cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
-
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
-
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kota bogor,
Jawa barat
INDONESIA
Indonesian Journal of Business and Entrepreneurship (IJBE)
Published by Institut Pertanian Bogor
ISSN : 24075434     EISSN : 24077321     DOI : -
Core Subject : Economy, Science,
Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance
Indonesian Journal of Business and Entrepreneurship (IJBE) publishes information of empirical research and reviews in business and entrepreneurship. IJBE is published by School of Business, Bogor Agricultural University (SB-IPB) associated with Indonesian Alliance of Magister Management Program (APMMI). IJBE was first published at the beginning of 2015 with three issue per year in January, May, and September. Editor receives articles of empirical research and reviews in business and entrepreneurship.
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 413 Documents
 38   39   40   41   42 
Financial Barriers to Women-Led Enterprises in South Africa: Insights from the Wefis Model Sisanda Ngubane; Kombi Sausi
Indonesian Journal of Business and Entrepreneurship Vol. 12 No. 2 (2026): IJBE, Vol. 12 No. 2, May 2026
Publisher : School of Business, IPB University (SB-IPB)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.17358/ijbe.12.2.428

Abstract

Background: Women-led enterprises play a transformative role in addressing unemployment and inequality. However, these businesses in South Africa face complex barriers, including exclusion from formal financial systems, a lack of institutional support, and gendered socio-cultural norms.Purpose: This study aims to identify and analyse the financial and institutional challenges affecting women entrepreneurs, while proposing adaptive strategies through the development of the Women's Entrepreneurial Finance and Institutional Support (WEFIS) Model.Design/methodology/approach: A qualitative case study methodology was used, involving semi-structured interviews with 12–15 women entrepreneurs in Durban and Gauteng. Data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis supported by NVivo.Finding/Result: Four key domains emerged: structural finance barriers, institutional gaps, adaptive social capital strategies, and transformational impact pathways. Women entrepreneurs use informal peer networks and social capital to overcome systemic exclusion, though scalability remains limited.Conclusion: Women entrepreneurs develop creative coping strategies in response to exclusion, generating socio-economic gains such as community upliftment and gender-based empowerment. However, policy reforms must address systemic barriers to achieving impact at scale.Originality/value (state of the art): This study addresses these gaps by developing the Women’s Entrepreneurial Finance and Institutional Support (WEFIS) Model, an integrative framework combining the Resource-Based View, Institutional Theory, Social Capital Theory, and Empowerment Theory. Keywords: women entrepreneurship, financial inclusion, institutional support, empowerment, South Africa
Digital Leadership and Employee Performance: Mediating Role of Digital Culture and Digital Skill in Financial Services Companies in Jakarta Shinta Arista; Muhammad Ramaditya; Abdul Razak Abdul Hadi
Indonesian Journal of Business and Entrepreneurship Vol. 12 No. 2 (2026): IJBE, Vol. 12 No. 2, May 2026
Publisher : School of Business, IPB University (SB-IPB)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.17358/ijbe.12.2.478

Abstract

Background: Digital Transformation Landscape in Indonesia asserts that successful digital transformation in Indonesia depends not only on technology adoption but also on human resource readiness and leadership effectiveness in guiding change processes.Purpose: This study aims to analyze the influence of digital leadership on employee performance, with digital culture and digital skills serving as mediating variables, among employees working in financial services companies in Jakarta, including the banking, securities, investment, insurance, and financing sectors. Design/methodology/approach: The research employs a quantitative approach by distributing questionnaires to 124 respondents and analyzing the data using Structural Equation Modeling (SEM). The study used non-probability purposive sampling due to limited population accessibility and specific criteria for respondents, namely employees who have worked in the company for at least one year and utilize digital technology in their daily tasks.Findings/Result: The findings indicate that digital leadership has a positive and significant effect on employee performance, both directly and through the mediation of digital culture and digital skills. Conclusion: These results conclude that strong digital leadership enhances employees’ digital skills, fosters a digital culture, and improves employee performance, thereby supporting the company’s digital transformation initiatives, while also extending the literature on their mediating roles in digital transformation contexts.Originality/value (State of the art): A well-established digital culture encourages employees to view digital technology not merely as a tool but as an integral part of daily work practices. The internalization of digital-based values, norms, and habits enables employees to leverage technology for faster, more integrated information sharing, collaboration, and innovation. Keywords:  digital leadership, digital culture, digital skill, employee performance, financial services industry
Mitigating Risk in The Construction Supply Chain Through the Integration of The Supply Chain Operations Reference Model and the House of Risk Method Achmad Bahauddin; Ratna Ekawati; Hilal Yumna; Atia Sonda; Christine Natalia
Indonesian Journal of Business and Entrepreneurship Vol. 12 No. 2 (2026): IJBE, Vol. 12 No. 2, May 2026
Publisher : School of Business, IPB University (SB-IPB)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.17358/ijbe.12.2.492

