Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.751
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Akta Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Green Social: International Journal of Law and Civil Affairs Indonesia Media Law Review
Geofani Milthree Saragih
Universitas Pamulang
Economics, Econometrics & Finance Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

 1 
Prospects of AI Use in The Supreme Court: Comparison of Canada and Indonesia Geofani Milthree Saragih; Ade Sathya Sanathana Ishwara; Jeremy Aprilian Hutauruk; Mohamad Juliandri Rahman; Mariko Hattori
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Vol 15 No 1 (2026)
Publisher : Pusat Strategi Kebijakan Hukum dan Peradilan Mahkamah Agung RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/jhp.15.1.2026.1-30

Abstract

The opportunities and challenges of applying artificial intelligence (AI) in law enforcement are the main focus of a comparative study between the Indonesian Supreme Court and Canadian judicial guidelines. In Canada, AI has been used to support transparency, speed, and consistency in decisions through decision prediction, case management, and legal data processing. This serves as an important inspiration for Indonesia, which is currently exploring the use of similar technology in its judicial system. The main challenges faced by Indonesia include limited digital infrastructure, the absence of comprehensive regulations governing the use of AI, and concerns regarding the integrity of decisions and the principle of justice. A normative juridical method combined with a comparative literature review was employed to examine the regulatory frameworks, court practices, and applications of artificial intelligence in each country. The study's findings indicate that despite the significant challenges in Indonesia, the opportunities for AI implementation remain vast. AI implementation must be supported by adaptive national policies, capacity building for judicial officials, and continuous oversight to maintain the integrity of decisions and legal certainty. This study provides strategic recommendations for strengthening Indonesia's legal system in an increasingly complex and dynamic digital era.
Business Dispute Resolution through Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR): A Civil Law Analysis of the Effectiveness of Non-Litigation Mechanisms Ani Purwati; Dora Kusumastuti; Geofani Milthree Saragih; Ade Sathya Sanathana Ishwara; A. Rachmat Wirawan
JURNAL AKTA Vol 13, No 2 (2026): June 2026
Publisher : Program Magister (S2) Kenotariatan, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Islam Sultan Agung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This study examines the resolution of business disputes through Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) mechanisms, analyzing their effectiveness from a civil law perspective. Amid the limitations of litigation in accommodating the practical needs of business actors, this research investigates several problems, namely the normative foundations of ADR within civil law-based business dispute resolution, the effectiveness of non-litigation mechanisms in resolving business disputes, and the challenges and limitations of ADR within civil law systems. A normative juridical method is employed, combining statutory and conceptual approaches to analyze civil law doctrines, ADR regulations, and relevant legal literature. The findings show that ADR is normatively grounded in the principles of party autonomy, freedom of contract, good faith, and legal certainty, positioning it as an integral component of civil law rather than a mere alternative to litigation. Non-litigation mechanisms prove effective in delivering time and cost efficiency, confidentiality, and the preservation of business relationships, although constrained by power imbalances, enforceability issues, and limited institutional capacity. This study concludes that strengthening ADR's normative framework and institutional integration is essential to enhance its effectiveness in civil law-based business dispute resolution.
Dynamics of Access to Justice for Marginalized Communities in Urban Green Space Utilization Conflicts During Ongoing Social and Environmental Transitions Geofani Milthree Saragih; Rengga Kusuma Putra; Muhamad Rezky Pahlawan MP
Green Social: International Journal of Law and Civil Affairs Vol. 1 No. 3 (2024): International Journal of Law and Civil Affairs
Publisher : International Forum of Researchers and Lecturers

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70062/greensocial.v1i3.271

Abstract

Urban green-space conflicts have emerged as a significant challenge for marginalized communities, exacerbating existing social and environmental inequalities in cities undergoing rapid urbanization and environmental transitions. This study explores the dynamics of access to justice for marginalized groups in the context of urban green-space conflicts, focusing on the barriers they face and the enabling factors that improve their ability to access legal remedies. Through a socio-legal research design, data was collected using surveys, case reviews, and stakeholder interviews, which were analyzed to identify key physical, socio-economic, and institutional barriers that hinder equitable access to green spaces. Findings revealed that marginalized communities often experience physical barriers such as limited proximity to green spaces, socio-economic disparities that prevent them from accessing legal resources, and institutional constraints, including discriminatory urban planning policies. Despite these challenges, enabling factors such as legal aid networks, participatory forums, and inclusive urban planning policies emerged as crucial elements in improving access to justice for these communities. Moreover, the study examined the impact of social and environmental transitions, such as urbanization and climate change, on justice outcomes, showing that these transitions can either exacerbate or alleviate barriers depending on how policies are implemented. The study emphasizes the need for policy reforms that promote equity in urban planning and legal aid systems, ensuring that marginalized communities are included in decision-making processes. Future research should explore the impact of environmental justice policies in global contexts and investigate new legal frameworks to address the specific needs of vulnerable populations.
RECONSTRUCTING DEMOCRATIC MEDIA GOVERNANCE AMID PLATFORM DOMINANCE IN INDONESIA Tajudin Tajudin; Geofani Milthree Saragih; Ade Sathya Sanathana Ishwara; H. Muhamad Rezky Pahlawan MP; Fadhli Muhaimin Ishaq
Indonesia Media Law Review Vol. 5 No. 1 (2026): January-June, 2026
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/imrev.v5i1.48839

Abstract

Digital platforms have become dominant actors in shaping public discourse, political communication, and democratic participation in Indonesia. While these platforms facilitate freedom of expression and access to information, their algorithmic governance also raises concerns regarding transparency, accountability, misinformation, and democratic integrity. This study aims to analyze the challenges of democratic media governance amid platform dominance and to formulate a legal reconstruction model that balances freedom of expression with algorithmic regulation. This research employs a normative juridical method using statutory, conceptual, and comparative approaches. Legal materials were collected through library research, including legislation, legal doctrines, academic journals, and relevant international regulatory frameworks, and were analyzed qualitatively using descriptive-analytical methods. The findings demonstrate that Indonesia’s existing media regulatory framework remains inadequate in addressing the legal consequences of algorithmic control exercised by digital platforms. The absence of comprehensive standards concerning transparency, accountability, and public oversight has weakened democratic governance within the digital public sphere. This study concludes that democratic media governance in Indonesia requires a reconstructed legal framework that strengthens platform accountability, promotes algorithmic transparency, protects freedom of expression, and ensures democratic oversight in the digital era.
Co-Authors A.Rachmat Wirawan Ade Sathya Sanathana Ishwara Ade Sathya Sanathana Ishwara Ani Purwati Dora Kusumastuti Fadhli Muhaimin Ishaq Jeremy Aprilian Hutauruk Mariko Hattori Mohamad Juliandri Rahman Pahlawan MP, H Muhamad Rezky Rengga Kusuma Putra Tajudin Tajudin