cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
-
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
-
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kab. sleman,
Daerah istimewa yogyakarta
INDONESIA
Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM
Published by Universitas Islam Indonesia
ISSN : 08548498     EISSN : 2527502X     DOI : -
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
Ius Quia Iustum Law Journal is a peer-reviewed legal journal that provides a forum for scientific papers on legal studies. This journal publishes original research papers relating to several aspects of legal research. The Legal Journal of Ius Quia Iustum beginning in 2018 will be published three times a year in January, May, and September. This journal really opens door access for readers and academics to keep in touch with the latest research findings in the field of law.
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 983 Documents
 41   42   43   44   45 
Agenda Reformasi Sistem Peradilan Pidana Rusli Muhammad
Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM Vol. 6 No. 11 (1999)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Meningkatnya kejahatan diikuti dengan bertambahnya korban jiwa harta di masyarakat adalah indikator lemahnya dan gagalnya sistem peradilan pidana sehingga tawaran melakukan reformasi adalah semuah alternatif yang harus dilakukan pada seluruh bagian-bagian atau sub-sub sistem pendukungnya, terutama menyangkut struktur kelembagaan, materi hukum dan moralitas manusianya. Mengabaikan salah satu sasaran ini, maka reformasi yang dilakukan tidak akan membawa dampak positif pada upaya penanggulangan kejahatan dan perlindungan masyarakat.
Beberapa Permasalah Penerapan Paten dan Upaya untuk Membangun Sistem Paten Indonesia yang Efektif, Wajar, dan Reallstis Syihabudin Syihab
Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM Vol. 8 No. 16 (2001): Cyberlaw
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20885/iustum.vol8.iss16.art9

Abstract

On August 1, 2001 the government ratified Law No 14 2001 concerning Patent in place of the previous Law. in fact, the reisnothing wrong with Indonesian Patent Law. Unfortunately,the implementation of such law still face various obstacles. The following article will high light problems in implementing patent in Indonesia, and efforts to establish an effective, genuine, and realistic patent system.
Korupsi Sebagai Suatu Bentuk White Collar Crime Rusli Muhammad
Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM Vol. 1 No. 2 (1994): KEJAHATAN KERAH PUTIH
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20885/iustum.vol1.iss2.art5

Abstract

Korupsi, baik dalam proses maupun efeknya temyata telah melahirkan berbagai masalah problematis dan krusial, terlebih jenis korupsi  yang masuk klasiflkasi WCC, demikian terungkap dari uraian ekstensif-nya
Mahkamah Konstitusi Dan Pengujian Undang-Undang Jimly Asshiddiqie
Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM Vol. 11 No. 27: SEPTEMBER 2004
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20885/iustum.vol11.iss27.art1

Abstract

The consequences of altering the 1945 constitution is that the possibility of opposition to the principle of supremacy adhered to by the government of Indonesia has been stren hered. The 1945 constitution now adheres to the principle of division of power, that is distributed between legislative, executive and judicial a pheres. This system givespri orityto a relationship of checks and balances between each sphere. Based on these concepts, a new institution has been established, the constitutional court which has fourspheres of outhority and one obligation. However, its primary function is the evalution of the constitutionaly of acts of law. Inotherwords. It is recognizedas a court of Law as Well as functioning as a Court of Justice
EFEKTIVITAS PEMIDANAAN SISTEM PEMASYARAKATAN: Beberapa Kritik Suparman Marzuki
Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM Vol. 2 No. 4: September 1995
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20885/iustum.vol2.iss4.art3

Abstract

Terdapat inkonsistensi antara tujuan pemidanaan dan indikator tujuan pemidanaan berupa prevensi umum dan prevensi khusus, yang lianya diukur dengan frekuensi kuantitas dan kualitas kejahatan dalam kurun waktu lertentu.
Perlindungan Lingkungan dalam Hukum Humaniter Sri Wartini
Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM Vol. 10 No. 24: September 2003
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20885/iustum.vol10.iss24.art13

Abstract

War has never been kind to human environment and human health. Trough out history, warfare hasbeen associated with death, disease, pollution and destruction of the environmentThe Human Rights Law and Humanitarian Law does not protect the Environment directly, so that the protection of those isstill weak
Pertanggungjawaban Pejabat Pemerintahan dalam Menetapkan Diskresi (Studi terhadap Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 25/PUU-XIV/2016) Zaki Ulya
Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM Vol. 24 No. 3: JULI 2017
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20885/iustum.vol24.iss3.art4

