cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
-
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
-
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kota denpasar,
Bali
INDONESIA
JURNAL MAGISTER HUKUM UDAYANA
Published by Universitas Udayana
ISSN : 25023101     EISSN : 2302528X     DOI : -
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana adalah jurnal ilmiah hukum yang mempublikasikan hasil kajian bidang hukum yang diterbitkan secara online empat kali setahun (Februari-Mei-Agustus-Nopember). Redaksi menerima tulisan yang berupa hasil kajian yang berasal dari penelitian hukum dalam berbagai bidang ilmu hukum yang belum pernah dipublikasikan serta orisinal. Jurnal ini selain memuat tulisan / kajian dari para pakar ilmu hukum (dosen, guru besar, praktisi dan lain-lain.) juga memuat tulisan mahasiswa Magister Ilmu Hukum baik yang merupakan bagian dari penulisan tesis maupun kajian lainnya yang orisinal. Tulisan yang masuk ke Redaksi akan diseleksi dan direview untuk dapat dimuat
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 16 Documents
 1   2 
Search results for , issue "Vol 11 No 2 (2022)" : 16 Documents clear
Perlindungan Hukum Konten Parodi Dalam Dimensi Kekayaan Intelektual A A Gede Cahya Pratama; I Wayan Novy Purwanto
Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 11 No 2 (2022)
Publisher : University of Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2022.v11.i02.p11

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to identify, analyze and elaborate the legal protections for parody content based on Law Number 28 of 2014 concerning Copyright (hereinafter Copyright Law) and Law Number 20 of 2016 concerning Marks and Geographical Indications (hereinafter the Trademark Law and Geographical Indications), as well as sanctions that can be given to parties who violate the intellectual property of parody content groups. This paper uses a normative legal research method using a statutory approach, a concept approach and an analytical approach. The results of the study show that Warkop DKI gets protection under the Copyright regime as well as Trademarks. Protection in the Copyright regime is given automatically starting from the time a Work is manifested in a tangible form. Protection is also provided in the Trademark regime considering that Warkop DKI through the Dono Kasino Indro Coffee Shop Institute has registered the “Warung Kopi Dono Kasino Indro” brand in 2014. Tujuan penulisan ini adalah untuk mengidentifikasi, menganalisis dan mengelaborasi perlindungan hukum atas konten parodi berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 28 Tahun 2014 tentang Hak Cipta (selanjutnya UU Hak Cipta) dan Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2016 tentang Merek dan Indikasi Geografis (selanjutnya UU Merek dan Indikasi Geografis), serta sanksi yang dapat diberikan kepada para pihak yang melakukan pelanggaran atas kekayaan intelektual grup konten parodi . Tulisan ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif dengan menggunakan pendekatan peraturan perundang-undangan, pendekatan konsep dan pendekatan analisis. Hasil studi menunjukkan bahwa Warkop DKI mendapatkan perlindungan dalam rezim Hak Cipta dan juga Merek. Perlindungan dalam rezim Hak Cipta diberikan secara otomatis terhitung sejak suatu Ciptaan diwujudkan dalam bentuk nyata. Perlindungan juga diberikan dalam rezim Merek mengingat pihak Warkop DKI melalui Lembaga Warung Kopi Dono Kasino Indro telah mendaftarkan merek “Warung Kopi Dono Kasino Indro” pada tahun 2014.
Principle of Impartiality: Air Transport Restriction Policy During the Covid-19 Pandemic in Indonesia Annalisa Y; Murzal Murzal; Firman Muntaqo; M. Syaifuddin
Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 11 No 2 (2022)
Publisher : University of Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2022.v11.i02.p02

Abstract

The aim of this study is to analyze and identify policies issued by the government related to air passenger transportation restrictions during the Covid-19 pandemic. In addition, this study also examines the application of the principle of impartiality to passengers and airlines in the policy. This study uses a normative research method with secondary data in the form of a Circular issued by the Minister of Transportation and the Task Force for the Acceleration of Handling Covid-19 from 2020 to 2021. The results show that the policies issued by the Minister of Transportation during the Covid-19 Pandemic are by limiting the number of passengers ranging from 50% to 70% of the carrying capacity was made based on policies in order to minimize the transmission of Covid-19 passengers in the aircraft cabin by applying the principle of social distancing. The policy regulations issued are in the form of a Circular from the Ministry of Transportation and the Covid-19 Handling Acceleration Task Force related to passenger restrictions while still paying attention to the principle of impartiality. This restriction is an appropriate action, not discriminatory treatment for airlines where restrictions on passenger transportation can have an effect on reducing revenue. However, the restriction policy is implemented in the context of the state protecting the health of its citizens (passengers).
Pemberantasan Mafia Hukum di Pengadilan Putu Tresna Nararya Indranugraha; I Gede Artha
Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 11 No 2 (2022)
Publisher : University of Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2022.v11.i02.p16

