cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
jurnalius
Contact Email
jurnaliusunram@yahoo.com
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
jurnaliusunram@yahoo.com
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kota mataram,
Nusa tenggara barat
INDONESIA
Jurnal IUS (Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan)
Published by Universitas Mataram
ISSN : 23033827     EISSN : 2477815X     DOI : -
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
Jurnal IUS established December 2012, is an institution that focuses on journal development for post graduate students and all law activists in general and specialised topics. Journal IUS publishes three times a year and articles are based on research with specific themes. Jurnal IUS was founded by a group of young lecturers who had a passion to spread their ideas, thoughts and expertise concerning law. Jurnal IUS focuses on publishing research about law reviews from law students, lecturers and other activists on various topics. As an academic centre, we organize regular discussions around various selected topics twice a month. Topics of interest: the battle of legal paradigm legal pluralism law and power
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 715 Documents
 68   69   70   71   72 
Non-Formal Legitimacy of Constitutional Change and Public Perception in The Reform of the 1945 Constitution Through Constitutional Court Decisions Hasanah, Siti; Jiwantara, Firzhal Arzhi
Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan Vol. 13 No. 3 (2025): Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan
Publisher : Magister of Law, Faculty of Law, University of Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29303/ius.v13i3.1841

Abstract

Problematics of the legitimacy of non-formal constitutional changes through judicial decisions in the context of constitutional reform in Indonesia, with a focus on public perception as the main determinant of acceptance or rejection of these changes. Constitutional changes that do not go through formal procedures, carried out through the interpretation of judicial institutions, raise debates about the limits of institutional authority and the integrity of basic norms in the legal system. The purpose of the study was to evaluate how public perception affects the legitimacy of non-formal constitutional change through constitutional court decisions. This research uses a juridical-normative approach with the support of qualitative data analysed descriptively and evaluatively on several Constitutional Court decisions that are considered to contain elements of changes in constitutional norms. The novelty of this research lies in emphasizing the analysis of the relationship between public perception, trust in judicial institutions, and the direction of constitutional reform. The results show that without public support, constitutional change through non-formal channels risks delegitimization, and has the potential to create a crisis of confidence in constitutional institutions. This research contributes to promoting transparency, participation and accountability in the practice of judicial-based constitutional reform.
Fungsi Pajak Terhadap Lingkungan Hidup Sugiharti, Dewi Kania; Hartanto, Ghani Satria; Indri Yuliafitri; Ismail, Shafinar
Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan Vol. 13 No. 3 (2025): Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan
Publisher : Magister of Law, Faculty of Law, University of Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29303/ius.v13i3.1843

Abstract

The environment is an integral part of human life, as it provides essential resources, including food, water, and other necessities. It is the primary source for meeting our various needs. However, many activities that claim to improve welfare and promote economic development actually cause environmental destruction, such as forest burning, illegal logging, and the exploitation of natural resources with no regard for environmental concerns. Government-led development projects require substantial funding. Funding for such projects comes from government savings, which are taxes. Taxes are a highly reliable source of revenue for the Indonesian government at both the central and local levels. Taxes are closely related to development and the environment, so studying this issue in depth is important because it has theoretical and practical value in developing environmentally sustainable practices for a just and prosperous Indonesia. This research focuses on the gap between Indonesian tax regulations, which have not yet significantly accommodated environmental conservation interests. Tax collection in Indonesia is primarily focused on fulfilling the State Budget (APBN). This research analyses the tax law system to determine how it can accommodate the government’s financial interests while also providing space for environmental protection and not hindering the community’s ability to strive for a decent and prosperous life. This descriptive-analytical research uses a normative legal approach. The research stages include a literature review and fieldwork. Data collection techniques were carried out through document studies. Conclusions and research results were drawn using qualitative normative analysis methods.
Legal Protection System for Children Left Behind by Indonesian Migrant Workers: A Multilevel SCII Strategy Approach Maemunah, Maemunah; Rejeki, Sri; Syahrial Haq, Hilman; Sakban, Abdul
Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan Vol. 13 No. 3 (2025): Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan
Publisher : Magister of Law, Faculty of Law, University of Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29303/ius.v13i3.1845