Abstract

Putusan MK Nomor 25/PUU-XIV/2016 telah memberikan keleluasan bagi pejabat pemerintahan dalam menerbitkan diskresi terkait penggunaan anggaran negara maupun daerah. Permasalahan dalam penelitian ini, bagaimana pola pertanggungjawaban pejabat pemerintahan yang telah menerbitkan diskresi serta upaya dan batasan dalam menerbitkan suatu diskresi oleh pejabat pemerintahan agar terhindar dari tindak pidana korupsi. Kajian ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif, dengan menggunakan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan konsep. Hasil kajian menyimpulkan bahwa Putusan MK Nomor 25/PUU-XIV/2016 telah membatalkan ketentuan Pasal 2 Ayat (1) dan Pasal 3 UU Tipikor dengan menyatakan bertentangan dengan konstitusi. Namun dalam hal pertanggungjawaban diskresi yang dikeluarkan oleh pejabat pemerintahan tetap wajib dilakukan sesuai dengan asas-asas umum pemerintahan yang baik dan Undang-Undang No. 30 Tahun 2014 dan Undang-Undang No. 17 Tahun 2003. Batasan bagi pejabat pemerintahan dalam menerbitkan diskresi khususnya pasca Putusan MK yaitu dengan ketaatasasan pada ketentuan peraturan perundang-undangan.
Budaya Hukum llmuwan tentang Hak Cipta: Suatu Penelitian Hukum Empiris Muhammad Syamsudin
Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM Vol. 9 No. 19: Februari 2002
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20885/iustum.vol9.iss19.art12

Abstract

This writing is aimed to discuss either theoretically or empirically about the cultural law of scientist for copyright. The cultural law has a very large meaning, covers the vaiues, ideas, knowledge, belief, attitude and societal behaviour to the law both positive andnegative. In this writing, the law values and societal behaviour of the law becomes an indicator inknowing the law culture. Statistics isapplied to assist analyzing the main data gained from the research subject, namely the scientists at the universities in Yogyakarta more about 114 which they are gained in a quata way. In the analysis, itis used an CHI square by using the three category of law culture, namely strong, middle andweak. The result shows that thelaw culture of scientists on copyright in general are strong enough which is showed by the value indicator and positive behaviour on the Acts of Copyright. It means that in the scientist environment, the Act of Copyright is well understood, comprehended and held by the scientist in doing their scientific activities. The Acfs ofCopyright also gives gurantee of justice, exactness and utility for the scientist dealwith scientific paper.
Hukum pada Masyarakat Tradisional dan Kemungkinann Pengembangnya bagi Hukum Indonesia Moden M. Syamsudin
Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM Vol. 4 No. 7 (1997)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Pada dasarnya pembangunan hukum adalah upaya untuk membangun hukum modern yang tidak boleh tereerabut dari basis sosial. Melalui tulisan M. Syamsudin kembali nilai-nilai primer ditampilkan sebagai basis pegangan hidup sehingga hukum mampu ber-interaksi dengan masyarakat.
Beberapa Kendala dalam Penyelesaian Status Hukum Tanah Bekas Swapraja di Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta Ni'matul Huda
Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM Vol. 7 No. 13: April 2000
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20885/iustum.vol7.iss13.art7

Abstract

Pertaining to the 'lex posteriori derogat legi inferioh principle', the issuance of the Act No.5,1960 of UUPA (the Basic Principle of Agrarian Law) seems different It results that theauthority of the Yogyakarta Special Territory Province having its own nghts to arrange land affairs as an autonomy authority based on the Act No. 3,1950, becomes nullified. Despite the reality, the resolution ofthe fourth Dictum letter 'a'of the Basic Principle of AgrarianLaw (UUPA) is bias. It states that since the Act iseffective, rights and authority of the land and water of autonomous region or ex-autonomous region prevailing atthe time become removed, and those change into State ownership since then. The arrangement of the fourth Dictum lettera will be settled in the forms of government regulation, and the government regulation it self has not been issued yet In terms of its legal status, the ex-autonomous land in Yogyakarta Special Territory Province is unclear.

