cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Andri Putra Kesmawan
Contact Email
andriputrakesmawan@gmail.com
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
igpa@ugm.ac.id
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kab. sleman,
Daerah istimewa yogyakarta
INDONESIA
Jurnal Kebijakan dan Administrasi Publik
Published by Universitas Gadjah Mada
ISSN : 08529213     EISSN : 24774693     DOI : -
Core Subject : Health, Science, Education, Social,
Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Education Public Health Social Sciences
JKAP (Jurnal Kebijakan dan Administrasi Publikasi), dengan nomor p-ISSN: 0852-9213, e-ISSN: 2477-4693, adalah jurnal multidisiplin berskala nasional yang mencakup berbagai pokok persoalan dalam kajian ilmu-ilmu administrasi publik. Secara khusus JKAP menaruh perhatian pada pokok-pokok persoalan tentang perkembangan ilmu kebijakan dan administrasi publik, administrasi pembangunan, otonomi daerah, birokrasi dan aparatur negara, desentralisasi, ilmu ekonomi dan studi pembangunan, manajemen publik, kebijakan dan pemerintahan, serta ilmu sosial lain mencakup ilmu kesehatan masyarakat, politik fiskal, dan perencanaan wilayah.
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 8 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue "Vol 21, No 1 (2017): May" : 8 Documents clear
Far from Fire: The service delivery quality gap plaguing Indonesian Ports Wayu Eko Yudiatmaja; Alfiandri Alfiandri; Rahmat Hidayat
JKAP (Jurnal Kebijakan dan Administrasi Publik) Vol 21, No 1 (2017): May
Publisher : Magister Administrasi Publik

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (946.48 KB) | DOI: 10.22146/jkap.22713

Abstract

This study analyzes the gap between expected and perceived services by ship passengers at the Sri Bayintan Port, Kijang, Riau Archipelago. The purpose of the paper is to examine the gap between expected and perceived service delivery by ship passengers in the Sri Bayintan Port.  To test the service gap, ServQual variables as postulated in Parasuraman, Zeithaml & Berry (1988) were used. The variables include tangibility, reliability, responsiveness, assurance, and empathy. Data were collected using a sample of 98 passengers, who were chosen at random. Research results showed that there is a significant difference between expected and perceived service delivery among   passengers who use Sri Bayintan port.  In particular, findings of this study showed that passengers were not satisfied with the quality of service delivery they received in Sri Bayintan Port. 
Back Matter JKAP (Jurnal Kebijakan dan Administrasi Publik) Andri Putra Kesmawan
JKAP (Jurnal Kebijakan dan Administrasi Publik) Vol 21, No 1 (2017): May
Publisher : Magister Administrasi Publik

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (1332.296 KB) | DOI: 10.22146/jkap.30948

Abstract

Back Matter JKAP (Jurnal Kebijakan dan Administrasi Publik)
Agencification in Asia: Lessons from Thailand, Hong Kong, and Pakistan Arif Budy Pratama
JKAP (Jurnal Kebijakan dan Administrasi Publik) Vol 21, No 1 (2017): May
Publisher : Magister Administrasi Publik

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (968.563 KB) | DOI: 10.22146/jkap.23008

Abstract

This paper discusses the agencification phenomena as one of New Public Management (NPM)-based administrative reform initiatives. Thailand, Hong Kong, and Pakistan were chosen because of their similarity on administrative legacy and availability of data. The study uses a review of literature research method, while comparative approach was employed to analyze experiences of agencification in the three selected cases. Research result showed that the three countries implemented agencification in different ways; rational agency model is not the only driver for agencification initiatives; and contextual factor that include traditions, cultures, structures, and values influence the implementation of agencification process as a public sector reform initiative. Policy implications can be drawn by reading the three countries on agencification. Thus,  Indonesia, as one of NPM adopters can learn from experience gleaned from the three polities in conducting its administrative reform agenda.
Front Matter JKAP (Jurnal Kebijakan dan Administrasi Publik) Andri Putra Kesmawan
JKAP (Jurnal Kebijakan dan Administrasi Publik) Vol 21, No 1 (2017): May
Publisher : Magister Administrasi Publik