Abstract

This study investigates the systemic neglect experienced by children of Indonesian migrant workers through the lens of the SCII (Societal, Community, Institutional, Individual) strategy. Despite the economic benefits of labor migration, an estimated 11,732 children in East Lombok remain in vulnerable caregiving arrangements, often overseen by elderly or extended family members. Using an empirical juridical method, data were collected from March to July 2025 through semi-structured interviews, field observations, and document analyses involving seven key informants, including government officials, caregivers, and child protection advocates. The findings reveal a 70% gap between national child protection mandates and local enforcement. For example, only two of ten migrant-sending villages possess local regulations addressing the welfare of left-behind children. Cultural norms such as begawé (communal work) and saling jaga (mutual care) create informal safety nets but also obscure neglect and discourage reporting due to respect for kinship hierarchies. Institutional actors such as schools and health centers remain underutilized; 80% of teachers interviewed lacked standard procedures to identify or report neglect cases. The study highlights SCII’s potential to integrate formal legal mandates with community-based practices and concludes that a pluralistic, multilevel, and context-sensitive protection model is essential to ensure accountability and sustainability in safeguarding migrant workers’ children.
The Challenge of Admitting Electronic Evidence in Civil Procedure Law Adinda, Fadhel Arjuna; Rahmawati, Ema; Suparman, Eman; Arifin, Ridwan; Ezzerouali, Souad
Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan Vol. 13 No. 3 (2025): Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan
Publisher : Magister of Law, Faculty of Law, University of Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29303/ius.v13i3.1873

Abstract

In the digital age, the use of electronic evidence in civil disputes has become increasingly common. However, judges often face significant challenges in accepting and evaluating electronic evidence due to concerns about its authenticity, integrity, and relevance. This paper examines the factors contributing to judicial doubts regarding electronic evidence in Indonesian civil litigation and explores the implications of such doubts on the resolution of legal disputes. Drawing on case law, legal theory, and practical challenges, the paper identifies key issues such as the ease of manipulation, lack of standardized procedures for collecting and preserving digital evidence, and the limited understanding of technology among many judges. These factors create a significant barrier to the effective use of electronic evidence in court, leading to delays, case dismissals, or unjust outcomes. The paper also discusses potential solutions to overcome these challenges, including the need for clearer legal frameworks, the role of forensic digital experts, and judicial education in information technology. By addressing these concerns, this paper aims to highlight the critical importance of building trust in electronic evidence, ensuring its proper use in civil dispute resolution, and promoting a more efficient and fair legal process. Ultimately, the study proposes strategies to strengthen the role of electronic evidence in Indonesian civil law while maintaining judicial integrity and ensuring the protection of all parties involved.
Legal Policy Model of the Red and White Village Cooperative (KDMP): Implementation Factors and Comparative Insights from Brazil, Denmark, and Japan Mauludin, Novie Afif; Wahyudi, Ary; Ulum, Hafizatul
Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan Vol. 13 No. 3 (2025): Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan
Publisher : Magister of Law, Faculty of Law, University of Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29303/ius.v13i3.1894

Abstract

This study examines the legal policy model of the Red and White Village Cooperative (KDMP), the determinants of its implementation, and Indonesia’s comparative position vis-à-vis cooperative systems in Brazil, Denmark, and Japan. The urgency of this research stems from the Indonesian government’s large-scale initiative to establish and revitalize more than 80,000 village cooperatives through a centralized, top-down regulatory framework, implemented amid persistent structural challenges, including regulatory ambiguity, limited managerial and digital capacity, uneven infrastructure, and variations in community participation. Without careful legal policy evaluation, this model risks reproducing structural weaknesses previously observed in Indonesia’s Village Unit Cooperatives (KUD). Employing a normative–empirical legal methodology that integrates statutory analysis, conceptual inquiry, comparative law, and a sociological approach supported by interviews and field-based questionnaires in selected villages in West Nusa Tenggara, the study finds that KDMP’s legal policy is predominantly shaped by Thomas R. Dye’s institutional and process models. This centralized framework enables rapid nationwide implementation but reveals a structural misalignment between legal design and practical readiness at the village level. Implementation outcomes are influenced by both juridical factorsparticularly regulatory clarity and policy coherence and non-juridical factors, including human resources, digital infrastructure, and levels of member participation. A comparative analysis based on Ragone and Smorto’s functional framework demonstrates that, while Indonesia shares normative cooperative objectives with Brazil, Denmark, and Japan, differences in governance structures significantly affect sustainability outcomes. Brazil and Denmark illustrate the advantages of autonomy-based, bottom-up cooperative models operating under flexible legal regimes. At the same time, Japan represents a hybrid trajectory in which early state coordination gradually transitions toward member-centered governance. This study contributes an integrated legal-policy model of KDMP that connects implementation realities with comparative insights. The findings indicate that strengthening member-based governance, simplifying overlapping regulations, and gradually reducing excessive centralization are essential to enhance sustainability, community ownership, and the long-term effectiveness of village-based cooperatives in Indonesia. Journal keywords: Legal Policy Model, Comparative Law, and Merah Putih Village Cooperative

