cover
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
-
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
-
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kota denpasar,
Bali
INDONESIA
JURNAL MAGISTER HUKUM UDAYANA
Published by Universitas Udayana
ISSN : 25023101     EISSN : 2302528X     DOI : -
Core Subject : Social,
Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana adalah jurnal ilmiah hukum yang mempublikasikan hasil kajian bidang hukum yang diterbitkan secara online empat kali setahun (Februari-Mei-Agustus-Nopember). Redaksi menerima tulisan yang berupa hasil kajian yang berasal dari penelitian hukum dalam berbagai bidang ilmu hukum yang belum pernah dipublikasikan serta orisinal. Jurnal ini selain memuat tulisan / kajian dari para pakar ilmu hukum (dosen, guru besar, praktisi dan lain-lain.) juga memuat tulisan mahasiswa Magister Ilmu Hukum baik yang merupakan bagian dari penulisan tesis maupun kajian lainnya yang orisinal. Tulisan yang masuk ke Redaksi akan diseleksi dan direview untuk dapat dimuat
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 10 Documents
Search results for , issue "Vol 8 No 4 (2019)" : 10 Documents clear
Mereposisi Korban dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana di Indonesia: Suatu Keterlemparan (gowerfen-sein) dalam Mitos Modernitas Rocky Marbun
Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 8 No 4 (2019)
Publisher : University of Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (498.15 KB) | DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2019.v08.i04.p07

Abstract

Myths in the modern era are things that are considered like truth. It arises through the process of hegemony and dialectical domination by the authority in history. So, myth is a phenomenon of common sense without criticism. The state's presence in the criminal justice process as a grand narrative identified with the interests of victims and society, in general, is common sense without criticism. This study aims to reveal whether the myth of modernity is a representation of victims in the Criminal Justice System. This study uses a normative juridical method based on secondary data with several models of approaches, including conceptual approaches, philosophical approaches, and critical approaches. The result of this research shows the phenomenon of objectification and reification of the people as victims in the Criminal Justice System in Indonesia. Mitos dalam era modern merupakan hal-hal yang diandaikan begitu saja sebagai suatu kebenaran. Hal tersebut tampil melalui proses hegemoni dan dominasi dalam dialektika otoritas dalam sejarah. Sehingga, mitos merupakan suatu fenomena common sense tanpa kritik. Kehadiran negara dalam proses peradilan pidana sebagai narasi tunggal (grand narrative) yang diidentikan dengan kepentingan korban dan masyarakat secara umum, merupakan common sense tanpa kritik. Penelitian ini ditujukan untuk membongkar apakah mitos modernitas tersebut merupakan representasi korban dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridis normatif yang berbasis kepada data sekunder dengan beberapa model pendekatan, antara lain pendekatan konseptual, pendekatan filsafat, dan pendekatan kritis. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan adanya fenomena objektivikasi dan reifikasi terhadap masyarakat sebagai korban dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana di Indonesia.
Pendekatan Restorative Justice dalam Penyelesaian Tindak Pidana di Tingkat Penyidikan I Made Tambir
Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 8 No 4 (2019)
Publisher : University of Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (427.814 KB) | DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2019.v08.i04.p09

