Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

Kerangka Yuridis dan Implementasi Kebijakan Pendidikan dalam Pencegahan Perundungan Siswa Andryawan Andryawan; Aryanti Agripina Winata; Kearen Elvira Naftali; Marcia Gladys Rumambi; Allaysha Adindaputri Kirani
SUPREMASI: Jurnal Pemikiran, Penelitian Ilmu-ilmu Sosial, Hukum dan Pengajarannya Volume 21, Nomor 2 (April 2026)
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26858/supremasi.v21i2.83097

Abstract

Perundungan (bullying) di lingkungan pendidikan masih menjadi isu krusial yang menimbulkan dampak negatif terhadap perkembangan psikologis, emosional, dan prestasi akademik siswa. Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis kerangka hukum nasional terkait pencegahan bullying, meliputi Undang-Undang Perlindungan Anak, Permendikbud tentang Pencegahan dan Penanganan Kekerasan di Satuan Pendidikan, serta regulasi daerah yang relevan. Selain itu, kajian ini menelaah implementasi kebijakan di sekolah serta faktor-faktor penyebab terjadinya bullying. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah yuridis-normatif dengan pendekatan konseptual dan perundang-undangan, sehingga fokus analisis diarahkan pada norma hukum dan penerapannya dalam praktik pendidikan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa kerangka hukum yang tersedia sebenarnya cukup memadai untuk mendukung upaya pencegahan, namun pelaksanaannya masih menghadapi kendala berupa kurangnya sosialisasi regulasi, lemahnya budaya sekolah dalam penegakan disiplin, serta minimnya keterlibatan orang tua dalam pengawasan. Temuan ini menegaskan perlunya strategi komprehensif yang tidak hanya berorientasi pada regulasi, tetapi juga pada penguatan pendidikan karakter, optimalisasi peran satuan tugas anti-kekerasan, serta pengembangan mekanisme pelaporan yang lebih efektif dan mudah diakses. Artikel ini merekomendasikan sinergi antara pemerintah, sekolah, dan masyarakat untuk menciptakan lingkungan pendidikan yang aman, inklusif, dan bebas dari praktik perundungan.
Kesetaraan Pasien Peserta BPJS dan Non-BPJS dalam Memperoleh Pelayanan Kesehatan di Rumah Sakit Andryawan; Aryanti Agripina Winata; Kearen Elvira Naftali; Marcia Gladys Rumambi; Allaysha Adindaputri Kirani
Jurnal Hukum Caraka Justitia Vol. 6 No. 1 (2026)
Publisher : Universitas Proklamasi 45

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30588/jhcj.v6i1.2468

Abstract

Since 2014, the government has been implementing the JKN BPJS program to meet the basic health needs of the poor. However, there are still disparities in service between BPJS and non-BPJS patients, such as complicated processes, limited facilities, restrictions on hospitalization, and discriminatory treatment by medical personnel. The main focus of this study is on the supervision carried out by the government to ensure equality in medical services. This study is a normative legal analysis based on secondary data obtained from literature reviews, employing a statutory and conceptual approach. The results of the study show that although the government has carried out its supervisory duties, the implementation is still not optimal, and the suboptimal supervision by relevant institutions (BPJS Supervisory Board, DJSN, and BPRS) has caused inequality in medical services. Even new policies such as the Standard Inpatient Class (KRIS), which aims to eliminate disparities, have not been optimally implemented. Based on the study's results, it was concluded that fairness in services is necessary to ensure equal treatment and access for all patients, without discrimination. Therefore, it is recommended that the government and supervisory agencies consistently enhance the effectiveness of supervision and provide training and guidance to medical personnel to ensure fair services are provided without discrimination based on insurance status.
Legality of The Use of Water Birth Methods in Childbirth Practices in Indonesia Andryawan Andryawan; Aryanti Agripina Winata; Kearen Elvira Naftali; Marcia Gladys Rumambi
Journal of Research in Social Science and Humanities Vol 5, No 3 (2025)
Publisher : Utan Kayu Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47679/jrssh.v5i3.426

Abstract

Doctors, as one of the main providers of health services to the community, play a very central role because they are directly involved in the provision of health services and the quality of those services. The main foundation for doctors to be able to perform medical procedures on patients is their knowledge, technology, and competence. The decline in public trust in doctors, as well as the increasing number of legal claims filed today, are often associated with failures in the healing efforts undertaken by doctors. These conflicts are triggered by patients' dissatisfaction with doctors in carrying out treatments or practicing their medical profession. In providing care, every doctor must uphold medical ethics, which determine the integrity of this profession. This raises the issue of the legality of using the water birth method in childbirth procedures performed by obstetricians and gynecologists in Indonesia and the role of the Medical Ethics Honorary Council (MKEK) in addressing this issue. The method used in this study is a normative method obtained through library research, supported by data from interviews with the West Jakarta IDI. The research findings indicate that the water birth method is not yet recommended for use in medical practice in Indonesia. Neither the IDI nor the Indonesian Medical College has recognized this method. When an obstetrician-gynecologist uses this method, the doctor in question may be categorized as having violated medical professional discipline and medical ethics. The Medical Ethics Council (MKEK) of the Indonesian Medical Association (IDI) will take action against any doctor found to have violated medical ethics. The enforcement of medical ethics by the MKEK IDI is more of a form of guidance for doctors to better understand and adhere to the code of medical ethics.
Legal Protection for Consumers in E-Commerce Transactions Resulting from Breaches of Contract by Businesses: A Study of the Shopee and Tokopedia Platforms Kearen Elvira Naftali; Gunardi Lie
Journal of Legal, Political, and Humanistic Inquiry Vol 1 No 4 (2026): June: Custodia: Journal of Legal, Political, and Humanistic Inquiry
Publisher : CV SCRIPTA INTELEKTUAL MANDIRI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.65310/n6g57g32

Abstract

The development of e-commerce as the primary instrument of digital commerce has transformed the legal relationships between consumers, businesses, and platform operators, thereby introducing new complexities in consumer legal protection. This study aims to analyze the concept of breach of contract in electronic transactions and examine the legal liability of marketplaces for consumer losses. The research method employed is normative legal research using a legislative and conceptual approach, supported by primary and secondary legal sources. The findings indicate that breach of contract in e-commerce encompasses non-conforming goods, delivery delays, and failure to fulfill obligations, all of which have legal implications under the Civil Code and the Consumer Protection Act. As operators of electronic systems, marketplaces bear legal liability that extends beyond that of mere intermediaries; rather, it includes active obligations to ensure transaction security. Normative reconstruction is necessary through strengthened regulations, restrictions on standard clauses, and the integration of more progressive liability principles. This study contributes to the development of legal liability theory within the digital ecosystem and provides a foundation for updating consumer protection policies in Indonesia.