JURNAL MAGISTER HUKUM UDAYANA
Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana adalah jurnal ilmiah hukum yang mempublikasikan hasil kajian bidang hukum yang diterbitkan secara online empat kali setahun (Februari-Mei-Agustus-Nopember). Redaksi menerima tulisan yang berupa hasil kajian yang berasal dari penelitian hukum dalam berbagai bidang ilmu hukum yang belum pernah dipublikasikan serta orisinal. Jurnal ini selain memuat tulisan / kajian dari para pakar ilmu hukum (dosen, guru besar, praktisi dan lain-lain.) juga memuat tulisan mahasiswa Magister Ilmu Hukum baik yang merupakan bagian dari penulisan tesis maupun kajian lainnya yang orisinal. Tulisan yang masuk ke Redaksi akan diseleksi dan direview untuk dapat dimuat
Articles
16 Documents
Search results for
, issue
"Vol 12 No 4 (2023)"
:
16 Documents
clear
<![CDATA[Indonesian Clean Water Availability in SDGs: Analysis of Emerging Legal Problems ]]>
<![CDATA[Shelvi Rusdiana]]>;
<![CDATA[Ninne Zahara Silviani]]>;
<![CDATA[Sri Zanariyah]]>;
<![CDATA[Ratna Kumala Sari]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 12 No 4 (2023) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[University of Udayana ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2023.v12.i04.p01
<![CDATA[The right to access clean water is a fundamental human right and an important part of SDGs. Indonesia as a country committed to developing SDGs-compliant policies to respond to climate challenges need to make sure that it has enough normative support from its legal framework. Using normative legal research method, this study analyzes the emerging legal problems regarding the Indonesian government’s responsibility to provide clean water to its citizens. To support the analysis, this study employs the statutory approach to find the normative problems contributing to a number of possible legal problems that might hinder Indonesia’s commitment to SDGs, particularly the one to make sure that every person has the right to access clean water. Analysis of this research finds that there are normative confusions within the Indonesian legal framework that are related to the government’s responsibility in providing access to clean water, along with the urgency to tackle to these normative issues to better deal with the emerging legal problems, in the face of climate change.]]>
<![CDATA[Pelaksanaan Kewajiban PPAT dalam Memberikan Jasa Tanpa Memungut Biaya Kepada Seseorang yang Tidak Mampu ]]>
<![CDATA[Eva Rahayu]]>;
<![CDATA[Muktiono Muktiono]]>;
<![CDATA[Hendrarto Hadisuryo]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 12 No 4 (2023) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[University of Udayana ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2023.v12.i04.p15
<![CDATA[AT and Temporary PPAT are required to provide services without charging a fee to someone who cannot afford it in making Authentic Deeds regarding land rights or Rights of Ownership to apartments units as evidence of specific legal actions. The strength of the Authentic Deed becomes conclusive evidence for those involved, and hence, if a party raises objections, it can be proven in court. In legal existing and interpreting the legal norms governed by these regulations, multiple interpretations and uncompleted regulations can be produced regarding the intended criteria and the completeness of the required document for the involved parties. Therefore, the application for PPAT in fulfilling their obligations depends on each of them involving their standardization, as this is not regulated in the existing regulations. Hence, the next question is how far this regulation can be implemented, considering the legal subjects targeted by this regulation are less privileged or those who are unable to pay. The purpose of this research is to address the implementation of PPAT in carrying out their duties. This research analyzed the relevant regulations, literature, and conduct interviews with PPAT. This research uses a normative legal research method using a Statute Approach and a Conceptual Approach. The results of this research showed a misinterpretation in its implementation that is influenced by two factors: the absence of standardized criteria to determine an individual’s inability, and requirements specified are not sufficiently accurate to guarantee the validity. AT dan PPAT Sementara wajib memberikan jasa tanpa memungut biaya kepada seseorang yang tidak mampu dalam hal membuat Akta Autentik mengenai hak atas tanah atau Hak Milik Atas Satuan Rumah Susun sebagai