Abstract

As the gateway to the criminal justice system, law enforcement that carried out by polri always influenced by social change factors. In accordance with the development of law today, polri required to be able to resolve criminal acts by prioritizing restorative justice approach. However it hasn’t been regulated in statutory. The research purposes to describe and analyze the settlement of criminal acts with restorative justice approach in investigation level at the present and the future. The research used normative legal research, using a statute approach, historical approach and comparative approach, using primary and secondary legal materials that collected by a systematic method and then analyzed by descriptive and interpretation techniques. The research show that polri has carried out several policies to answer the community expectations and demands in accordance with the development of law today by issuing several letters and regulations, namely Surat Kapolri No. Pol. B/3022/XII/2009/Sde Ops, ST Kabareskrim No. ST/110/V/2011, STR Kabareskrim No. STR/583/VIII/2012, Perkap 15/2013, Perkap 3/2015, SE Kapolri No. SE/7/VII/2018 and SE Kapolri No. SE/8/VII/2018. In perspective of “ius constituendum,” it is needed criminal law policy to regulate the settlement of criminal acts with restorative justice approach in investigation level, by carrying out a renewal of material criminal law, including the understanding of criminal acts, objectives and guidelins for criminal actions and also renewal of formal criminal law including updating KUHAP, Perkap 14/2012 and Perkap 3/2015. Sebagai pintu gerbang sistem peradilan pidana, penegakan hukum yang dilakukan polri selalu dipengaruhi oleh faktor perubahan sosial. Dalam perkembangan hukum dewasa ini, polri dituntut mampu menyelesaikan tindak pidana dengan mengedepankan pendekatan restorative justice. Akan tetapi hal itu belum diatur dalam peraturan perundang-undangan. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan dan menganalisis pendekatan restorative justice dalam penyelesaian tindak pidana di tingkat penyidikan pada saat ini dan pada masa yang akan datang. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah jenis penelitian hukum normatif, menggunakan pendekatan perundang-undangan, pendekatan kasus, pendekatan historis, pendekatan perbandingan dan pendekatan konsep, dengan menggunakan bahan-bahan hukum primer dan bahan-bahan hukum sekunder yang dikumpulkan dengan metode sistematis yang selanjutnya dianalisis dengan teknik deskriptif dan interpretasi. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa polri telah melakukan beberapa kebijakan untuk menjawab harapan dan tuntutan masyarakat sesuai dengan perkembangan hukum dewasa ini dengan menerbitkan beberapa surat dan peraturan, yaitu Surat Kapolri No. Pol. B/3022/XII/2009/Sde Ops, ST Kabareskrim No. ST/110/V/2011, STR Kabareskrim No. STR/583/VIII/2012, Perkap 15/2013, Perkap 3/2015, SE Kapolri No. SE/7/VII/2018 dan SE Kapolri No. SE/8/VII/2018. Dalam perspektif ius constituendum diperlukan kebijakan hukum pidana untuk mengatur penerapan konsep restorative justice dalam penyelesaian tindak pidana di tingkat penyidikan, dengan melakukan pembaharuan hukum pidana materiil, mencakup pengertian tindak pidana, tujuan dan pedoman pemidanaan, serta melakukan pembaharuan hukum pidana formil, mencakup pembaharuan KUHAP, Perkap 14/2012 dan Perkap 3/2015.
Pengaturan Pengawasan Peraturan Daerah oleh Dewan Perwakilan Daerah Republik Indonesia I Putu Indra Prasetya Wiguna; Ni Luh Gede Astariyani
Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 8 No 4 (2019)
Publisher : University of Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (456.303 KB) | DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2019.v08.i04.p08

Abstract

Supervision of regional regulations is a new authority possessed by the Regional Representative Council. The purpose of writing this article is to examine the implications of regional regulation oversight arrangements by the Regional Representative Council. This article uses a normative legal research method with a statue approach, a legal concept analysis approach, and a historical approach. The results of the study show that the implications of regional regulation oversight by the Regional Representative Council as Article 249 paragraph (1), letter j, Law number 2 of 2018, namely: cause legal uncertainty due to unclear regulation; raises legal problems if related to article 31 of Law number 3 of 2009, article 245 of Law number 9 of 2015, articles 15 and 16 of Law number 6 of 2014; and raises the problem of constitutionality. Pengawasan terhadap peraturan daerah merupakan wewenang baru yang dimiliki oleh Dewan Perwakilan Daerah. Artikel ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji implikasi pengaturan pengawasan peraturan daerah oleh Dewan Perwakilan Daerah. Artikel ini memakai metode penelitian hukum normative sebagai jenis penelitian, yang dikaji melalui pendekatan perundang-undangan, analisis konsep hukum, dan juga sejarah. Hasil studi menunjukkan bahwa Implikasi pengaturan pengawasan peraturan daerah oleh Dewan Perwakilan Daerah sebagaimana tertuang pada Pasal 249 ayat (1), huruf j, Undang-Undang nomor 2 tahun 2018, yakni: menimbulkan ketidakpastian hukum karena pengaturannya yang tidak jelas; menimbulkan masalah hukum apabila dikaitkan dengan pasal 31 Undang-Undang nomor 3 tahun 2009, pasal 245 Undang-Undang nomor 9 tahun2015, pasal 15 dan 16 undang-undang no. 6 tahun 2014; serta menimbulkan problem konstitusionalitas.
Analisis Terhadap Kendala Perlindungan Konsumen oleh Majelis Permusyawaratan Ulama Aceh Terhadap Sertifikasi Label Halal Produk Sailendra Wangsa; Sri Walny Rahayu; M. Jafar
Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 8 No 4 (2019)
Publisher : University of Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (306.312 KB) | DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2019.v08.i04.p04

