Muhamad Radjhu Khan Saputra
Universitas Singaperbangsa Karawang

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Diferensiasi Pemidanaan Kratom Alami Dan Produk Turunan 7-Hydroxymitragynine Dalam Hukum Pidana Kesehatan Ahmad Hamdani; Audry Salsabila Pasaribu; Muhamad Radjhu Khan Saputra; Muhammad Rifki Nurrasman; Margo Hadi Pura; Wiwin Triyunarti
Science and Education Journal (SICEDU) Vol 5 No 2 (2026): Science and Education Journal 2026
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Pahlawan Tuanku Tambusai

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31004/sicedu.v5i2.462

Abstract

Kratom menimbulkan persoalan hukum karena satu nama dagang digunakan untuk menunjuk daun alami, simplisia, ekstrak, dan produk turunan 7-hydroxymitragynine yang memiliki kadar risiko berbeda. Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis batas pemidanaan antara kratom alami dan produk olahan berkadar 7-hydroxymitragynine tinggi dalam hukum pidana kesehatan Indonesia. Metode yang digunakan ialah yuridis normatif melalui pendekatan peraturan perundang-undangan dan konseptual. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pemidanaan berbasis nama tanaman tidak memadai karena dapat menyamakan petani atau pelaku hulu dengan pelaku usaha yang mengendalikan formulasi, label, klaim, dan peredaran produk konsumsi berisiko. Produk turunan 7-hydroxymitragynine lebih tepat dinilai melalui Undang-Undang Kesehatan sepanjang dipasarkan sebagai sediaan farmasi atau produk konsumsi yang tidak memenuhi standar keamanan, khasiat, kemanfaatan, dan mutu. Diferensiasi pidana perlu bertumpu pada kadar senyawa, bentuk sediaan, izin edar, akurasi label, dan posisi pelaku agar pemidanaan tetap presisi, proporsional, serta tidak merugikan pemanfaatan kratom alami sebagai komoditas botani yang memiliki konteks sosial-ekonomi bagi masyarakat lokal terdampak.
Penyalahgunaan Perusahaan Cangkang dalam Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang Berbasis Kejahatan Sumber Daya Alam Audry Salsabila Pasaribu; Ahmad Hamdani; Muhamad Radjhu Khan Saputra; Muhamad Rifki Nurrasman; Margo Hadi Pura; Puti Priyana
Science and Education Journal (SICEDU) Vol 5 No 2 (2026): Science and Education Journal 2026
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Pahlawan Tuanku Tambusai

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31004/sicedu.v5i2.498

Abstract

The abuse of shell companies in Money Laundering Crimes (TPPU) based on natural resource crimes represents an organized white-collar crime modus operandi that exploits corporate legal fiction to sever the chain of criminal evidence. This study aims to analyze the legal standing of shell companies as strategic instruments for concealing the origin of illicit assets and to examine the construction of proving criminal liability against the actors controlling them. The research method employed is normative juridical, utilizing statutory, conceptual, and case study approaches. The results indicate that shell companies serve as artificial legal shields devoid of economic substance, facilitating the layering and integration phases through capital legality engineering, nominee agreements, and import-export transaction manipulations to conceal the identity of the Beneficial Owner. Proving criminal liability against corporate controllers requires disregarding the legal fiction of separate personality through the doctrine of piercing the corporate veil and the alter ego theory. Pursuant to Law Number 8 of 2010 on the Prevention and Eradication of Money Laundering jo. Law Number 1 of 2023 on the Criminal Code, criminal sanctions can be applied cumulatively to both the controlling individuals and the shell corporations.
Penyalahgunaan Kewenangan dalam Penetapan Kebijakan Proyek Strategis sebagai Tindak Pidana Korupsi Muhamad Radjhu Khan Saputra; Audry Salsabila Pasaribu; Ahmad Hamdani; Muhamad Rifki Nurrasman; Margo Hadi Pura; Wiwin Triyunarti
Science and Education Journal (SICEDU) Vol 5 No 2 (2026): Science and Education Journal 2026
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Pahlawan Tuanku Tambusai

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31004/sicedu.v5i2.506

Abstract

This study examines abuse of authority in the determination of strategic project policies as a corruption offense. The central issue concerns the boundary between legitimate governmental policy, administrative error, and abuse of authority that satisfies criminal elements. This research uses normative juridical method with statutory and conceptual approaches. The findings show that the strategic status of a project does not remove the obligation of officials to act under legality, good governance principles, transparency, and accountability. The alleged corruption in the Cirebon-Semarang/Cisem gas pipeline project is positioned as an illustration of supervisory vulnerability, not as proof of corruption, because no court decision exists. Criminal liability may arise only when office, distorted use of authority, benefit for certain parties, state financial loss, and culpability are proven as an integrated chain. This construction is necessary to prevent criminal law from becoming a tool for criminalizing policy while maintaining accountability in national strategic development.