bukti telah dilakukannya suatu perbuatan hukum tertentu. Kekuatan Akta Autentik yang dihasilkan merupakan pembuktian sempurna bagi para pihak, sehingga apabila suatu pihak mengajukan keberatan dapat dibuktikan dalam meja pengadilan. Dengan kondisi hukum (legal existing) yang mengatur, penafsiran dari Norma hukumnya yang diatur dalam peraturan-peraturan tersebut dapat menimbulkan multitafsir serta ditemukan ketidaklengkapan peraturan baik dalam hal kriteria yang dituju maupun kelengkapan persyaratan dokumen yang diperlukan bagi pihak yang berkepentingan. Maka penerapannya bagi Pejabat Pembuat Akta Tanah (PPAT) dalam menjalankan kewajibannya tergantung dari yang bersangkutan dengan menerapkan standarisasi berdasarkan versinya karena hal tersebut tidak diatur dalam peraturan yang berlaku. Sehingga yang menjadi pertanyaan selanjutnya sejauh mana peraturan ini dapat terlaksana, mengingat sasaran yang menjadi subjek hukum dalam peraturan tersebut ialah Masyarakat/Seseorang yang tidak mampu. Tujuan penelitian ini untuk menjawab terkait bagaimana pelaksanaan kewajiban Pejabat Pembuat Akta Tanah (PPAT) dalam menjalankan kewajibannya, penelitian ini diarahkan untuk menganalisis peraturan terkait, literatur, serta melakukan wawancara dengan Pejabat Pembuat Akta Tanah (PPAT). Penelitian ini menggunakan jenis penelitian hukum normatif. Dari hasil penelitian pada pelaksanaanya terdapat kesalahan penafsiran yang dipengaruhi oleh 2 faktor yaitu; tidak ada standar baku untuk menentukan kriteria seseorang tidak mampu; persyararatan yang ditentukan tidak cukup akurat untuk menjamin kebenarannya;]]>
<![CDATA[Relation Between Plea of Guilty and Defendants Right in RUU KUHAP (An Overview Through “Jalur Khusus” System) ]]>
<![CDATA[Intan Khoirun Nisa']]>;
<![CDATA[Abdul Madjid]]>;
<![CDATA[Setiawan Noerdajasakti]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 12 No 4 (2023) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[University of Udayana ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2023.v12.i04.p06
<![CDATA[The stacks of cases in judicial institutions hinder achieving the principles of fast, simple, low-cost justice. Through the Drafting Team for the Criminal Procedure Code Draft, the intention is to try to adopt a system that commonly applies in the common law legal system, namely plea bargaining “jalur khusus”” which is shown in Article 199 of the RUU KUHAP. This research intends to examine the concept of plea of guilty used in special channels and to look for the relationship between giving a plea of guilty and the rights of the defendant. This research uses normative juridical research methods or library legal research using conceptual and analytical approaches. The technique for collecting legal materials used is the library research model. From this research it can be concluded that the plea of guilty given by the defendant to the indictment by the public prosecutor must be voluntary, in this case, the judge will assess the truth of the Plea of Guilty. It brings consequences that the trial process will faster for the defendant. However, ““jalur khusus”” do not specifically regulate what defendant right will release if he confesses to the charges, moreover there is a gap that need to be resolve. This has the potential for uncertainty for the defendant. Apart from that, there is no regulation regarding the right to file legal action which will have an impact on the defendant's right to obtain legal certainty regarding efficient time to achieve a speedy trial.]]>
<![CDATA[Tanggung Jawab Notaris dalam Kewenangannya Melakukan Legalisasi Perjanjian di Bawah Tangan ]]>
<![CDATA[Ninik Darmini]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 12 No 4 (2023) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[University of Udayana ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2023.v12.i04.p11
