cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
-
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
-
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kab. ogan ilir,
Sumatera selatan
INDONESIA
Sriwijaya Law Review
Published by Universitas Sriwijaya
ISSN : -     EISSN : -     DOI : -
Core Subject : Science, Social,
Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
The Sriwijaya Law Review known as the SLRev launched on the 31st January 2017 and inaugurated formally by the Rector of the university is a forum which aims to provide a high-quality research and writing related to law. Areas that relevant to the scope of the journal cover: business law, criminal law, constitutional law, administrative law, and international law
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 176 Documents
 14   15   16   17   18 
Legal Consequences of Disobedience of Provisional Decision of the Administrative Court Sri Winarsi
Sriwijaya Law Review Volume 8 Issue 1, January 2024
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Sriwijaya University, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.28946/slrev.Vol8.Iss1.3201.pp152-170

Abstract

The existence of a legal vacuum in the State Administrative Court (PTUN) procedural law relating to the execution of the PTUN Provisional Decision raises the issue of Judicial Disobedience by state administrative institutions that do not want to carry out the PTUN Provisional Decision. Departing from this, there are two main problem formulations, namely: (1) What are the characteristics of PTUN provisional decisions? and (2) What is the formulation of legal protection against non-compliance with PTUN provisional decisions? Furthermore, this legal research uses a statutory approach, a conceptual approach, and a case approach. Based on an examination of existing legal issues, it can be concluded that provisional decisions are known in PTUN procedural law practice, where provisional decisions are submitted for matters deemed essential (urgent circumstances) by the Plaintiff to the Panel of Judges to be decided in an Interim Decision. Suppose the Party ordered by the PTUN does not implement the PTUN provisional decision. In that case, 2 (two) legal preventive mechanisms and 3 (three) legal repressive remedies can be taken in stages: 1) Sending a letter to the relevant agency, 2) Reporting to the Ombudsman, and 3) Using Criminal Law Mechanisms.
The Influence of Transjudicial Conversation in the Cross-fertilization of Philippine Human Rights Jurisprudence James Gregory Alcaraz Villasis; Naparat Kranrattanasuit
Sriwijaya Law Review Volume 8 Issue 2, July 2024
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Sriwijaya University, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.28946/slrev.Vol8.Iss2.3574.pp393-416

Abstract

Transjudicial conversation refers to the domestic court's judicial practice of cross-citing foreign decisions on common and shared human rights issues. Scholars have argued that this phenomenon facilitates the cross-fertilisation of rights norms and standards across territories. While this has been documented and studied in various jurisdictions, its incidence and effect in the Philippine context is yet to be fully understood. The paper thus seeks to explore the extent of such influence in the Philippine setting, specifically in the development of domestic human rights jurisprudence. In order to examine its impact, this research employs a qualitative research design. Select cases on free speech and religious exercise rights were analysed using doctrinal and content analysis approaches. These cases were purposively chosen, considering that Philippine provisions on these rights have shown close affinity with foreign constitutions. The analysis reveals that the participation of the Philippine Supreme Court in the transjudicial conversation phenomenon generally causes the cross-border fertilisation of human rights norms. Particularly, the impact of this engagement contributes to filling the gap in the domestic understanding of human rights concepts, expanding existing legal systems such as human rights and penal laws, and aligning national human rights systems with international laws. Such impacts enrich the domestic understanding of free speech and religious rights, specifically drawing bright lines between legitimate state intervention and individual enjoyment of the rights.
Human Rights Violations and Corporate Criminal Liability: An Analysis of the New Indonesian Criminal Law Mia Amiati; Adhryansah Adhryansah; Iman Prihandono
Sriwijaya Law Review Volume 8 Issue 2, July 2024
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Sriwijaya University, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.28946/slrev.Vol8.Iss2.3687.pp230-248