Abstract

Aceh as a Province that implements Islamic Sharia is required so that every product circulating to be certified halal before being consumed by the public. The task was given to the Aceh Ulama Consultative Assembly through the Institute for the Assessment of Food, Medicine and Cosmetics Aceh Ulama Consultative Assembly (LPPOM MPU) Aceh. In fact in 2017 the discovery of the same noodle products traded in the city of Banda Aceh and not halal certified. This study discusses to explain and analyze the causes of ineffective consumer protection by the Aceh Ulama Consultative Assembly on Samyang Noodle Product Halal Certification Certification. This research is an empirical juridical legal research using a legal sociology approach and a qualitative analysis approach using an inductive mindset. Based on the results of research that prove the obstacles-which cause less effective consumer protection by the Aceh Ulama Consultative Assembly on the certification of halal labels for Samyang noodles are that the Aceh Government has not issued a Governor Regulation which is a derivative of Qanun Number 8 of 2016 concerning the Halal Product Guarantee System. And the socialization of the Qanun has not been communicated to the wider community and business people Aceh sebagai Provinsi yang melaksanakan syariat Islam diwajibkan agar setiap produk yang beredar untuk disertifikasi halal sebelum dikonsumsi oleh masyarakat. Tugas tersebut diberikan kepada Majelis Permusyawaratan Ulama Aceh melalui LPPOM MPU Aceh.. Kenyataanya pada tahun 2017 ditemukannya produk mie samyang yang diperdagangkan di Kota Banda Aceh serta tidak bersertifikasi halal. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menjelaskan dan menganalisis hambatan yang menyebabkan kurang efektifnya perlindungan konsumen oleh Majelis Permusyawaratan Ulama Aceh Terhadap Sertifikasi Label Halal Produk mie Samyang. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum yuridis empiris dengan menggunakan pendekatan sosiologi hukum dan pendekatan analisis secara kualitatif menggunakan kerangka pikir induktif. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian diketahui bahwa hambatan-hambatan yang menyebabkan kurang efektifnya perlindungan konsumen oleh Majelis Permusyawaratan Ulama Aceh terhadap sertifikasi label halal produk mie Samyang yaitu, Pemerintah Aceh belum mengeluarkan Peraturan Gubernur yang merupakan turunan dari Qanun Nomor 8 Tahun 2016 tentang Sistem Jaminan Produk Halal. Dan belum tersosialisasinya Qanun tersebut kepada masyarakat luas dan para pelaku usaha.
Pengaturan Bukti Petunjuk pada Hukum Acara Persaingan Usaha dalam Kerangka Hukum Pembuktian di Indonesia Sterry Fendy Andih
Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 8 No 4 (2019)
Publisher : University of Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (276.656 KB) | DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2019.v08.i04.p10