Page 72 of 72 | Total Record : 715

 68   69   70   71   72 

Filter by Year

2013 2025


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 13 No. 3 (2025): Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan Vol. 13 No. 2 (2025): Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan Vol. 13 No. 1 (2025): Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan Vol. 12 No. 3 (2024): Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan Vol. 12 No. 2 (2024): Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan Vol. 12 No. 1: April 2024: Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan Vol. 11 No. 3: December 2023 : Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan Vol. 11 No. 2: August 2023 : Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan Vol. 11 No. 1: April 2023 : Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan Vol 10, No 3: December 2022 : Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan Vol. 10 No. 3: December 2022 : Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan Vol 10, No 2: August 2022 : Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan Vol. 10 No. 2: August 2022 : Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan Vol. 10 No. 1: April 2022 : Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan Vol 10, No 1: April 2022 : Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan Vol. 9 No. 3: December 2021 : Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan Vol 9, No 3: December 2021 : Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan Vol 9, No 2: August 2021 : Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan Vol. 9 No. 2: August 2021 : Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan Vol 9, No 1: April 2021 : Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan Vol 8, No 3: December 2020 : Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan Vol. 8 No. 3: December 2020 : Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan Vol 8, No 2: August 2020 : Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan Vol. 8 No. 1: April 2020 : Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan Vol 8, No 1: April 2020 : Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan Vol 7, No 3 (2019) Vol 7, No 2 (2019) Vol 7, No 1 (2019) Vol 6, No 3 (2018) Vol 6, No 3 (2018) Vol 6, No 2 (2018) Vol 6, No 1 (2018) Vol 5, No 3 (2017) Vol 5, No 2 (2017) Vol 5, No 1 (2017) Vol 4, No 3 (2016): HUKUM YANG BERKEADILAN Vol 4, No 2 (2016): HAK DAN PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM Vol 4, No 1 (2016): HUKUM DAN TANGGUNG JAWAB Vol 3, No 9 (2015): HAK MENGUASAI (Monopoli) NEGARA Vol 3, No 8 (2015): POLEMIK PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM DI INDONESIA Vol 3, No 7 (2015): LOGIKA DAN TEROBOSAN HUKUM Vol 3, No 3 (2015): HAK MENGUASAI (Monopoli) NEGARA Vol 3, No 2 (2015): POLEMIK PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM DI INDONESIA Vol 3, No 1 (2015): LOGIKA DAN TEROBOSAN HUKUM Vol 2, No 6 (2014): PLURALISME HUKUM Vol 2, No 5 (2014): HUKUM DAN TATA KUASA Vol 2, No 4 (2014): UTOPIA HUKUM - KESEJAHTERAAN Vol 2, No 3 (2014): PLURALISME HUKUM Vol 2, No 2 (2014): HUKUM DAN TATA KUASA Vol 2, No 1 (2014): UTOPIA HUKUM - KESEJAHTERAAN Vol 1, No 3 (2013): APAKAH HUKUM SUDAH MATI? Vol 1, No 3 (2013): APAKAH HUKUM SUDAH MATI? Vol 1, No 2 (2013): REALITA HUKUM DALAM MASYARAKAT Vol 1, No 2 (2013): REALITA HUKUM DALAM MASYARAKAT Vol 1, No 1 (2013): DIALEKTIKA KEPASTIAN HUKUM DAN KEADILAN Vol 1, No 1 (2013): DIALEKTIKA KEPASTIAN HUKUM DAN KEADILAN More Issue