Abstract

In light of the increasing role of corporations in facilitating gross human rights violations, this article seeks to evaluate the implementation of the Indonesian Criminal Law in addressing corporate criminal liability. Notably, the recently amended Indonesian Criminal Law recognizes corporations as subjects of criminal law, but Law No. 26 of 2000, which regulates gross human rights violations, does not. Consequently, this research specifically scrutinizes the Indonesian Criminal Code, Law No. 26 of 2000, and international legal standards to answer the issues: rules of aiding and abetting under international criminal law and the applicability of corporate culture theory, and the implementation of Indonesian Criminal Law in addressing corporate criminal liability for gross human rights violations. Examining these issues relies on three methodologies, namely the statutory approach, conceptual approach, and case approach. The results of this article uncover that the recognition of corporations as subjects under the new Indonesian Criminal Code and rectification of the ratione materiae of Law No. 26 of 2000 open the avenue for corporations to be held criminally liable for gross human rights violations based on aiding and abetting. Furthermore, the theory of corporate culture envisaged in the new Indonesian Criminal Code renders the plausibility of holding corporations liable if they are deemed to cultivate a culture that pushes or encourages a gross human rights violation. 
Judaization in Palestine: Is It Genocide According to the 1998 Rome Statute? hafara khoirunisa; sefriani sefriani; jawahir thontowi; jaya indra santosa; yashifa febriani; Ahmed Zeiad Masoud
Sriwijaya Law Review Volume 8 Issue 1, January 2024
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Sriwijaya University, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.28946/slrev.Vol8.Iss1.3144.pp79-98

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to analyse the act of genocide in the attempt at Judaization in Palestine based on the 1998 Rome Statute and examine the possibility of categorizing the Judaization of Palestine as cultural genocide because Judaization has changed various aspects of Palestinian life and the Palestinian territories themselves. In addition, cultural genocide has been eliminated from its history, but there are still actions that are assumed to lead to it. This research is a type of normative legal research using a conceptual, statutory, case, and historical approach. The results of this study indicate that the Judaization of land and people in Palestine is a crime of genocide, as stated in Article 6 (c) of the 1998 Rome Statute. At the same time, the Judaization of identity and holy places can be categorized as cultural genocide, according to experts. However, the opinions of experts contained in legal works are subsidiary legal sources and, until now, have not been recognized as customary international law. In addition, the Judaization of identity and holy places within the framework of international law can only be viewed as genocidal intent, not cultural genocide.
Enhancing Consumer Protection in Electronic Transactions in Indonesia Rosidah, Zaidah Nur; Karjoko, Lego
Sriwijaya Law Review Volume 9 Issue 1, January 2025
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Sriwijaya University, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.28946/slrev.Vol9.Iss1.3942.pp194-207

Abstract

Technological advancements have significantly facilitated electronic transactions, making business interactions faster and more convenient. However, these developments also introduce risks, especially for consumers, as electronic transactions can lead to significant financial losses if not handled carefully. This study proposes effective legal protections for consumers to prevent such losses and ensure proper compensation in electronic business transactions. This research employs a normative legal methodology, utilizing both a statutory and conceptual approach. The statutory approach analyses laws and regulations governing electronic transactions, while the conceptual approach applies Richard Posner's Economic Analysis of Law theory to assess the efficiency of consumer protection mechanisms. Data was gathered through a literature review of primary and secondary legal sources, and conclusions were drawn using deductive reasoning. The Economic Analysis of Law theory was the major premise, with relevant laws and regulations forming the minor premise. The findings reveal two main conclusions. First, while existing laws such as the Consumer Protection Law, the ITE Law, PP PMSE, PP PSTE, and Regulation of the Minister of Trade Number 31 of 2023 provide basic consumer protection by sanctioning businesses that offer mismatched products, reclaiming consumer rights is not straightforward. Second, to mitigate potential losses in electronic transactions, a validation process for business actors is necessary before they offer products, and Electronic System Trading Providers (PPMSE) must establish an efficient mechanism for compensating consumer losses. This study highlights the need for a more robust and accessible framework to protect consumers in electronic business transactions, ensuring that legal recourse is both efficient and effective.
Legislative Controls for Disciplinary Penalties Imposed on Public Servants: A Comparative Analysis of Jordanian and French Legal Frameworks Al-Billeh, Tareq
Sriwijaya Law Review Volume 9 Issue 1, January 2025
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Sriwijaya University, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.28946/slrev.Vol9.Iss1.2777.pp137-156