Page 43 of 99 | Total Record : 983

 41   42   43   44   45 

Filter by Year

1994 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 33 No. 1: JANUARI 2026 Vol. 32 No. 3: SEPTEMBER 2025 Vol. 32 No. 2: MEI 2025 Vol. 32 No. 1: JANUARI 2025 Vol. 31 No. 3: SEPTEMBER 2024 Vol. 31 No. 2: MEI 2024 Vol. 31 No. 1: JANUARI 2024 Vol. 30 No. 3: SEPTEMBER 2023 Vol. 30 No. 2: MEI 2023 Vol. 30 No. 1: JANUARI 2023 Vol. 29 No. 3: SEPTEMBER 2022 Vol. 29 No. 2: MEI 2022 Vol. 29 No. 1: JANUARI 2022 Vol. 28 No. 3: SEPTEMBER 2021 Vol. 28 No. 2: MEI 2021 Vol. 28 No. 1: JANUARI 2021 Vol. 27 No. 3: SEPTEMBER 2020 Vol. 27 No. 2: MEI 2020 Vol. 27 No. 1: JANUARI 2020 Vol. 26 No. 3: SEPTEMBER 2019 Vol. 26 No. 2: MEI 2019 Vol. 26 No. 1: JANUARI 2019 Vol. 25 No. 3: SEPTEMBER 2018 Vol. 25 No. 2: MEI 2018 Vol. 25 No. 1: JANUARI 2018 Vol. 24 No. 4: OKTOBER 2017 Vol. 24 No. 3: JULI 2017 Vol. 24 No. 2: APRIL 2017 Vol. 24 No. 1: JANUARI 2017 Vol. 23 No. 4: OKTOBER 2016 Vol. 23 No. 3: JULI 2016 Vol. 23 No. 2: APRIL 2016 Vol. 23 No. 1: JANUARI 2016 Vol. 22 No. 4: Oktober 2015 Vol. 22 No. 3: Juli 2015 Vol. 22 No. 2: APRIL 2015 Vol. 22 No. 1: Januari 2015 Vol. 21 No. 4: Oktober 2014 Vol. 21 No. 3: Juli 2014 Vol. 21 No. 2: April 2014 Vol. 21 No. 1: Januari 2014 Vol. 20 No. 4: Oktober 2013 Vol. 20 No. 3: Juli 2013 Vol. 20 No. 2: April 2013 Vol. 20 No. 1: Januari 2013 Vol. 19 No. 4: Oktober 2012 Vol. 19 No. 3: Juli 2012 Vol. 18 (2011): Edisi Khusus Vol. 18 Oktober 2011 Vol. 18 No. 4 (2011) Vol. 18 No. 3 (2011) Vol. 18 No. 2 (2011) Vol. 18 No. 1 (2011) Vol. 17 No. 4 (2010) Vol. 17 No. 3 (2010) Vol. 17 No. 2 (2010) Vol. 17 No. 1 (2010) Vol. 16 No. 4 (2009) Vol. 16 No. 3 (2009) Vol. 16 No. 2 (2009) Vol. 16 No. 2 (2009): English Version Vol. 16 No. 1 (2009) Vol. 16 No. 1 (2009): English Version Vol 16, Edisi Khusus 2009 Vol. 15 No. 3 (2008): English Version Vol. 15 No. 3 (2008) Vol. 15 No. 2 (2008) Vol. 15 No. 1 (2008) Vol. 14 No. 4 (2007) Vol. 14 No. 3 (2007) Vol. 14 No. 2 (2007) Vol. 14 No. 1 (2007) Vol. 13 No. 2: Mei 2006 Vol. 13 No. 1: Januari 2006 Vol. 12 No. 30: September 2005 Vol. 12 No. 29: Mei 2005 Vol. 12 No. 28: Januari 2005 Vol. 11 No. 27: SEPTEMBER 2004 Vol. 11 No. 26: Mei 2004 Vol. 11 No. 25: Januari 2004 Vol. 10 No. 24: September 2003 Vol. 10 No. 23: Mei 2003 Vol. 10 No. 22: Januari 2003 Vol. 9 No. 21: September 2002 Vol. 9 No. 20: Juni 2002 Vol. 9 No. 19: Februari 2002 Vol. 8 No. 18: Oktober 2001 Vol. 8 No. 17: Juni 2001 Vol. 8 No. 16 (2001): Cyberlaw Vol. 7 No. 15: Desember 2000 Vol. 7 No. 14: Agustus 2000 Vol. 7 No. 13: April 2000 Vol. 6 No. 12 (1999): H A K I Vol. 6 No. 11 (1999) Vol. 5 No. 10 (1998) Vol. 6 No. 9 (1997) Vol. 5 No. 8 (1997) Vol. 4 No. 7 (1997) Vol. 3 No. 6 (1996) Vol. 3 No. 5 (1996): Hukum dan Ekonomi Vol. 2 No. 4: September 1995 Vol. 1 No. 3 (1995) Vol. 1 No. 2 (1994): KEJAHATAN KERAH PUTIH Vol. 1 No. 1 (1994): Era PJPT II More Issue