violations while in the detention center, so that the administrative requirements do not support prisoners being sent to parole; Even from society, parole sometimes gets obstacles that make prisoners often feel unacceptable, for example the victim's family is still grudging against the prisoners concerned and there is an assumption from the public that these prisoners after leaving and getting parole can disrupt order and security in the environment his place.]]>
<![CDATA[PERTANGGUNG JAWABAN HUKUM AKIBAT WANPRESTASI DALAM PELAKSANAAN PERJANJIAN UMROH ANTARA BIRO PERJALANAN UMROH/HAJI DENGAN JAMAAH UMROH ]]>
<![CDATA[Khairunnisa, Khairunnisa]]>
<![CDATA[ Journal of Law ( Jurnal Ilmu Hukum ) Vol 1, No 1 (2018) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Samarinda ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
<![CDATA[ABSTRACTAccountability is the duty of the individual/group to take responsibility for actions that harm others, if there are irregularities would be cased. As one form of accountability bureau Umrah/Hajj that provide services and guarantees against the congregation. The liability under the auspices of the law and adjusted by agreement between the two sides. Any action relating to the law already provided for in Article 45 of Law No.13 of 2008 concerning Hajj and Umrah. This study uses normative research methods, namely doctrinaire legal research or research library, which is only indicated in the written regulations that are closely connected to the library. Of primary legal materials, secondary law and non-law material processing performed deductively in drawing conclusions from a problem that is common to concrete problems. Analyzed using descriptive technique, interpretation, legal reasoning to answer the problems that exist, namely the legal liability of default in the execution of an agreement between travel agents Umrah/Hajj with Umrah pilgrims. The result showed that with the enactment of legislation regulating the conduct of Umrah/Hajj to give legal protection to pilgrims, besides that no party would be harmed. The government’s efforts in this case the Ministry of Religious Affairs has been working that all travel agency implementation of Umrah/Hajj have a business license, but the fact in the field that cannot be implemented thoroughly, as seen from the number of data register Bureau Implementation of Hajj/Umrah in the Ministry of Religion in particular Samarinda city is not equal to the number of existing Bureau.Keywords : Accountability bureau Hajj/Umrah, Wanprestasi, The tort Umrah Agreement.]]>
<![CDATA[SISTEM PENETAPAN NILAI JUAL OBJEK PAJAK (NJOP) TANAH, DALAM PAJAK BUMI DAN BANGUNAN PERDESAAN DAN PERKOTAAN (PBB-P2) MENURUT UNDANG-UNDANG PAJAK DAERAH DAN RETRIBUSI DAERAH NO. 28 TAHUN 2009 DI SAMARINDA ]]>
<![CDATA[MISTURIYANI, SRI]]>
<![CDATA[ Journal of Law ( Jurnal Ilmu Hukum ) Vol 1, No 1 (2018) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Samarinda ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
<![CDATA[ABSTRACTÂ In the management of land and rural and urban land tax (PBB-P2) in addition to the determination of tax rates, the Regional Government also has the authority to determine the size of NJOP per square meter land based on the assessment results. Land valuation is done by market data comparison method and done in bulk. Appropriation of NJOP of land can reasonably be carried out if the assessment is done objectively and the data obtained may reflect the fair market price of the land at the assessment site in the year of appraisal.The method used in this research is (1) normative juridical by collecting data from books, laws, internet. and (2) juridical sociology that goes directly to the field by interview and question and answer to BAPENDA officer as resource person.From research conducted at the Office of BAPENDA of Samarinda City, the determination of NJOP of land against PBB-P2 according to Law no. 28 of 2009 on Regional Taxes and Levies, the determination of NJOP is done by comparison of the price of other similar objects, the new acquisition value by calculating all the costs incurred to obtain the object of the tax when the appraisal is done, the substitute selling value based on the result of the tax object production called the income approach.]]>
<![CDATA[PROBLEMATIKA DALAM JUAL BELI HARTA GONO – GINI KAITANNYA DENGAN KEWENANGAN SUAMI ATAU ISTERI MENURUT UNDANG - UNDANG NOMOR 1 TAHUN 1974 ]]>
<![CDATA[CRISTANTI, YELIANA]]>
<![CDATA[ Journal of Law ( Jurnal Ilmu Hukum ) Vol 1, No 1 (2018) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Samarinda ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
<![CDATA[Abstrak Perkawinan merupakan suatu lembaga suci yang bertujuan untuk membentuk keluarga yang bahagia dan kekal, sesuai dengan Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 tentang perkawinan yang menyebutkan bahwa perkawinan ialah ikatan lahir batin antara seorang pria dengan seorang wanita sebagai suami isteri dengan tujuan membentuk keluarga (rumah tangga) yang bahagia dan kekal berdasarkan Ketuhanan Yang Maha Esa.Bahwa untuk melakukan perbuatan hukum atas harta gono-gini, baik suami atau isteri mempunyai hak yang sama dan seimbang, asalkan dengan persetujuan kedua belah pihak baik yang menyangkut penggunaan, pengurusan dan perolehannya. Sebagaimana disebutkan dalam pasal 36 ayat (1) Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974, dikatakan bahwa mengenai harta bersama (gono-gini) suami atau isteri dapat bertindak atas persetujuan kedua belah pihak.Oleh karena perihal harta gono-gini dalam peraturan Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 adalah sangat singkat dalam arti hanya secara garis besarnya saja sedangkan permasalahan yang menyangkut harta gono-gini semakin kompleks, maka menurut hemat penulis hendaknya dalam usaha menciptakan peraturan yang berhubungan dengan harta gono-gini diuraikan secara jelas dan transparan agar masyarakat mengetahuinya.]]>