Abstract

This study examines the legislative framework governing disciplinary penalties imposed on public servants under the Jordanian Civil Service Regulation of 2020 and the French General Civil Service Law of 2021. It seeks to analyze the concept of disciplinary punishment, its legal nature, and the fundamental principles that regulate its application within public administration. Additionally, the research explores the extent of judicial oversight exercised by administrative courts over disciplinary sanctions, ensuring compliance with legal and procedural safeguards. By adopting a comparative approach, the study highlights both the similarities and differences between the Jordanian and French legal systems concerning the imposition of disciplinary penalties and the mechanisms of judicial review applicable to such measures. The findings underscore that while administrative authorities possess discretionary power in selecting disciplinary measures, this discretion must be exercised within the confines of legality, adhering to the principle of proportionality. The study emphasizes that excessive or disproportionate penalties risk judicial intervention, reinforcing the necessity for fair and reasoned decision-making. Furthermore, the research concludes that disciplinary sanctions should be proportionate to the severity of the infraction, with administrative bodies ensuring a clear and precise definition of violations and their circumstances. This clarity facilitates effective judicial oversight and prevents arbitrary or overly punitive disciplinary measures, thus maintaining a balance between administrative authority and legal accountability.
Empowering Communities Through Old Oil Wells: Analyzing Legal Frameworks and Policy Gaps in Indonesia Febriani, Indah; Safa’at, Rachmad; Istislam, Istislam; Qurbani, Indah Dwi
Sriwijaya Law Review Volume 9 Issue 1, January 2025
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Sriwijaya University, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.28946/slrev.Vol9.Iss1.4261.pp95-113

Abstract

This article examines the relationship between the operation of old oil wells, as governed by Minister of Energy and Mineral Resources Regulation Number 1 of 2008, and the improvement of community welfare, particularly for communities surrounding mining areas. The regulation aims to empower communities by enabling their participation in oil well operations through Village Unit Cooperatives (KUD) and Regionally Owned Business Entities (BUMD). Employing a socio-legal approach, this study conceptualizes law as a functional social institution and investigates its application in three sub-districts in Musi Banyuasin Regency, South Sumatra Province. The findings reveal that the regulation is ineffective due to its complex permit requirements, which are perceived as a significant obstacle by local communities, thereby impeding its objectives. Moreover, the regulation lacks explicit legal provisions to address community welfare by exploiting old oil wells. To address these shortcomings, the study recommends revising the regulation to simplify licensing procedures and include explicit provisions that promote community welfare. Additionally, it emphasizes the need for policy instruments, such as legal assistance, mentoring, technical and non-technical guidance, and continuous supervision, to support community-led mining activities. These measures are essential to ensure that the operation of old oil wells contributes meaningfully to the welfare of local communities, aligning with the regulation's intended goals.
Looking at The Civil Suits and Court Cases Under the Justice Against Sponsors of Terrorism Act: Why it Fails? Alheji, Ali Ibrahim; Ismail, Shahrul Mizan
Sriwijaya Law Review Volume 9 Issue 1, January 2025
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Sriwijaya University, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.28946/slrev.Vol9.Iss1.3128.pp%p