Abstract

Background: During construction, companies face various risks that can disrupt operational efficiency. Potential risks include payment schemes that do not align with the initial contract, errors in estimating material requirements, and inaccuracies in work planning.Purpose: This study focuses on identifying risk events and risk agents within the construction supply chain process, determining the priority of risk agents based on Aggregate Risk Potentials (ARP), and proposing mitigation strategies to address these risk agents.Design/methodology/approach: This research employs the Supply Chain Operations Reference (SCOR) 11.0 model and the House of Risk (HOR) method, utilizing Phase 1 for risk identification and Phase 2 for determining actions to mitigate the identified risk sources.Findings/Results: Seventeen risk agents and sixteen risk events were identified. The priority risk agents include a payment system that deviates from the initial contract, inaccuracies in estimating material requirements, and errors in work planning calculations. In response to these risks, five risk mitigation strategies were proposed: (1) estimating unexpected costs, (2) establishing an alternative payment system, (3) formulating Standard Operating Procedures for material specifications, (4) forecasting material prices, and (5) creating an automated system for estimating labor requirements.Conclusion: In the construction supply chain, among the identified risk events and risk agents, the top-priority risk agents include payment schemes that do not align with the initial contract, inaccuracies in calculating material requirements, and errors in work planning calculations. These results show that risks associated with money, materials, and planning are very important for making the building supply chain less effective. Combining SCOR and the HOR method provides an organized, data-driven approach to identify, rank, and reduce risks in a methodical manner. In practice, the results help businesses better allocate resources, reduce project delays, and keep costs down by using focused and proactive risk management measures.Originality/value (State of the art): This study contributes to the existing literature by developing a hybrid risk management framework by integrating the SCOR model with the HOR method, enabling systematic mapping and assessment of risks across the entire construction supply chain.  Keywords:  risk mitigation, house of risk, supply chain operations reference, construction supply chain, supply chain management

Page 42 of 42 | Total Record : 413

 38   39   40   41   42 

Filter by Year

2015 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 12 No. 2 (2026): IJBE, Vol. 12 No. 2, May 2026 Vol. 11 No. 3 (2025): IJBE, Vol. 11 No. 3, September 2025 Vol. 11 No. 2 (2025): IJBE, Vol. 11 No. 2, May 2025 Vol. 11 No. 1 (2025): IJBE, Vol. 11 No. 1, January 2025 Vol. 10 No. 3 (2024): IJBE, Vol. 10 No. 3, September 2024 Vol. 10 No. 2 (2024): IJBE, Vol. 10 No. 2, May 2024 Vol. 10 No. 1 (2024): IJBE, Vol. 10 No. 1, January 2024 Vol. 9 No. 3 (2023): IJBE, Vol. 9 No. 3, September 2023 Vol. 9 No. 2 (2023): IJBE, Vol. 9 No. 2, May 2023 Vol. 9 No. 1 (2023): IJBE, Vol. 9 No. 1, January 2023 Vol. 8 No. 3 (2022): IJBE, Vol. 8 No. 3, September 2022 Vol. 8 No. 2 (2022): IJBE, Vol. 8 No. 2, May 2022 Vol. 8 No. 1 (2022): IJBE, Vol. 8 No. 1, January 2022 Vol. 7 No. 3 (2021): IJBE, Vol. 7 No. 3, September 2021 Vol. 7 No. 2 (2021): IJBE, Vol. 7 No. 2, May 2021 Vol. 7 No. 1 (2021): IJBE, Vol. 7 No. 1, January 2021 Vol. 6 No. 3 (2020): IJBE, Vol. 6 No. 3, September 2020 Vol. 6 No. 2 (2020): IJBE, Vol. 6 No. 2, May 2020 Vol. 6 No. 1 (2020): IJBE, Vol. 6 No. 1, January 2020 Vol. 5 No. 3 (2019): IJBE, Vol. 5 No. 3, September 2019 Vol. 5 No. 2 (2019): IJBE, Vol. 5 No. 2, May 2019 Vol. 5 No. 1 (2019): IJBE, Vol. 5 No. 1, January 2019 Vol. 4 No. 3 (2018): IJBE, Vol. 4 No. 3, September 2018 Vol. 4 No. 2 (2018): IJBE, Vol. 4 No. 2, May 2018 Vol. 4 No. 1 (2018): IJBE, Vol. 4 No. 1, January 2018 Vol. 3 No. 3 (2017): IJBE, Vol. 3 No. 3, September 2017 Vol. 3 No. 2 (2017): IJBE, Vol. 3 No. 2, May 2017 Vol. 3 No. 1 (2017): IJBE, Vol. 3 No. 1, January 2017 Vol. 2 No. 3 (2016): IJBE, Vol. 2 No. 3, September 2016 Vol. 2 No. 2 (2016): IJBE, Vol. 2 No. 2, May 2016 Vol. 2 No. 1 (2016): IJBE, Vol. 2 No. 1, January 2016 Vol. 1 No. 3 (2015): IJBE, Vol. 1 No. 3, September 2015 Vol. 1 No. 2 (2015): IJBE, Vol. 1 No. 2, May 2015 Vol. 1 No. 1 (2015): IJBE, Vol. 1 No. 1, January 2015 More Issue