Abstract

Regulations related to evidence in the procedural law of business competition still cause debate because regulations related to evidence of instructions that apply in the business competition procedural law are different from the regulation of evidence in the procedural law that generally applies in Indonesia, especially if there are objections to the KPPU's decision submitted to the district court. The formulation of the problem examined is related to the procedures for resolving business competition cases by the business competition supervisory commission and the use of evidence evidence in business competition law within the criminal procedural framework in Indonesia. This type of research method used is a normative legal research method with a proof of law approach. The results of the research show that the procedure for handling cases by KPPU based on Perkom 1/2019 is sourced from KPPU's reports and initiatives. The stages or process of procedure for handling cases by KPPU consists of the initial stages (receipt of reports or KPPU initiatives), investigations, commission assembly sessions (preliminary hearing and follow-up hearings), and decisions (deliberations of commission assemblies and reading of decisions and implementing decisions) . The use of evidence of guidance in business competition law contracted in Perkom 1/2019 can still lead to this debate because the procedural law used in general courts (if there is an objection to the KPPU's decision) is criminal or civil procedural law, which if understood there are still differences fundamental evidence related to these instructions. The evidence evidence can be obtained through economic evidence and communication evidence whereas in criminal procedural law the limit is limited to evidence evidence evidence obtained from evidence witnesses, letters and statements of the defendant. Pengaturan terkait alat bukti petunjuk dalam hukum acara persaingan usaha masih menimbulkan perdebatan dikarenakan pengaturan terkait alat bukti petunjuk yang berlaku dalam hukum acara persaingan usaha berbeda halnya dengan pengaturan alat bukti petunjuk dalam hukum acara yang secara umum berlaku di Indonesia, khususnya apabila terjadi keberatan atas putusan KPPU yang diajukan kepada pengadilan negeri. Adapun rumusan permasalahan yang dikaji adalah terkait tata cara penyelesain perkara persaingan usaha oleh komisi pengawas persaingan usaha dan penggunaan bukti petunjuk pada hukum persaingan usaha dalam kerangka hukum acara pidana di indonesia. Jenis metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah metode penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan hukum pembuktian. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan tata cara penanganan perkara oleh KPPU berdasarkan Perkom 1/2019 adalah bersumber dari laporan dan insiatif KPPU. Adapun tahapan atau proses tata cara penanganan perkara oleh KPPU terdiri dari tahapan awal (penerimaan laporan atau insiatif KPPU), penyelidikan, sidang majelis komisi (sidang pemeriksaan pendahuluan dan sidang pemeriksaan lanjutan), dan putusan (musyawarah majelis komisi dan pembacaan putusan serta pelaksanaan putusan). Penggunaan bukti petunjuk pada hukum persaingan usaha yang dikontruksikan dalam Perkom 1/2019 masih dapat menimbulkan perdebatan hal ini dikarenakan hukum acara yang dipergunakan pada peradilan umum (apabila terjadi keberatan atas putusan KPPU) adalah hukum acara pidana atau perdata, yang mana apabila dipahami masih terdapat perbedaan mendasar terkait alat bukti petunjuk tersebut. Alat bukti petunjuk dapat diperoleh melalui bukti ekonomi dan bukti komunikasi sedangkan dalam hukum acara pidana dibatasi secara limitatif alat bukti petunjuk diperoleh dari alat bukti keterangan saksi, surat dan keterangan terdakwa.
Madani Community and Criminal Action on Children's Online Prostitution in Social Media Fransiska Novita Eleanora
Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 8 No 4 (2019)
Publisher : University of Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (508.441 KB) | DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2019.v08.i04.p01

Abstract

Rampant and rampant crime against children on social media, resulting in increasingly restless and worried every parent, especially trafficking child prostitution, and carried out using the internet media. This online prostitution also spreads the contents of child pornography, whether done by the perpetrators themselves, a group of people or even corporations. The aim is to find out how to deal with civil society in dealing with child crimes through online prostitution, the ways that civil society do in eradicating crimes or criminal acts that occur in the environment or civil society life so that they are always vigilant, cautious and not easily trapped in criminal acts or crimes that occur in social medial that is by using social media namely through the internet, or facebook, instagram and so forth. While the research method used is normative research that is by examining and processing theories or in existing concepts and regulations and even legislation that is considered relevant and related to this research, in this case cannot be separated by using books or literature which exists. The results of this finding are various mitigation efforts that can be carried out by civil society in responding to criminal acts related to online prostitution of children, namely by carrying out various measures which are also called preventive, repressive, persuasive, curative and rehabilitation, considered to be able to reduce prostitution crime. existing children on social media, accompanied by a mindset which is advanced modern and supervision from the community and law enforcement which exist.
Pengantar mengenai Hegemoni dan Hukum: Menyoal Kembali Bekerjanya Hukum di Masyarakat Ricca Anggraeni; Endra Wijaya
Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 8 No 4 (2019)
Publisher : University of Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (347.831 KB) | DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2019.v08.i04.p05