Abstract

Terrorism remains a persistent and significant global threat, with far-reaching consequences for world peace and stability. The September 11, 2001 attacks marked a pivotal moment in the fight against terrorism, prompting governments and international organizations to adopt new strategies to counter this threat. In response to these tragic events, the United States enacted the Justice Against Sponsors of Terrorism Act (JASTA), a legislative framework designed to allow victims of terrorism to seek compensation from state sponsors of terrorism. While JASTA reflects a commitment to holding individuals and nations accountable for supporting terrorism, it has sparked controversy, with critics arguing that it undermines the principle of sovereign immunity, while others view it as a crucial tool for combating terrorism. This study examines the legal and procedural implications of JASTA, focusing on the challenges of bringing civil actions under this law. Through a literature-based research approach, the study explores anti-terrorism laws, relevant case law, and the practical obstacles of pursuing legal claims under JASTA. The findings highlight the legal complexities and political considerations involved in holding state sponsors accountable, emphasizing the need for a balanced approach that upholds international law and diplomacy while ensuring justice for terrorism victims. This research contributes to ongoing discussions on refining strategies to combat state-sponsored terrorism and offers recommendations for potential legislative reforms to enhance the effectiveness of JASTA in achieving justice.
The Right to Bail in Extradition Proceedings: Malaysia’s Criminal Law Perspective Masri, Faizul Aswad; Nordin, Rohaida; Md Said, Muhamad Helmi
Sriwijaya Law Review Volume 9 Issue 1, January 2025
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Sriwijaya University, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.28946/slrev.Vol9.Iss1.3914.pp1-21

Abstract

This article delves into the issue of bail pending extradition in Malaysia. It adopts a doctrinal legal research methodology, focusing on analysing legislation and court decisions to objectively understand how current laws and practices determine bail applications within the context of Malaysian extradition law. The study reveals that Malaysia's Extradition Act 1992 does not explicitly provide for bail pending extradition, except under limited circumstances. Malaysian courts have utilised section 44 of the Extradition Act 1992 to apply bail provisions from the Criminal Procedure Code. The study finds that Malaysian courts adopt a cautious approach when determining bail applications in extradition cases. However, this judicial approach presents challenges, particularly in extradition cases involving offences governed by specific statutes other than the Criminal Procedure Code. The findings suggest that the reliance on section 44 should be re-evaluated to address these challenges. The article concludes by recommending further research to assess the need for an explicit and comprehensive provision for bail in the Extradition Act 1992 to ensure legal consistency and a uniform application across all types of offences.
Navigating Legal Barriers: The Impact of Foreign Subsidies Regulation on Chinese SOEs in EU Public Procurement Si, Tongle
Sriwijaya Law Review Volume 9 Issue 1, January 2025
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Sriwijaya University, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.28946/slrev.Vol9.Iss1.3048.pp114-136

Abstract

The EU Foreign Subsidies Regulation (FSR), effective from July 2023, aims to create a level playing field in the EU internal market by addressing concerns about non-EU companies gaining unfair advantages through subsidies from their home countries. By granting the European Commission extensive investigative powers, particularly in public procurement and mergers, the FSR aims to ensure fair competition and fill regulatory gaps in the EU’s existing legal framework. However, the regulation’s impact on the participation of non-EU companies in the EU public procurement market remains insufficiently explained. This article examines the impact of the FSR on non-EU companies, focusing on its effects on public procurement, especially case studies from the Commission’s investigations into two Chinese state-owned enterprises (SOEs). It offers a detailed interpretation of the FSR’s rules on foreign subsidies in the context of EU public procurement from both procedural and substantive perspectives. Additionally, the article provides practical recommendations for non-EU companies seeking to navigate the FSR's requirements and minimise its negative impacts while maintaining their participation in EU public procurement markets.

Page 17 of 18 | Total Record : 176

 14   15   16   17   18 

Filter by Year

2017 2025


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Volume 9 Issue 1, January 2025 Volume 8 Issue 2, July 2024 Volume 8 Issue 1, January 2024 Volume 7 Issue 2, July 2023 Volume 7, Issue 1 January 2023 Volume 6 Issue 2, July 2022 Volume 6 Issue 1, January 2022 Volume 5 Issue 2, July 2021 Volume 5 Issue 1, January 2021 Volume 4 Issue 2, July 2020 VOLUME 4 ISSUE 1, JANUARY 2020 VOLUME 3 ISSUE 2, JULY 2019 VOLUME 3 ISSUE 1, JANUARY 2019 VOLUME 2, ISSUE 2, JULY 2018 VOLUME 2, ISSUE 1, JANUARY 2018 VOLUME 1, ISSUE 2, JULY 2017 VOLUME 1, ISSUE 1, JANUARY 2017 More Issue