cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
-
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
-
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kab. sleman,
Daerah istimewa yogyakarta
INDONESIA
Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM
Published by Universitas Islam Indonesia
ISSN : 08548498     EISSN : 2527502X     DOI : -
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
Ius Quia Iustum Law Journal is a peer-reviewed legal journal that provides a forum for scientific papers on legal studies. This journal publishes original research papers relating to several aspects of legal research. The Legal Journal of Ius Quia Iustum beginning in 2018 will be published three times a year in January, May, and September. This journal really opens door access for readers and academics to keep in touch with the latest research findings in the field of law.
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 983 Documents
 70   71   72   73   74 
Problem Teoritik Dan Implikasi Praktis Atas Perubahan Keputusan Tata Usaha Negara Tohadi Tohadi; Frieda Fania; Dadang Gandhi
Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM Vol. 26 No. 3: SEPTEMBER 2019
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20885/iustum.vol26.iss3.art4

Abstract

The change in the meaning of the State Administration Decree (KTUN) as stipulated in Article 87 of the Government Administration Act raises academic questions when the change had not been made through the amendment to the PTUN Law. This study discusses first, analysis on the change in the meaning of KTUN according to Law No. 30 of 2014 in terms of the theory of repeal and changes in legislation. Second, change in the meaning of KTUN according to Law No. 30 of 2014 in terms of the principles of the statutory rules. Third, implications of changing the meaning of KTUN according to Law No. 30 of 2014 against the absolute competence of PTUN. This is a normative study with qualitative analysis. The results of the study concluded, firstly, based on the theory of changes in legislation, the amendment to the provision of KTUN is not at all appropriate. Because it is done through a law that (the substantive content) is different. Second, the principles of statutory rules, namely lex specialis derogat legi generali, and lex posteriori derogat priori legi are not applicable to the enactment of Article 87 of Law No. 30 of 2014. Third, amendment to the provision of the KTUN according to Article 87 of Law No. 30 of 2014 has expanded the absolute authority of the PTUN to examine, to prosecute, and to decide the unlawful acts committed by the state officials that were previously the authority of the general court.
Model Pemberdayaan Konsumen terhadap Ancaman Bahaya Produk Pangan Tercemar Bahan Berbahaya Beracun di Provinsi Lampung Ahmad Zazili; Hartono Hartono
Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM Vol. 23 No. 3: JULI 2016
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20885/iustum.vol23.iss3.art3

Abstract

One of the consumer rights is the right for food security. In fact there are still many food products distributed for people not fulfilling the health standard. This research is to study the issues of first: what are the measures taken by government in controlling the food products contaminated by the chemical substances? Second, how is the model of consumer empowerment from the threat of food products contaminated by the chemical additives?  The research method used is the empirical-normative law research. Through the library research and elucidation, the result of the research showed first; the controlling measures of government were by prohibiting the use of Formalin, Borax, Rhodamine B, Methyl Yellow as the food additives, and by controlling the distribution of food products. Second, the model of consumer empowerment that can be done is the education for the consumers by spreading the information and elucidation.
Mencari Relevansi Teori dalam Menganalisis Sikap MPR 1998-2000 terhadap Gagasan Negara Hukum yang Demokratis Margarito Kamis
Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM Vol. 7 No. 14: Agustus 2000
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20885/iustum.vol7.iss14.art7

Abstract

A sociological approach is the relevant and appropriate one to clarify the current phenomena in line with administrative law. Its significance can betraced from three views; firstly, interactionand interrelationship among the phenomena: law, economy, politic and culture have been considered more important toward aspects of the current state affairs issue. Secondly,  hope, perception, and value are continuously developed and rapidly changeable. Theoretically and practically, the change has an influence to the state affairs system. Thirdly, historically the state affairs form of a country provides as well as constitutes a reflection of dynamic and interaction among politic, economy, law, and cultural dimensionsat that time. Ethical quality and state affair philosophy of a country should be investigated and put into their context.
Pengadaan Tanah Untuk Kepentingan Umum (Perbandingan antara Malaysia dan Indonesia) mukmin zakie
Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM Vol. 18 (2011): Edisi Khusus Vol. 18 Oktober 2011
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Land is a basic capital for human’s life. As a basic capital, land has two functions: productive function and non-productive function. The needs of land use often clashed with each other since the amount of land is limited, in other side population grows rapidly. For the sake of development, every state in the world needs land. The development is related to land and needs land. During the practice of development, the program might clashed with the land which right already attributed or the land has already been possessed by person or legal entity. As the strategy to obtain that land, government uses the term of public interest. This research is a comparative research between Indonesia and Malaysia in providing land for public interest. The problem in this research is how the regulation take over the land and the concept of public interest in Indonesia and Malaysia.The result of the research shows that there is deviation of the meaning of public interest in both state which generates different perception in society related to land providing. Even so, land providing for public interest has already expressed into legislation in both states.
Harmonisasi Hukum sebagai Perlindungan Hukum oleh Negara bagi Para Pihak dalam Transaksi Elektronik Internasional Abdul Halim Barkatullah
Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM Vol. 23 No. 1: JANUARI 2016
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20885/iustum.vol23.iss1.art1