<![CDATA[rivate deed legalization is a Notary’s authority to serve the community based on the Notary Act. Legalization that is conducted without good faith and circumspection could bring a Notary into trouble. This research aims to understand and analyze the liability of a Notary in private deed legalization. This descriptive doctrinal legal research uses secondary data that is supported by primary data which were then analyzed qualitatively. This research concludes that, first, legalization by a Notary who by his/her mistake causes harm to another party consequently brings administrative, civil, and/or criminal liability. The administrative liability is based on Article 16 paragraph (1) letter a jis. Article 16 paragraph (11), and 73 paragraph (1) letter e of the Notary Act; the civil liability is based on Article 1365 of the Indonesian Civil Code on civil wrongdoing; while the criminal liability is based on Article 55 of the Indonesian Criminal Code on deelneming and Article 263 on document falsification. Second, good faith ought to be a Notary’s guidance in carrying out his/her position as it would prevent him/her from either administrative, civil, or criminal sanctions. Third, it is necessary for a Notary to apply circumspection by not getting involved in the contract-making of the private deed; observing the private deed contents to ensure that it is not against the law; and documenting the legalization properly, although a legalization is passive in nature. galisasi perjanjian di bawah tangan merupakan kewenangan Notaris yang diatur dalam Undang-Undang Jabatan Notaris. Legalisasi yang dilakukan tanpa itikad baik dan kehati-hatian dapat membawa Notaris ke dalam masalah. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk memahami dan menganalisis tanggung jawab Notaris dalam legalisasi perjanjian di bawah tangan. Penelitian hukum normatif yang bersifat deskriptif ini menggunakan data sekunder yang didukung dengan data primer, kemudian dianalisis secara kualitatif. Penelitian ini menemukan bahwa, pertama, legalisasi oleh Notaris yang oleh karena kesalahannya merugikan pihak lain berakibat pada pertanggungjawaban secara administratif, perdata, dan/atau pidana. Pertanggungjawaban administratif didasarkan pada Pasal 16 ayat (1) huruf a jis. Pasal 16 ayat (11) dan Pasal 73 ayat (1) huruf e UU Notaris; pertanggungjawaban perdata didasarkan pada Pasal 1365 KUHPerdata tentang Perbuatan Melawan Hukum; sedangkan pertanggungjawaban pidana didasarkan pada Pasal 55 KUHP tentang deelneming dan Pasal 263 KUHP tentang pemalsuan dokumen. Kedua, Notaris harus berpegang pada itikad baik dalam melaksanakan jabatannya karena hal tersebut dapat mencegahnya dari pengenaan sanksi administratif, perdata, maupun pidana. Ketiga, sangat penting bagi Notaris untuk menerapkan kehati-hatian meskipun legalisasi bersifat pasif, dengan tidak terlibat pada pembuatan perjanjian di bawah tangan; mengamati substansi perjanjian tersebut untuk memastikan tidak ada pertentangan dengan hukum; dan mendokumentasikan legalisasi dengan baik.]]>
<![CDATA[Reconceptualization of Rehabilitation for Recidivists in the Persective of Dignified Justice ]]>
<![CDATA[I Made Wirya Darma]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 12 No 4 (2023) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[University of Udayana ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2023.v12.i04.p02
<![CDATA[A relapse condition is when the former addicts and victims of narcotics abusers who have undergone treatment at a rehabilitation center may return to taking narcotics. This relapse patient in legal terms is called a recidivist. Law Number 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics regulates sanctions for actions in the form of rehabilitation for addicts and victims of narcotics abusers, but does not regulate whether or not a recidivist can receive rehabilitation sanctions. In this study, there are three issues that will be discussed, namely rehabilitation measures in overcoming drug abuse, rehabilitation sanctions for recidivist addicts and victims of narcotics abusers and reconceptualization of rehabilitation in the perspective of dignified justice. This research is a normative juridical research that examines the void of norms regarding the imposition of rehabilitation crimes for recidivists. The research analysis was carried out qualitatively. The rehabilitation action is motivated by the view that addicts and victims of narcotics abusers are victims. By itself, drug abuse is a victimless crime. The Law on Narcotics does not regulate rehabilitation sanctions for recidivist addicts and victims of narcotics abusers, so that in law enforcement practice there are several people who have been sentenced to rehabilitation sanctions before and in subsequent cases are still subject to rehabilitation sanctions. Reconceptualization of rehabilitation in the perspective of dignified justice places recidivists as victims; therefore, as long as the person is only an addict and a victim of narcotics abuse, he is still entitled to receive rehabilitation sanctions.]]>
<![CDATA[Kebijakan Hukum Pidana terhadap Pelaku Penyalahguna Narkotika yang Mengulagi Perbuatannya Setelah Menjalani Sanksi Rehabilitasi ]]>