Abstract

Gramsci’s concept of hegemony tries to explain how modern capitalist society has been organized. Although he did not explain about law particularly, but his study on hegemony is relevant and usefull to the study of law untill now. This paper focuses on how to understand the concept of hegemony and use it in field of the study of law. To examine the focus of this study, conceptual approach is used, and some points of argumentations in this study are based on several scholars’ opinions related to concept of hegemony. This study concludes that hegemony could be understood as the way to how certain social group obtains its authority persuasively, and then leads others to give its consensus to hegemonic social group. This point could help to understand about the working and binding force of authority and law in the society. Besides that, the concept of hegemony could also become a kind of tool in understanding the dynamic of law, such as how could law becomes a tool of social engineering, or how, at the end, law is obeyed by the society. Konsep hegemoni dari Gramsci berupaya menjelaskan bagaimana masyarakat pada tahap kapitalis modern diorganisasikan. Gramsci memang tidak secara khusus membahas persoalan hukum, namun kajian hegemoninya ternyata relevan juga bagi kajian di bidang hukum. Tujuan kajian atau pembahasan dalam artikel ini diarahkan kepada persoalan memahami konsep hegemoni, dan kemudian, bagaimanakah hegemoni ini, sebagai sebuah konsep atau teori, dapat berguna di dalam kajian bidang hukum. Pembahasan kedua hal tersebut menggunakan metode pendekatan konseptual, dengan bersandar pada beberapa pendapat sarjana. Kajian ini menyimpulkan bahwa hegemoni dapat dipahami sebagai cara bagaimana suatu kelompok sosial memperoleh pengaruh (kekuasaan) melalui cara-cara yang lebih persuasif, dengan menggiring kelompok sosial lain (yang dikuasai) untuk memberikan persetujuannya (konsensus) kepada kelompok sosial yang menguasai. Poin ini bisa membantu untuk memahami otoritas dan hukum yang bekerja serta mengikat masyarakat. Selain itu, hegemoni dapat pula digunakan sebagai alat bantu dalam memahami fenomena yang terjadi dalam bidang hukum, seperti bagaimana hukum itu dapat berperan sebagai sarana untuk mengubah masyarakat, atau bagaimana hukum itu pada akhirnya dipatuhi oleh masyarakat.
Position of Collective Labor Agreement as a Company Autonomous Law: Industrial Relation Dispute Settlement Approach Kadek Agus Sudiarawan; Putu Ade Harriesta Martana; Nyoman A. Martana; Bagus Hermanto
Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 8 No 4 (2019)
Publisher : University of Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (366.933 KB) | DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2019.v08.i04.p02

Abstract

Collective Labor Agreement (CLA) is one of the main pillars that can be used in resolving disputes that occur in the company, However, there are problems concerning the implementation of CLA. The purpose of this research is to find and identify factors that can trigger disputes in the implementation of CLA, the probability of amendment of the CLA, identify the position of CLA in resolving Industrial Relation Disputes and find a mechanism of settlement in the implementation of the CLA. The research was carried out using empirical legal methods and analyzed using qualitative methods. The results are presented in a descriptive analysis report. The results of this research showed differences in interpretation, when unclear validity arrangements and adjustments of the new legislation happen were triggering disputes in the implementation of the CLA. Based on goodwill from the CLA parties, amendments could be made through negotiations in accordance with the mechanism stipulated in the Laws and Regulations. The position of CLA is an autonomous law that applies to the company and is an important element in preventing and resolving Industrial Relation Disputes. Finally, the settlement through bipartite, tripartite and Industrial Relation Court are the mechanism that can be taken for interest disputes.
Implementasi Kebijakan Gubernur Bali Tentang Komisi Penyelenggara Perlindungan Anak Daerah dalam Perlindungan dan Pemenuhan Hak Anak I Wayan Eka Wijaya; Luh Nila Winarni; Cokorde Istri Dian Laksmi Dewi; Ida Ayu Putu Sri Widnyani
Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 8 No 4 (2019)
Publisher : University of Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (285.617 KB) | DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2019.v08.i04.p06