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to find out and analyze the occurrence of judicial mafia actions in court institutions and to review and provide solutions to overcome judicial mafia actions in courts. The above phenomena will be studied based on normative legal research. With a statutory approach, a legal concept approach, and a case approach. The analysis used is technical evaluative, argumentative, and descriptive. Problem are studied and analyzed based on theoretical foundations such as legal principles, legal concepts, doctrine, jurisprudence and legal theory. The results of the study explained that the judicial mafia that occurs in Indonesian criminal justice does not only occur in legal courts and law enforcement regarding the judicial mafia that occurs in the courts requires strategies and strict actions for the perpetrators, so far the occurrence of lawlessness by judges is still difficult to control, stemming from low morals, a consumptive lifestyle easily tempted by the lure of bribes, gratification that results in abuse of authority, until it leads to the emergence of legal mafia actions in court Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui dan menganalisis terjadinya Tindakan mafia peradilan pada Lembaga pengadilan serta mengkaji dan memberi solusi guna mengatasi Tindakan mafia peradilan di pengadilan. Terhadap fenomena diatas akan diteliti berdasar penelitian hukum normatif. Dikaji melalui pendekatan perundang-undangan, pendekatan konsep hukum serta pendekatan kasus. Analisis yang digunakan dengan teknis evaluatif, argumentatif dan deskriptif. Permasalahan dikaji dan dianalisis berdasar Landasan teoritis seperti asas-asas hukum, konsep hukum, doktrin, yurisprudensi dan teori hukum. Hasil penelitian menjelaskan bahwa mafia peradilan yang terjadi dalam peradilan pidana Indonesia bukan saja terjadi di pengadilan hukum serta penegakan hukum menyangkut mafia peradilan yang terjadi di pengadilan memerlukan strategi dan tindakan tegas bagi pelakunya, selama ini terjadinya pelanggaran hukum oleh oknum hakim masih sulit dikendalikan, bersumber dari moral yang rendah, gaya hidup konsumtif dengan mudah tergoda iming-iming suap, gratifikasi yang mengakibatkan penyalahgunaan kewenangan, sampai berujung munculnya tindakan mafia hukum di pengadilan.
Akta Pejabat Pembuat Akta Tanah Elektronik Sebagai Alat Bukti: Urgensi Harmonisasi Kebijakan Bella Kharisma; I Gede Agus Kurniawan
Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 11 No 2 (2022)
Publisher : University of Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2022.v11.i02.p07

Abstract

The development of the 5.0 era, namely the era of the internet of things, made Land Deed Maker Officials required to follow the development of digitalization, one of which was by making an electronic Land Deed Making Official deed. The purpose of this research is to examine and analyze the arrangement and strength of the proof of the deed which is made electronically. This study uses a normative legal research method with statute approach and an analytical approach. The study indicates that the arrangement for the deed of granting mortgage rights is made by the Land Deed Making Officer submitted in electronic form as stipulated in Article 9 paragraph (4) of the Minister of ATR/KBPN No. 5 of 2020 which is related to Article 86 of PP 18/2021, but is still experiencing a blurring of norms because it is not clear what PPAT deeds are made electronically so that they do not provide legal certainty, and the power of proof of deeds made electronically does not have the power of proof which is perfect as an authentic deed and cannot be used as legal evidence in court so that it cannot be enforced because it is not in accordance with the provisions of Article 5 paragraph (4) letter b of the ITE Law. Therefore, it is urgent to harmonize policies related to electronic deeds Perkembangan zaman era 5.0 yaitu era internet of things membuat Pejabat Pembuat Akta Tanah dituntut harus mengikuti perkembangan digitalisasi salah satunya dengan membuat akta Pejabat Pembuat Akta Tanah secara elektronik. Tujuan penelitian ini untuk mengkaji dan menganalisa pengaturan dan kekuatan pembuktian akta tersebut yang dibuat secara elektronik. Studi ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan Perundang-Undangan dan pendekatan Analisis. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pengaturan akta pemberian hak tanggungan dibuat oleh Pejabat Pembuat Akta Tanah disampaikan dalam bentuk elektronik sebagaimana ketentuan Pasal 9 ayat (4) Permen ATR/KBPN No. 5 Tahun 2020 yang memiliki keterkaitan dengan Pasal 86 PP 18/2021, namun masih mengalami kekaburan norma karena belum jelasnya akta-akta PPAT apa saja yang dibuat secara elektronik sehingga tidak memberikan kepastian hukum, serta kekuatan pembuktian akta yang dibuat secara elektronik tidak memiliki kekuatan pembuktian yang sempurna selayaknya akta otentik serta tidak dapat dijadikan alat bukti yang sah di pengadilan sehingga tidak dapat diberlakukan karena tidak sesuai dengan ketentuan Pasal 5 ayat (4) huruf b UU ITE. Oleh karenanya, urgen harmonisasi kebijakan yang terkait dengan akta elektronik.
Registrasion of Sound Marks in Indonesia Ni Desak Made Eri Susanti; Kadek Agus Sudiarawan
Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 11 No 2 (2022)
Publisher : University of Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2022.v11.i02.p12