<![CDATA[I Nyoman Agus Adi Priantara]]>;
<![CDATA[Sagung Putri M.E Purwani]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 12 No 4 (2023) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[University of Udayana ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2023.v12.i04.p16
<![CDATA[In Indonesia, there is a double track system in resolving narcotics cases, namely the imposition of laws in the form of action sanctions in the form of rehabilitation and criminal sanctions in the form of imprisonment. However, in reality law enforcers tend to impose criminal sanctions on narcotics addicts because they focus on the guilt of their actions and rarely apply rehabilitation sanctions. This study aims to examine and analyze legal policies for addicts or narcotics abusers based on Law Number 35 of 2009 and legal policies against narcotics abusers who repeat their actions. This study uses normative legal research with the types of approaches used include statutory approaches, case approaches, and legal concept analysis approaches related to narcotics crimes. This study explains that no legal regulations or policies have been found against addicts or narcotics abusers who repeat their actions, giving rise to empty norms that make it difficult for law enforcement officials to impose appropriate sanctions on these problems. The imposition of criminal sanctions on narcotics addicts and abusers is considered less effective in enforcement, so that in the future it is hoped that law-making apparatus can make a policy that can be useful for narcotics addicts and abusers. In determining future legal policies for narcotics addicts or abusers who repeat their actions after undergoing rehabilitation sanctions, several comparisons can be made, namely, legal comparisons through the RKUHP Criminal, Narcotics Bill and Comparison of Laws from various countries to be used as a reference for future legal formulations. Di Indonesia mengenal double track system dalam penyelesaian kasus narkotika, yaitu penjatuhan hukum berupa sanksi tindakan berupa rehabilitasi serta sanksi pidana berupa pemenjaraan. Namun dalam kenyataanya para penegak hukum cenderung menjatuhkan sanksi pemidanaan terhadap pecandu narkotika karena mereka berfokus kepada kesalahan atas perbuatannya dan jarang menerpkan sanksi rehabilitasi. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji dan menganalisis kebijakan Hukum Bagi Pecandu Atau Penyalahguna Narkotika Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 35 Tahun 2009 serta kebijakan hukum terhadap penyalahguna mnarkotika yang mengulangi perbuatannya. Penelitian ini menggunakan penelitian hukum normatif dengan jenis pendekatan yang digunakan meliputi pendekatan perundang-undangan, pendekatan kasus, serta pendekatan analisis konsep hukum terkait tindak pidana narkotika. Studi ini menjelaskan bahwa tidak ditemukannya pengaturan atau kebijakan hukum terhadap pecandu atau penyalahguna narkotika yang mengulangi perbuatannya, sehingga menimbulkan norma kosong yang mempersulit aparat penegak hukum untuk menjatuhkan sanksi yang sesuai terhadap permasalahan tersebut. Penjatuhan sanksi pemidanaan terhada para pecandu dan penyalahguna narkotika dianggap kurang efektif dalam penegakannya, sehingga kedepannya diharapkan agar aparatur pembuat undang undang dapat membuat suatu kebijakan yang dapat berguna bagi para pecandu dan penyalahguna narkotika. Dalam menentukan kebijakan hukum ke depan terhadap pecandu atau penyalahguna narkotika yang kembali mengulangi perbuatannya setelah menjalani sanksi rehabilitasi dapat mempergunakan beberapa perbandingan yakni, perbandingan hukum melalui KUHP, RUU Narkotika dan Perbandingan Hukum dari berbagai negara untuk dijadikan acuan formulasi hukum kedepan.]]>
<![CDATA[Sumber Kewenangan Pemerintah: Permasalahan dan Prospek Pengaturannya dalam Ius Constituendum ]]>
<![CDATA[Mailinda Eka Yuniza]]>;
<![CDATA[Ni Nengah Dhea Riska Putri Nandita]]>;
<![CDATA[Ni Putu Maetha Maharani]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 12 No 4 (2023) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[University of Udayana ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2023.v12.i04.p07