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (1859.303 KB) | DOI: 10.22146/jkap.31023

Abstract

Front Matter JKAP (Jurnal Kebijakan dan Administrasi Publik)
Evaluation of the Implementation of Tourism Policy Yerik Afrianto Singgalen; Pamerdi Giri Wiloso; Gatot Sasongko
JKAP (Jurnal Kebijakan dan Administrasi Publik) Vol 21, No 1 (2017): May
Publisher : Magister Administrasi Publik

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (4289.657 KB) | DOI: 10.22146/jkap.16751

Abstract

This purpose of the study is to  evaluate the  implementation of tourism programs in Bobale Island, Kakara Island, Tagalaya Island and Meti Island in North Halmahera District. The study is based on a model developed by George Edward III, and used qualitative methods to collect and analyze data.  Data collection techniques used included in-depth interviews, observation and study of the documents. Results of the study showed that resources, communication, disposition and bureaucratic structure are the main factors that influence the implementation of tourism policies are. Nonetheless, this study also showed that public support through public participation in the implementation process is also an important factor that determines the success of tourism policy. To that end,   community support or community participation should be an important factor that must be taken into account in the formulation of development priorities of Tourism development Master plan for North Halmahera District government.
Functional Decentralization Construct in Decentralization Policy in Indonesia (A Study of Irrigation, Education, and Free Trade Sectors) Alma Arif; Irfan Ridwan Maksum
JKAP (Jurnal Kebijakan dan Administrasi Publik) Vol 21, No 1 (2017): May
Publisher : Magister Administrasi Publik

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (964.19 KB) | DOI: 10.22146/jkap.25383

Abstract

This research analyze the practice of irrigation, education, and free trade governance linked with functional decentralization concept in Indonesia’s decentralization policy frame. This research use constructivist approach and qualitative-descriptive method. Research result find several factors that cause functional decentralization in Indonesia’s decentralization policy for irrigation, education, and free trade is not adopted. Political institution is not adopted, independence of the farmers, integration of river and irrigation web, and state constitution, are the factors from irrigation side. Several factors in education are the existence of educational boards, the independence of school, devolution in education governance, and state constitution. For free trade, the institution of Batam governance, members structure in Batam’s boards, the uncertainty of BP. Batam in Indonesia’s administration structure, and state constitution, which make functional decentralization is not adopted. Generally, state constitution is major factor of functional decentralization is not adopted. The Construction of Decentralization in the Future of Indonesia’s Decentralization Policy especially in irrigation, education, and free trade can be done gradually begin from inter-local government cooperation, state-local collaboration in boards until establishing the functional decentralization’s organization. 
Ecocracy : Ecology Based Democracy Pursuing Local Goals of Sustainable Development in Indonesia Retnayu Prasetyanti
JKAP (Jurnal Kebijakan dan Administrasi Publik) Vol 21, No 1 (2017): May
Publisher : Magister Administrasi Publik

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (1000.765 KB) | DOI: 10.22146/jkap.18824

Abstract

This paper analyze the need for ecology based democracy to achieve sustainability in local development.  Research results indicate that the development of democracy as it was mandated in the Green Constitution has directed the implementation of the Local Sustainable Development Goals using Ecocracy principles. The new trend of Open Local Government and Green Economy by strengthening the strategies of gender development and Ecoregion has recognized the sovereignty of the environment in local development.  A qualitative CATWOE analysis concludes that in the context of local sustainable development, the ideas of Ecofeminism and Ecoregion practically take into consideration local factors which are unique and different due to the nature of diversity. Consequently, the key principle of Ecocracy must be enhanced comprehensively through enhanced participation, transparency, law enforcement, sustainability, local wisdom (socio-culture), equality (gender), accountability, efficiency and effectiveness, and welfare. 
A Study of Good Governance Index in Yogyakarta Special Region Between 2012 and 2016 Achmad Ubaidillah
JKAP (Jurnal Kebijakan dan Administrasi Publik) Vol 21, No 1 (2017): May
Publisher : Magister Administrasi Publik

