Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Akta RIO LAW JURNAL Indonesia Media Law Review
Ade Sathya Sanathana Ishwara
Kejaksaan Republik Indonesia
Humanities Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Business Dispute Resolution Through Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR): A Civil Law Analysis of the Effectiveness of Non-Litigation Mechanisms Ani Purwati; Dora Kusumastuti; Geofani Milthree Saragih; Ade Sathya Sanathana Ishwara; A. Rachmat Wirawan
JURNAL AKTA Vol 13, No 2 (2026): June 2026
Publisher : Program Magister (S2) Kenotariatan, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Islam Sultan Agung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30659/akta.v13i2.51069

Abstract

This study examines the resolution of business disputes through Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) mechanisms, analyzing their effectiveness from a civil law perspective. Amid the limitations of litigation in accommodating the practical needs of business actors, this research investigates several problems, namly the normative foundations of ADR within civil law-based business dispute resolution, the effectiveness of non-litigation mechanisms in resolving business disputes, and the challenges and limitations of ADR within civil law systems. A normative juridical method is employed, combining statutory and conceptual approaches to analyze civil law doctrines, ADR regulations, and relevant legal literature. The findings show that ADR is normatively grounded in the principles of party autonomy, freedom of contract, good faith, and legal certainty, positioning it as an integral component of civil law rather than a mere alternative to litigation. Non-litigation mechanisms prove effective in delivering time and cost efficiency, confidentiality, and the preservation of business relationships, although constrained by power imbalances, enforceability issues, and limited institutional capacity. This study concludes that strengthening ADR's normative framework and institutional integration is essential to enhance its effectiveness in civil law-based business dispute resolution.
RECONSTRUCTING DEMOCRATIC MEDIA GOVERNANCE AMID PLATFORM DOMINANCE IN INDONESIA Tajudin Tajudin; Geofani Milthree Saragih; Ade Sathya Sanathana Ishwara; H. Muhamad Rezky Pahlawan MP; Fadhli Muhaimin Ishaq
Indonesia Media Law Review Vol. 5 No. 1 (2026): January-June, 2026
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/imrev.v5i1.48839

Abstract

Digital platforms have become dominant actors in shaping public discourse, political communication, and democratic participation in Indonesia. While these platforms facilitate freedom of expression and access to information, their algorithmic governance also raises concerns regarding transparency, accountability, misinformation, and democratic integrity. This study aims to analyze the challenges of democratic media governance amid platform dominance and to formulate a legal reconstruction model that balances freedom of expression with algorithmic regulation. This research employs a normative juridical method using statutory, conceptual, and comparative approaches. Legal materials were collected through library research, including legislation, legal doctrines, academic journals, and relevant international regulatory frameworks, and were analyzed qualitatively using descriptive-analytical methods. The findings demonstrate that Indonesia’s existing media regulatory framework remains inadequate in addressing the legal consequences of algorithmic control exercised by digital platforms. The absence of comprehensive standards concerning transparency, accountability, and public oversight has weakened democratic governance within the digital public sphere. This study concludes that democratic media governance in Indonesia requires a reconstructed legal framework that strengthens platform accountability, promotes algorithmic transparency, protects freedom of expression, and ensures democratic oversight in the digital era.
Optimalisasi Mekanisme Asset Recovery dalam Tindak Pidana Penipuan: Analisis Efektivitas Peran Jaksa Berdasarkan Prinsip Keadilan Restoratif Ade Sathya Sanathana Ishwara; Toha Masrur; Cut Fadhlan Akhyar; Muhammad Irwan; Selamat Lumban Gaol
RIO LAW JURNAL Vol 6, No 2 (2025): Rio Law Jurnal
Publisher : Universitas Muara Bungo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36355/rlj.v6i2.1864

Abstract

ABSTRAK Tindak pidana penipuan merupakan salah satu kejahatan yang paling merugikan masyarakat karena selain menimbulkan kerugian material, juga menimbulkan ketidakpercayaan terhadap sistem hukum. Salah satu tantangan utama dalam penanganannya adalah optimalisasi mekanisme asset recovery guna mengembalikan kerugian korban secara efektif. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis efektivitas peran jaksa dalam proses asset recovery dengan menggunakan pendekatan prinsip keadilan restoratif, sehingga tidak hanya menitikberatkan pada penghukuman, tetapi juga pemulihan hak-hak korban. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridis normatif dengan menelaah peraturan perundang-undangan, putusan pengadilan, serta doktrin hukum yang relevan, kemudian dikaji melalui analisis kualitatif. Hasil pembahasan menunjukkan bahwa penerapan prinsip keadilan restoratif memberikan ruang bagi jaksa untuk berperan lebih aktif dalam memediasi kepentingan korban dan pelaku, mempercepat pengembalian aset, serta mengurangi potensi overkriminalisasi. Namun, implementasinya masih menghadapi kendala berupa keterbatasan regulasi, kapasitas sumber daya, serta resistensi paradigma hukum yang masih berorientasi pada retributif. Kesimpulannya, optimalisasi peran jaksa dalam asset recovery harus diarahkan pada sinergi antara mekanisme hukum positif dan pendekatan restoratif. Saran penelitian ini adalah perlunya penguatan regulasi dan pedoman teknis bagi jaksa, peningkatan kapasitas institusional, serta pengembangan model best practice agar asset recovery dapat berjalan lebih efektif dan berkeadilan.Kata Kunci: Asset Recovery, Jaksa, Keadilan Restoratif.
Co-Authors A.Rachmat Wirawan Ani Purwati Cut Fadhlan Akhyar Dora Kusumastuti Fadhli Muhaimin Ishaq Geofani Milthree Saragih Muhammad Irwan Pahlawan MP, H Muhamad Rezky Selamat Lumban Gaol Tajudin Tajudin Toha Masrur