<![CDATA[This study aims to identify existing problems in the regulation of sources of authority and formulate recommendations for the ideal regulation to be accommodated in the revision of the Job Creation Law. The method used to answer the research problem is normative legal research with descriptive research nature. The author identifies the problem by interpreting the existing norms and formulating recommendations based on a theoretical study of the source of authority. The results of the study indicate that the problem in regulating the source of authority lies in the limitation of legal products to which authority can be given (attribution and delegation). Then, the recommendation that the author gives is the expansion of the form of legal products that can give authority to Government Agencies and/or Officials. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengidentifikasi permasalahan yang eksis dalam pengaturan tentang sumber kewenangan dan merumuskan rekomendasi pengaturan yang ideal untuk dapat diakomodir dalam revisi Undang-Undang Cipta Kerja. Metode yang digunakan untuk menjawab permasalahan penelitian adalah penelitian hukum normatif dengan sifat penelitian deskriptif. Penulis mengidentifikasi masalah dengan menginterpretasikan norma yang ada dan merumuskan rekomendasi berdasarkan kajian teori tentang sumber kewenangan. Adapun hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa permasalahan dalam pengaturan tentang sumber kewenangan terletak pada limitasi produk hukum yang dapat tempat diberikannya kewenangan (atribusi dan delegasi). Kemudian, rekomendasi yang Penulis berikan ialah perluasan bentuk produk hukum yang dapat memberikan kewenangan kepada Badan dan/atau Pejabat Pemerintahan.]]>
<![CDATA[Pengaturan Pemilihan Bandesa Adat Secara Musyawarah Mufakat ]]>
<![CDATA[Made Indra Suma Wijaya]]>;
<![CDATA[A.A. Istri Eka Krisna Yanti]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 12 No 4 (2023) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[University of Udayana ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2023.v12.i04.p12
<![CDATA[After the formation of the Bali Provincial Regional Regulation Number 4 of 2019, there were regulations regarding the mechanism for selecting Traditional Village Heads, which had never previously been regulated in previous regional regulations. This article aims to examine and analyze the Arrangements for the Election of Traditional Village Villages by Deliberation and Consensus After the Establishment of Bali Province Regional Regulation Number 4 of 2019. This article uses normative legal research methods as a type of research, which is studied through a statutory approach, analysis of legal concepts, and also history. The results of the study show that the Arrangements for the Election of Traditional Bandesas After the Establishment of Bali Provincial Regulation Number 4 of 2019, which were carried out through a deliberation and consensus mechanism, resulted in legal uncertainty in the regulation of the election of Traditional Bandesas, because there were no strict sanctions or strict provisions prohibiting the election mechanism for Traditional Bandesas. not through consensus deliberation. Pasca terbentuknya Peraturan Daerah Provinsi Bali Nomor 4 Tahun 2019, terdapat pengaturan mengenai mekanisme pemilihan Bandesa Adat, yang sebelumnya tidak pernah diatur dalam perda sebelumnya. Artikel ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji dan menganalisis Pengaturan Pemilihan Bandesa Adat Secara Musyawarah Mufakat Pasca Terbentuknya Peraturan Daerah Provinsi Bali Nomor 4 Tahun 2019. Artikel ini memakai metode penelitian hukum normative sebagai jenis penelitian, yang dikaji melalui pendekatan perundang-undangan, analisis konsep hukum, dan juga sejarah. Hasil studi menunjukkan bahwa Pengaturan Pemilihan Bandesa Adat Pasca Terbentuknya Peraturan Daerah Provinsi Bali Nomor 4 Tahun 2019 yang dimana dilakukan melalui mekanisme musyawarah mufakat, mengakitbatkan ketidakpastian hukum dalam pengaturan pemilihan Bandesa Adat, oleh karena tidak terdapat sanksi tegas ataupun ketentuan tegas yang melarang mekanisme pemilihan Bandesa Adat tidak melalui musyawarah mufakat.]]>
<![CDATA[Discourse on Fiduciary Guarantee Execution’s Arrangement After the Constitutional Court Decision Number 18/PUU-XVII/2019: A Deterioration? ]]>
<![CDATA[I Putu Reinaldy Putrawan]]>;
<![CDATA[Kadek Agus Sudiarawan]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 12 No 4 (2023) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[University of Udayana ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2023.v12.i04.p03