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (46.168 KB) | DOI: 10.22146/jkap.22201

Abstract

This study assesses the progress of good governance index in Yogyakarta between 2012 and 2016. Kemitraan (Partnership for Governance Reform) developed the Yogyakarta governance index of 2012 based on the IGI (Indonesia Governance Index)’s methodology. The author used the same methodology   to develop Yogyakarta governance index of 2016 based on newly collected data on government, bureaucracy, civil society and economic society in Yogyakarta. This paper compares Yogyakarta good governance index for 2012 and 2016. The index comprises scores on three levels, interalia:  the arena, principles and actual policy. The paper introduces and describes the three tier structure and index processing. Results of the comparison of the index for 2012 and 2016 shows that in general Yogyakarta governance index increased from the level of fairy good (6.80) in 2012 to good (7.93) in 2016. Subsequently, the scores that comprise the arena and principle levels were analyzed to determine the contribution of each to the total governance index, and afterwards determine the contribution of each principle to the score of each arena. The results of the analysis procedure indicates the possibility that the increase in governance index may be linked to new special status Law No.13 of 2012 for Yogyakarta. Prior to 2012, the special status of Yogyakarta special administration was shrouded in uncertainty. However, with the passage of Law No.13/2013, the special status of the province is now codified, and today forms the legal basis for   policy making in this province. This paper limits itself to indicators that point to the association between the governance and the enactment of the law, and does neither go as far as analyzing the impact that the enactment of the special status law has had on policies, nor evaluate the impact that policy changes made in the aftermath of the implementation of the special status law on the performance of the index.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 8