Abstract

Supervision of child protection was legitimized within Policy of the Governor of Bali Regulation No. 48 of 2015 concerning the Commission for the Management of Children of the Province of Bali. In this study, there are two issues that will be examined namely how is the implementation of the Bali the Governor of Bali Regulation No. 48 of 2015 concerning the Commission for the Management of Children of the Province of Bali and how are the efforts being made to overcome obstacles in the protection and fulfillment of children's rights in Bali? This research uses the theory of the Van Metter and Van Horn Implementation Model. The research method used is to use a qualitative approach. Data analysis in the study was carried out interactively using interactive models from Miles and Huberman. The results of the study concluded that the implementation of the Bali Governor of Bali Regulation No. 48 of 2015 concerning the Commission for the Management of Children of the Province of Bali has not been effective in fulfilling and protecting children's rights. Regional Child Protection Organizing Commission has not been able to optimally carry out its duties as a supervisor of the implementation of child protection in the Province of Bali. Efforts are being made to overcome obstacles in the protection and fulfillment of children's rights in Bali by establishing communication and coordination and making a joint commitment in the form of an MoU with several parties organizing child protection in the Province of Bali. Pengawasan terhadap perlindungan anak di Provinsi Bali dilegitimasi melalui Gubernur Bali membentuk Komisi Penyelenggara Perlindungan Anak Daerah Provinsi Bali melalui Kebijakan Peraturan Gubernur Bali Nomor 48 Tahun 2015 tentang Komisi Penyelenggara Perlindungan Anak Daerah Provinsi Bali. Dalam penelitian ini, terdapat dua permasalahan yang akan dikaji yakni bagaimanakah implementasi Peraturan Gubernur Bali Nomor 48 Tahun 2015 tentang Komisi Penyelenggara Perlindungan Anak Daerah Provinsi Bali dan bagaimanakah upaya yang dilakukan untuk mengatasi kendala dalam perlindungan dan pemenuhan hak anak di Bali? Penelitian ini menggunakan teori Model Implementasi Van Metter dan Van Horn. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah mempergunakan pendekatan kualitatif. Analisis data dalam penelitian dilakukan secara interaktif dengan menggunakan model interaktif dari Miles dan Huberman. Hasil penelitian menyimpulkan bahwa implementasi Peraturan Gubernur Bali Nomor 48 Tahun 2015 tentang Komisi Penyelenggara Perlindungan Anak Daerah Provinsi Bali belum efektif dalam memenuhi dan melindungi hak anak. Komisi Penyelenggara Perlindungan Anak Daerah belum bisa optimal dalam melaksanakan tugasnya sebagai pengawas pelaksanaan perlindungan anak di Provinsi Bali. upaya yang dilakukan untuk mengatasi kendala dalam perlindungan dan pemenuhan hak anak di Bali adalah dengan membangun komunikasi dan koordinasi serta membuat suatu komitmen bersama berupa MoU dengan dengan beberapa pihak yang menyelenggarakan perlindungan anak di Provinsi Bali.
The Legal Status of Surrogacy Agreement According to Contract Law in Indonesia A.A.A.Ngr.Sri Rahayu Gorda; Ni Ketut Elly Sutrisni; I Gusti Agung Ayu Mas Triwulandari
Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 8 No 4 (2019)
Publisher : University of Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (252.694 KB) | DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2019.v08.i04.p03

Abstract

Indonesia does not yet have specific rules regarding surrogate mother or surrogacy agreement. The purpose of this paper is to analyze the position of surrogacy agreement according to contract law in Indonesia. It is a normative legal research that raising legal issues regarding the position of surrogacy agreement according to contract law in Indonesia. The results of the study showed that according to the elements of the legality of the agreement as stipulated in Article 1320 of the Indonesian Criminal Code, the surrogacy agreement did not fulfill the objective conditions of the agreement that entails a null and void. Besides, the surrogacy agreement did not fulfill the elements of propriety and custom and was prohibited by the Law

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 10