cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Kadek Agus Sudiarawan
Contact Email
agus_sudiarawan@unud.ac.id
Phone
+6281916412362
Journal Mail Official
agus_sudiarawan@unud.ac.id
Editorial Address
Jalan Pulau Bali No.1 Denpasar
Location
Kota denpasar,
Bali
INDONESIA
Kertha Patrika
Published by Universitas Udayana
ISSN : 0215899X     EISSN : 25799487     DOI : 10.24843
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences
Focus in Scope Jurnal Kertha Patrika terbit tiga (3) kali setahun: yaitu bulan April, Agustus, dan Desember. Jurnal ini adalah jurnal yang bertemakan Ilmu Hukum, dengan manfaat dan tujuan bagi perkembangan Ilmu Hukum, dengan mengedepankan sifat orisinalitas, kekhususan dan kemutakhiran artikel pada setiap terbitannya. Tujuan dari publikasi Jurnal ini adalah untuk memberikan ruang mempublikasikan pemikiran kritis hasil penelitian orisinal, maupun gagasan konseptual dari para akademisi, peneliti, maupun praktisi yang belum pernah dipublikasikan pada media lainnya. Fokus dan lingkup penulisan (Focus & Scope) dalam Jurnal ini meliputi: Hukum Tata Negara; Hukum Administrasi; Hukum Pidana; Hukum Perdata; Hukum Internasional; Hukum Acara; Hukum Adat; Hukum Bisnis; Hukum Kepariwisataan; Hukum Lingkungan; Hukum Dan Masyarakat; Hukum Informasi Teknologi Dan Transaksi Elektronik; Hukum Hak Asasi Manusia; Hukum Kontemporer.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 173 Documents
 14   15   16   17   18 
Implementasi Mandat Konstitusional Putusan MK Nomor 91/PUU-XVIII/2020 dalam Dinamika Hubungan MK dengan Pembentuk Undang-Undang Halmadiningrat, I Made; Hafidz, Violla Reininda
Kertha Patrika Vol 45 No 3 (2023)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/KP.2023.v45.i03.p02

Abstract

The discrepancy between Constitutional Court Decision Number 91/PUU-XVII/2020 on the review of the Job Creation Law and the PERPPU on Job Creation has created constitutional incompatibilities. The research aims to analyze the executorial power in the final and recall nature of the Constitutional Court's decision on the follow-up of the Constitutional Court's decision by the legislators and (ii) the implementation of the constitutional mandate of Constitutional Court Decision Number 91/PUU-XVIII/2020 on Job Creation in the Job Creation PERPPU in the dynamics of the relationship between the Constitutional Court and the legislators. This research uses a combination of normative-doctrinal methods using a contextual approach, legislative approach, conceptual approach and case approach. The results of this study indicate that the Constitutional Court's decision has executorial power over the final and binding nature erga omnes. The Constitutional Court's conditional unconstitutional decision regarding the formal examination of the Job Creation Law has shifted the role of the Constitutional Court as a positive legislature which also results in the nature of the Constitutional Court's decision as a quasi-law. Follow-up of the Constitutional Court's decision is also considered important as compliance with the constitution. This research also shows that there is a mismatch between the constitutional mandate in Constitutional Court Decision Number 91/PUU-XVII/2020 and the follow-up carried out by the President as one of the branches of lawmaking power. This mismatch is clearly a form of constitutional delegitimization and straddles the final and binding Constitutional Court decision.
Perjanjian Kerahasiaan Bagi Karyawan Pengelola Data Pribadi Perusahaan Dian Laksmi Dewi, Cokorde Istri; Rudin, Denny; Tungga, Benyamin
Kertha Patrika Vol 46 No 2 (2024)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/KP.2024.v46.i02.p02

Abstract

In a confidentiality agreement, the owner of personal data must maintain the security of the data by taking appropriate actions. This means that each step includes standards of reasonableness, feasibility, and propriety. The employee-employer relationship in possession of a trade secret is usually associated with maintaining the secret. The purpose of this research is to examine Company secrets rather than protecting personal data and discuss protecting Company secrets through confidentiality agreements. This normative legal study looks at statutory regulations and uses a problem approach by looking at literary sources and previous concepts of norms. The findings of this study show that employee personal data is a company secret, and there can be misuse of personal data by the company because leaking of it can be done by the company or not by the company. It is not impossible that there are parties who are not from companies who deliberately steal personal data to make a profit. Confidentiality agreements safeguard the interests of parties involved in business relationships or transactions within the company when the sharing of sensitive and personal information must be restricted from third-party access. This is a form of protection of company secrets which includes company data and employee personal data through a confidentiality agreement agreed by the superior and the employee. Confidential information is the essence of every confidentiality agreement.
The Authority Of Military Justice To Try Military Doctors Who Perform Malpractices In Non-Government Hospitals Tambunan, Johannes; Pramono, Budi
Kertha Patrika Vol 45 No 3 (2023)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/KP.2023.v45.i03.p07

Abstract

In every action of a military doctor in a hospital, there are certainly interesting potential problems related to criminal acts in general or the military as well as in the field of health law. The aims of study were to analyze the form of regulations and legal issues for military doctors who practice in non-government hospitals; analyze authorities and justice mechanisms that prosecute malpractice acts of military doctors in non-government hospitals. The type of research was normative juridical. The approach study used a statute approach and conceptual approach. Legal materials obtained from research, literature study, statutory regulations and legal articles. The results of the research explain that a military doctor is a soldier with strata officer status or rank who can practice both in private practice and in non-government hospitals based on regulations, in accordance with the condition that a doctor must have a doctor's registration letters and a practice license. The military judiciary has authority over every T soldier who commits a crime, be it a military crime or a general crime, including military doctors who are definitely officers, if they commit a crime or malpractice at a place of practice in a non-government hospital.

Page 18 of 18 | Total Record : 173

 14   15   16   17   18 

Filter by Year

2008 2024


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 46 No 2 (2024) Vol 46 No 1 (2024) Vol 45 No 3 (2023) Vol 45 No 2 (2023) Vol 45 No 1 (2023) Vol 44 No 3 (2022) Vol 44 No 2 (2022) Vol 44 No 1 (2022) Vol 43 No 3 (2021) Vol 43 No 2 (2021) Vol 43 No 1 (2021) Vol 42 No 3 (2020) Vol 42 No 2 (2020) Vol 42 No 1 (2020) Vol 41 No 3 (2019) Vol 41 No 2 (2019) Vol 41 No 1 (2019) Vol 40 No 01 (2018) Vol 40 No 3 (2018) Vol 40 No 2 (2018) Vol 39 No 03 (2017) Vol 39 No 01 (2017) Vol 39 No 2 (2017) Vol 38 No 3 (2016) Vol 38 No 2 (2016) Vol 38 No 1 (2016) Vol 33 No 1 (2008) More Issue