 1 

Filter by Year

2017 2017


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 29, No 2 (2025): November Vol 29, No 1 (2025): May Vol 28, No 1 (2024): May 2024 Vol 28, No 2 (2024): November Vol 27, No 2 (2023): November Vol 27, No 1 (2023): May Vol 26, No 1 (2022): May 2022 Vol 26, No 2 (2022): November Vol 26, No 1 (2022): May Vol 25, No 1 (2021): May, 2021 Vol 25, No 2 (2021): November Vol 24, No 2 (2020): November Vol 24, No 1 (2020): May Vol 23, No 2 (2019): November Vol 23, No 1 (2019): May Vol 22, No 2 (2018): November Vol 22, No 1 (2018): May Vol 21, No 2 (2017): November Vol 21, No 1 (2017): May Vol 20, No 2 (2016): November Vol 20, No 1 (2016): May 2015: JKAP Volume 19 Nomor 2, November Tahun 2015 2015: JKAP Volume 19 Nomor 1, Mei Tahun 2015 Vol 19, No 2 (2015): November Vol 19, No 1 (2015): May 2014: JKAP Volume 18 Nomor 2, November Tahun 2014 2014: JKAP Volume 18 Nomor 1, Mei Tahun 2014 Vol 18, No 2 (2014): November Vol 18, No 1 (2014): May 2013: JKAP Volume 17 Nomor 2, Tahun 2013 2013: JKAP Volume 17 Nomor 1, Tahun 2013 Vol 17, No 2 (2013): November Vol 17, No 1 (2013): May 2012: JKAP VOLUME 16 NOMOR 2, TAHUN 2012 2012: JKAP VOLUME 16 NOMOR 1, TAHUN 2012 Vol 16, No 2 (2012): November Vol 16, No 1 (2012): May 2011: JKAP VOLUME 15 NOMOR 1, TAHUN 2011 Vol 15, No 1 (2011): May 2010: JKAP VOLUME 14 NOMOR 2, TAHUN 2010 2010: JKAP VOLUME 14 NOMOR 1, TAHUN 2010 Vol 14, No 2 (2010): November Vol 14, No 1 (2010): May 2009: JKAP VOLUME 13 NOMOR 2, TAHUN 2009 2009: JKAP VOLUME 13 NOMOR 1, TAHUN 2009 Vol 13, No 2 (2009): November Vol 13, No 1 (2009): May 2008: JKAP VOLUME 12 NOMOR 2, TAHUN 2008 2008: JKAP VOLUME 12 NOMOR 1, TAHUN 2008 2008: JKAP VOLUME 12 NOMOR 1, TAHUN 2008 Vol 12, No 2 (2008): November Vol 12, No 1 (2008): May 2007: JKAP VOLUME 11 NOMOR 2, TAHUN 2007 2007: JKAP VOLUME 11 NOMOR 2, TAHUN 2007 2007: JKAP VOLUME 11 NOMOR 1, TAHUN 2007 2007: JKAP VOLUME 11 NOMOR 1, TAHUN 2007 2006: JKAP VOLUME 10 NOMOR 2, TAHUN 2006 2006: JKAP VOLUME 10 NOMOR 2, TAHUN 2006 2006: JKAP VOLUME 10 NOMOR 1, TAHUN 2006 2006: JKAP VOLUME 10 NOMOR 1, TAHUN 2006 2005: JKAP VOLUME 9 NOMOR 2, TAHUN 2005 2005: JKAP VOLUME 9 NOMOR 2, TAHUN 2005 2005: JKAP VOLUME 9 NOMOR 1, TAHUN 2005 2005: JKAP VOLUME 9 NOMOR 1, TAHUN 2005 2004: JKAP VOLUME 8 NOMOR 2, TAHUN 2004 2004: JKAP VOLUME 8 NOMOR 2, TAHUN 2004 2004: JKAP VOLUME 8 NOMOR 1, TAHUN 2004 2004: JKAP VOLUME 8 NOMOR 1, TAHUN 2004 2003: JKAP VOLUME 7 NOMOR 2, TAHUN 2003 2003: JKAP VOLUME 7 NOMOR 2, TAHUN 2003 2003: JKAP VOLUME 7 NOMOR 1, TAHUN 2003 2003: JKAP VOLUME 7 NOMOR 1, TAHUN 2003 2002: JKAP VOLUME 6 NOMOR 2, TAHUN 2002 2002: JKAP VOLUME 6 NOMOR 2, TAHUN 2002 2002: JKAP VOLUME 6 NOMOR 1, TAHUN 2002 2002: JKAP VOLUME 6 NOMOR 1, TAHUN 2002 2001: JKAP VOLUME 5 NOMOR 2, TAHUN 2001 2001: JKAP VOLUME 5 NOMOR 2, TAHUN 2001 2001: JKAP VOLUME 5 NOMOR 1, TAHUN 2001 2001: JKAP VOLUME 5 NOMOR 1, TAHUN 2001 2000: JKAP VOLUME 4 NOMOR 2, TAHUN 2000 2000: JKAP VOLUME 4 NOMOR 2, TAHUN 2000 2000: JKAP VOLUME 4 NOMOR 1, TAHUN 2000 2000: JKAP VOLUME 4 NOMOR 1, TAHUN 2000 1999: JKAP VOLUME 3 NOMOR 2, TAHUN 1999 1999: JKAP VOLUME 3 NOMOR 2, TAHUN 1999 1999: JKAP VOLUME 3 NOMOR 1, TAHUN 1999 1999: JKAP VOLUME 3 NOMOR 1, TAHUN 1999 1998: JKAP VOLUME 2 NOMOR 2, TAHUN 1998 1998: JKAP VOLUME 2 NOMOR 2, TAHUN 1998 1998: JKAP VOLUME 2 NOMOR 1, TAHUN 1998 1998: JKAP VOLUME 2 NOMOR 1, TAHUN 1998 1997: JKAP VOLUME 1 NOMOR 2, TAHUN 1997 1997: JKAP VOLUME 1 NOMOR 2, TAHUN 1997 1996: JKAP VOLUME 1 NOMOR 1, TAHUN 1996 1996: JKAP VOLUME 1 NOMOR 1, TAHUN 1996 More Issue