<![CDATA[This research has a goal in terms of knowing the arrangements for Fiduciary Guarantees as a national legal instrument, to find out the procedures for executing fiduciary guarantee objects, as well as those disclosed as a result of the issuance of the Constitutional Court Decision Number: 18/PUU-XVII/2019. This study uses a normative legal research method with a statutory approach and an analytic and conceptual approach. The results of this study indicate that fiduciary guarantees as national guarantee legal instruments have been regulated through the Fiduciary Guarantee Act as a legal umbrella in the procedure for implementing fiduciary guarantees. Regarding the procedure for executing fiduciary guarantees, it is specifically regulated in the Fiduciary Guarantee Law by using executorial titles, through public auctions, and also underhand or private sales. However, after the Decision of the Constitutional Court Number: 18/PUU-XVII/2019 raises a legal implication for the execution procedure in terms of buying a default based on an agreement with the debtor who voluntarily surrenders the object and the execution procedure must be based on an agreement and there is already legal remedies against fraudulent breach of contract actually imposed on the creditor's position.]]>
<![CDATA[Perlindungan Hak Privasi sebagai bagian dari Hak Asasi Manusia dalam Sistem Hukum Nasional Indonesia ]]>
<![CDATA[I Gede Pasek Eka Wisanjaya]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 12 No 4 (2023) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[University of Udayana ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2023.v12.i04.p08
<![CDATA[The development of technology has brought us into a borderless world, which can be a challenge or an opportunity depending on how we approach it. Recent cases have shown that an individual's personal data, which is part of their privacy, can be leaked and misused by irresponsible parties. Examples such as the Facebook data breach during the U.S. presidential election, hacking attacks carried out by Bjorka, and the leakage of data from various government agencies are real examples of this issue. In this context, the protection of privacy has become more crucial than ever. The purpose of this writing is to investigate how Indonesian regulations protect individual privacy. This research uses a normative approach by analyzing the applicable laws and relevant facts. The research findings indicate that Indonesia has regulations that indirectly provide protection for individual privacy. This is in line with Indonesia's constitution and its international responsibility as a party that has ratified the ICCPR. Furthermore, these regulations also include sanctions that can be imposed in cases of privacy violations. However, challenges persist in terms of supervision and the implementation of these regulations, as well as the presence of extraterritorial threats beyond the jurisdiction of the country. Therefore, the challenge of protecting privacy in the digital era needs to be continuously addressed through rigorous supervision and international cooperation. Perkembangan teknologi telah membawa kita ke dalam dunia yang tidak mengenal batas, yang dapat menjadi tantangan atau peluang tergantung pada bagaimana kita menghadapinya. Kasus-kasus terbaru menunjukkan bahwa data pribadi seseorang, yang merupakan bagian dari privasi mereka, dapat bocor dan disalahgunakan oleh pihak yang tidak bertanggung jawab. Contoh-contoh seperti kebocoran data Facebook selama pemilihan presiden Amerika Serikat, serangan peretasan yang dilakukan oleh Bjorka, dan bocornya data dari berbagai lembaga pemerintah menjadi contoh nyata dari masalah ini. Dalam konteks ini, perlindungan privasi menjadi lebih krusial daripada sebelumnya. Penulisan ini bertujuan untuk menyelidiki bagaimana peraturan perundang-undangan di Indonesia melindungi privasi individu. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan normatif dengan menganalisis hukum yang berlaku dan fakta-fakta terkait. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Indonesia telah memiliki peraturan-peraturan yang secara tidak langsung memberikan perlindungan terhadap privasi individu. Hal ini sejalan dengan konstitusi Indonesia dan tanggung jawab internasionalnya sebagai pihak yang telah meratifikasi ICCPR. Selain itu, dalam peraturan tersebut juga telah diatur sanksi yang dapat diberlakukan dalam kasus pelanggaran privasi. Namun, kendala tetap muncul dalam hal pengawasan dan penerapan peraturan tersebut, serta adanya ancaman ekstrateritorial yang berada di luar yurisdiksi negara. Oleh karena itu, tantangan perlindungan privasi dalam era digital ini perlu terus diatasi dengan ketatnya pengawasan dan kerja sama lintas negara.]]>