Abstract

The main problems of this research are, first, why state intervention in the form of legal protection to relevant parties in international transaction is needed? Second, is legal harmonization able to become a solution in providing legal protection for relevant parties in electronic transactions? This research was a normative legal research. The research findings show that, first, the parties involved in international transactions in free trade era are in a very weak position. Legal protection to the rights of the parties in international transactions cannot be fulfilled by only one legal aspect, but by a set of legal system so that the rights of the parties involved in electronic international transactions can be maintained. Second, the state’s roles in providing legal protection for the parties involved in electronic international transactions are by: (i) abolishing legal obstacles and issuing regulation for transactions; (ii) providing facilities in the form of regulation of legal protection for the parties involved in international transactions which are done by the parties themselves (self-regulation); and (iii) the parties should be cautious when being involved in international trade transaction.
FUNGSI KONSTITUSI DALAM PEMBATASAN KEKUASAAN Sri Soemantri Martosoewignjo
Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM Vol. 3 No. 6 (1996)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20885/iustum.vol3.iss6.art1

Abstract

Selain sebagai dokumen nasional dan tanda dari kedewasaan kemerdekaan sebagai bangsa, konstitusi adalah juga sebagai alat yang berisi sistem politik dan sistem hukum yang hendak diwujudkan, demikian yang diungkapkan oleh Sri Soemantri M. Hal itu berarti bahwa konstitusi memiliki peran yang bukan saja besar, tetapi paling strategis dalam pembatasan kekuasaan.
Franchise dan Kaitannya sebagai Sarana Alih Teknologi: Suatu Tinjauan Hukum Ridwan Khairandy
Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM Vol. 4 No. 7 (1997)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Sebagai sarana alih teknologi Franchise adalah perjanjian yang menurut tulisan Ridwan Khairandy baru mencapai tahapan pengalihan belum sampai pada bentuk pengembangan atau inovasi Teknologi. Hal ini mengandung pertanyaan mengenai bagaimana peluang bagi Indonesia untuk mengarah pada pengembangan Teknologi yang sesungguhnya.
Institusionalisasi Proses Mediasi dalam Sistem Peradilan di Indonesia sri wardah
Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM Vol. 11 No. 26: Mei 2004
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20885/iustum.vol11.iss26.art4

Abstract

The mediation process of intemalization in the judicature system which it is expected to strengthen and maximize the function of judicature Institution forming in judicial conflict solution and the function of the law strengthen and the justice managed through PERMA, in order that it can be improved effectively in the form of legislation.
Kedudukan PT. Angkasa Pura I Dalam Pembayaran Bea Perolehan Hak Atas Tanah Dan Bangunan Ridwan HR; Nurmalita Ayuningtyas Harahap; Siti Ruhama Mardhatillah
Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM Vol. 26 No. 1: JANUARI 2019
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20885/iustum.vol26.iss1.art8

Abstract

This paper examines the issues of, first, the special assignment of the Minister of BUMN (State Owned Enterprise) and the Minister of Transportation to PT. Angkasa Pura I (Persero) in land procurement forthe construction of the New Yogyakarta International Airport (NYIA) airport in Kulon Progo Regency, DIY Province whether it can invalidate the obligations of PT. Angkasa Pura I (Persero) to pay BPHTB. Second, it is regarding the land procurement for the construction of the New Yogyakarta International Airport (NYIA) airport in Kulon Progo Regency, Special District of Yogyakarta whether it can be qualified as  "land  acquisition  for  the  development  of  public interest"  which  is  freed  from  the  obligation  to  payBPHTB.  This  is  a  normative  legal  research  using  primary  and  secondary  legal  materials  obtained through literature studies and is analyzed juridical. From the research results, it can be concluded that, first, special assignments could not invalidate the obligations of PT. Angkasa Pura I (Persero) to payBPHTB.  Secondly,  PT.  Angkasa  Pura  I  (Persero)  in  Kulon  Progo  Regency  of  Special  District  of Yogyakarta Province cannot be qualified as "land acquisition for development for public interest" freed from the obligation to pay BPHTB.
Profil Pelanggaran Hak Asasi Manusia dalam Rejim Hukum Perundang-Undangan Deno Kamelus
Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM Vol. 5 No. 10 (1998)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Hukum perundang-undangan lahir dari kekuasaan. Dalam banyak hal. Logika kekuasaan mendominasi struktur, sistem, dan substansi rejim hukum perundang-undangan. pengalaman sejarah menunjukkan, hukum perundang-undangan dimanipulasi dan direkayasa sedemikian rupa dan kepentingan kekuasaan, yang berlindung di balik asas legalitas dan paham konstitusionalisme. Secara teoritis, lahirlah apa yang disebut unjust law. Hukum yang demikian, dalam hal-hal tertentu, secara potensial melanggar hak-hak asasi manusia (HAM). Tulisan ini mencoba menganalisis unjust law tersebut dan profil pelanggaran HAK yang terdapat di dalamnya.