<![CDATA[PENEGAKAN HUKUM TERHADAP PROSES HUKUM PEMBUKTIAN TERBALIK TERBATAS DALAM PERKARA PIDANA KORUPSI ]]>
<![CDATA[Kuntong, Dalmasius]]>
<![CDATA[ Journal of Law ( Jurnal Ilmu Hukum ) Vol 1, No 1 (2018) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Samarinda ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
<![CDATA[ABSTRACT The legal process of reversing evidence is limited in the case of corruption preceded by a defense conducted by the defendant in which the defendant attempted to prove that he did not commit a criminal act of corruption. Regarding the effectiveness of reversed evidence can not be explained with certainty. This is because in general the juridical rule that this applies to everyone who is entangled or becomes a defendant is given a chance to prove. According to research usually in terms of proof, the defendant can say that the wealth he has obtained from inheritance and grants. So in this case the relationship between the prosecutor and the defendant in the proof. However, the provisions that the defendant admits wrongly before the trial, that what he has done is fully acknowledged, with clear explanations of criminal incidents committed and all in accordance with the testimony of the victim's witnesses and other evidence, perfect. In its implementation to reveal the case of corruption is the obstacle to obtain supporting evidence. Proving the element of corruption, it should not be said that corruption is detrimental to the state's finances. In the case investigation, the obstacle faced is usually at the time of proof, because in this case it is very risky and complicated and to say the certainty in this case needs expert witnesses who are expected to help. So although there is a corruption case can not necessarily direct investigators say that there is a state loss, but the investigator must carefully handle and overcome it. In case of reversal of the existing constraints, among others, the investigator to find the defendant's criminal offense and to propose the offense finds difficulties if it turns out the process is incorrect. The inverse proof is the right of the suspect to defend himself against the allegations imposed by evidence. Administratively the existing constraints are in the handling of notification letter to the local government, where in this case for the regional level must be known by the governor, and for the central level must be known by the president. In addition to the above it is incriminating to obtain preliminary evidence in conducting an investigation. Keywords : Corruption, Limited Proof of Best]]>
<![CDATA[TINJAUAN YURIDIS TERHADAP PENERBITAN BANK GARANSI DI BANK MANDIRI CABANG SAMARINDA ]]>
<![CDATA[Arafat, M. Kurniawan]]>
<![CDATA[ Journal of Law ( Jurnal Ilmu Hukum ) Vol 1, No 1 (2018) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Samarinda ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (93.184 KB)
<![CDATA[ABSTRAKSebelum menerbitkan Bank Garansi hendaknya Bank meneliti seksama bonafiditas nasabahnya untuk meyakini kemampuan dan kemauan nasabah dalam memenuhi kewajibannya kepada pihak penerima jaminan termasuk kemauan dan kemampuannya dalam memenuhi kewajibannya kepada Bank sendiri, seandainya Bank Garansi yang akan diterbitkan menjadi efektif.Pengamanan Bank Garansi dapat dilakukan dari tiga sudut pandang, yaitu pengamanan dari sudut pandang nasabah yang dijamin, pengamanan dari sudut pandang bouwheer dan pengamanan dari sudut pandang Bank penerbit Bank Garansi.]]>
<![CDATA[KEKUATAN ALAT BUKTI KETERANGAN SAKSI YANG MEMILIKI HUBUNGAN DARAH DENGAN TERDAKWA DALAM TINDAK PIDANA PENCURIAN DALAM KELUARGA ]]>
<![CDATA[A, Icshan]]>
<![CDATA[ Journal of Law ( Jurnal Ilmu Hukum ) Vol 1, No 1 (2018) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Samarinda ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
<![CDATA[ABSTRAKPenelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui kekuatan alat bukti keterangan saksi yang memiliki hubungan darah dengan terdakwa dalam tindak pidana pencurian dalam keluarga dan faktor apa saja yang menjadi hambatan dalam pembuktian dengan mengunakan alat bukti keterangan saksi yang memiliki hubungan darah dengan terdakwa terhadap tindak pidana pencurian dalam keluarga serta faktor apa yang menyebabkan terjadinya tindak pidana pencurian dalam keluarga. Keterangan saksi dalam suatu perkara pidana merupakan salah satu alat bukti penting dalam suatu pembuktian. Alat bukti berupa keterangan saksi sangatlah lazim digunakan dalam penyelesaian perkara pidana. Keterangan yang diberikan oleh seorang saksi dimaksudkan untuk mengetahui apakah memang telah terjadi suatu perbuatan pidana (strafbaar feit) atau tidak yang dilakukan terdakwa. Posisi saksi yang demikian penting nampaknya sangat jauh dari perhatian masyarakat maupun penegak hukum. Pembuktian dalam hukum acara pidana merupakan hal sangat penting dalam proses pemeriksaan perkara pidana di pengadilan. Pembuktian dipandang sangat penting dalam hukum acara pidana karena yang dicari dalam pemeriksaan perkara pidana adalah kebenaran materil, yang menjadi tujuan dari hukum acara pidana itu sendiri. Untuk menemukan suatu kebenaran dalam suatu perkara, pembuktian adalah cara paling utama yang digunakan hakim untuk menentukan benar tidaknya terdakwa melakukan perbuatan yang didakwakan atau memperoleh dasar-dasar untuk menjatuhkan putusan dalam menyelesaikan suatu perkara. Oleh karena itu, para hakim harus hati-hati, cermat, dan matang dalam menilai dan mempertimbangkan masalah pembuktian. Keynote: Tindak Pidana, Alat Bukti Keterangan Saksi, Pembuktian.]]>