Abstract

Sound marks is one of the most popular technical methods today which comprises an important part of forming a well-known mark. Regarding the registration of sound marks in the Indonesian Regulations Law of Marks and Geographical Indications as well as the Minister of Law and Human Rights of the Republic of Indonesia No. 12 of 2021 concerning Amendments to No. 67 of 2016 concerning trademark registration does not provide a definition of sound mark and without an explanation of an example of a creation. This causes errors in registration. Considering that sound is a non-visual sign, but the absence of a sound mark definition and the lack of clarity on the specific requirements. This research method uses normative legal research methods related to using a statutory approach. The results of this paper indicate that the regulation of sound mark registration in Indonesia follows the general trademark registration requirements and in the case of sound mark registration in Indonesia it does not provide a clear definition so that it can lead to legal uncertainty and even multiple interpretations. In contrast to Australia, the regulation of sound mark registration guidelines is more strict, detailed and restrictive. Registration of a Sound Mark in Indonesia can be carried out by submitting an application for registration the label attached by the applicant is in the form of a notation and a sound recording, or a sonogram
Guarantee of Legal Assurance and Justice for the Implementation of Consumer Financing Dhaniswara K. Harjono; Aarce Tehupeiory; Heddy Kandou
Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 11 No 2 (2022)
Publisher : University of Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2022.v11.i02.p03

Abstract

This study aims to determine how to guarantee legal certainty and justice for the implementation of consumer financing. This study was conducted at the Christian University of Indonesia in 2021 for four months, starting from March – June 2021. The research method used was normative legal research, focusing mainly on fiduciary guarantee legislation and the theory of legislation, justice, and legal certainty. The findings of this study are that if the debtor/consumer of consumer financing is in default, based on Constitutional Court Number 18/PUU-XVII / 2019, creditors of consumer finance companies cannot carry out direct execution of the object of collateral. It must refer to the provisions of Article 15 paragraph (2) of the UUJF, namely through fiat execution as the implementation of court decisions that have permanent legal force.

Page 2 of 2 | Total Record : 16

 1   2 

Filter by Year

2022 2022


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 14 No 2 (2025) Vol 14 No 1 (2025) Vol 13 No 4 (2024) Vol 13 No 3 (2024) Vol 13 No 2 (2024) Vol 13 No 1 (2024) Vol 12 No 4 (2023) Vol 12 No 3 (2023) Vol 12 No 2 (2023) Vol 12 No 1 (2023) Vol 11 No 4 (2022) Vol 11 No 3 (2022) Vol 11 No 2 (2022) Vol 11 No 1 (2022) Vol 10 No 4 (2021) Vol 10 No 3 (2021) Vol 10 No 2 (2021) Vol 10 No 1 (2021) Vol 9 No 4 (2020) Vol 9 No 3 (2020) Vol 9 No 2 (2020) Vol 9 No 1 (2020) Vol 8 No 4 (2019) Vol 8 No 3 (2019) Vol 8 No 2 (2019) Vol 8 No 1 (2019) Vol 7 No 4 (2018) Vol 7 No 3 (2018) Vol 7 No 2 (2018) Vol 7 No 1 (2018) Vol 6 No 4 (2017) Vol 6 No 3 (2017) Vol 6 No 2 (2017) Vol 6 No 1 (2017) Vol 5 No 4 (2016) Vol 5 No 3 (2016) Vol 5 No 2 (2016) Vol 5 No 1 (2016) Vol 4 No 4 (2015) Vol 4 No 3 (2015) Vol 4 No 2 (2015) Vol 4 No 1 (2015) Vol 3 No 3 (2014) Vol 3 No 2 (2014) Vol 3 No 1 (2014) Vol 2 No 3 (2013) Vol 2 No 2 (2013) Vol 2 No 1 (2013) Vol 1 No 1 (2012) More Issue