Page 72 of 99 | Total Record : 983

 70   71   72   73   74 

Filter by Year

1994 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 33 No. 1: JANUARI 2026 Vol. 32 No. 3: SEPTEMBER 2025 Vol. 32 No. 2: MEI 2025 Vol. 32 No. 1: JANUARI 2025 Vol. 31 No. 3: SEPTEMBER 2024 Vol. 31 No. 2: MEI 2024 Vol. 31 No. 1: JANUARI 2024 Vol. 30 No. 3: SEPTEMBER 2023 Vol. 30 No. 2: MEI 2023 Vol. 30 No. 1: JANUARI 2023 Vol. 29 No. 3: SEPTEMBER 2022 Vol. 29 No. 2: MEI 2022 Vol. 29 No. 1: JANUARI 2022 Vol. 28 No. 3: SEPTEMBER 2021 Vol. 28 No. 2: MEI 2021 Vol. 28 No. 1: JANUARI 2021 Vol. 27 No. 3: SEPTEMBER 2020 Vol. 27 No. 2: MEI 2020 Vol. 27 No. 1: JANUARI 2020 Vol. 26 No. 3: SEPTEMBER 2019 Vol. 26 No. 2: MEI 2019 Vol. 26 No. 1: JANUARI 2019 Vol. 25 No. 3: SEPTEMBER 2018 Vol. 25 No. 2: MEI 2018 Vol. 25 No. 1: JANUARI 2018 Vol. 24 No. 4: OKTOBER 2017 Vol. 24 No. 3: JULI 2017 Vol. 24 No. 2: APRIL 2017 Vol. 24 No. 1: JANUARI 2017 Vol. 23 No. 4: OKTOBER 2016 Vol. 23 No. 3: JULI 2016 Vol. 23 No. 2: APRIL 2016 Vol. 23 No. 1: JANUARI 2016 Vol. 22 No. 4: Oktober 2015 Vol. 22 No. 3: Juli 2015 Vol. 22 No. 2: APRIL 2015 Vol. 22 No. 1: Januari 2015 Vol. 21 No. 4: Oktober 2014 Vol. 21 No. 3: Juli 2014 Vol. 21 No. 2: April 2014 Vol. 21 No. 1: Januari 2014 Vol. 20 No. 4: Oktober 2013 Vol. 20 No. 3: Juli 2013 Vol. 20 No. 2: April 2013 Vol. 20 No. 1: Januari 2013 Vol. 19 No. 4: Oktober 2012 Vol. 19 No. 3: Juli 2012 Vol. 18 (2011): Edisi Khusus Vol. 18 Oktober 2011 Vol. 18 No. 4 (2011) Vol. 18 No. 3 (2011) Vol. 18 No. 2 (2011) Vol. 18 No. 1 (2011) Vol. 17 No. 4 (2010) Vol. 17 No. 3 (2010) Vol. 17 No. 2 (2010) Vol. 17 No. 1 (2010) Vol. 16 No. 4 (2009) Vol. 16 No. 3 (2009) Vol. 16 No. 2 (2009) Vol. 16 No. 2 (2009): English Version Vol. 16 No. 1 (2009) Vol. 16 No. 1 (2009): English Version Vol 16, Edisi Khusus 2009 Vol. 15 No. 3 (2008) Vol. 15 No. 3 (2008): English Version Vol. 15 No. 2 (2008) Vol. 15 No. 1 (2008) Vol. 14 No. 4 (2007) Vol. 14 No. 3 (2007) Vol. 14 No. 2 (2007) Vol. 14 No. 1 (2007) Vol. 13 No. 2: Mei 2006 Vol. 13 No. 1: Januari 2006 Vol. 12 No. 30: September 2005 Vol. 12 No. 29: Mei 2005 Vol. 12 No. 28: Januari 2005 Vol. 11 No. 27: SEPTEMBER 2004 Vol. 11 No. 26: Mei 2004 Vol. 11 No. 25: Januari 2004 Vol. 10 No. 24: September 2003 Vol. 10 No. 23: Mei 2003 Vol. 10 No. 22: Januari 2003 Vol. 9 No. 21: September 2002 Vol. 9 No. 20: Juni 2002 Vol. 9 No. 19: Februari 2002 Vol. 8 No. 18: Oktober 2001 Vol. 8 No. 17: Juni 2001 Vol. 8 No. 16 (2001): Cyberlaw Vol. 7 No. 15: Desember 2000 Vol. 7 No. 14: Agustus 2000 Vol. 7 No. 13: April 2000 Vol. 6 No. 12 (1999): H A K I Vol. 6 No. 11 (1999) Vol. 5 No. 10 (1998) Vol. 6 No. 9 (1997) Vol. 5 No. 8 (1997) Vol. 4 No. 7 (1997) Vol. 3 No. 6 (1996) Vol. 3 No. 5 (1996): Hukum dan Ekonomi Vol. 2 No. 4: September 1995 Vol. 1 No. 3 (1995) Vol. 1 No. 2 (1994): KEJAHATAN KERAH PUTIH Vol. 1 No. 1 (1994): Era PJPT II More Issue